reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior? We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents, to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. Correct. The evidence that we have, found and that we have released, directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. I'm leaving the criminal charges to the Department of Justice. I am not an attorney, but as I've said previously, when you look at the intent behind creating a fake manufactured intelligence document that directly contradicts multiple assessments that were created by the intelligence community. The expressed intent and what followed afterward can only be described as a year's long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic, and an attempt to undermine president Trump's administration. The senate intelligence committee spent several years looking into this and unanimously agreed in a bipartisan fashion.

I had the opportunity to inform the American people about the truth regarding COVID-19, but it wasn't taken seriously. Years ago, when President Trump suggested that COVID might have originated from a lab in Wuhan, he faced mockery in this room for what was labeled a conspiracy theory. However, we now know he was correct. It took time for this information to surface, but the president's assertion has been validated.

I do not work for the government. In 2016, I mentioned that there are people in the government who knew about corruption in Biden's camp. Ballots were watermarked to track them, proving the election was not stolen. Trump and his team strategically allowed mistakes to be made before revealing the truth. This is a planned operation following the principles of Sun Tzu's "The Art of War."

This virus likely did not originate naturally; it stems from scientific arrogance. In the early pandemic days, there were claims about a wet market origin, but evidence soon emerged showing many cases unrelated to it. By early January, I informed the National Security Council and Anthony Fauci that the virus was highly infectious in humans, suggesting a lab origin. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is well-known for coronavirus research, making the lab leak theory plausible. Despite discussions, Fauci maintained a focus on the wet market hypothesis, disregarding other possibilities. I believed a broader scientific investigation was necessary, but only a single hypothesis was considered.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have economic consequences.

This morning, we were given a binder that was supposed to contain information Kash Patel had seen, but it was empty. The feeling is that the Southern District of New York FBI has the tapes and won't release them to the White House. If this is true, it's an internal civil war. You have a duly elected president and confirmed leaders of the FBI and DOJ, but the Southern District of New York is bucking their orders. If true, departments are in complete rebellion, a cancer that must be cut out. I believe in the president, Kash, and Pam's mission to root out this evil. If it's true we are in civil war. If I were President Trump, I would fly to New York and fire everyone in the Southern District Of New York.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

We discovered a previously missing interview where it was revealed that Trump heard Mark Meadows offer 10,000 troops. In January, Vanity Fair reported that Trump authorized the National Guard and told Secretary Miller to prepare them. Additionally, a White House employee present during the Capitol attack stated that Trump’s immediate response was to contact Pelosi and Milley for assistance. There are multiple records showing that Trump offered the National Guard, but the requests were declined by Pelosi and Bowser.

Witnesses claim they met with President Trump on January 4th, and that he offered 20,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol on January 6th, but the offer was rejected. According to Trump's acting secretary of defense, Chris Miller, Donald Trump never issued any order to deploy the guard to protect the Capitol. Four interviewees confirm that on January 4th in the Oval Office, they heard Donald Trump authorize up to 20,000 troops, two days before January 6th. Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guardsmen and women for utilization should the request come in, but those requests never did. This was stated under oath under the threat of a penalty of perjury. The meeting was about a foreign threat directed towards the United States. The president then brought up January 6th, and was doing exactly what a commander in chief should do.

This virus likely did not originate naturally; it stems from scientific arrogance. In the early pandemic, there were claims about a wet market being the source, but evidence soon showed many cases unrelated to it. By early January, it was clear the wet market narrative was misleading. I informed the National Security Council and Anthony Fauci that the virus was highly infectious, suggesting it had been engineered in a lab. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is well-known for coronavirus research, making the lab leak theory plausible. Despite discussions, Fauci maintained a focus on the wet market hypothesis, dismissing the need for broader scientific investigation.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

I don't think there's been transparency. Routine announcements are being made about findings, and questions are being invited daily. But providing data for the evidence that is being presented isn't happening. The White House has provided information, but these claims seem to be dismissed. Information is being provided; it just isn't believed.

President Trump was not aware of the gain of function ban repeal process that started before he became president. Anthony Fauci worked without supervision during the 18-month period when Trump did not appoint a new science adviser. Congressional investigators confirmed that Fauci and the new science adviser kept information about the research from Trump's administration. Trump himself admitted in an interview that he was not informed about most of it. Fauci has been in charge since the virus became public and has worked with his scientists, many of whom he funds, to promote the narrative that the virus is natural and not from a lab. The US intelligence community, including the Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, likely played a role in this deception.

"You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times." "He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020." "Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities." "Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public."

I caught a Pentagon advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, specializing in AI, coordinating a secret war room to counter Trump. This guy, Jamie Mannarino, worked for Hillary Clinton, then the FBI as a "spy hunter," and now advises on AI technologies that "don't yet exist." Mannarino was caught on hidden camera discussing these secret meetings and expressing his negative opinions about Trump. He even mentioned consulting with retired generals about what actions they could take to prevent certain potential presidential actions. Following this exposure, the Pentagon spokesperson stated they were not involved and that Mannarino was out of control and had been stopped. This is an example of the deep state attempting a coup.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent, specializing in counterintelligence. I have concerns about Trump, viewing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders to discuss AI and the need for better information sharing. I've been collaborating with retired generals to address national security concerns related to Trump's presidency. We aimed to inform the public about the implications of another Trump term, and I contributed extensively to op-eds and articles. I predict Trump may publicly consider extending his term, which would create significant political tension.

There is a belief that the 2020 election was rigged, and task forces are working to educate the public about the military's potential involvement. The speaker is part of a task force monitoring public sentiment and barriers to acceptance. They aim to provide information to the Strategic Information Operations team. The goal is to understand why people support Biden and to predict the response if action is taken. The military's involvement is seen as a way to clean up corruption, but they want to avoid civil unrest. The speaker believes that more truths need to come out before the military can publicly intervene. They speculate on potential catalysts for military action.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. However, I did not recommend locking anything down.

While I was pretrial in DC after January 6, I was denied access to evidence initially. Eventually, I gained access to evidence.com, which provided me with more information than most, including lawyers. After securing my bond, I retrieved evidence that supports the claim that President Trump is correct: Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for the events of January 6. This is not just a conspiracy theory; it’s a fact. I can prove Pelosi's involvement. More details will follow.

I spent 17 years in the military, 14 in a special operations unit. I believe the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump involved help from an agency or government. The shooter couldn't have reached the rooftop alone to take a shot at the president. It seems too obvious that assistance was involved.

I advised the president to shut down the country despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made the difficult decision to shut the country down.

I did not recommend locking everything down. I advised the president to shut the country down, which was a tough decision due to the significant economic consequences it would bring.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, and it is important to note that shutting everything down was not my suggestion.

I sit on a task force at the Department of Defense. They have important information, and Trump believed that revealing it early would cause a civil war. He thought it was necessary for people to understand the severity of the situation.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I’ve been in discussions with retired generals about protecting American interests, especially regarding the potential threats posed by Trump, whom I view as a sociopathic narcissist. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders in a secure room called "the tank" to discuss these critical issues. I’ve also been involved in efforts to explain the national security risks of another Trump presidency, contributing to numerous op-eds under the names of retired officials. I predict Trump may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limits, which could create significant political tension.