TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Lyme disease cases are rising, with the CDC estimating half a million cases a year, or 1,300 people a day. Lyme disease wasn't a problem until the mid-1970s, the peak of the US biological weapons program. Three diseases emerged: Lyme arthritis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and Babesia. These previously rare diseases appeared across from the US government's biological weapons testing facility. This is a perfect stealth weapon, a poor man's nuke. Creating new germs inside ticks could have unintended consequences.

In Ukraine, there were military biological programs experimenting with deadly pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. They are now trying to hide the evidence, but we believe they were creating components for a biological weapon. This poses a direct threat to Russia's safety. Ukraine and their US supporters rejected these claims, but their actions were bold and brazen.

Today, almost any country can create a powerful biological weapon in a couple of months using current technology.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the US Army conducted secret experiments involving the release of bacteria in public places across America, including New York City. These experiments were kept hidden from the public for many years. Some of the experiments had fatal consequences, with people developing infections and even dying. The government also covered up the deaths of individuals who were unknowingly tested with mind-altering drugs. It took decades for the truth to come out, and families had to fight in court for justice. The Army and Navy have a history of conducting secret risk assessments to test the vulnerability of American cities to biological attacks. These experiments need to be stopped, and there should be accountability for the harm caused.

The discussion centers on gain-of-function (GoF) research, its regulation, and the motivations behind it. The first speaker notes the administration’s goal to end GoF research and asks where that stands. The second speaker says progress has been made, and the White House is working on a formal policy. He then defines the issue in stages: what GoF research is, why someone would do it, and how to regulate it to prevent dangerous projects that could catastrophically harm human populations. He clarifies that GoF research is not inherently bad, but dangerous GoF research is. He gives an insulin example: creating bacteria to produce insulin is a legitimate GoF that benefits diabetics. In contrast, taking a virus from bat caves, bringing it to a lab in a densely populated city with weak biosafety, and manipulating it to be more transmissible among humans is a dangerous GoF that should not be supported. The administration’s policy aims to prevent such dangerous work entirely, and the President signed an executive order in April or May endorsing this policy. Next, he discusses implementation: how to create incentives to ensure this research does not recur. He explains that the utopian idea behind such research was to prevent all pandemics by collecting viruses from wild places, testing their potential to infect humans by increasing their pathogenicity, and then preparing countermeasures in advance (vaccines, antivirals) and stockpiling them, even though those countermeasures would not have been tested against humans yet. If a virus did leap to humans, the foreseen countermeasures might prove ineffective because evolution is unpredictable. This “triage” approach—identifying pathogens most likely to leap and preemptively preparing against them—was the rationale for dangerous GoF work, a rationale he characterizes as flawed. He notes that many scientists considered this an effort to do bioweapons research under the guise of safety and defense. The work is dual-use. The U.S. is a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention and does not conduct offensive bio-weapons research, but other countries might. The discussion highlights that the GoF research discussed during the pandemic can backfire and may not align with true biodefense, since countermeasures might not match whatever pathogen actually emerges. The speaker concludes that this agenda—pursuing GoF to prevent pandemics—has drawn substantial support from parts of the Western world and other countries for about two and a half decades, but he implies it is not deserving of continuation.

The perception, not reality, leads to the killing of bio-threat defense projects. 50% of allies believe the US has an offensive bioweapons program, which is false. Since Nixon, there has been no such program. Developing countermeasures against bio-threats can be mistaken for an offensive program, causing public and political concerns. The information will be published in Science and Nature soon.

President Richard Nixon announced in 1969 that the United States would renounce the use of deadly biological weapons, but few Americans knew that the country had been operating a secret bioweapons program for over 25 years. Born out of fear during World War II, the program conducted extensive research and experiments, even using human subjects. The British and Japanese also had their own bioweapons programs, with the Japanese conducting horrific experiments on thousands of people. The US program, fueled by the Cold War, conducted tests on American cities and human subjects, proving the feasibility of biological warfare. However, concerns over the uncontrollable nature of these weapons and the mounting political pressure led to the program's eventual end in 1969.

I used to work for the FBI's foreign counterintelligence unit and did surveillance on various intelligence groups. One interesting topic is the Wuhan virus, which I believe is a bioweapon developed by the Chinese military. Many countries, including the US and Russia, have bioweapons. The FBI confirmed it was a bioweapon within 48 hours and traced its origin using specialized equipment. China's goal is not to destroy the US but to colonize it gradually, starting with media and schools. They have been spying since the 1970s, attending trade and science shows, and now they are deeply involved in universities, gathering data for new weapons.

Over a year ago, we knew about the biolabs, their experiments, and related documents. It started in 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency, which created the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with Nathaniel Wolf, later Meta Biota. Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm headed by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr., funded Meta Biota. This is a corrupt operation developed over the last decade to generate biological warfare against the Russians. They've been collecting DNA from Slavic people. General Igor Krylyov exposed this as a war crime because it violates the biological weapons agreement. America's 30 biolabs in Ukraine experimented on animal-to-human transmission, which is the origin of COVID-19. The research conducted in Ukraine will be directly connected to COVID-19. The United States created and opened this Pandora's box.

You don't need a secret lab or a massive complex to create bioweapons. Unlike nuclear weapons, biological weapons can be developed discreetly, blending in with legitimate activities like vaccine production. This dual-use nature makes it difficult to detect a biological weapons program.

The federal government ended gain of function research funding, which the US military and intelligence agencies engaged in beginning in 1947. By 1969, the CIA claimed they could kill the entire US population for 29¢ a person. President Nixon announced a unilateral end to dual use research and persuaded over 80 countries to sign the bioweapons charter in 1973, ending gain of function research globally until 2002. After the anthrax attacks, the Patriot Act included a provision stating that US Federal Officials who violated the bioweapons charter and Geneva Convention could not be prosecuted. This relaunched a bioweapons arms race driven by gain of function research. In 2014, three bugs escaped from US labs, leading President Obama to place a moratorium on future use, and much of the research was moved offshore to the Wuhan Lab.

We need to discuss bioweapons. I've spent over two years researching them for a book and the technology to develop these microbes is rapidly advancing. Hundreds of millions have been invested in ethnically targeted microbes, and China is doing the same. There's an argument that COVID-19 was ethnically targeted, disproportionately impacting certain races. The genetic structure of ACE2 receptors varies among races, making some more immune than others. COVID-19 seems to target Caucasians and Black people, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese individuals appear more immune. Whether this was deliberate is unknown, but research shows the racial and ethnic impact differential. China and the U.S. are developing ethnic bioweapons, which explains those labs in Ukraine that collect Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

We attempted to verify the Soviet Union's biological weapons program, achieving some success as they dismantled facilities and allowed inspections. However, American scientists on these missions felt that Soviet scientists were not entirely transparent. Some parts of the former Soviet bioweapons complex remain unexplored by Westerners, suggesting ongoing military biological weapons research.

The U.S. bioweapons program, initially run by the CIA after World War II, involved recruiting German and Japanese scientists. They conducted unethical experiments on the American public, including spraying toxins in cities and testing bioweapons. In 1969, President Nixon ended the program due to concerns over the potential for widespread harm. However, the CIA secretly retained samples and continued bioweapons research. Following the 9/11 attacks, the Patriot Act was passed, allowing the CIA to bypass legal restrictions on bioweapons. Funding for bioweapons development surged, with Tony Fauci becoming a key figure in this area. Despite a moratorium on gain-of-function studies, Fauci moved research overseas. The CIA also funneled money through organizations to obscure its involvement. The discussion highlights the dangers of government overreach and the importance of resisting authoritarianism.

We know that approximately 40-plus laboratories directly worked with the Pentagon. More than a dozen have ceased operation, likely due to our influence. Some were relocated to other territories and continued their activities. I cannot say that the biological program in Ukraine has been completely shut down. There's a misconception about what military biological research entails. It's not like the infamous Japanese Unit 731. It's much simpler in some ways and more complex in others, involving advanced research and artificial intelligence. These so-called garage laboratories have kits that can synthesize viruses. All of this is integrated into a single information system, ultimately controlled by the same entities, whether it's the Pentagon or other organizations.

To create a defensive program against bioterrorism, the speaker consulted with unconventional sources. These included former U.S. bioweapons experts from decades ago, international figures from countries like the U.K., and defectors from the Soviet Union. The speaker learned from these experts to inform the development of a multi-billion dollar program.

The military industrial complex often evokes images of soldiers in combat, but it encompasses much more. In light of recent global events, previously taboo topics, including government secrecy around bio labs, have gained attention. One notable example is Project 112, authorized in 1962 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. This project involved extensive testing of biological and chemical agents, including VX nerve gas, Sarin, and E. Coli, across various locations. The aim was to explore controlled temporary incapacitation as a military strategy. The government denied Project 112's existence until 2000, raising concerns about the safety of military personnel involved, many of whom were unaware of the risks. The project reflects a troubling reality where governments that condemn bioweapons may simultaneously engage in their development, leaving the public unaware of the potential dangers lurking in their midst.

Speaker 0 argues that parasites have become a problem because they have been weaponized. They reference a Nobel Prize-winning finding showing that a certain parasite could produce stomach cancer in rats, and that a different parasite produced this effect in Japan. They note these results only worked in animals that ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated, not in healthy animals. They then connect this to twentieth-century American policy: vaccination began with troops during World War I and continued in the military, then expanded to schoolchildren after World War II. The speaker predicts that vaccines at school would eventually affect broader segments of the population, not just children, and claims that vaccines have the effect of making people more susceptible to parasites, including those that cause cancer, not just toxoplasmosis. Regarding diet, the speaker mentions the food pyramid of the twentieth century, pointing out that the bottom consisted of carbohydrates, implying a link to susceptibility. The speaker then discusses bioweapons policy: in 1971, Nixon declared an end to the United States bioweapons offensive program and signed a treaty (they mention a 1978 figure, implying a multinational agreement). They claim that, despite this treaty, the Soviet Union and others violated it, and that perhaps everyone violated it. They assert that, at the same time the treaty was signed, Fort Detrick was converted from a bioweapons lab to be part of the National Cancer Institute. They compare this to Nazi Germany, stating that they hid bioweapons under cancer research, and claim that the United States did something similar. The transcription ends with emphatic agreement.

General Shiroishi knew whoever controlled disease could control the world. The material shared links the CIA to involvement of this lab and to expanding this program for the last eighty years.

There are US biolabs in Ukraine that are developing bio weapons using synthetic biology, CRISPR technology, and genetic engineering. The Pentagon transferred the authority for biosecurity to the National Institute for Infectious and Allergic Disease, run by Anthony Fauci, who received a 68% raise from the Pentagon for bioweapons development. Every bioweapon needs a vaccine, so they are developed side by side through gain of function science. In 2014, three dangerous microbes escaped from different labs in the US. President Obama signed a moratorium to shut down Anthony Fauci's experiments, but he shifted operations offshore, including to the Wuhan lab in China and Ukraine. Funding for these labs comes from various government agencies, with USAID being the largest funder.

The Chinese and us are both developing ethnic bioweapons, with labs in Ukraine collecting Russian and Chinese DNA to target people by race.

Cases of Lyme disease are increasing, with the CDC estimating half a million cases annually. The rise coincided with the peak of the US biological weapons program in the mid-seventies, leading to the emergence of Lyme arthritis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and Babesia. These diseases clustered near a government testing facility, suggesting a sinister origin. Nature cannot be controlled, and the implications are disturbing.

Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk itself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.

Weapon states and nation states can create biological weapons, and even small groups or individuals may have the ability to do so. The necessary technology is widely available to the public.

Speaker 1 states that documents were signed to end federal funding and private corporation control of gain of function studies, which he claims the US military and intelligence agencies began in 1947. He says that by 1969, the CIA claimed they could kill the entire US population for 29¢ a person. According to Speaker 1, President Nixon ended this research and persuaded over 80 countries to sign the bioweapons charter in 1973, but US federal officials who violate it cannot be prosecuted. Speaker 1 claims that gain of function research relaunched a bioweapons arms race and that in 2014, three bugs escaped from US labs, leading President Obama to declare a moratorium that moved research offshore to the Wuhan Lab. He asserts that China, Russia, Iran, and other countries are developing devastating weapons using AI and CRISPR technologies. He says that gain-of-function research has never produced anything good, and commends President Trump for ending US bioweapons research.