reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I've been investigating USAID spending through usaspending.gov and found that Chemonics International Inc. is the largest recipient of these funds, receiving $6 billion recently. They primarily transport pharmaceutical products, especially AIDS drugs, to developing nations. Chemonics earned $1.8 billion in the last year and has a troubling track record, with only 7% of health shipments arriving on time in 2017. Despite scandals, including issues in Haiti and Afghanistan, they continue to secure lucrative contracts. Their operations raise questions about effectiveness and accountability in USAID funding. If anyone has more information on Chemonics, please share.

The speaker is advocating for a US taxpayer refund due to information released by the Department of Government Efficiency, claiming Elon Musk and Doge revealed there are over 60,000 federal employee millionaires. The speaker states that when Joe Biden took office in 2021, there were approximately 70,000 federal employee millionaires, but by September 2024, that number more than doubled to 55,334, and is now estimated to be around 60,000. The speaker questions how this increase occurred, given the average federal employee salary is $86,000. The speaker notes that even the highest-paid federal employees, such as medical officers and cybersecurity personnel, earn around $250,000-$260,000 annually. The speaker expresses distrust in federal agencies and opposes paying down the deficit under these circumstances.

Introducing Samantha Power, a former USAID administrator recently dismissed from her position. Power, known for her far-left views, was sworn in on May 8, 2021. Her financial disclosure from January 2021 indicates her assets range from $6.7 million to $16.5 million, with an estimated net worth of up to $30 million by 2024. Despite earning a salary of $180,000 at USAID, her wealth has significantly increased. Now, she appears on national television discussing her contributions, raising questions about the nature of her work and the management of government funds.

I'm demanding refunds for US taxpayers due to alarming financial mismanagement within our federal government. Information from the Department of Government Efficiency reveals that the number of federal employee millionaires has more than doubled since 2021, estimating around 60,000 currently. This is suspicious considering the average federal employee salary is $86,000 annually. Given this, plus a national debt exceeding $36 trillion and a deficit over $2 trillion, I question the trustworthiness of these agencies. With evidence of potential payroll fraud and a lack of oversight from elected officials, I believe taxpayers deserve a refund. Our money has been irresponsibly squandered. Since they have failed to act responsibly with our finances, we deserve our money back.

I found something fascinating regarding Representative Ilhan Omar's net worth. Her $83 million net worth is striking, considering her annual congressional salary of $175,000. Even saving every penny over eight years would only amount to $1.2 million. I'm curious how such a significant increase in wealth occurred. While I don't know the details of her personal finances, it raises questions that warrant further investigation. It seems worth exploring how a congresswoman accumulates such substantial wealth during her time in office.

Introducing Samantha Power, a former USAID administrator who has been dismissed from her position. Power, known for her far-left views, was sworn in on May 8, 2021. Her financial disclosure from January 2021 shows her assets ranging from $6.7 million to $16.5 million, with an estimated net worth of up to $30 million by 2024. Despite earning an annual salary of $180,000 at USAID, her wealth has significantly increased. She now appears on national TV discussing her contributions, raising questions about the nature of her work and the management of government funds.

There's significant fraud in USAID, with radical groups receiving funds they don't deserve. A staggering amount, like a hundred million, is being misallocated. It's crucial to investigate the kickbacks associated with this spending. Who would invest such sums in questionable projects? It's likely that those who received the funds are not returning any to the government, indicating a high level of corruption. The key issue is understanding the extent of these kickbacks.

My team faced significant obstruction from USAID while trying to access records on taxpayer money. Partnering with Representative Mike McCall, we initiated a congressional investigation, but USAID only provided limited data. Our findings revealed excessive spending with minimal results. Notably, USAID funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology for dangerous coronaviruses, and also allocated money for pottery classes in Morocco and tourism in Lebanon, despite travel warnings from the State Department. There are numerous examples of questionable expenditures.

The National Security Agency has been monitoring illicit wealth for 15 years. It has been revealed that Wall Street has taken a staggering $100 trillion from Main Street through naked short selling.

USAID is far worse than people realize. Remember the outrage over Elon Musk buying Twitter? We should have that same energy about the $200 billion supposedly sent to Ukraine—Zelensky says only half arrived. That's $100 billion unaccounted for! Meanwhile, crucial needs like fixing Flint's water crisis ($1.5 billion) are ignored, while Ethiopia receives more annually. The system is corrupt; politicians benefit through USAID, creating a loop of self-enrichment. The media, also funded by USAID, manipulates public opinion, making us think we're wrong to question it. This isn't normal; our outrage is manufactured. We need to investigate this waste and corruption. If you're a business owner struggling to reach your potential, let's fix your processes and boost your profits.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We need transparency. The only way to uncover the truth might be if someone leaks information online before mysteriously dying.

Taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs. If it's a government-funded NGO, it's effectively just the government. A fraud loophole exists because the government can send money to an NGO that is no longer governed by U.S. laws. The money is sent overseas to one NGO, then through others. The speaker is highly confident that some of that money returns to the U.S. and enriches certain people. There are strangely wealthy members of Congress, and it's unclear how they accumulated millions while earning comparatively little. The speaker aims to investigate this and prevent it from continuing.

We have a prominent political family that runs 64 NGOs, and it looks like a lot of people are working for free as trustees while others are getting paid huge salaries. For example, we see a Senior VP for policy research making $400,000 a year and someone in strategy affairs making $330,000 a year. Remember, this is all from your tax dollars. These families in government are like thieves who found an open bank vault. Each NGO is a bag for cash. They stuff as much money as possible into each one, then they start a new LLC with a new purpose. Do they achieve anything? Not really. Do they build anything or make anything better for anyone? Not tangibly, but the people working for them are doing quite well.

Elon highlighted significant issues of fraud, waste, and abuse in the budget, estimating that around 10% could be fraudulent, amounting to approximately $600 billion to $1 trillion in waste. Initially, there was hope for a democracy, but now there's concern that it may devolve into a kleptocracy, reminiscent of Latin American regimes. The data from USAID reveals troubling political contributions that suggest corruption. This situation is alarming, and it's crucial to prevent further decline. Fortunately, there are over 80 dedicated individuals working tirelessly to address these issues, and their efforts are commendable.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

The shocking part of investigating government-funded NGOs is that small decisions lead to massive, multi-billion dollar outcomes. I saw one instance of $1.9 billion being sent to an NGO that was formed a year prior and had no prior activity. Government-funded NGOs are essentially a loophole, allowing actions that would be illegal for the government directly but become permissible through nonprofits. These nonprofits are then used for personal enrichment, with individuals cashing out and paying themselves exorbitant sums. It's a giant scam where people can establish an NGO for a relatively small investment and then lobby politicians to funnel vast sums of money into it. There might be some good that comes from them, maybe 5 or 10%, but the rest is not.

We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several individuals in bureaucratic positions with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. We're curious about the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that they are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers. We are investigating to determine how this occurred.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

Bill Gates donated $5 billion to his own foundation and received a tax write-off for it. This raises questions about the corruption within the government.

We've found some odd things, like bureaucrats with modest salaries somehow accumulating millions while in their positions. It makes you wonder where that money comes from. It seems taxpayers are footing the bill for this wealth. Basic controls that any company would have are missing at Treasury, like payment categorization codes or comments explaining payments. The "do not pay" list, meant for terrorists and fraudsters, takes up to a year to get on and isn't even used. Departments fail audits because of these missing controls. It boils down to complaint minimization. Approving all payments avoids complaints, even from fraudsters. But we need to complain when money is misspent and demand taxpayer dollars are used wisely. It's just common sense. We even see people claiming Social Security who are 50 years old!

An organization recently received the largest fine in state ethics commission history, totaling $300,000. The Trump administration has discovered approximately $2,000,000,000 earmarked for the same organization and its affiliates. This situation warrants investigation.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.

It seems odd that many people in the bureaucracy with salaries of a few hundred thousand dollars somehow accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while in their positions. We're curious where this wealth comes from. Maybe they're good at investing, and we should seek their advice. But mysteriously, they get wealthy, and we don't know why. The reality is that they're likely getting wealthy at the taxpayer's expense, and that's the honest truth.