TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.

Elon and I have resolved our differences after a long chat at one of our conferences. I admire his work with SpaceX, Tesla, and Neuralink, and I want to support him and his companies. Many people view the government as ineffective, especially regarding issues like inner-city education and stagnant income for the bottom 20% over the past two decades. We deserve a better government, and simply sending more money to Washington won't solve the problem. Government needs to be more accountable and efficient, focusing on outcomes. It's a complicated system, but I hope we can contribute positively to it.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, claiming Elon knew the details of a bill "better than almost anybody" and initially had no problem with it. The speaker suggests Elon's problem arose when the EV mandate was cut, costing billions. The speaker wants various car types available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. The speaker claims Elon made positive statements about them previously. The speaker states they helped Elon a lot. A second speaker asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public.

I don't think that we ever wanted the responsibility of the job, and frankly, he's not bright enough to handle it. Elon Musk kisses up to him, stroking his ego, so he gets to nap while this guy runs things. But this guy wasn't even born here. He was born under apartheid in South Africa and I understand he was pro-apartheid, so he has that mentality going on. And now he's a naturalized citizen. How did he even do that? Did he come over the border legally?

The other side is complaining that nobody voted for Elon or any of my cabinet nominees. They say people are dying because of budget cuts and even allege illegal activity. But frankly, I don't care. If they're complaining, we must be over the target and doing something right. We're simply trying to restore the will of the people through the President. What we've found is a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy that is against the President and the cabinet. In DC, it's 92% Kamala. How can we live in a democracy if the President's will, representing the people, isn't implemented? We're witnessing the bureaucracy thrashing as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

Elon is a patriot who is saving America and cutting the cause. He supported me in the election, but has never asked me for anything. I got rid of the electric car mandate, which may not be good for him. I got activated last week when I saw what they're doing to him. He makes an incredible product and people should support him. If he wasn't doing this, he wouldn't have any of these difficulties. Pam has done a great job with regard to all of the investigations that are going on. She already found four of them. They're really terrorists at a high level and the people that are financing them are in big trouble, so they better cut it out.

The speaker believes they would have easily won Pennsylvania, and is disappointed in Elon, who initially endorsed them and knew the details of a bill. Elon only developed a problem with the bill when the EV mandate was cut due to its high cost. The speaker wants cars of all types to be available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and initially had no problem with it. The speaker helped Elon a lot. The speaker clarifies that Elon did not raise concerns privately before going public. The speaker believes Elon misses being in the Oval Office and that people who leave the administration sometimes become hostile due to "Trump derangement syndrome" or missing the glamour.

The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.

The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.

Democrats may have alienated Elon Musk on a personal level by failing to celebrate his achievements, such as Starlink and private space endeavors. One speaker believes Democrats should have celebrated Musk's contributions to electric vehicles, even though he opposed unionization. Musk was reportedly offended when he wasn't invited to an EV summit. One speaker called the White House to inquire, and was told the union issue was likely the reason for the snub. The speaker felt he deserved credit and should have been invited. One speaker thinks Musk should stay off Twitter, but also notes that he was once an Obama supporter. Democrats should remember their history of celebrating innovation and entrepreneurship.

The Democrats complain that nobody voted for Elon or my cabinet nominees and claim people are dying because of budget cuts while also calling my actions illegal. Their reaction shows we must be over the target and doing something right. We're trying to restore the will of the people through the president. There's a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. Consider that DC voting is 92% for Kamala. If the president's will, representing the people, isn't implemented, then the will of the people isn't being implemented. We're not living in a democracy, but a bureaucracy. What you're seeing is the bureaucracy resisting as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

People paint me as an oligarch trying to raid the government for wealth, but since joining the administration to improve government efficiency, my net worth has dropped by $133 billion. Besides the financial hit, there's been vandalism targeting Tesla across the country, like Molotov cocktails at dealerships and burned charging stations. Tesla's stock recently experienced its biggest one-day drop since September, marking the seventh consecutive week of losses. So, why make these sacrifices? While wealth, power, and fame motivate many, I already possessed these before my current role. This initiative has only cost me personally. Therefore, consider that, much like my goals of putting a man on Mars or electrifying vehicles, I view this as a mission to put the United States on sound financial footing.

We got a lot of hostages back, but we're gonna talk about you. I've been watching. We might have to put Doze on Elon. Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is gonna be terminated. Not everybody wants an electric car. I wanna have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe someday a hydrogen. If you have a hydrogen car, it has one problem: it blows up. I'm gonna let Peter test it off.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, stating that Elon previously said "the most beautiful things" about them. The speaker claims to have helped Elon and asserts that Elon was very knowledgeable about the details of a particular bill and initially had no issues with it. According to the speaker, Elon's opposition arose only when he learned about the planned reduction of the EV mandate, which the speaker says involves billions of dollars. The speaker states the desire to have cars of all types.

The speaker claims a previously "great relationship" with Elon has soured due to disagreements over the "great big beautiful bill." He asserts the bill, featuring the "biggest tax cuts in history," will generate a surplus if tariff revenue is included, citing a minimum of $2.8 trillion over ten years, even according to the "Democrat"-run CBO. He touts low inflation (around 2%) and falling gasoline and grocery prices (specifically eggs), attributing past high inflation to the Biden administration's energy policies. The border is now "the best in the history of our country," with only a few legal entrants recently. The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon's changed stance on the bill, suggesting it stemmed from cuts to the EV mandate, which Elon previously understood and supported. He speculates that people who leave his administration often become "hostile" due to missing the "glamour" and "beautiful Oval Office."

We got a lot of hostages back, but we're gonna talk about y'all. I've been watching. We might have to put Doze on Elon. Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is gonna be terminated. Not everybody wants an electric car. I wanna have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe someday a hydrogen. If you have a hydrogen car, it has one problem: it blows up. I'm gonna let Peter test it off.

Speaker 0 states that rhetoric makes politicians less than human. Speaker 1 believes Democrats lost Elon Musk because they didn't celebrate his contributions to electric vehicles, Starlink, and private space endeavors, even though he was against unionization. Speaker 2 says he received a call from Musk about not being invited to an EV summit and called the White House to ask why. He felt Musk should have been invited and that the union issue was the reason for the snub. Speaker 1 agrees he deserved credit. Speaker 1 thinks Musk should stay off Twitter and not make jokes about the Vice President. Speaker 1 says Democrats should remember that Musk supported Obama and that the Democratic party should be about innovation and entrepreneurship.

The speaker was asked if they would get rid of the Tesla and Starlink service at the White House. The speaker responded no, stating they may move the Tesla around a little bit, but that Starlink is a good service. When asked where they would move the Tesla, the speaker said they have a lot of locations. The speaker was then asked if they ever saw Elon Musk get physical with the treasury secretary. The speaker responded no, stating they had an argument, but didn't see any physicality. The speaker was then asked about a New York Times report alleging that Elon Musk was blurring the lines between recreational use of drugs and medicinal use towards the end of his time in the White House, and whether the speaker thought Musk ever had drugs at the White House. The speaker responded that they didn't know, and hoped not, wishing Musk well and stating they had a good relationship.

The speaker claims to have had a great relationship with Elon, but is now disappointed. He believes Elon only developed a problem with the "great big beautiful bill" after the EV mandate was cut, which Elon knew about and initially supported. The speaker says the CBO, which is run by Democrats, projects a $2.8 trillion surplus over ten years if tariff revenue is included. He touts low inflation, down to 2%, and falling grocery and gasoline prices. He also claims the U.S. now has the best border in history with a 99.99% success rate. He speculates that people who leave his administration miss the "glamour" and become hostile, possibly due to "Trump derangement syndrome." He suggests that Elon may be experiencing something similar.

Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.

You have to be keenly aware that the media and punditry threw everything they had at us, the New York Times, Washington Post, the networks, late night comedy, cable channels, lawfare, weaponization, and they didn't win. Now they want us to hate each other. They want a divorce between us. For example, with Elon, he called me and said they're trying to drive us apart. They said, "Breaking news, Trump has ceded control to President Musk, who will be attending a cabinet meeting tonight." It's so obvious, and they're so bad at it. If they were good, I'd never have been president because nobody has ever gotten more bad publicity than me. I could do the greatest things and get 98% bad publicity. But the people are smart; they get it. They really see what's happening.

Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.

Governor Waltz stated he frequently checks Tesla stock to give himself a boost during the day. One speaker questioned how Americans should view politicians who take pride in the downfall of an American car company. Another speaker responded that Governor Waltz is living a sad existence after his devastating defeat on November 5.

Elon is a patriot who is saving America and has been unfairly treated. He supported me in the election and has never asked me for anything. I got rid of the electric car mandate, which might not be good for him. I got activated last week when I saw what they're doing to him and decided to support him because he makes an incredible product. Pam has done a great job with the investigations and has already found four of them. Those people are terrorists at a high level, and the people financing them are in big trouble and better cut it out.