TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I have two daughters and can’t imagine telling them they were born wrong. That idea is harmful and misguided. Medical interventions like halting puberty, administering opposite-sex hormones, and performing surgeries on children are alarming. In the U.S., insurance data shows that up to 179 girls under 12 and a half have undergone double mastectomies. This means young girls are having their breasts removed because they’ve been led to believe they are boys inside.

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

Vultures profit from the confusion they intentionally create in innocent kids' minds. They use puberty blockers, which are also given to sex offenders, to chemically castrate them. Many kids undergo surgeries like double mastectomies before turning 18. Children in identity crisis need love and guidance, not hormone injections and scalpels. Adults must protect our kids because their silence makes them complicit in what's happening. The media blindly accepts the medical establishment's claim that castrating a child is life-saving care without questioning it. We must protect our kids.

A politician introduces a video clip of a surgeon who identifies as the "queer surgeon" and performs gender affirming surgeries. The politician expresses concern over experimental and irreversible procedures being performed on children. In the clip, the surgeon states that 80% of their practice is gender affirming surgery, with a focus on genital surgeries like vaginoplasty and phalloplasty. They acknowledge an increase in adolescents seeking surgical intervention, which presents unique challenges, especially for those who have undergone puberty suppression. The surgeon admits that there is a lack of published research on genital surgeries for pubertally suppressed adolescents and that they are "just kind of learning and figuring out what works." They explain that puberty suppression affects the amount of tissue available for vaginoplasty, requiring alternative techniques like using peritoneum to line the vaginal canal. The surgeon notes that they will know more about the outcomes in 5-10 years and that it will be fascinating to see how these kids turn out. The politician then condemns these procedures as "barbarism" and "mutilation of children" that should be illegal. They claim that children lack the capacity to make such life-altering decisions and that sex is an immutable characteristic.

The hospital was found to be secretly performing gender affirming procedures on children as young as 11, despite claiming to have stopped. Doctors implanted drug delivery devices in kids, causing irreversible effects. A ban on gender affirming care for minors was implemented in Texas. A whistleblower exposed the hospital's lies, leading to changes in state laws. Medical professionals were criticized for providing irreversible treatments without sufficient evidence. Concerns were raised about the lack of proper protocols and the rush to medically transition minors. The whistleblower and another former clinic worker shared their experiences of medical harms and questionable practices.

Girls facing puberty are being rushed into harmful medical interventions without proper understanding or support. This push is compared to atrocities of the past, with concern over an industry profiting from describing gender transition as life-saving. The severity of irreversible surgeries and sterilizations is highlighted, causing disbelief even among those who uncover the truth. The brutality and experimental nature of these procedures are condemned as worse than historical atrocities.

A 14-year-old girl was quickly prescribed testosterone at a pediatric gender clinic in Quebec after self-diagnosing as trans due to online influence. The CBC's investigative report on this incident led to trans activists vandalizing their headquarters and issuing a statement defending the right to experiment with their bodies, despite potential mistakes. The activists demand no state interference while expecting state funding for modifications. Concerns are raised about young individuals being led into transitioning without full understanding, as seen with the girl's case. The activists' extreme actions and threats of further retaliation highlight the contentious nature of the issue.

A clinician explains that a chart could show a 15 year old female with a testosterone deficiency, but 'it's a boy that has a testosterone deficiency' and that 'testosterone ... doesn't raise any red flags.' An insurance claim showing 'a boy who has a testosterone deficiency on paper' can obscure fraud. The speaker calls the pattern the 'unholy trinity'—'The hospital system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health insurance companies.' Regarding drugs, puberty blockers 'was Lupron is the most common one,' plus testosterone and estrogen. Some of these drugs are used to chemically castrate sex offenders, and there are children with health issues who need them. There are lack of safeguards: Medicaid and similar insurers 'don't have a system in place where they verify to make sure this is correct before they reimburse.' There should be oversight. 'They actually put the sex they want to be, not the sex they are.'

The push for gender transition in children is harmful and must be stopped. On my first day, I will revoke current policies on gender-affirming care, halt federal funding for these procedures, and ensure hospitals that perform them lose federal health standards. I will support legal action against doctors who perform these procedures on minors. Teachers suggesting children might be in the wrong body will face serious consequences. I will advocate for recognizing only male and female genders and protecting parental rights in gender identity matters. Chloe Cole shares her experience of being misled into believing she was born in the wrong body, leading to irreversible harm. She emphasizes the need for compassion and therapy instead of affirming harmful beliefs. Puberty is a natural process, not a condition to be altered. We must learn from past medical mistakes and protect children from this dangerous trend.

We are harming children with the current approach to gender identity. Young kids, facing bullying or discomfort during puberty, may express confusion about their gender. They are often sent to mental health professionals who are instructed to affirm their feelings, leading to irreversible medical interventions like puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. This process can sterilize children and deprive them of future sexual pleasure. Many affected are as young as 9 or 10, unable to give informed consent. When they later wish to detransition, they often face abandonment and depression, having permanently altered their bodies. This issue is critical for both children and women's rights.

I was once a true believer in gender affirming care, training judges and hospital staff in Missouri. My trans spouse of 13 years detransitioned, which contributed to my change of mind, along with other factors. The protocol is homophobic, built on regressive stereotypes. Of the first 70 children in the protocol, 68 were same-sex attracted. One patient died after a vaginoplasty using their colon due to the puberty blocker preventing normal penis growth. Teenage girls are susceptible to social contagion, especially during COVID lockdowns and increased phone use. Patients mirrored online narratives about being trans, which we called "TikTok tics" in the clinic. I harmed patients, sending them to the ER for emergency surgeries after vaginal tearing during their first sexual experiences. We removed a young woman's breasts who later regretted it, detransitioned, became pregnant, and said her trans identity was a social contagion. I changed my mind because it was the ethical thing to do.

Chloe Cole shares her personal experience as a victim of gender affirming care, which she considers a medical scandal. At 12 years old, she expressed discomfort with her changing body and identified as transgender. Her parents sought help from a gender specialist who immediately recommended puberty blockers and testosterone. Chloe experienced negative side effects, including hot flashes and joint pains. At 15, she underwent a double mastectomy, which affected her mental health and academic performance. Chloe emphasizes the need for compassion and therapy instead of affirming a delusion that transitioning would solve her problems. She urges society to stop telling children they are born wrong and to recognize that puberty is a natural part of growing up. Chloe pleads with elected representatives to end this harmful practice.

Outside Stonewall National Monument, Chris says, 'this is where the whole gay rights movement began.' He adds, 'This whole trans business, right, trans kids on top of that, it's a crime.' He notes, 'the same NGOs... won their gay rights. Really around 02/2010, 02/2015, all across the West.' He states, 'Trans people don't exist. Okay. Men and women, boys and girls.' He warns that 'tens of thousand kids are being irreparably physically harmed' and that 'puberty blockers are all about blocking puberty, which occurs with children, so they should never get it.' He cites, 'WPATH is a big part of it for sure' and 'They write what are called the standards of care.' He points to funding by 'USAID... billions of dollars overseas to proliferate this throughout the world' and to online 'Tumblr, TikTok, Reddit' as vectors. He notes '28 states have legislated a ban on this.'

A viral video highlighted the difficulty of discussing fertility preservation with teenagers. Recent research challenges the idea that drugs and surgeries prevent suicide among those with gender dysphoria. Internal files from WPATH reveal discussions on treating gender distress without proper consent. The files suggest that gender affirming care can lead to lifelong complications and sterility, with patients often unaware of the risks. A report by Environmental Progress exposes pseudoscientific experiments on children and vulnerable adults in the field of gender medicine. The report, along with the WPATH files, is available for public access on environmentalprogress.org.

Children's bodies are not properly developed, but people argue that denying transition will lead to suicide. Data indicates the opposite: transitioning correlates with increased suicide rates, suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety. Individuals may regret transitioning, feeling manipulated and exploited. The speaker criticizes the use of "puberty blockers" and "gender affirming care" for minors, comparing it to barbaric practices like lobotomies. Children go through phases, and boys who want to transition may simply be gay. Some gay individuals feel that the concept of transition erases gay identity by implying they are in the wrong gender.

We're outside the Supreme Court, where a case about Tennessee's gender-affirming care is being heard. This practice is viewed as harmful, akin to child abuse. The concern is that children are being subjected to hormone treatments that could have devastating, permanent effects. Kids should not be treated like experiments or given hormones irresponsibly. This care should not be funded by the government, as it is seen as nonsensical and damaging. The situation is alarming and raises significant ethical concerns.

Concerns arise about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on psychiatric diagnoses, particularly regarding child dysphoria. Children, who are not allowed to make significant decisions like getting tattoos or drinking alcohol, are being encouraged to change their gender. Studies on puberty blockers indicate they do not improve mental health and may have severe side effects, yet this information is not being published. There seems to be a cultural trend among certain demographics, particularly affluent white progressives, where identifying as trans becomes a social signifier. This shift may lead parents to rationalize their child's gender identity as a way to engage with social issues. Normal adolescent confusion is being medicalized, risking irreversible consequences for children who may later regret their decisions.

Beauty blockers have been used by doctors for kids experiencing precocious puberty. The conversation then shifts to transgender children, with one speaker arguing that gender affirming care is life-saving and reduces suicide rates. The other speaker questions the lack of studies on suicide rates among transgender children and argues against medical interventions like hormone therapy and surgeries. The conversation becomes heated, with one speaker claiming that transgender children don't exist and that they should be accepted as they are, while the other argues that they need medical interventions. The debate centers around the belief that transgender children are either born in the wrong body or that they should be accepted without medical interventions.

The speaker believes the financial aspect of gender-affirming care is a "big problem" and "evil" due to its multibillion-dollar scale. They recall someone who supported the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and its previous advocacy for gay marriage. The HRC now reportedly rates medical institutions on their gender-affirming care, impacting potential grant money. The speaker believes this information is available on the HRC website. They mention Pfizer as a funder and suggest Lupron is a near-billion-dollar-a-year drug, potentially used off-label.

We are harming children with the current approach to gender identity. Young kids, often facing bullying or discomfort during puberty, are being rushed into gender transition without proper evaluation. They are sent to therapists who are instructed to affirm their feelings, leading to the administration of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, which can sterilize them and eliminate their ability to experience sexual pleasure later in life. This is happening to children as young as 9 or 10, who cannot provide informed consent. When they later wish to detransition, they often face abandonment and depression, having made irreversible changes to their bodies. This issue is critical, impacting both children and women's rights.

Beauty blockers have been used by doctors for children experiencing precocious puberty. The conversation then shifts to transgender children, with one speaker arguing that gender affirming care is life-saving and reduces suicide rates. The other speaker questions the lack of studies on suicide rates among transgender children and challenges the necessity of medical interventions such as hormone therapy and surgeries. The conversation becomes heated as they discuss the cutting off of body parts and the speaker's belief that there is no such thing as a transgender child. The debate centers around the message being sent to children and the potential harm or benefit of gender affirming care.