TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes Lord Evelyn Rothschild as extraordinarily rich and powerful, claiming that historically the Rothschild wealth was hidden in underground vaults and that their secret financial records were never audited or accounted for. He asserts researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000, more than half the wealth of the entire world, noting possessions such as castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses, and exotic resorts, and that the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the eighteen hundreds, which then bought the Associated Press. He claims they have controlling interest in three major television networks and can easily avoid media tangents since they own it. He says they owned and operated England’s Royal Mint, continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct, and control the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association), where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily, earning millions weekly on transaction fees. He asserts they fix the world price of gold daily and profit from its ups and downs, and over centuries have amassed trillions in gold bullion in subterranean vaults, cornering the world’s gold supply. He claims they own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in The Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. He mentions Alba Lynn Rothschild as looking like a harmless gray-haired old man, but says to “make no mistake about it.” He concludes that Rothschilds and their ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment of millions, and that the wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on earth. Speaker 1 reframes the Rothschilds as the head of the snake, locating their headquarters within a one-mile square in the City of London as the center of their banking dynasty that owns money supplied through central banks of almost every nation. He recalls a November 1910 secret meeting on Jekyll Island among seven of the world’s richest Jewish men to establish a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank, naming Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip (representing the Rockefeller financial empire), Henry P. Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong (representing JP Morgan), and Paul Warburg (representing the Rothschild dynasty of Europe). He mentions powerful men who opposed the Federal Reserve, including Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor, who reportedly died in the Titanic sinking. He states that by April 1912 opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated, and on 12/23/1913 the president signed a bill establishing the privately owned Federal Reserve System in the United States. He quotes Woodrow Wilson: “I’m a most unhappy man. I’ve unwittingly ruined my country,” and notes that a great industrial nation became controlled by its system of credit, with growth in the hands of a few men. He claims Jewish bankers and rabbis celebrated the Federal Reserve Act, and quotes Charles August Lindbergh criticizing the system as private, for profit, and not federal or reserves, with debt-based finance. He asserts that the Fed system enslaves to protect its monopoly over credit and that the Fed’s money-creating tricks enable big brother government to borrow endlessly; the Fed is controlled by Jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff, and that every Federal Reserve chairman since 1980 has been Jewish (Burns, Volker, Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen). He claims the “house of Rothschild” owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank. Speaker 2 asks about the proper relationship between a Fed chairman and a U.S. president. Speaker 3 states that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, meaning there is no other government agency overrule actions taken. Speaker 1 quotes Harold Grellis Rosenthal: “our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system,” asserting that the Federal Reserve System is owned by “us” even though the name implies a government institution. He alleges a long-standing plan to confiscate gold and silver and replace them with worthless paper, claiming Jews promoted both sides of issues while the goyim fail to see who is behind the scenes, and accusing Jews of parasitically consuming production while producers receive less.

Zelensky is described as a manufactured political figure created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who owns One Plus One Media. Kolomoisky financed and produced the TV show "Servant of the People," hiring Zelensky, an actor with no political experience, to play the president. The show was popular and Kolomoisky created a political party with the same name, running Zelensky as its candidate. Kolomoisky also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to be on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company. It is claimed that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are both bankrolled by Kolomoisky and have drug addictions. The speaker suggests the U.S. establishment is "freaking out" over Ukraine because the country has been used as a "private piggy bank," financially exploiting it and contributing to its poverty. The speaker claims Hunter Biden received $50,000 a month, with a possible 10% kickback to his father. The speaker asserts Kolomoisky financed both Zelensky and Biden, and that Westerners are terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

I'm currently in Paris in front of a Milize Bank office, France's third-largest independent asset management group with €13 billion in assets. In early February, Maltex multicapital corp acquired the group. Maltex multicapital corp, linked to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, is registered in the British Virgin Islands and is at the heart of Zelensky's offshore empire. Before being elected, Zelensky ceded his shares to business partner Sergiy Shefir, with an arrangement to continue dividend payments to Zelensky's wife. Chantale Laurie, known for her support for Ukraine, chairs the board of Milize Bank. After seven years of losses, the bank finally posted positive results in 2023 and sought a buyer. The acquisition occurred in early February 2024 for an estimated €1.1 to 1.25 billion. Rothschild & Co, Emmanuel Macron's former employer, was tasked with finding a buyer for Milize Bank.

BlackRock recruiter reveals how financial institutions buy politicians to control the world. They acquire diverse industries to minimize risk and generate exponential growth. Serge Varley explains how owning a little bit of everything gives power and money to influence politics. He mentions the Senate as a place where money can buy influence. War, like the Ukraine-Russia conflict, is seen as an opportunity for profit due to market volatility. BlackRock's influence on politics and culture is highlighted in the investigation. Serge Varley's role as a gatekeeper at BlackRock is emphasized, showing the power he holds in shaping lives.

This war should never have happened. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily to keep NATO out. Military contractors benefit from NATO expansion, ensuring a market for their weapons. Since March 2022, the U.S. has committed over $113 billion to Ukraine, with more requested, while the real beneficiaries are American defense manufacturers. Mitch McConnell suggested this funding is a money laundering scheme, with BlackRock owning many of these companies. Loans to Ukraine come with harsh conditions, including austerity and the sale of government assets, particularly valuable agricultural land. Despite the sacrifices of Ukrainians, 30% of this land has already been sold to companies like DuPont and Cargill, also linked to BlackRock. The rebuilding contracts for Ukraine have gone to BlackRock, revealing a strategy to maintain divisions among us while profiting from the conflict.

Zelensky's rise to power is not as organic as you might think. He was essentially manufactured by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, who owns OnePlusOne Media. Kolomoyski funded Zelensky's TV show, "Servant of the People," where he played the president. The show's popularity catapulted Zelensky into the political arena. Kolomoyski then created a political party with the same name and backed Zelensky as their candidate, despite his lack of political experience. Kolomoyski's money turned Zelensky into a billionaire. Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to sit on the board of Burisma. The Washington establishment has been using Ukraine as a piggy bank, exploiting the country's resources. The West is afraid the truth about Ukraine's corruption will come out.

Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is described as a “cokehead” and a manufactured political figure. He is said to have been manufactured by Igor Kolomoyski, described as a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch who owns OnePlusOne Media in Ukraine. OnePlusOne Media is claimed to have financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People, which hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even political interest, to play the role of President in the show. The show ran from 2015 to 2018 and achieved huge ratings, with claims that there was disproportionate propaganda and PR for the show, some saying it was completely astroturf. Viewers who know Ukrainian and watched the show described it as mildly enjoyable but not a big deal. It is asserted that Kolomoisky created a political party called Servant of the People, mirroring the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky. The claim is that Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. The speaker notes that not many actors are billionaires, implying Zelensky’s wealth is unusually high for an actor, and contends that Zelensky is the “finger puppet” of Kolomoisky. The narrative continues that Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, to the tune of $50,000 a month plus additional benefits, in 2014, when Burisma, the Ukrainian oil and gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors at $50,000 a month. It questions who controls Burisma, asserting Kolomovsky is the same person who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are “spiritual cousins,” both bankrolled by the same man, Kolomovsky. It is claimed that both have serious drug addictions and both are intimately involved in Ukraine, with a contrast that Zelensky does not have a father who is President of the United States. There is a claim that the White House is freaking out over Ukraine, and that in Ukraine there are many secrets. The assertion is that “the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment” have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, financially exploiting it and stripping it of monies and assets needed by the Ukrainian people. This is linked to Ukraine being one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption and Western exploitation. Hunter Biden’s $50,000 a month is highlighted, with a remark that $50,000 a year would solve the problems of four or five families in Ukraine, illustrating the disparity given Ukraine’s poverty. The laptop is invoked to mention a possible 10% kickback to the old man, Joe Biden. The speaker asserts that Kolomovsky financed Zelensky and Joe Biden, and suggests there are many others who financed Ukraine’s leaders to carry out “evil deeds,” asserting that the West is terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.

Zelensky, the "coke head of Kyiv," is described as a manufactured political figure created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who owns 1+1 media. Kolomoisky's company financed and produced the TV show "Servant of the People," hiring Zelensky, an actor with no political experience, to play the president. The show was hugely popular and Kolomoisky created a political party with the same name, running Zelensky as their candidate. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that he is now a billionaire. Kolomoisky also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month plus additional benefits. Hunter Biden was hired by Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company, to be on its board of directors for $250,000 a month. Kolomoisky controls Burisma. Both Zelensky and Hunter Biden have drug addictions and are bankrolled by Kolomoisky. The speaker claims that the White House is "freaking out" over Ukraine because the "unsavoury people in the Washington establishment" have used Ukraine as their "private piggy bank," financially raping the country. Western politicians have exploited Ukraine, contributing to its poverty. The speaker suggests that the West is terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.

In 2015, Ukrainian money held in the account of a company called Buri H was transferred to a US bank, M.S. The payment amounted to $3.4 million and was connected to a related company.

Larry: Lavrov claimed Ukraine attempted to attack Putin’s official residence in Novgorod with around 91 long-range drones in December; allegedly all intercepted, no proof provided, no reported injuries or damage. Lavrov said retaliation is coming, targets for retaliatory strikes and timing had been set. Putin supposedly mentioned this on a call to Trump two days before the Zelensky meeting in Florida; Yuri, a Kremlin aide, said Putin was shocked and outraged, and that it would influence Washington’s approach to working with Zelensky. Russians claim Trump was relieved that no Tomahawk missiles were provided to Ukraine. No US confirmation; Trump described the meeting with Putin as very productive, and discussions included the temporary ceasefire not being an option. Budanov had suggested it wouldn’t be the first assassination attempt on Putin, but the most consequential due to timing. The question posed: who is the target—Ukraine, Zelensky, Budanov—or a Russian false flag to justify attacks and derail negotiations. Speaker 1: Timelines. The attack allegedly began the night of the 28th and continued into the 29th. The Russians say it was an attack on one of Putin’s residences, described as terrorism. Putin hasn’t lived at his residences for three years, using the Kremlin instead, but this is not the first Ukrainian attempt to target Putin; there was a proposed attack when he flew into Kursk by helicopter. Russians are upset that this attack had no military objective, only potential assassination, and they know Putin wasn’t there. The Russians view it as real and plan to respond; Lavrov indicated that negotiations would be reexamined. Budanov claims Ukrainian intelligence has targeted Putin multiple times; the attack timing coincides with Zelensky in Florida, suggesting possible rifts or risk of undermining negotiations. The possibility of Western (American or British) intelligence involvement is raised, with speculation about CIA influence or European intelligence, particularly Britain’s MI6, given its Ukrainian roots. The question remains whether the attack was staged to derail negotiations or a genuine strike. Larry: If Ukraine did this, why would they? Ukraine might want to eliminate an obstacle to peace, though that could backfire; some argue Putin is more restrained than any immediate successor. If 91 drones were launched, Western intelligence would likely be involved, possibly undermining Trump’s approach. There is a sense of mixed messages from U.S. intelligence, with individuals like Susan Miller pushing claims of Russian interference that contradict other narratives. Zelensky stated no territory would be ceded as part of negotiations; Russia’s position is that Crimea, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk must be permanently part of the Russian Federation, elections must occur in Ukraine before negotiations, NATO must be out of Ukraine, and demilitarization is non-negotiable. Russia suggests there will be no 800,000-man army; these conditions are not open for negotiation. Russia may be willing to discuss numbers of troops for Ukraine, but not to concede core territorial goals. Speaker 0: If CIA or other elements were behind this, could it be to undermine Trump or push for a peace deal by pressuring Putin? Putin showed up in uniform with the military leadership, signaling a hard stance on land/territory, stating that negotiations should proceed without ceasing. Some argue this would trigger a stronger Russian push, while others see this as undermining Trump’s efforts. Trump and Zelensky had discussed a peace plan with 90-95% agreement, with a few thorny issues, possibly territorial. Trump characterized their call as productive; Russia reportedly agreed to support Ukraine postwar with discounted energy and resources. Lavrov’s rapid response to the attack and the potential retaliation would affect ongoing negotiations, which some view as already derailed due to Ukraine’s intransigence on concessions. Speaker 1: Could European intelligence be involved? Britain’s MI6 is seen as critical; there is a suggestion that British intelligence could have acted without American consultation. This would strain relations with Trump, especially after new security strategy. The transcript also notes a broader shift in Western posture: some European leaders are pushing for stronger defense and a more independent European stance, which might influence the dynamic around negotiations and intelligence actions. Speaker 0: Zelensky’s Christmas remark, “may he perish,” followed by an attack on Putin’s residence, prompts questions about who’s pulling Zelensky’s strings. Zelensky is described as the “highest paid actor in the world” with large sums allegedly pilfered from Ukraine’s aid; Zelensky could be expendable to those steering Ukraine’s direction. The meeting in Mar-a-Lago between Zelensky, Trump, and others occurred while the Putin residence attack was underway, suggesting an attempt to undermine negotiations. Budanov’s connection to the CIA and potential independent actions by Ukrainian intelligence raise further concerns about internal Ukrainian divisions. Speaker 1: Russia’s potential retaliation could target Ukrainian intelligence assets like the SBU headquarters in Kyiv, or European assets inside Ukraine if evidence points to Western involvement. Russia’s current military actions include continuing strikes on power infrastructure, with movements in Zaporizhzhia and around Kherson, indicating an axis of attack. Independently, Russia claims significant ground progress; Ukraine counters with claims of selective advances by Russia and a favorable propaganda edge for Ukraine. The battlefield metrics show Russia increasing manpower and maintaining multiple axes of attack, with eight or more fronts, while Ukrainian recoveries of bodies show a ratio suggesting heavy Ukrainian losses. Speaker 0: The conversation ends with expectations for retaliation, possible new European involvement, and the enduring fear that negotiations remain unsettled. The next days could reveal more about who is behind the attack, how Russia responds, and whether a path to peace remains possible, given the conflicting narratives and competing strategic interests.

BlackRock and Chase are involved in a $400 billion contract to rebuild Ukraine. The speaker questions the situation, expressing confusion and disbelief, but clarifies that they are not a conspiracy theorist.

"Ukrainian actor Volodymyr Zelenskyy has achieved fame portraying a president in this TV show, which is broadcast on a channel owned by a man backing his real life presidential campaign." "Billionaire Ihor Kolomoisky has provided security, lawyers, and vehicles for Zelensky." "His bodyguard accompanied Zelensky on the campaign trail." "The car Zelensky uses belongs to a company owned by one of Kolomoyski's companies." "Kolomoyski's lawyer is now working for Zelensky's campaign." "Kolomoyski is an arch foe of Poroshenko and one of the richest men in Ukraine with holdings in the metal, petroleum, and media sectors." "In 2016, Polushenko's government seized control of Privet Bank, claiming that billions of dollars were embezzled from it." "Kolomoyski denies any wrongdoing and is fighting in court to get Privet Bank back."

I'm Zelensky, or rather, the manufactured political figure you know as Zelensky. My career began when Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who owns One plus one Media, hired me, an actor with no political experience, to play the president on TV. The show, Servant of the People, gained huge popularity, and Kolomoisky then created a political party with the same name, positioning me as the candidate. Kolomoisky's influence extends further. He also financed Hunter Biden, paying him handsomely to sit on the board of Burisma. So, in a way, Hunter and I are financially linked through Kolomoisky. The West's concern over Ukraine stems from the fact that Ukraine has been used as a piggy bank for unsavory dealings. Western politicians have exploited Ukraine, contributing to its economic struggles. They fear the truth about these dealings will come to light.

I'm Zelensky, and my political career was manufactured by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski. He owns OnePlusOne Media, which financed the TV show *Servant of the People*, where I played the president. The show was popular and Kolomoyski then created a political party with the same name, and I became their candidate, despite having no political experience. Kolomoyski's financial support has made me a billionaire. He also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to sit on the board of Burisma, which Kolomoyski controls. Ukraine has been used as a piggy bank by unsavory people in the Washington establishment, leading to corruption and exploitation that have made it one of the poorest countries in Europe. The West is terrified the truth about Ukraine will come out, exposing their secrets and corrupt dealings.

One name to watch is Victoria Nuland, who has a lot at stake regarding Ukraine, which I believe is one big money laundering operation. What Elon Musk has revealed is only the outflow of dollars. The full cycle of funding—where the money goes in Europe and how it flows back into the pockets of people in the United States—has yet to be demonstrated, but I am aware of it. I believe Trump and Elon will discover that people like Victoria Nuland will feel the pain as they are at the center of this. Zelensky is an actor with a great relationship with Putin. In the coming weeks or months, we will discover things about Zelensky that will upset the American people regarding money flowing back into the US and into the pockets of people in Washington DC. It will be ugly and involve the entire establishment.

Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is a manufactured political figure created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who owns one plus one Media. They financed and produced the TV show "Servant of the People," hiring Zelensky, an actor with no political experience, to play the president. The show gained huge popularity. Kolomoisky then created a party with the same name and made Zelensky the candidate. Kolomoisky also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month via Burisma, which Kolomoisky controls. So, Zelensky and Hunter Biden are bankrolled by the same guy, Kolomoisky. The West is so invested because Ukraine has become a piggy bank for the unsavory in the Washington establishment, financially raping it. They are terrified that their secrets will come out.

This war never should have happened. Russia tried to settle with terms beneficial to Ukraine and us, mainly keeping NATO out. Military contractors want new NATO countries because it forces them to buy weapons from specific companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed, creating a trapped market. We've committed billions to Ukraine, money that could have housed every homeless person in the US. Mitch McConnell admitted this money largely goes to American defense manufacturers, essentially a money laundering scheme. BlackRock owns these companies. The "loan" to Ukraine will never be repaid. The conditions include extreme austerity and the sale of government-owned assets, including its valuable agricultural land, to multinational corporations like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, which are also owned by BlackRock. BlackRock even got the contract to rebuild Ukraine. They're doing this openly because they keep us divided and fighting each other.

The Ukrainian President, Zelensky, owns properties in Miami, Israel, Italy, London, Georgia, and Crimea. His real estate holdings include a villa in Tuscany, a house in Israel, an apartment in London, and multiple apartments in Georgia. However, his penthouse in Crimea, purchased before Russian control, could pose political risks. Zelensky's total real estate assets are extensive, but he has not transferred them to his children. This has led to criticism of his perceived stinginess and greed.

Shahzad Nasir shares an interesting discovery about two Ukrainian brothers, Boris and Serhey Shafir, who own luxurious yachts worth millions of dollars. The yachts were purchased from Italian manufacturers and are believed to be proxies for President Zelensky. A leaked document reveals Zelensky's ownership in a shell company, which he later transferred to Serhey. The My Legacy Yacht was even referred to as Zelensky's yacht during its signing. As a government employee, Serhey Shafir couldn't afford such purchases, but with the US providing large sums of money to Ukraine, it's possible for Zelensky to embezzle funds and have his trusted friend buy the yachts on his behalf.

A BlackRock recruiter, Serge Barlett, claims financial institutions buy politicians, stating senators can be bought for as little as $10. He says it's not the president who controls things, but hedge funds and banks. According to Barlett, war, specifically the Russia-Ukraine war, is "good for business" because volatility creates opportunities for profit. He notes that BlackRock manages $20 trillion. Barlett describes himself as a "gatekeeper" at BlackRock who decides people's fates. He explains that BlackRock acquires and diversifies, reinvesting profits to exponentially grow wealth and eventually "buy people." He also says the US government relies on BlackRock.

The transcript outlines a string of alleged connections between Jeffrey Epstein, Ukraine, and Zelensky, tied to broader themes of modeling, trafficking, and political upheaval. It states that Epstein’s newly released files reference two Kyiv-based modeling agencies described as the best in Kyiv and as providers of cheap escorts, with one contact suggesting access to around 400 girls. The files also document travel routes from New York to Kyiv, arranged apartments, extended stays, and logistics, along with real estate dealings including a 2017 discussion of a mansion purchase in Lviv and large money transfers tied to the deal. A key claim is that Epstein was prepared to take advantage of Ukraine’s upheaval. An email from 2013, before Ukraine’s CIA-facilitated government change, purportedly shows Epstein writing to the head of the Rothschild banking group that “Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities. Many.” The transcript claims the emails indicate Epstein worked directly with the Rothschilds on capitalizing on the chaos in Ukraine, and asserts that Rothschild-linked interests moved into Ukraine after the 2014 upheaval to acquire assets in land, energy, and infrastructure. It also mentions the transfer of major financial assets during Petro Poroshenko’s presidency, with an assertion that oligarchs “simply changed hands.” The narrative then moves to 2019, noting Poroshenko’s ouster and Zelensky’s rise. Epstein allegedly wrote to a Ukrainian-born woman urging her to study Ukrainian politics, Zelensky, corruption, and parliament, adding, “it is funny, but sophisticated corruption. Huge amounts of money will be made. I’d like to see you as a female oligarch.” The transcript claims Epstein and Zelensky had lunch together multiple times. It also asserts Zelensky was accused of being complicit in human trafficking in Ukraine, citing a redacted email that reportedly states Zelensky “allowed modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel to traffic girls out of the country.” Jean Luc Brunel is described as someone Epstein used to traffic girls; he was found dead in a prison cell in 2022 while under investigation for rape of minors, sexual exploitation, and trafficking. A further twist claims Zelensky invited performance artist Marina Abramovic, a central figure in the original Pizzagate narrative, to serve as Ukraine’s ambassador in September 2023, to help rebuild schools and support children affected by the war. Abramovic is described as Serbian, not Ukrainian, and her art is noted for themes involving ritual blood and cannibalistic imagery. The transcript suggests Abramovic’s involvement as ambassador raises questions given her association with Pizzagate figures from the Podesta emails. Overall, the content asserts that several names linked to Epstein and Pizzagate appear in connection with Zelensky and Ukraine, including claims Zelensky’s regime and associates are involved in trafficking and corruption, while noting Abramovic’s ambassadorial role and historical links to the Pizzagate narrative.

Zelensky is 'the cokehead of Kyiv' and 'a manufactured political figure' created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, owner of OnePlusOne Media, which financed and produced 'Servant of the People.' 'Servant of the People' hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, to play the role of the President. Kolomoyski created a party called 'Servant of the People' and financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire; 'he's the finger puppet of Kolomsky.' Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month on Burisma's Board of Directors in 2014. 'Hunter Biden' and Zelensky are 'spiritual cousins' bankrolled by the same guy. The laptop mentions a 10% kickback to 'the old man.' The White House is freaking out over Ukraine; Westerners exploited Ukraine; Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

Le trafic de drogue est lié au blanchiment d'argent. Les gains illégaux sont transférés par des experts financiers vers des paradis fiscaux. La BCCI, une banque internationale, a été créée sans apport de capitaux. Elle avait des sièges au Luxembourg et aux îles Caïmans, connus pour le trafic de cocaïne. Les autorités locales ne contrôlaient pas les échanges d'argent. La BCCI a été financée de manière complexe entre ses entités au Luxembourg et aux îles Caïmans, permettant ainsi son lancement. Translation: Drug trafficking is linked to money laundering. Illegal gains are transferred to tax havens by financial experts. The BCCI, an international bank, was created without capital contribution. It had offices in Luxembourg and the Cayman Islands, known for cocaine trafficking. Local authorities did not control money exchanges. The BCCI was funded in a complex way between its entities in Luxembourg and the Cayman Islands, enabling its launch.