TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The three largest asset managers in the world, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, control over $20 trillion of people's money without their knowledge. These firms are major shareholders in companies like Microsoft, Apple, Disney, Pepsi, and Coca Cola. This lack of competition is concerning because when both sides of the competition are controlled by the same actors, it undermines the idea of a free market economy. The reason behind this control is that institutions like CalPERS and New York State Pension Fund, which are government actors, demand that these asset managers adopt certain racial and gender ideologies and vote shares accordingly in order to manage their money. This requirement extends beyond just California's money.

Bud Light did not want to lose money by putting Dylan Mulvaney's face on a beer can. The Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index ties visibility activism to ESG scores, which are criticized for being corrupt and pushing agendas to destroy America.

The speaker will use their 17 years of experience at T-Mobile to illustrate how corporate America has turned against the American people. While many news sources cover Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), the speaker aims to show how these initiatives have personally impacted their career. The speaker is passionate about exposing the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum. They claim that these entities are significantly influencing the future of individuals and their children, even more so than American politicians.

Many companies are embracing woke issues due to the Corporate Equality Index (CEI), a score created by the HRC. The HRC pressures companies to follow woke demands or risk a low CEI score, leading to backlash from woke investors and activists. The HRC is funded by George Soros' Open Society Foundation. This scoring system extends to states, municipalities, and schools, influencing behavior and investments. This control over digital money and actions is seen as a form of mind control.

BlackRock, founded in 1988 by Larry Fink, rose to dominance after the 2008 financial crisis, advising entities like AIG and the Federal Reserve. Fink, who previously created the subprime mortgage market, was seen as a savior during the crisis. BlackRock executives have since moved into government positions, influencing policy. In 2019, BlackRock proposed a "going direct" monetary policy, bypassing traditional interest rate channels. This plan was implemented shortly after, with central banks injecting money directly into the economy. BlackRock also managed bailout programs, benefiting its own iShares ETFs. BlackRock's Aladdin software, used by numerous institutions, manages trillions in assets. The company is increasingly using AI and algorithms for investment decisions. Fink's annual letters to CEOs push the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) agenda, influencing corporate behavior. BlackRock is leveraging its power to shape the corporate world and promote digital currencies. Some US states are divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG agenda. While protests have occurred, they often focus on greenwashing rather than the broader agenda. The question remains: who owns BlackRock?

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.

BlackRock is under investigation for investing $429 million into the Chinese military. The US government has initiated a full-scale investigation, but allegedly knew about BlackRock's business dealings prior to informing the public. Nine out of ten congresspeople trading BlackRock stock were reportedly selling it. Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna allegedly sold $130,000 worth of this stock months before the investigation.

Three initiatives from the World Economic Forum—CEI, ESG, and DEI—are driving corporations to adopt policies that may harm their businesses. These companies rely heavily on funding tied to these initiatives, leaving them no choice but to comply, even as they risk alienating their customer base. The executives making these decisions are often disconnected from the brand's roots and the values of the American public. This situation is seen as part of a broader strategy to undermine American identity and create a divide between the rich and the poor. As a result, hardworking Americans suffer the consequences, while those at the top remain insulated from the fallout. The push for these initiatives is perceived as a deliberate effort to weaken iconic American brands and foster a lower class system.

Major asset managers like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have been using their clients' money to influence companies' decisions. For instance, Apple was pressured into adopting a racial equity audit when a majority of its shareholders voted for it. Similarly, Chevron had to change its policies on emissions after these asset managers voted in favor of a emissions cap. While reducing emissions and promoting diversity in the boardroom may have merit, it is questionable to impose these agendas on companies that may not have wanted them. The primary responsibility of asset managers and corporate boards should be to prioritize the financial interests of their clients and shareholders.

As president, I banned Wall Street and employers from investing retirement accounts in ESG for political reasons. These poorly performing woke financial scams are radical left garbage. Biden gutted my rule, allowing fund managers to play politics with seniors' savings. He's using your money to fund left-wing causes. Your 401(k)s are crashing, pensions and retirement accounts are going down. I will sign an executive order and a law to keep politics away from retirement accounts. Funds should invest to help you, not the radical left. I will protect our seniors from the woke left. They destroy countries. Thank you.

As president, I banned Wall Street and employers from investing retirement accounts in ESG for political reasons. These woke financial scams are radical left garbage that would never be funded on their own. Biden gutted my rule, allowing fund managers to play politics with seniors' savings. 401(k)s and retirement accounts are plummeting due to radicalism and incompetence. Biden is using your money to fund left-wing causes. I will sign an executive order and work with Congress to keep politics away from retirement accounts. I will demand funds invest your money to help you, not the radical left. I will protect seniors from the woke left.

Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock have significant influence in various industries, including defense contracts, Hollywood, and pharmaceuticals. These companies hold a monopoly-like control over 88% of the companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone has assets under management worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. They have the power to shape people's lives, replace CEOs, and buy politicians. The military-industrial complex is a major concern, as defense contractors profit from wars. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives are seen as a means of control rather than just making money. The goal seems to be about acquiring power and control rather than accumulating more wealth.

The three largest shareholders of 88% of S&P 500 companies are BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. These companies hold significant power and influence over CEOs, who must answer their calls and hire according to their preferences. The same goes for companies in the Department of Defense, where State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock are three out of the top four shareholders in most of these companies. This suggests that the CEOs of these investment firms hold more power than we may realize, making them the de facto commanders in chief.

BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street lost a major court ruling in Texas, where a federal judge agreed they can be sued for allegedly forming an investment cartel to control US energy markets. The lawsuit claims they bought coal companies to shut them down, forcing green energy initiatives and raising prices through ESG policies. These companies also allegedly have influence in Delaware. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street own Tyler Technologies, which is behind corrupt reassessments, and are major shareholders in Amazon and Costco, who received tax decreases. They indirectly own Delmarva Power through Exelon, and power bills are rising due to ESG policies. They also own Ryan Homes indirectly through NVR Homes, buying residential and farmland for developments. Additionally, they have major ownership in Chesapeake Utilities, impacting overdevelopment, utility monopolies, and artesian water. The speaker alleges a profit scheme involving politicians and urges viewers to research these claims.

BlackRock, the world's largest alternative investment firm, has gained significant power and influence over the global economy. Founded in 1988, BlackRock has grown to manage over $21 trillion in assets, making it a major player in the financial world. The company's proprietary software, Aladdin, is used by over 200 institutions to analyze risk and manage portfolios. BlackRock has also embraced the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) agenda, pushing for sustainable investing and decarbonization. However, there are concerns about BlackRock's influence and its potential to shape the course of civilization. Some state governments have even started divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG practices.

The conversation centers on a perceived collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level, framing a looming “great reset” as a plan to control money, freedom of movement, and human existence. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones is described as opening a door to a topic mainstream outlets avoid, with the question posed: how much time remains before the great reset becomes reality? Key claims and points discussed: - The global elite, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum, are portrayed as deciding in the last few years to “deal with monetary debt worldwide” through inflation, affecting corporate, governmental, and individual debt, with Trump’s stance described as accepting inflation alongside expansion of goods. - The Great Reset is depicted as a plan by leftist UN, WEF elements to implement post-industrial, carbon tax policies that will yield stagflation (high inflation with ongoing recession), described as a “perfect storm of hell on earth.” - The globalists allegedly want to create a worldwide system of “more manageable slaves” by breaking down borders, lowering all levels of economic status, and establishing small and rural city-states (reminiscent of a Hunger Games scenario) while tech and medicine are centralized above a devalued population; this is presented as the official policy for 2030. - Depopulation and resource restriction are asserted as deliberate strategies to crash the world economy, enable bank loans to fund a new cashless system, and implement a social credit system. Carbon lockdowns and 15-minute cities are described as tools for totalitarian control. - The UN’s and globalists’ aim is claimed to be feudalism or neo-feudal capitalism, a system where a few elites retain rights while others are stripped of them, an economic model presented as the oldest form of government being revived. - Elon Musk is cited as recognizing the existential threat, and the importance of mobilizing political and legislative action is emphasized. - The dialogue highlights high-level influence over policy, including John Kerry’s statements on cutting global farming, and the actions of global financial players like BlackRock. The depiction is that BlackRock’s influence over investment and ESG policies is being challenged by state-level pushback. - Recent legal and political countermeasures are noted: attorney generals winning cases in Texas and elsewhere against BlackRock’s climate and fossil-fuel initiatives; states pulling pension funds from BlackRock; public admissions from Larry Fink and shifts away from certain ESG directives in some regions. - The overarching narrative asserts that the aim is to demoralize free Western societies, to consolidate global power, and to ensure there is nowhere for free societies to escape to, thereby reinforcing a globalist control structure. Overall, the discussion portrays a globalist scheme involving monetary manipulation, demographic and political restructuring, and technological and legal controls intended to establish a new world order, with mainstream opposition framed as insufficient and the West needing to resist to preserve freedom.

Speaker 0 contends that concerns over rising power bills due to AI data centers are about to worsen as BlackRock and Blackstone buy up local power utilities. The piece, attributed to The New American, claims globalist equity firms are acquiring local energy companies nationwide to support AI infrastructure, provoking pushback from ratepayers and regulators. The Associated Press is cited as reporting that private equity giants are purchasing utilities to power AI-driven data centers, raising ratepayer and regulator concerns, with Oregon Citizens Utility Board noting increased public discussion at Public Utility Commissions. Speaker 0 notes a widespread anxiety about electricity costs tied to aging and expanding power infrastructure, including lines, poles, transformers, and generators, as utilities harden for extreme weather. The narrative asserts that apart from general cost increases, the core issue is the AI race, and that large international asset firms are eager to back a technology with potential for surveillance, manipulation, and control, while also seeking strong returns on investment. It claims these firms have historically used monetary power to push corporate support for climate alarmism and transgender activism, and that BlackRock and Blackstone together controlled more than $13 trillion in assets (BlackRock about $12 trillion; Blackstone about $1.2 trillion). It states only the U.S. and China have GDPs larger than $13 trillion. Concrete buyouts and investments are listed: January 2024, Blackstone bought a 20% stake in Northern Indiana Public Service Company for $2.1 billion, with the utility planning to boost green energy production afterward. In January 2025, Blackstone outright bought Potomac Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Loudoun County, Virginia, for $1 billion, described as Blackstone’s most recent investment in power infrastructure for AI. In March 2025, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission approved the buyout of Superior Water, Light, and Power by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners, with BlackRock taking a 60% majority stake. A separate deal: Blackstone bought Hilltop Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Pennsylvania, for $1 billion, with executives Bilal Khan and Mark Zhu describing the acquisition as AI-focused. Blackstone is also seeking regulatory permission to buy Albuquerque-based Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas New Mexico PowerCo, while BlackRock and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s attempted purchase of Minnesota Power faces regulatory turbulence; a Minnesota sale could determine how such firms expand in a sector linking households, data centers, and power sources. Speaker 0 adds that the rise of AI is providing these firms with an “excuse” to control infrastructure, and mentions Yuval Noah Harari and the WEF. It cites the WEF’s “you will own nothing” rhetoric and notes Harari’s hypothetical about future irrelevance, Neuralink, and a broader agenda including surveillance, ownership consolidation, and potential reductions in access to private property. It asserts Larry Fink of BlackRock is at the WEF and CFR, and that BlackRock’s broader investments include real estate, farmland, timberland, and single-family rental homes, as part of a “build to rent” scheme. The piece warns that one corporation controlling vast natural resources and power utilities amid rising prices would be disastrous, urging citizens to resist BlackRock’s influence. It contrasts China’s influence with BlackRock’s power, condemning ESG models and the World Economic Forum’s agenda toward a “great reset,” digital currency, digital ID, and reduced access to resources. Speaker 1 interjects with a separate 1999 statement about how genetic engineering will change us and implies a need to start conversations now, arguing that one direction relinquishes power to others while the other empowers individuals to fix themselves. Speaker 0 reiterates that the conversation centers on power, AI, and control, warning against allowing a single corporation to own essential resources. The closing note references the January 1999 statement on genetic engineering, while Speaker 1 emphasizes taking personal power to fix oneself, framing the discussion as a shift in responsibility.

Speaker 0: Date. We sometimes at the Council for Inclusive Capitalism call it a race to the top. We should invest in and work for companies that are taking care of people and planet. That's the way I would Speaker 1: answer will replace ESG. Right? Because all of this needs to be measurable, describable, and tangible for investors to find a way to invest in. So if if you dustbin ESG Right. For all the bad will that it has earned over the last couple of years, something else will take its place. Is there a concept or an idea that you think could improve or actually deliver what ESG was meant to but didn't? Speaker 0: I think it's vital that we deliver what ESG was meant to deliver. And ESG as a term was created almost by accident by the United Nations in a speech in 2005. And then it took on its huge life of its own and assullied itself in the in, you know, in the process. So

The goal of ESG is to assess a corporation's long-term viability based on environmental, social, and governance policies. Started in 2003, ESG aims to direct passive investments towards impact investing in socially responsible companies. However, corruption exists, leading to manipulation of ESG scores for personal gain. ESG has evolved into a tool for control and social credit system for corporations, as mentioned by Larry Fink. The original intention to save the environment has shifted towards influencing corporate behavior through financial incentives.

ESG funding in gaming and Hollywood is discussed, noting tax breaks and strings attached to funding. Studios seek external funding to spread risk, with ESG boosting scores for access to funds. Despite rebranding, ESG influence remains, impacting game development. The reliance on ESG creates a financial trap, necessitating a focus on creating quality games. The decline of expensive Hollywood films is also predicted.

Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.

BlackRock, the world's largest alternative investment firm, has gained significant power and influence over the global economy. Founded in 1988, BlackRock has grown to manage over $21 trillion in assets and has become a major shareholder in numerous major corporations. The company's proprietary software, Aladdin, plays a crucial role in managing and analyzing investments. BlackRock has also embraced the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda, using its influence to push for sustainable investing and climate-related initiatives. However, there is growing public awareness and concern about BlackRock's control and influence, leading to protests and divestment efforts by some state governments. The future impact of BlackRock's power and agenda remains uncertain.