reSee.it - Related Video Feed

She’s stopping, and the computer won’t record. We have a license plate; it’s from Pennsylvania, but the mail is from New Jersey. I might need to borrow one from you. She mentioned that at 4:23, he was approaching her while she was walking towards the sushi building. The timestamp could be useful.

Speaker 0 describes a scenario involving mister Ballard and Julie, described as a high-end escort. They were not going to a hot tub but to a pool at a very nice hotel, the Ritz Carlton. It was a public indoor, heated pool with many other guests present. Ballard had Julie at the pool alone in a public setting and was trying to get her to disclose information. She indicated she was willing, but there were cameras and they were out in public, so she was hesitant. They then allegedly moved toward going up to a bedroom. There were three rooms, two normal, though Speaker 1 questions whether this was part of a 30 list. There is mention of semen, with Speaker 0 confirming that the semen was involved in the discussion, and Speaker 1 noting that it was in the same skirt with the semen located somewhere else. Speaker 0 clarifies that test results for the skirt or the semen had not been provided, but there was one incident where it could have and probably did occur. Speaker 0 continues by saying Ballard called Matt Cooper, who is present in the discussion, and asked for a little time alone with Julie in the room. Julie says they voluntarily vacated the room and let Ballard go up because it was part of their plan. They did not object to him going up, as it was part of the arrangement to extract information. Speaker 1 indicates they are following along, and Speaker 0 notes that what Julie says contains both truth and untruth. Page 11 of Julie’s account is referenced, wherein it is stated that Ballard takes Julie up to the room and gets information from her, which she concedes. However, she then wants to have sex; the overall goal of the couple’s ruse was to avoid sexual contact. Ballard is described as very loyal to his wife and family, and the contrast is drawn with his actions. Speaker 0 adds that the situation was exacerbated by Ballard’s skirt, as it was involved when he was in Julie’s room, using her skirt to facilitate the act, and that this was the excuse he used with the prostitute.

Two civilians attended to, one laying down with a book bag next to him. They were spotted in the next building over. The speaker tried to locate them but faced difficulties due to obstacles. They were cautious as the civilians could come down on them. Despite challenges, they continued to search for the individuals. The speaker requested assistance from Jesse multiple times.

We're facing north, over here. Are you the team in the broken window, left floor? We're on the left floor, but we don't have a broken window. Okay, copy that. There appears to be movement in another room with a broken window, also on the left floor of the north end. Unsure if the movement is just the curtains; working on getting a clearer view.

Speaker 0 introduced the topic of cell phone tracking and forensic geofencing data, noting that the same tracking methods used in January 6 were capable of determining whether someone went onto the steps or onto the lawn, and where they were exactly. The question was what findings exist regarding this data in the current case. Speaker 1 answered that the investigation will reveal with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages involving many questions were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, and whether Lance Twigg was in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main point is addressing how he could have known certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school. It is stated that it would be unlikely to have planned a murder from Google Maps, and that the authorities will determine this from the cell phone pathway—whether he went the day before or weeks before, and tracking all of that. Speaker 1 relayed information from forensic expert Joseph Scott Morgan, who claimed they would be able to track Tyler Robinson from 8 Hundredth Street through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs to the roof, from the roof to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, and run into the woods. The speaker also mentioned conspiracy videos suggesting he was seen on a café security system; although the footage is limited, it exists, and some claim the FBI tracked him to that location. The next morning, at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, it is claimed he swiped a credit card, and the phone was followed to his home, to visits with Lance, and to his parents. All calls, texts, and other phone activity are said to be known. Speaker 1 summarized that the forensic expert states that next to the gun, the cell phone data will be the element that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day. The response also notes skepticism about trust in the FBI, but emphasizes that geotracking will demonstrate the phone’s location during the day in question.

I have an iPhone. Does Google track my movement if I move to sit with my democrat friends? Google knows if I move, but it depends on the services I've opted into. Can you answer if Google knows I moved without more details?

Where is he? He’s straight up. We have two civilians with him. Jackie, where did you pick me up? He was on the left side. We need to get them out of here. Yo, Blasto, get some fish. He’s on our neck building over, near the gap. She has glasses and long hair. I found the wall and pulled my head in front of him. He’s laying down with a book bag next to him. Give me a hard line over here. Watch out; he can come right down on you. If you have eyes on him, give me a ladder. He was on top of the left building. I jumped up by the yellow crane. It’s very hairy on the left side. There’s a gap between you and him.

Speaker 0 says the person shows back up in his neighborhood after the shooting. It shows him in a field, because they believe he probably popped up over there, came up the hill from where they feel the gun was dropped. He ran up there, over the hill, and then ran down that dirt path, and that’s where they see...

He sent out pictures of the suspect with glasses on. Our sniper saw him walking away from his bike. The person who physically witnessed this called it out and sent the pictures. There are multiple people detained, including a guy mentioned by someone on the scene.

Speaker 0: So there's somebody on the roof over there. He just ran from over there, ran in. And now he's right there.

Speaker 0 asks Michelle if she wants to move to the lower roof for comfort. Speaker 1 is looking for gas meters, suspecting someone has a device. Speaker 0 says the CR units were under the water tower. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 is aware of any gas meters seen while coming through. Speaker 0 mentions a bike with a book bag on the west side of the building that will be checked.

Speaker 0 instructs others to 'stay stay back and back to the grass as much as possible.' He states, 'I the guy who was arrested, got a photo of him.' The exchange ends with 'Yeah.'

The person sent out pictures of a man with glasses and a bike. Our sniper saw the man walking away. The person who saw this called it out and we have someone detained. Many people were detained, including a man mentioned by another person.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found forensics in a database. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. The speaker claims Christy previously tweeted about letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions a law proposal.

The discussion centers on forensic cell phone tracking and geofencing data, the same methods that were used to track individuals in January 6 cases, including whether someone went onto the steps, onto the lawn, or exactly where they were. The speakers indicate that investigators can determine an individual’s precise movements and locations through cell phone data. The key point is that in this case, it will become clear whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, and whether the text messages that have raised questions—whether those messages were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg—place Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main outcome anticipated is clarity about Robinson’s location, but importantly, the discussion emphasizes the ability to reconstruct movements and associations from cell phone data. The speakers note that people are asking how Robinson could have known about certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school, and they argue that Google Maps alone would not explain this. They assert that the path of his cell phone—whether he went the day before or weeks before—will be accessible, allowing investigators to track his movements comprehensively. A forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, is cited as saying they would be able to trace his movement from 8 Hundredth Street, down through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, where the shot was taken, and then to him running into the woods. The conversation also references conspiracy videos claiming to see him on a cafe’s security system—claiming his car is visible—arguing that this is not necessarily inconsistent with a murderer’s behavior, since a killer could be in a car while amped up on adrenaline. The speakers explain that the cafe owner could only review such surveillance if the FBI tracked him to that location; they discuss how geolocation and surveillance data would be used to corroborate movements, including how, the next morning at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, he swipes a credit card and the authorities follow his phone, tracking when he goes home, whether he visits Lance, and when he visits his parents, with a full trail of calls, texts, and movements. The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, emphasizes that aside from the gun, the cell phone data will be the key element tying Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day, addressing doubts about the FBI’s methods and reliability.

The speaker mentions having spoken with whistleblowers and an informant who provided valuable information. However, they express difficulty in locating the informant and hope that they are still available. The whistleblower is described as credible. When questioned about the informant's whereabouts, the speaker clarifies that they are hopeful of finding them. They explain that informants in the spy business tend to avoid being seen frequently or being in the public eye.

The speaker talks about their encounter with a criminal and their efforts to get information about two individuals named Martine and Leslie. The criminal admits to running a child sex hotel and reveals that the hotel only caters to boys aged 10 and younger. The speaker expresses interest in visiting the hotel but is denied access. They learn that the criminal had been a bartender at the hotel for two months in Ecuador. The speaker's team raids the criminal's house and finds his passport, confirming his connection to Ecuador. Through online investigation, they discover that Leslie, using his real name, was advertising a boutique hotel in Canoa, a village on the beach in Ecuador.

Speaker 0: Yeah. You think he'd already be in place? You would think that. So there's somebody on the roof over there. Just saying. He just ran from over where's my finger? Well, from over there, ran in. And now he's right there.

Speaker 0: 'So there's somebody on the roof over there.' 'He just ran from over there, ran in, and now he's right there.' 'You think he'd already be in place? You would think that.' 'Just saying.'

A man signed into a location using the name Peter Bergmann, spelled with two n's, which is common for Austrian nationals. He provided an address in Wehn, Austria, but did not offer any identification. Austrian police inquiries revealed that the address he provided does not exist.

Speaker 0 notes movement and placement: "Can ride up." "Yeah." "You think he'd already be in place?" "You would think that." "So there's somebody on the roof over there." "Just saying." "He just ran from over where's my finger?" "Well, from over there, ran in." "And now he's right there." "Just saying."

The speaker mentions having spoken with whistleblowers and an informant who provided valuable information. However, they express difficulty in locating the informant at present. The whistleblower is considered credible and has knowledge of the informant. It is hoped that the informant can be found, but it is noted that informants in the spy business tend to avoid being seen or attracting attention.

A data broker, Near Intelligence, with ties to US Defense Contractors, tracked cell phones of visitors to Jeffrey Epstein's island over a three-year period. We found that Near Intelligence left this data exposed online. The maps generated show visitors' movements, potentially leading back to their homes and workplaces. The data reveals visitors came from over 166 locations in the US and abroad. Near Intelligence sources data from advertising exchanges. Before a targeted ad appears, your phone sends data, including location, to ad exchanges. Near Intelligence siphons this data, repackages, analyzes, and sells it. Despite its intended use for advertising, Near Intelligence has provided this data to the US military. Anyone with a phone can be tracked. To protect your privacy, use trusted apps, turn off location services, use ad blockers, and use VPNs that filter out advertising technology.

I informed the social security office about the suspicious person. I mentioned it at the meeting. The student may have seen or been with him.

The investigation centers on Thomas Escato, a current Secret Service agent on the vice president JD Vance’s security detail, who was exposed by undercover journalists from O’Keefe Media Group. The reporters met Escato via Tinder in October 2025 and documented that he was a holdover from the Biden administration, originally tasked with protecting Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff. He is described as involved in protecting the vice president’s transportation, residence surveillance, and even Vance’s wife and children. Key revelations include Escato sharing highly sensitive, real-time and historical security information with an undercover journalist who posed as a stranger. He discussed protective formations, shift-change times, and exact travel plans, including the routes and times for the vice president’s convoy, as well as the specific vehicles involved. He sent photos with location metadata revealing convoy locations from various international and domestic contexts, including Joint Base Andrews, Munich, King Khalid International Airport, JFK, and Abu Dhabi, among others. Metadata and photos indicated where the vice president’s convoy had been and the routes used, sometimes with dates months prior to disclosure. Escato provided ongoing updates on the vice president’s movements, including the time and place of the vice president’s flights, which plane would be used, and the journalist’s implication in following the movements. He sent a selfie from inside a venue associated with the vice president, and even images from inside the Naval Observatory, where the vice president’s residence is located. He also described the journalist’s ability to “follow” the vice president’s movements and the security details surrounding transport and protection. The exchange included intimate details about the vice president’s family logistics, such as transportation of Vance’s wife and mentions of the residence and school arrangements for his children, with a recurring theme of the idea that “we call them everywhere” and that “there’s a 24/7” aspect to the protection. Escato claimed knowledge of future travel plans, including a four- to five-day stay in Ohio and a one-night visit to Florida, and he described the existence of a “cover subpoena” related to counter-surveillance duties. Escato also disclosed personal political opinions: he voted for Biden, dislikes Trump, and opposes Vance’s immigration policies, including ICE-related concerns. He described his citizenship status (citizen since 2018) and stated his tenure as a Secret Service agent as five years. He asserted it is his First Amendment right to express opinions, while acknowledging the potential implications of his disclosures, noting that he “sign paperwork” and that if he doesn’t disclose information, “I never do. Otherwise, I get in trouble.” The reporting emphasizes that such behavior inside the Secret Service is troubling, especially given prior security lapses in 2024 that led to the head of the Secret Service resigning after an incident in Butler, Pennsylvania. The piece concludes by asserting the importance of protecting the vice president’s security, hoping the story prompts reforms and accountability, and inviting readers to share tips with O’Keefe Media Group.