reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Health Organization, led by controversial figure Tedros, faces criticism for its funding sources and potential power grab. Concerns arise over a new treaty granting WHO authority over global health emergencies, leading to fears of mandatory vaccination and loss of national sovereignty. Calls for defunding and withdrawal from WHO to prevent a move towards a centralized global government.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) of being a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans, including planning exercises, funding, creating rationales, and deploying and profiting from them. The speaker also alleges that the WHO has committed crimes such as genocide, racketeering, and terrorism. They provide examples of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials and the manipulation of the COVID-19 pandemic for profit. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal activities.

In 2016, the Gates Foundation genetically modified chickens for African families, despite their lack of interest. The chickens required special food and vaccinations, which raised concerns about sustainability. The Gates Foundation also funded the development of genetically modified mosquitoes, but the plan backfired when the modified mosquitoes bred with natural ones, resulting in a stronger mosquito population. The involvement of the US Army and the secrecy surrounding these projects raise questions about their true intentions. Additionally, the Gates Foundation's influence over the WHO and its director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has been criticized, especially considering Tedros' involvement in corruption scandals with the Clinton Foundation and the Global Fund.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been accused of being a criminal cartel that has manipulated public health for profit, leading to widespread harm. The speaker argues that the WHO's actions, including the handling of vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic, reflect a long history of deceit and exploitation. They assert that the organization was founded with the intent to commit crimes, using tactics that prioritize profit over public health. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize these actions as organized crime and calls for the dismantling of the WHO, rather than merely limiting its power. This is framed as a necessary step to address the alleged global terrorism and profiteering that has resulted from the WHO's operations.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

Dr. Tedros, the current head of the WHO, previously held positions in Ethiopia where he was accused of political persecution and withholding aid from certain ethnic groups. He has ties to a known terrorist organization and is seen as an ally by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite not being a medical physician, he was chosen by China to lead the WHO over five other candidates who were doctors.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They criticize the WHO's immunity from legal prosecution and highlight the financial ties between the organization and the Gates Foundation. The speaker also accuses the WHO and pharmaceutical companies of engaging in biological warfare and profiting from the pandemic. They call for the dismantling of the WHO.

Bill Gates is described as a top donor to the World Health Organization and as calling for virus war games every five years. The transcript claims Canada’s top bureaucrats have committed Canada to “captured” WHO rules that will make this happen, while saying the United States rejected the same power grab last year but Canada accepted it without asking. According to the transcript, nations that accept the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) “are signing over their power in health emergencies” to an unelected international organization that can order “lockdowns, travel restrictions, or any other measures it sees fit.” The transcript adds that the organization “doesn’t even need to declare an emergency,” and that “potential public health risks” are enough to initiate action. The transcript says Canada’s acceptance occurred earlier this month when Governor General Mary Simon authorized Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand to take the actions necessary for Canada to accept IHR amendments adopted in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 1, 2024. It states this was done “without parliamentary debate,” with “no public consultation,” via “an order in council,” while “Canadians are being left in the dark.” The transcript argues that giving the WHO this power should involve “a thorough public debate,” and says the arrangement is not an official treaty. It also claims the process “bypasses the US Senate,” which the transcript describes as playing a role in democratic oversight of major international commitments. The transcript further claims the IHR amendments use “extremely broad language” that gives the WHO unprecedented power. It says countries are required to establish “systems of risk communication” so the WHO can implement unified public messaging globally, describing this as enabling “narrative management and propaganda and censorship” based on what the transcript says was seen during COVID. It alleges the amendments were rushed through in Geneva at the annual World Health Assembly in May 2024 “without a vote,” with only a “loosely defined quorum.” The transcript states the WHO is led by Director General Tedros Gabriese (Tedros Ghebreyesus) and asserts that “pharmaceutical profiteering partners” like Bill Gates and his foundation are involved. It says Tedros praised China’s early pandemic actions and response and promoted the “safe and effective narrative,” and that the changes are characterized as about “cooperation and collaboration.” The transcript claims the IHR amendments “grease the wheels” for faster emergency declarations and more coordination with global actors, reducing Canada’s ability to refuse. It says Parliament “hasn’t even debated this,” provinces are “barely consulted,” and it asserts Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada emphasize global health security while the transcript questions who guards against “global overreach.” The transcript also claims the text confirms military-style virus war games as a core part of meeting IHR obligations, describing “recurring simulation war game exercises” as built into a regular global preparedness cycle. It says this normalizes top-down scenario planning that could shape policy and erode local discretion. The transcript concludes by stating that the next health crisis “won’t be managed from Ottawa” but instead “directed to you from Geneva.” It identifies the speaker as Tamara Ugolini for Rebel News and calls for sharing the information, demanding debate and transparency, and signing a petition at nopandemictreaty.com (nopandemictreaty dot com).

The World Health Organization (WHO) is claimed to be a criminal racketeering organization violating the Sherman and Clayton Acts due to interlocking directorates, racketeering, market domination, and market controls. Since 1953, the WHO has allegedly been a vaccine-promoting enterprise benefiting those with commercial interests in vaccines. The Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust funded the WHO's establishment, allegedly not for information sharing, but to force drugs onto countries, including the dumping of drugs from Germany, the UK, and the US. While monitoring health conditions globally is important, the speaker argues that a financially disinterested party should make these determinations. The claim is that those with a financial incentive to declare a pandemic will collect data to justify their existence. The speaker asserts that the same group of people from the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 established the World Health Organization in 1953 and are making these decisions.

Doctor Ted Ross is facing growing accusations of siding with China and supporting the Tigray rebels in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian military claims that he is backing the rebels by helping them procure arms and providing diplomatic support. The conflict in Ethiopia began when the Tigray People's Liberation Front refused to recognize the authority of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, leading to a civil war. Doctor Ted Ross, a Tigrayan and the director general of the World Health Organization, was previously accused of covering up cholera epidemics and of involvement in human rights abuses during his time as foreign minister. The conflict in Ethiopia has resulted in deaths and forced displacement, and if the accusations against doctor Ted Ross are true, it could further destabilize the region.

The Gates Foundation genetically modified chickens for African families, but the locals didn't want them. The chickens required special food and vaccinations, leading to a bird flu outbreak. Hendrix Genetics replaced the dead chickens. The Gates Foundation also funded the development of genetically modified mosquitoes to combat diseases like Zika and malaria, but the plan backfired as the mosquitoes became stronger. The collaboration between the Gates Foundation and the US army, as well as the involvement of Oxitec, raises questions about bioweapons and military tests. Bill Gates's influence extends to the WHO, with the organization heavily dependent on his funding. The director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has ties to the Clintons and was involved in corruption scandals.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

The speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal activities and use a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis but rather a genocide. They provide examples of unethical clinical trials and argue that the WHO has immunity from prosecution. Additionally, they criticize the Gates Foundation for exerting undue influence on the WHO through their donations. The speaker concludes by stating that the release of a biologically modified chimera was planned to sustain funding and profit.

A small group of conspirators has manipulated global health organizations for profit, leading to widespread harm. The World Health Organization (WHO) has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, prioritizing control and profit over public health. They employ a four-step process: planning, funding, creating rationale, and profiting from their actions. Evidence suggests that the WHO and its partners have engaged in unethical practices, including harmful vaccine trials. The funding structure, heavily reliant on the Gates Foundation, raises legal concerns. The narrative surrounding pandemics has been manipulated to instill fear and drive acceptance of vaccines. This situation is characterized as organized crime, requiring a reevaluation of the WHO's role and a call for its dismantlement rather than mere reform. The focus should be on addressing the criminal actions rather than debating public health measures.

The Gates Foundation was formed after Microsoft's antitrust violations settlement. It funneled money to the World Health Organization, influencing its actions. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board was created with members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and others. The WHO's funding is mostly from Gates, giving them control. This violates Swiss law. The agenda includes population control, with statements about reducing the global population through vaccinations.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is accused of being a criminal cartel due to their self-exemption from criminal prosecution in their founding document. This exemption raises questions about their behavior and motives, suggesting they may be aware of illegal activities within the organization.

The speaker expresses concern about the World Health Organization (WHO) and suggests that it would be better for humanity to sign an agreement with the Colombian Drug cartel instead. They accuse the WHO of lying during the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that they spread false information about the virus and the effectiveness of vaccines. The speaker believes that the WHO should be declared a terrorist organization and states that it is now more dangerous for humanity than the World Economic Forum.

The WHO's new treaty and amendments are causing concern as they could potentially seize governing powers during a pandemic. This unelected body, funded by billionaires, could dictate when people can leave their homes, wear masks, and receive mRNA shots. It is seen as undemocratic and not in the best interest of the people. The United States government proposed changes to the treaty, but most were withdrawn due to public outrage. However, the WHO continues to pursue their agenda, finding alternative methods to achieve their goals.

We are the top funder, but Bill Gates is also a big funder of the World Health Organization. Bill Gates and the Communist Chinese Party have significant influence, overshadowing the United States. A small group of elites, including Bill Gates, could pass a global pandemic treaty and make amendments without needing approval from all member nations. This power grab is unprecedented in human history and will drastically impact our future if not stopped. Pay attention and take action before it's too late.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The World Health Organization worsened global health during the pandemic by supporting coercive mandates for harmful pharmaceutical products. They have not apologized for the harm caused. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a major funder, profited from investments in COVID mRNA vaccines. We must resist and refuse to comply with these actions. Our voices must be heard to protect our rights. Thank you to everyone standing up with courage.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experiences to explain how he views the United Nations today. He says the UN was set up in 1945 with the simple purpose “to keep the peace,” but in his view it has become a platform for an oligarchic system that controls the organization and its agenda. He contends that the UN serves as a bridge for a world oligarchy, sharing the same agenda as the Davos/world economic forum, and that it operates in close alignment with actors like the World Economic Forum, Club of Rome, WWF, Greenpeace, and other NGOs. He argues that the UN’s structure and personnel are increasingly selected for political correctness and loyalty, with incentives such as high salaries and perks used to secure compliance, making it difficult for individuals to say no. Georgescu recounts his personal observations from field work in sustainable development programs, including his roles with the United Nations Development Programme and the International Involvement Programme for Europe. He distinguishes between the idealistic aims of the UN and the practical realities he encountered: while nature provides for human needs, he believes greed—driven by a small segment of society and the oligarchy—drives exploitation and control. He identifies natural resource exploitation as a major issue, citing Guinea Conakry as an example of immense richness that is often exploited by outsiders, with local leadership acting as employees of the oligarchy rather than as representatives of their people. He claims that discussions within UN meetings are manipulated and that the true outcomes usually favor increasing consumption and the interests of the oligarchs, rather than addressing genuine welfare. He notes that the UN’s connection to Davos and elite networks facilitates control over resources, leaders, and policies, and that many leaders are chosen or shaped to align with these interests rather than to serve their populations. The World Health Organization is described as another NGO that fits into this pattern, with him criticizing its governance and questioning how leaders like Tedros Ghebreyesus attained high positions without being elected by the people. Georgescu discusses the role of fear in governance, describing fear as the ultimate instrument of control and warning against narratives like climate change and pandemics that he claims are used to manipulate populations and expand oligarchic power. He asserts that fear and engineered crises enable the prescribing of policies and the extraction of wealth, while ordinary people are kept in a state of dependency and subservience through educational systems, consumer culture, and media. He recounts his own decision to leave the UN after experiences such as the Marshall Islands nuclear legacy, where he says US nuclear testing caused widespread ecological and health damage and was suppressed from reporting. He describes attempts to stop him from presenting his findings and the censure of his press conference, which reinforced his perception that the UN is under oligarchic control. Georgescu emphasizes the need for a “quality life” rooted in connection with nature rather than accumulation and manipulation by global institutions. He argues for personal sovereignty, direct engagement with nature, and conscious living as a political act. He calls for resistance—“say no, no consent”—to the UN’s agendas and the broader oligarchic system. He concludes that humanity should reconnect with nature, reject fear-based control, and redefine life beyond the constructs of political campaigns, NGOs, and transnational governance.

The Albanese government continues the previous administration's efforts to cede Australian sovereignty to the World Health Organization (WHO), despite a failed attempt. The WHO is heavily influenced by corporate donors, notably Bill Gates, who profits from the vaccines it promotes. The WHO's director, Tedros Ghebreyesus, has a controversial past linked to a terrorist organization in Ethiopia, where he faced accusations of complicity in suffering during cholera epidemics. Recent reports revealed a scandal involving WHO staff sexually exploiting women and girls during the Ebola outbreak in Congo, with at least 83 staff members involved. The organization failed to hold perpetrators accountable, claiming their actions did not violate policies. This leadership raises concerns about elevating the WHO's authority over Australian governance. One Nation opposes the WHO's power grab and advocates for the defense of Australian sovereignty.

The video discusses the controversial leadership of Tedros Ghebreyesus, the director general of the World Health Organization (WHO). It highlights accusations against Tedros for covering up health epidemics during his time as Ethiopia's health minister. Additionally, it mentions his involvement with the Tigray People's Liberation, a political group responsible for crimes against humanity. The video questions how Tedros secured the top position at the WHO, pointing to his connections with the Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, and the Communist Party of China. The transcript ends with a quote from Tedros about the consequences of not behaving.

The transcript contrasts “legend” that young Bill Gates built his computer empire out of his garage with “reality” that Gates was born into wealth and privilege. It says his grandfather and great grandfather were banking moguls, and that his father, William Gates senior, was a prominent Seattle-based lawyer and political lobbyist. It adds that Gates learned the “ins and outs” of law and politics and “how to manipulate those governing forces.” The transcript includes Bill Gates’ identity statement (“I’m Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft.”). It claims Gates dropped out of college to start Microsoft and is credited with inventing the operating system that became Windows, but says he “played no part” in Windows’ invention, stating that he bought an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products, had it modified, and licensed it to IBM “then licensed it to IBM,” while still taking credit. It also includes Paul Allen suffering from cancer while Gates allegedly “seized the opportunity” by attempting to cheat Allen out of his share of Microsoft’s fortune. A deposition excerpt describes Allen’s share being planned to be diluted “down to almost nothing.” The transcript says Gates’ business strategies came under fire in 1998 when the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations, and that Gates gave hours of videotape testimony during an eighteen-month trial. It then says that, “in a move to overshadow the negative press,” Gates invested $100,000,000 to set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, transforming his public image and leading to a doubling of his net worth and him being titled the richest man in the world. It includes a claim from Gates about vaccines producing “over a 20 to one return,” citing a Wall Street essay that calls vaccines “the best investment I’ve ever made.” The transcript describes the Gates Foundation expanding into a vertically integrated multinational organization and includes claims about controversy: it says critics ask whether the world’s largest private philanthropy is causing harm, alleging investments in “69 of the worst polluting companies” and other portfolio accusations including forcing people to lose their homes, child labor, defrauding, and neglecting patients, while stating the Foundation “has not provided details.” It also claims Gates is a top donor to the WHO and CDC and that “no one man” has more power than Gates to influence health and medical freedom. It then presents vaccine-and-policy statements and planning language: “Normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population,” “Until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk,” and “We need to produce it and to deploy it in every single corner of the world,” including full vaccination of children and pregnant women, syringes already bought, and military mobilization for rapid distribution. A historical section says Ronald Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986, granting total immunity to vaccine manufacturers, and that after a decade of lawsuits, vaccine makers were going bankrupt. It claims taxpayers would pay damages for adverse reactions. The transcript then asserts events in India: allegations about tribal girls being used as guinea pigs after HPV vaccine administration; it says caregivers were told they were being given “wellness shots” and some were misled that it would cure cancer, with seizures, cancer, and “seven girls” dying. It states India created a task force, studied the matter, and “kicked out the Gates Foundation,” while also saying the foundation denies having clinical trials. The transcript claims scientific findings about polio vaccine-related paralysis in India and says the story was buried by U.S.-based media and fact checkers, while pointing to an NIH.gov posting. It further asserts that without medical training, Bill and Melinda Gates founded the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization to vaccinate the world, and claims governments of some countries sued it for causing serious harm through experimental programs. Later, the transcript lists other alleged initiatives: a Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment to block out the sun, Earth Now’s global surveillance with hundreds of satellites, an “invisible certificate” vaccine/records concept using “quantum dot tattoo” scanning, genetically modified mosquito releases for malaria, and “flying syringes.” It also claims the New York Times reported connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, saying they met multiple times, traveled on Epstein’s plane, and were involved in cofounding a charitable fund. The transcript ends by posing a framing question about Gates being “either the most misunderstood man alive, or one of the most convincing con men,” and includes a closing personal sentiment from an unspecified speaker expressing a desire to believe Gates is doing good and unaware of damage.