reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"The world is watching, and this is one of the babies. Who is it? Carrie. I got Carrie here. I mean, they have an obligation in a civil society." "Right? We don't suffer. It's in humane once again. Absolutely." "And the reason for her injury is because of the drones flying around and distressing the noise." "Injured before the drones. She was injured during those two helicopters, broke all the rules, flying over here in the dark with articulated searchlights. That's when they started running." "They went through the fences. Not the fence." "We don't even know if any of them got out that day." "What was her signs of dehydration? Very dehydrated. Skin tender. While she's drinking." "I've been appointed as the farm vet. And so are you guys. Sorry for that."

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

Katie Hopkins filmed a solar panel farm construction site, calling it vandalism of the countryside and "Batshit Bonkers Britain." She stated the solar panels are future landfill and the plastic packaging isn't recyclable, criticizing the idea of Net Zero. Hopkins said the farm makes it harder for farmers to rent space. She claimed the same solar panels are being put up while "they want to dim the sun." Despite being asked to leave, she argued it's her countryside and she entered through an open gate. She told workers they shouldn't be "vandalizing" the countryside.

Farmers in Wilmot County, Canada, had 770 acres of farmland expropriated by the region of Waterloo for a battery plant. Expropriation means the government takes land with compensation, regardless of the owner's consent. Farmers planted crops, asserting their right to harvest them, but the government hired a company to destroy the crops weeks before harvest. The destroyed crops were valued at £2,800,000, or 2,500,000 boxes of cornflakes. The speaker claims this destruction of food is happening in a world where people are starving. They are concerned about the future and call for the public to share the video to stop this attack on farmland. The speaker concludes with "no farmers, no food, no future."

Speaker 0 asserts that Bill Gates is not a philanthropist because he “gives a little bit of money to take over entire sectors.” They say Gates works on seed, with the big seed banks described as the “CJR system.” The claim is that “he gives a million here, but he takes all the seeds of that system, the ICRISAT system.” They assert that all of the world’s seed banks are now controlled by Gates through this method. The summary continues: Gates “finances the Swalbat seed bank,” then “he creates patent systems.” He is said to develop and promote technologies for patenting, including gene editing technologies and digital sequence technologies, thereby controlling the seeds of the world. They claim Gates “destroys the international system that controls the country’s rights to their seed,” naming the Convention on Biological Diversity and the FAO treaty on seed. They say he “destroys and undercuts them so that all the seeds of the world are his seeds,” and that he can be the Newman Santo on a global scale. Later, it is asserted that Gates is “the biggest farmland owner of America.” The speaker contends Gates coined a term, “net zero,” and that Gates says climate problems can be solved by net zero. They insist it doesn’t mean emission reductions; rather, “we will con” [likely "we will con" is a fragment] and that we will absorb pollution via “offsets” on other people’s lands. The claim is that Gates “flies a private jet and has all the private jet services of the world.” They say he bought “all the land in America,” but he “wants our land for carbon offsets.” The overall assertion is that this is the climate strategy described as net zero, and that it constitutes a “land grabber” approach through carbon offsets.

Amelia introduces herself, saying she’s English and loves England. The other speaker responds with a set of personal preferences—fish and chips, a pint at the local pub, Shakespeare, Dickens, Tolkien, Lewis, Harry Potter, pork sausage, dogs, and fashion—and then declares “Haram. Haram,” followed by anti-immigrant and anti-Islamic statements. They express frustration that Brits are polite but unwilling to “commit cultural suicide,” condemning the Church of England and the BBC as “a bunch of queers and nonces.” They question how the country could move from Churchill to the current leadership, naming Sadiq Khan and London as not Afghanistan or Star Wars. They claim the government won’t protect schoolgirls from grooming gangs and that the police won’t help, accusing law enforcement of prioritizing other concerns, including confiscating garden tools and suppressing free speech. A police encounter is depicted where a woman is arrested for tweeting rudely. They insist curry is fine but argue Britain doesn’t need “2,000,000 Indians here” to cook it, and they assert there are “50 Islamic nations” and that Muslims don’t need to be on the island because they want to conquer it. They state the government dictates the way things must be, and ask if that’s right, addressed to “Robin Hood.” The speaker uses imagery of dragons threatening England, suggesting brave knights must rise to slay them, and questions whether British bloodlines with any bollocks were killed off in World Wars I and II. They declare English men’s country being taken from them, saying it doesn’t matter if you’re “Chav” or “posh”—everyone is in this together. They express concern about the future of the women of England—and imply that women in Iran and Afghanistan wouldn’t want this either. They reference ancestors who defeated the Spanish Armada, Napoleon, and the Nazis, implying resilience of English history. They ask if people can handle welfare tourists, asserting that history will record what actions are taken. The message ends with a call to “Get cracking, lads. Love, Amelia.”

The speaker discusses the opposition to farming practices in the Netherlands, which are blamed for climate change. They argue that it doesn't make sense to blame agriculture when it has been a successful industry for centuries. The speaker questions the proposed alternatives, such as wind turbines, solar panels, and synthetic foods, which they view as a manufactured and unnatural solution. They believe that these alternatives are not as beneficial for the environment as the cows grazing in the fields. The speaker concludes by stating that deep down, everyone knows that the opposition's claims are false.

The video documents a drive through rural farmland in Indiana to a growing AI data center. The area is described as “super rural,” with miles of farmland and few signs of life until the data center lights appear, creating a noticeable intrusion in an otherwise empty landscape. The narrator notes the drive covers “30 plus miles, maybe more of nothing but just beautiful rural farmland,” and expresses strong emotion about returning to this area after a year away. As the video continues, the scenery remains rural and expansive, with mentions of semi trucks and cement trucks on the way to the site. The narrator highlights the emotional impact of the development, stating, “the first time I drove this, it genuinely made me so emotional because I haven't been this way. I haven't left town in, like a year.” The content hints at a pause in filming near a small parking lot or staging area before continuing along the corridor toward the project. A key claim is that the Meta AI data center is being built on this farmland, consuming “beautiful farmland that we will never be able to replace.” The narrator emphasizes the contrast between the large land use for the data center and the relatively small number of jobs it will create, stating that it will “only employ one to 500 people,” which the speaker finds startling. The final sentiment underscores the perceived imbalance between the considerable land impact and the limited employment opportunity, describing the situation as “pretty fucking insane.” The video ends after confirming the path to the data center and the ongoing construction.

The speaker reports they have been officially banned from entering the United Kingdom. They state the UK government, under Keirstarmer, deems their presence “not conducive to the public good,” and they express confusion over why being conducive to the public good is a requirement to enter a country. They compare this to thousands of illegal immigrants entering through the Channel daily, noting that “Nobody's asking them to be conducive to the public good,” yet they cannot go to the UK. The speaker mentions they did not apply for an EITA (likely a visa/permit) and had recently returned in September to join the Tommy Robinson rally where they spoke, intending to participate again in May, which now seems impossible. They describe the timing as suspicious, pointing out that three days earlier they posted about Kierst Armour calling out his hypocrisy for wanting to ban X because of women’s safety while allegedly allowing migrant gang rapes to happen. They imply this is connected to the ban as an act to ban free speech. They describe the situation as dystopian and emphasize the severe limitation of their freedom, noting that “as it says in email, I cannot appeal.” They stress they are not convicted of any crime, not under suspicion of any crime, and that the decision was made by Kirstarmer that someone like them is “not welcome in The UK.” The overall claim is that the ban is an abrupt, non-appealable restriction on their entry into the country, framed within accusations of political manipulation and hypocrisy by the UK government and Kier Starmer.

See what happens when all the police drones are flying so low. Fuck off. Go away. The police drones are flying so low. They're putting our birds through fences. You wanna talk humane? Here's our here's our girl. She just went through a fence, got stuck. She's don't know if she can get up. They're causing these animals to kill themselves. They're going through fences. They're hitting fence posts because their drones are flying solo. Do you see this? This is life. This is this is humane. These are healthy animals that are suffering

Shannon, a local resident who has lived in Brits for eight years, says a plan is underway to build an iPass center next to her home. She notes that 28 houses have already been built and that her house, currently next to a former nursing home, is set to be knocked down. She explains that they haven’t been given any letter or notification about the plan, and that it’s been confirmed as an iPass center in Brits. She emphasizes that she and others will lose their homes after eight years of residence, calling it an “absolute disgrace.” On a separate topic, she responds to news about a young girl being raped, calling the incident “unbelievable” and “absolutely disgusting,” and says those responsible “shouldn’t be here” and “they need to be deported,” expressing strong condemnation. Regarding safety at home, she states she has no kids but would defend her animals fiercely, saying, “if anyone touched my animals, my gods, there’d be war.” She describes a pervasive sense of danger, stating that it’s “inevitable now every week, every other day,” and that she cannot even go into the city center, feeling unsafe in her own country. She mentions clutching her bag and being scared, feeling it’s “not safe anymore,” and expresses displeasure about having “all this going on” on her doorstep. She ends by noting that tomorrow night at half past seven, a bigger crowd is anticipated, with an expectation of returning to the event.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a concept they refer to as a climate lockdown in Knokke, a town on the Belgian coast they describe as the “rich town.” They claim that on days that are too hot, Knokke will implement a climate lockdown in which the city is totally shut down and nobody can come in anymore “just because, you know, they wanna try it.” They state that this would mean local restaurants, bars, and business people would be ignored or sacrificed as the city is shut off. They say this is the plan they’ve warned about all along: that climate lockdowns would be implemented. They identify Knokke at the Belgian coast as the first city to start implementing it in the summer, asserting that people would simply drive there and that the highways “go through,” making the lockdown feel invasive and extreme. They describe the action as absolutely crazy and a dangerous precedent, arguing that citizens would not be able to go where they want to go anymore. The speakers emphasize that this area would be off limits, framing it as a violation of freedom since people should be able to go anywhere they want in their country and on public property. They describe the idea as a very dangerous precedent and express strong opposition, concluding the video by saying they do not like this development. The video ends with them signing off and thanking viewers, saying goodbye.

The speaker, a long-time green energy supporter, was dismayed to learn about the environmental and human costs associated with green technologies. A single lithium mine allegedly creates millions of tons of waste annually, laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium, polluting water for 300 years. Child labor is used to mine cobalt. Solar panels are allegedly made by laborers in razor wire enclosed camps exposed to quartz dust, causing silicosis. The Ethical Consumer Organization reports that forced labor in the solar panel supply chain is hard to avoid. Wind turbines consume vast resources, require diesel to start, gallons of oil to lubricate, and are hard to recycle. Solar panels are also extremely difficult to recycle, costing more than production. Lithium batteries pose steep challenges too. The speaker claims these "green" solutions are actually good marketing from the $1.5 trillion climate change industry. They urge people to prevent further escalation through unnecessary EVs and solar farms consuming farmland.

Rishi Sunak, a politician, has decided to backtrack on some net zero timelines in order to grab headlines from Liz Truss. He claims that since the UK only emits 1% of total carbon emissions, there is no need to do more and bankrupt the British people. However, the important point to note is that he mentions the risk of losing the consent of the British people. This tactic of presenting a bad idea and then pulling back is commonly used by both sides of the political spectrum. The speaker emphasizes that the British people were never asked for consent regarding net zero measures. They argue that net zero is questionable and that COVID has transitioned into climate lockdowns.

A privileged status exists for farms, and I believe we should take action against them, similar to what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners. You mean close them down? Yes, there’s an industry we could do without. If people are upset enough to protest and spray slurry, then we don’t need small farmers. So, you would use heavy-handed tactics to push them out of business? If the public is that angry, it indicates a need for change in the farming industry. Just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, right?

The speaker is in the Belgian coast on a sunny day and discusses a concept described as a “climate lockdown.” They claim that in Knokke, a town considered to be wealthy on the Belgian coast, a climate lockdown will be implemented: on hot days the city will be totally shut down and nobody can enter. The speaker asserts this action is intended to be a test or implementation, noting that Knokke is the first town to adopt it in the summer. According to the speaker, this means driving to Knokke would become impossible because the highway would be closed. They describe this as “absolutely crazy” and a dangerous precedent. The speaker argues that on hot days the area would be off limits, preventing citizens from going where they want since it is public property. They claim this represents a violation of freedom and rights, asserting that citizens should be able to go anywhere they want in their country. The speaker contends that the plan shows a disregard for local businesses, including restaurants and bars, and other local enterprises in Knokke. They state they have warned about declining logos and now observe that Knokke is the first city to start implementing this approach in the summer. The video ends with the speaker expressing personal disapproval of the plan and sign-off, saying they will see viewers next time and goodbye.

The speaker questions whether young people are being given all the facts about climate change. They ask Tanya Plibersek about the percentage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, to which she admits she doesn't know. The speaker then explains that carbon dioxide makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, with humans responsible for 3% of that, and Australia responsible for 1.3% of that. They argue that it is like cleaning a bridge for a tiny speck of sugar and criticize the push for renewable energy and electric cars. They believe it puts the economy, industry, and jobs at risk.

The speaker questions why Greta Thunberg never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia, only Western energy. They ask if she will condemn OPEC energy and every delegate who arrived on a private jet. They challenge her to condemn private jets and ask if she has ever been on one. The speaker claims to own 100 private jets and asks if Greta has ever been on one, to which she responds affirmatively.

Katie Hopkins filmed a solar panel farm construction site, expressing outrage at the destruction of the countryside. She criticized the plastic packaging of the solar panels, claiming it's non-recyclable and that the panels themselves will become landfill. Hopkins stated that the solar panels are being installed while there are plans to dim the sun. She accused the workers of vandalizing the countryside and claimed local farmers are negatively impacted. Hopkins admitted to entering the site through an open gate and argued it's "her countryside." She prayed for the end of "net zero bollocks" and the cessation of countryside vandalism. A worker asked her to leave, citing safety concerns and lack of authority to be on the site. Hopkins asserted her right to be there and accused the workers of vandalizing the countryside.

Speaker 0 argues that, for the last twenty years, the political classes have attacked farming in the countryside and tried to tell farmers how to operate. They state that their family has looked after the countryside for more than five hundred years and that they do not need “townies” dictating farming practices. They express frustration that they are now being paid to stop growing food and instead grow wildflowers. They call this situation insanity and say they are considering ceasing their production after five hundred years.

At a solar panel farm in the West Country, a speaker films to highlight what she calls the destruction of the countryside, saying, “This valley is so pretty. It's heartbreaking.” She claims the field is “ripping up” the countryside and that the workers are “vandals.” She points to “the plastic packaging that goes around all of this stuff, none of this can be recycled, obviously, but it's so green” and adds that “these solar panels can't be recycled” leading to “future landfill.” She condemns “the lie about net zero” and “net zero bollocks,” calling it “Batshit Bonkers Britain,” and states, “I'm trying to stand up for the countryside.” She notes the gate was open and she “wandered in,” addressing an audience of “1,200,000 people that follow me.” She mentions reform to roll back plans to “dim the sun” and references “Canadian solar.”

The speaker, a long-time green energy supporter, was dismayed to learn about the environmental and human costs associated with green technologies. A single lithium mine allegedly creates millions of tons of waste annually, laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium, polluting water for 300 years. Child labor is used to mine cobalt. Solar panels are allegedly made by laborers in razor wire enclosed camps exposed to quartz dust, causing silicosis. The Ethical Consumer Organization reports that forced labor in the solar panel supply chain is hard to avoid. Wind turbines consume vast resources, require diesel to start, gallons of oil to lubricate, and are hard to recycle. Solar panels are also difficult to recycle, and lithium batteries pose challenges. The speaker claims these so-called green solutions are actually good marketing from the $1.5 trillion climate change industry. The speaker urges people to prevent the exponential escalation of these issues with unnecessary EVs and solar farms.

Speaker 0 describes being on the Belgian coast on a very nice day in June and talks about a town on the Belgian coast implementing what they call a climate lockdown. The town mentioned is Kunuku, described as a wealthier town further from the coast. The claim is that on hot days the town will “totally shut down the city,” and nobody will be able to come in anymore “just because” they want to try it. Local restaurants, bars, and business people would be affected because no more people can come in after the city is supposedly full. The speaker states that this is part of a plan they have been warning about, to “decline the logos,” and that Knucker on the coast is the first city where this would be implemented in the summer. They claim that people would simply drive there and the highway would be closed. The speaker calls this “absolutely crazy” and says it’s a dangerous precedent, because as a citizen you wouldn’t be able to go where you want to go anymore. The speaker asserts that the area would be off-limits and that this constitutes a violation of freedom, since people should be able to go anywhere they want in their country and because it is public property. The speaker reinforces the notion that this is a very dangerous precedent and expresses personal disapproval of the plan. The video ends with the speaker saying that is all for this video and signs off, promising to see the audience next time and thanking them.

Those in power are compared to cancer, causing harm to the planet with nuclear bombs and power plants. Climate engineering must be stopped to allow the planet to heal. Dane Wington from GeoengineeringWatch.org urges us to expose and halt these damaging operations.