TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the absentee ballots. The ballot numbers were in sequence, which is unusual for mailed-in ballots. The speaker also discovered that the envelopes lacked a date and the ballots were all from the same area. The signatures were similar, and there were no date stamps. Additionally, the ballots were not showing up in the system and had to be entered manually. When the speaker questioned these issues, they were met with resistance from the supervisor. Despite wanting to stay in the room, the speaker chose not to challenge further.

Councilmen were approached with unmarked ballots, claiming they were from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned gathering 43 blank ballots and wanting to ensure they were filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation implied one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, leading to suspicions of ballot manipulation. Translation: Councilmen were given unmarked ballots supposedly from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned collecting 43 blank ballots to be filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation suggested one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, raising concerns about ballot manipulation.

The speaker describes irregularities observed in absentee/mail-in ballots. They claim that the ballot numbers and the last names on the ballots were in sequence, which should not happen with mail-in ballots because those ballots are supposed to arrive at different times and cannot be sequential like 2-2-3-2 next to 2-2-3-3. This pattern triggered the speaker’s concern, leading them to think something was wrong. The speaker states they began noticing that the numbers were almost adjacent to each other, with one hovering around the middle. This prompted them to raise questions about the process. They then asked the supervisor for clarification, but the supervisor reacted angrily, saying, “you’re not letting us do our job. You’re disturbing us.” Feeling hesitant to push the issue further for fear of being kicked out and wanting to stay in the room due to a lack of other observers, the speaker chose not to challenge the process more than they already had. They allege that the sequence of ballot numbers came from the same area, specifically Goddard Street in Downtown Detroit, and that the signatures on those ballots were all alike. The speaker notes several additional anomalies: envelopes had no date stamp, only the word “November 2020” without a more specific date, and there was no second or third numbering visible. They observed that none of these ballots were coming up in the voting system; instead, they were being entered manually. The speaker claims that the poll book or the system would not reflect these details, implying that the ballots were processed outside the normal electronic recordkeeping. In summary, the speaker alleges a pattern of sequential ballot numbers and similar signatures associated with absentee ballots from a single street area, envelopes without proper dating, and manual entry into the system rather than through standard digital processing, with the supervisor resisting questions about these irregularities.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. Younger individuals assisted them in filling out their voter information. They managed to bypass a two-hour line and approached a polling official. However, there was an issue with one woman's name not being in the system. The group suggested they could change it on the spot, raising questions about how that could be done.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. Younger individuals assisted them in filling out their voter registration forms. They managed to bypass a two-hour line and approached a polling station. However, one woman was told her name wasn't in the system. The group suggested they could go back and change it, raising questions about how names could be altered.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, and Uxbridge had been brought to the office to be counted. The individual questions how CTV and subsequently CBC could declare the Liberals as winners without any votes counted from Durham region. They call for an investigation, stating that something is not right.

I'm in downtown Detroit at the TCF Center where they are contesting ballots. A man shared that at 4 AM, three vehicles arrived with over 130,000 ballots, all for Biden, after the precinct had closed. This raised concerns about the legitimacy of the ballots.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. According to the worker, none of the packages had arrived at the office yet from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. They were assisted by younger individuals to fill out their voter registration forms. Despite facing a two-hour wait, they managed to bypass the line. When one woman approached the voting station, officials couldn't find her name in the system. The group suggested they could change her name to resolve the issue, raising questions about how that could be done.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order for tabulation. According to the worker, not a single vote package had arrived at the office from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

A Globe and Mail reporter asked about a Liberal candidate's ties to China-friendly groups and the speaker's meeting with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, a "pro-Beijing group." The reporter questioned if the Liberal party is comfortable with Peter Yen's closeness to the Chinese consulate, given the foreign interference inquiry. The speaker denied ever hearing of the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada and refuted having a "setup meeting" with them. They stated that attending events and taking pictures with people does not constitute a meeting. Regarding Peter Yen, the speaker defended him as someone who has served his community for decades, including as deputy police commissioner. They asserted that Yen's meetings with community groups were part of his job and that they are proud to have him as a candidate.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

An individual who was supposed to be working for Elections Canada in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The job entailed ensuring that all packages were sealed and documentation was in order after votes were brought to the office from each polling station, so votes could be tabulated and counted. According to the speaker, not a single vote in Durham region had been brought to the office or counted. The speaker questions how CTV and then CBC could declare the Liberals as winners when votes from a large area east of the GTA, including Pickering, Ajax, Whippy, Oshawa, Uckbridge, and Uxbridge, had not yet been counted. The speaker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

I saw 24 Gaylords of ballots loaded into my trailer, with handwritten return addresses. I was delayed in Harrisburg, then told to drive to Lancaster without unloading. The transportation supervisor refused to provide a ticket or late slip. The next day, my trailer was missing. I believe the events on October 21st were suspicious, as I transported ballots from New York to Pennsylvania without understanding why. I decided to speak out about it.

I noticed that the ballot numbers and last names on the absentee and mail-in ballots were in sequence, which is unusual because these ballots should come in different numbers. This raised my suspicion. I asked about the date on the envelopes, but there was only November 0, 2020, with no second number. When I questioned this, the supervisors became angry and accused me of disrupting their work. I didn't want to be kicked out, so I didn't challenge anything further. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures, and there was no date stamp after 0. None of these ballots were showing up in the system and were being manually entered, even though they knew these details wouldn't be in the poll book or system.

The speaker describes observing absentee/mail-in ballots and recording details from the ballots. They wrote down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person named on each ballot. The ballots appeared to be in sequence, which, according to the speaker, should not happen with mail-in ballots, since mail-in ballots come in at different times and numbers. The speaker recalls that when they noticed the numbers were almost next to each other—one in the middle, then another—they became suspicious. The speaker asked the supervisor about this, noting there was not even a date on the envelopes. The envelopes were marked November 2020, but there was no second number or other identifying date visible. When the speaker inquired about the date on a specific envelope, the response was hostile: the supervisors became angry and told them they were not letting them do their job and that the speaker was disturbing them. To avoid being kicked out, the speaker and the others in the room chose not to challenge the process further, since they did not want to be removed and there were only a few people present. The speaker also observed that the sequence of ballot numbers all originated from the same area—Guarded Street in Downtown Detroit. The ballots’ signatures looked alike, and none of the envelopes had dates stamped on them. The envelopes appeared to be missing a second or third date, or any date, and none of the ballots were appearing in the voting system. Additionally, the speaker notes that these ballots were being entered manually, and they asserted that none of these details would be present in the poll book or the system. The overall implication is that there was irregularity in the handling of these absentee ballots, with sequential numbers, indistinct dates, signatures resembling each other, and manual entry outside the expected process, raising concerns about whether the ballots were being processed consistent with standard procedures.

A series of witnesses describe a large-scale movement of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, claiming that hundreds of thousands of completed ballots were shipped and later disappeared. One witness asserts that “130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared.” The narrative emphasizes that the ballots were transported in a trailer from New York to Pennsylvania and subsequently vanished. Another witness recounts events on October 21, describing “a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence.” This person says, “I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania.” While initially believing the task was beneficial for the presidential race and feeling it was “cool,” the witness later reflects, upon things getting weirder, on why they were driving “complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania,” and states that they decided to speak up about it. A third participant broadens the scope, estimating “It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots.” This witness adds that the investigation indicates “there was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this.” Reflecting on the potential impact, they note the magnitude of votes that could appear “the night of the election after midnight,” suggesting that an “artifact” would be necessary to explain this phenomenon. They further state that, when something is impossible to reconcile, “whatever remains must be the truth.” They claim that “the truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted,” and that “in some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that.” Collectively, the speakers contend they have evidence of “a massive transfer of of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.” The statements emphasize a coordinated movement of completed ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, the disappearance of the ballots and their trailer, and allegations that ballots appeared, were counted, and did not necessarily align with expected voting records, with ongoing analysis indicating a substantial, orchestrated transfer intended to inject ballots into counting centers.

- The evidence, through eyewitness testimony corroborated by others, shows that a 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared. - On October 21, there was a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence. I know I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania. At first, I didn't think it was a big deal. In fact, I thought it was really awesome. I was like, sweet. I'm doing something for the presidential race. You know? This is cool. But as things became weirder, I got to thinking and wondered why I was driving complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. I didn't know why, so I decided to speak up. And that's what I'm doing today. - It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots. Part of our developing investigation indicates that Jesse wasn't alone. There was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this. So when you think about the magnitude of potential votes showing up the night of the election after midnight, you have to have an artifact. So if you eliminate the impossible with all things being equal, whatever remains must be the truth. The truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted. In some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that. - With that said, I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt, we have evidence of a massive transfer of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. They were assisted by younger individuals to fill out their voter registration. Despite a two-hour wait, they managed to bypass the line. One woman faced issues with her name not being in the system, but was told they could change it. There was confusion about how to change her name on the spot.

I was surprised to learn that there was no signature verification done for the ballots. I questioned how ballots without signatures were handled, and the response was they were just sent back out. This made me uncomfortable certifying the results.

I'm in downtown Detroit at the TCF Center, where they are contesting ballots. A guy I spoke to said they had finished counting all the ballots smoothly and were ready to shut down. But at around 4 AM, three vehicles arrived with 130,000+ ballots. He was astonished that every single one of those ballots was for Biden and had been delivered before the cutoff time.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge had arrived at the office. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The individual believes this situation is suspicious and warrants investigation.