reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to an official statement, Ukraine denies attempting to assassinate Vladimir Putin, viewing it as a pretext for escalating the conflict. An analyst speculates that U.S. intelligence services, not Ukraine, were behind the attempt, potentially aiming to disrupt peace negotiations. The analyst claims U.S. intelligence agencies know Putin's location at all times and are acting without briefing the President. Despite the assassination attempt, discussions about Russian-Ukrainian negotiations are ongoing, with Sergei Lavrov and Marco Rubio reportedly having a telephone call to discuss Russia's proposals. The analyst suggests Putin wants a deal with Trump but had to respond militarily to maintain his position domestically. The analyst also alleges rogue elements within U.S. intelligence agencies are undermining leadership, citing issues with CIA Director John Ratcliffe. The State Department is reportedly tightening visa vetting for Chinese students due to national security concerns, but the analyst believes the problem is broader, involving the recruitment of American students by China. Monica Crowley will be sworn in as Chief of Protocol.

In a Ukrainian village, a column of Russian military vehicles was stopped by Ukrainian security forces. There were damaged Russian vehicles in the area, leading to questions about who was responsible. The damaged vehicles were attributed to Ukrainian artillery, while the bombing of the village was attributed to Russia. The discussion highlights the conflicting narratives surrounding the events in the village.

Speaker 1: “The material, put it like that. The material used in my body is.” They discuss violence, asking, “she just got stabbed?” and reply, “that’s not me.” They say, “since they did that, now they gotta investigate the material my body is supposed to,” adding, “Since they won’t do all that, now they gotta investigate.” The talk shifts to geopolitics: “She’s from the Ukraine. She’s from Russia. And, you know, they got a war they had a war going on against The United States.” They express confusion, “out of all people her.” They conclude, “That’s hey. It ain’t I don’t have nothing. I they just lashed out on her. They lashed out on her.” The closing line asks, “Who else working the are work who was working the material who was whoever was working the material, they lashed out on her.”

Putin is accused of killing thousands of people while portraying himself as the victim. The speaker highlights the discrepancy between the reported injuries and the actual number of casualties. They emphasize the urgency to address this human tragedy, which could potentially result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands or even millions of people. The speaker acknowledges that they used to have a good relationship with Putin, as both leaders love their respective countries. However, they note that Putin has changed and appears to be mentally different from before.

It's 9 AM on February 28th, 2022. Criminals with military weapons are causing chaos in Kyiv due to the Zelensky regime's distribution of arms. Shootings are not related to Russians but likely gang-related. The regime's actions are irresponsible and harmful to Ukrainian civilians. The speaker, in Ukraine, fears for their safety from armed criminals. The regime's actions will not deter Russians but will lead to civilian deaths. The speaker believes the regime is evil and harming the Ukrainian people.

The speaker watched news coverage claiming the man arrested for attempting to murder Trump was a Trump supporter. Lindsey Graham blamed Iran. However, the speaker says the would-be assassin volunteered in Ukraine and shares the same neocon politics as Graham. The speaker believes the media is lying and omitting facts, distorting reality so the average person has no way of knowing the truth. The speaker highlights that the attempted murderer had been interviewed by every major media outlet and had extensive contact with US government agencies. The New York Times previously portrayed him as a "freedom fighter" in Ukraine, despite his criminal record and pending charges. The speaker believes the media will memory-hole the true story, and the public will be misled.

As Russian forces retreat from north of Kyiv, scenes of destruction emerge. Ukrainian authorities report flattened houses and believe bodies remain underneath. A mass grave in Bucha, shown by Ukrainian national police, is believed to contain up to 50 civilians killed during the Russian occupation. Vladimir searches for his brother, Dmitry, and believes he is buried there. A neighbor accompanying him accuses the Russians of hating and abusing Ukraine since the 1930s, with the intent to destroy and eliminate them. She asserts that Ukraine will endure.

Chef Jose Andres, known for his humanitarian work with World Central Kitchen, was in Ukraine during the war. The speaker suggests that someone wanting to assassinate Andres also wanted a picture with him while advocating for increased American involvement in Ukraine. Andres recently cooked for Kamala Harris and spoke at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting. World Central Kitchen feeds people in third-world countries and may soon need to do so in America.

The transcript claims Russia and Ukraine are preparing for the “end game” after what it describes as a major escalation, saying Russia has stopped negotiating while European and Western leaders are “playing with fire.” It provides context about an attack on the Sterbolesk College in which Ukraine is said to have launched multiple drone strikes that killed 21 college girls and wounded 42 people. The transcript asserts that, according to the speaker’s sources, there were “no military assets” at the college. It says Ukraine stated a drone went off course, and then argues that the targeting was intentional. It adds that Ukrainian drone operators are described as being awarded points and incentives for civilian deaths, with an “extra equipment” and “medals” system after monthly data handovers. The transcript further claims remaining Russian college professors who survived are “added to Ukraine’s kill list,” referencing the Myravaetz website. It also alleges coordination of drone targeting using satellite coordinates and says the CIA and the UK are involved in targeting and telemetry data for attacks on civilian infrastructure. On the Russian side, the transcript describes an overnight response on Kyiv, featuring, for the first time, “Orichin” missiles, and includes reactions to missiles striking nearby locations. It claims Russia warned foreign citizens to leave, calling it the “last straw,” and said it would conduct “systematic strikes” on targets across Kyiv. It quotes a Russian Ministry of Defense statement that foreign nationals and diplomatic missions should leave as soon as possible, and says the EU responded that it would not leave. The transcript includes remarks attributed to Dmitry Medvedev criticizing the EU’s decision to maintain diplomatic presence. It then claims that a larger buildup is underway and says forces and special forces from Germany, France, the UK, and the United States—including the CIA—have been building up inside Ukraine. It argues Russia might take Odessa and claims this would cut off Ukraine from the ocean, asserting that taking Odessa would effectively prevent Ukraine from remaining viable. It claims Putin has been patient and aims to prevent civilian casualties, and states that civilian casualty numbers on the Ukrainian side were “incredibly low” compared with attacks on Russian civilians. It also describes alleged pressure within Russia for a more aggressive approach, framed as coming from anger over civilian deaths. The transcript then shifts to alleged threats involving the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum (June 3–6), stating Russia is treating them seriously and expects possible attacks during the event. It asserts Russia plans to “bring pain to everyday infrastructure across Ukraine,” and, if that does not produce surrender, to encircle Kyiv again. It includes an RT-referenced claim that “annihilation” of terrorist infrastructure will begin, including in Europe. Later, it quotes an NBC interview with President Zelensky claiming soldiers are rationing ammunition and lacking weapons to advance, with territorial losses if American aid does not arrive. It then claims President Trump posted a meme about alleged waste and corruption involving Ukrainian steel shipped to Poland for export to the U.S. to avoid “Section 232” tariffs and anti-dumping duties. The transcript ends by arguing Russia was not “pushed back” at Kyiv, stating Russia “left” as part of a pullback and aims for a settlement.

In this video, the speakers discuss the situation in Mariupol, Ukraine. The first speaker claims that there is evidence of a fascist regime in Mariupol and mentions witnessing people being shot. The second speaker interrupts and accuses the first speaker of lying, stating that criminals attacked the local government and that the Ukrainian army is protecting the city. The second speaker also accuses the first speaker of spreading propaganda. The video ends with the second speaker requesting the Ministry of Justice to consider banning the Communist Party in Ukraine based on evidence of their alleged terrorist activities.

Hey guys, my name is Olesia and I'm a former employee of the so called Troll Fabric in Kyiv, Ukraine. Today I want to tell you something about this structure and some reasons why I have left this job. I may be wrong but I think it's the first time somebody published insider materials on this topic since 2019 when a journalist infiltrated the office in Kyiv to make a report about it. And back then I did realize that it was a troll fabric. But, you know, I told myself it's okay because I always supported President Zelenskyy and I still do. At first the job was focused on supporting President Zelenskyy online, like writing positive comments or posts, etc. So, we were mostly working on Facebook and Instagram. As time passed, I was transferred from the Ukrainian department, which worked for Ukrainian audience, to the English speaking department, which were focused on the English speaking public, like Americans and Europeans. But the doubts remain the same. Support for president Zelenskyy, support for Ukraine and Ukrainian Warfork. We also had French, German, and Italian departments. I heard some other officers in were hiring people who spoke Finnish and also Swedish and Estonian. About a half year ago our main chef in command, Andrei Borisovich Jermak, paid us a visit. I'm pretty sure you have heard of the head of President Zelensky office. Really it was an unusual event for the main figure behind our project to come visit the office. So he came with some English speaking officials who were introduced to us as the American partners. We were told that they were very important guests but no further details. Some of my colleagues told me that they were CIA. During the visit, they said that our field of work is expanding and we were told that our new target was The United States Of America, especially the upcoming elections. Long story short, we were asked to do everything to prevent Donald Trump from winning the elections. So basically, this topic added to our main lines of work. Since then, each of us had to post at least three or five posts daily, posing as Americans and Europeans, criticizing Donald Trump and praising Biden. The Americans have even organized a few lectures for us to get a better understanding of American politics and American mindset and main social and politics issues. Then we were occupied with the topics for the job which sounded like this. Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners. Also, Biden will not abandon Ukraine, and Biden will protect democracy while Trump is Putin's puppet. I honestly tried to convince myself it's okay since Biden is a clear option for Ukraine. But, you know, it was too much for me. Some of my colleagues felt really nervous too. One thing is to work for the best interest of my country, but interfering in US politics is a whole other thing.

The speaker describes being kidnapped and taken to a strange place in a minibus. They witnessed people being mistreated and forced to walk in their own waste. They blame Ukraine for the situation and deny any involvement from Russia. Another speaker recounts how Ukrainian tanks fired at a theater where children and civilians were present. The speaker also mentions seeing Ukrainian troops with neo-Nazi tattoos. The video shows the aftermath of attacks on hospitals and the speaker's personal experience of being injured and paralyzed. They express their determination to continue fighting against the lies spread by Ukraine and the West. The speaker now collaborates with a French journalist to gather evidence of Ukraine's crimes. They express their love for Russia and consider it their homeland.

Russia sends troops to Ukraine to ensure they won't join NATO. After a treaty is signed, Putin starts withdrawing troops, but Biden pressures Ukraine to break the agreement. As a result, many children have tragically died since then.

The video shows a journalist being violently attacked during a protest. The journalist turned his back and asked to be hit. There were several intense interventions, including a person pointing a gun. The journalist was hit hard with a stick. The video ends with medical professionals arriving at the scene and sadly stating that someone was seriously injured.

Larry: Lavrov claimed Ukraine attempted to attack Putin’s official residence in Novgorod with around 91 long-range drones in December; allegedly all intercepted, no proof provided, no reported injuries or damage. Lavrov said retaliation is coming, targets for retaliatory strikes and timing had been set. Putin supposedly mentioned this on a call to Trump two days before the Zelensky meeting in Florida; Yuri, a Kremlin aide, said Putin was shocked and outraged, and that it would influence Washington’s approach to working with Zelensky. Russians claim Trump was relieved that no Tomahawk missiles were provided to Ukraine. No US confirmation; Trump described the meeting with Putin as very productive, and discussions included the temporary ceasefire not being an option. Budanov had suggested it wouldn’t be the first assassination attempt on Putin, but the most consequential due to timing. The question posed: who is the target—Ukraine, Zelensky, Budanov—or a Russian false flag to justify attacks and derail negotiations. Speaker 1: Timelines. The attack allegedly began the night of the 28th and continued into the 29th. The Russians say it was an attack on one of Putin’s residences, described as terrorism. Putin hasn’t lived at his residences for three years, using the Kremlin instead, but this is not the first Ukrainian attempt to target Putin; there was a proposed attack when he flew into Kursk by helicopter. Russians are upset that this attack had no military objective, only potential assassination, and they know Putin wasn’t there. The Russians view it as real and plan to respond; Lavrov indicated that negotiations would be reexamined. Budanov claims Ukrainian intelligence has targeted Putin multiple times; the attack timing coincides with Zelensky in Florida, suggesting possible rifts or risk of undermining negotiations. The possibility of Western (American or British) intelligence involvement is raised, with speculation about CIA influence or European intelligence, particularly Britain’s MI6, given its Ukrainian roots. The question remains whether the attack was staged to derail negotiations or a genuine strike. Larry: If Ukraine did this, why would they? Ukraine might want to eliminate an obstacle to peace, though that could backfire; some argue Putin is more restrained than any immediate successor. If 91 drones were launched, Western intelligence would likely be involved, possibly undermining Trump’s approach. There is a sense of mixed messages from U.S. intelligence, with individuals like Susan Miller pushing claims of Russian interference that contradict other narratives. Zelensky stated no territory would be ceded as part of negotiations; Russia’s position is that Crimea, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk must be permanently part of the Russian Federation, elections must occur in Ukraine before negotiations, NATO must be out of Ukraine, and demilitarization is non-negotiable. Russia suggests there will be no 800,000-man army; these conditions are not open for negotiation. Russia may be willing to discuss numbers of troops for Ukraine, but not to concede core territorial goals. Speaker 0: If CIA or other elements were behind this, could it be to undermine Trump or push for a peace deal by pressuring Putin? Putin showed up in uniform with the military leadership, signaling a hard stance on land/territory, stating that negotiations should proceed without ceasing. Some argue this would trigger a stronger Russian push, while others see this as undermining Trump’s efforts. Trump and Zelensky had discussed a peace plan with 90-95% agreement, with a few thorny issues, possibly territorial. Trump characterized their call as productive; Russia reportedly agreed to support Ukraine postwar with discounted energy and resources. Lavrov’s rapid response to the attack and the potential retaliation would affect ongoing negotiations, which some view as already derailed due to Ukraine’s intransigence on concessions. Speaker 1: Could European intelligence be involved? Britain’s MI6 is seen as critical; there is a suggestion that British intelligence could have acted without American consultation. This would strain relations with Trump, especially after new security strategy. The transcript also notes a broader shift in Western posture: some European leaders are pushing for stronger defense and a more independent European stance, which might influence the dynamic around negotiations and intelligence actions. Speaker 0: Zelensky’s Christmas remark, “may he perish,” followed by an attack on Putin’s residence, prompts questions about who’s pulling Zelensky’s strings. Zelensky is described as the “highest paid actor in the world” with large sums allegedly pilfered from Ukraine’s aid; Zelensky could be expendable to those steering Ukraine’s direction. The meeting in Mar-a-Lago between Zelensky, Trump, and others occurred while the Putin residence attack was underway, suggesting an attempt to undermine negotiations. Budanov’s connection to the CIA and potential independent actions by Ukrainian intelligence raise further concerns about internal Ukrainian divisions. Speaker 1: Russia’s potential retaliation could target Ukrainian intelligence assets like the SBU headquarters in Kyiv, or European assets inside Ukraine if evidence points to Western involvement. Russia’s current military actions include continuing strikes on power infrastructure, with movements in Zaporizhzhia and around Kherson, indicating an axis of attack. Independently, Russia claims significant ground progress; Ukraine counters with claims of selective advances by Russia and a favorable propaganda edge for Ukraine. The battlefield metrics show Russia increasing manpower and maintaining multiple axes of attack, with eight or more fronts, while Ukrainian recoveries of bodies show a ratio suggesting heavy Ukrainian losses. Speaker 0: The conversation ends with expectations for retaliation, possible new European involvement, and the enduring fear that negotiations remain unsettled. The next days could reveal more about who is behind the attack, how Russia responds, and whether a path to peace remains possible, given the conflicting narratives and competing strategic interests.

On September 6th in Konstantinivka, Ukraine, a missile struck a market, killing 16 people and injuring 30 others. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky blames Russian terrorists for the attack, and the international community supports his claims. The New York Times conducted a thorough investigation, analyzing evidence found at the scene and studying surveillance footage. They discovered that the missile came from Ukraine, not Russia, based on the direction it was launched from and the fragments found near the impact site. Additionally, journalists from the New York Times recorded a conversation moments before the attack, in which a loud noise resembling a missile launch can be heard. Burn marks near a nearby village further support the theory that a missile battery was recently installed.

A Russian general, Igor Kirillov, was killed in a targeted assassination in Moscow, where a bomb hidden on a scooter detonated. Kirillov, head of Russia's radiation, chemical, and biological protection forces, had recently been charged by Ukraine for alleged chemical weapon use. He was known for making unfounded accusations against the West. Following the attack, Russian officials, including former Kremlin leader Dmitry Medvedev, called for retaliation against those responsible. Local residents expressed shock and fear, realizing that the war in Ukraine has now reached their doorstep. The incident has raised concerns about security in Moscow, with expectations of a strong response from President Putin.

This man doesn't yet know he's being watched, marked for death by Ukrainian military intelligence, unwittingly recruited as a suicide bomber to drive a vehicle to Crimea and cross the peninsula's bridge. The hybrid Chevy he's transporting appears ordinary, but its battery compartment conceals a 130 kilograms of Finnish made explosives, which were packed into it on the territory of Ukraine and then passed through many customs ports throughout European cities. The bomb was designated to detonate remotely as the vehicle crossed the Crimean Bridge. This was the plan of Ukrainian military intelligence: recruit a Ukraine sympathizer to drive the rigged vehicle to Crimea through Georgia. "He said that I would need to send him documents, my passport, individual insurance account number, and driver's license. I sent him all of this, after which, he said that I would need to go to Mineral Nivode to customs and find out what documents would be needed to clear the car through customs. After which, I would need to go to Levantov City to the Federal Financing Monitoring Service, the state automobile inspectorate, and find out what documents would be needed to register it in Russia. After which, she said that I would need to go to where this car was supposed to arrive. Then I was supposed to pick up the car there and drive it to the Republic Of Crimea via the Crimean Bridge." The driver was detained by FSB officers. The driver was promised $2,500 for the job. Russian forensic specialists are now examining the vehicle to identify others in on the plot. This strategy is no novelty for Ukraine's military intelligence. In October 2022, a bomb hidden on a truck killed five people on the Crimean Bridge. Since then, Russian security services have intercepted numerous similar plots. "It's terrible. They definitely took advantage of me, without even thinking for a second about what would happen to me, to my family, to anyone else. I don't know how the people who plan it do all this work. But in my opinion, they don't understand at all that our border is locked, how people work here." In every case, drivers believed they were doing legitimate business with their contacts from Ukraine, which they found via Telegram and throughout other messenger apps. None of them realized they were just expendable and sent one way. And while their gullibility and sympathy for Kyiv's authorities didn't cost them their lives, they have forfeited their freedom.

Speaker 0 states that someone is killing people and something happened to a guy, which they dislike. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 about a report that a Russian commander said Putin was almost caught in a drone attack from Ukraine. Speaker 0 responds that they haven't heard about the drone attack report, but it could be a reason for the killing.

Russian elections are rigged, with political opponents being imprisoned or eliminated. This leads to a lack of checks and balances in Russia. As a result, one man decides to launch an unjustified and brutal invasion of Ukraine, mistakenly mentioning Iraq.

Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Rabkinov said that documents related to attacks on Saint Petersburg could prompt Russia to use nuclear weapons in a worst-case scenario, including against countries that possess nuclear weapons, not only against Ukraine. The transcript argues that NATO is launching the attacks and that Ukraine lacks nuclear weapons. The claims are tied to events during the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum, attended by over 130 countries and more than 22,000 people. The transcript describes drone strikes beginning as the forum was taking place, including video said to show drones crossing the city and targeting a highly populated civilian area. It also cites reports of a civilian bus being attacked and states seven civilian casualties and eleven injured from a Ukrainian Armed Forces drone strike. The discussion contrasts Russia’s nuclear signaling with President Volodymyr Zelensky’s stance that he has been open to peace negotiations and is meeting with NATO head Mark Rutte. The transcript criticizes Zelensky’s messaging style, reiterates that he continues promoting NATO membership, and describes his warning that “big trouble” would come if Ukraine is denied membership. It also says Zelensky claims readiness for direct negotiations with Putin while purportedly maintaining obstacles to those talks. Professor Robert Pape, director of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats at the University of Chicago, argues that an “escalation trap” has been unfolding for about three years, with parallels to earlier dynamics seen in other conflicts. He says Putin pursued what he expected to be a quick victory but Ukraine “stiffened,” and that both sides have nearly irreconcilable objectives. Pape highlights that Putin has nuclear weapons and that Ukraine now has the capability to strike deep into Russia, which he frames as making escalation extremely dangerous. The transcript connects escalation risk to Ukraine’s increased drone capacity, stating Ukraine has drone manufacturing capabilities and that donor involvement—specifically mentioning Jennifer Pritzker—is part of how drone production and precision targeting have expanded. It emphasizes that drones are relatively inexpensive and that smaller funding streams could still enable effective drone campaigns, describing long-distance precision and the ability to steer drones directly into targets. The conversation also draws parallels to the Iran conflict, describing how the use of drones disrupted business and civilian-linked activities around the Gulf and how the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum is likened to Russia’s “Davos,” with an aim described as disrupting strategic investors rather than targeting the forum’s attendees directly. Pape and others argue for restraint and off-ramps to prevent being dragged into escalation traps. The transcript argues that Europe should push for a clear line to end the war, comparing it to ending the Korean War through a defined line of contact rather than leaving it to the decision of one party. It claims the “line of contact” has not moved meaningfully over several years and says Europe should publicly decide what line it supports, tying funding to an armistice and freezing the conflict. The transcript also references the idea that an earlier peace framework around the Ankara agreement was scuttled, and it concludes by arguing that without a defined settlement line, multiple actors keep escalation traps active, with repeated calls to ask why Europe and others are not publicly demanding the needed end conditions.

Following the June 2nd airstrike against the Lugansk city hall, a photo emerged of a red-haired woman with both legs blown off. The woman, moments before her death, looked into the camera as if to ask, "What are you gonna do about this?" The speaker felt personally compelled by the woman's gaze and resolved to fight and avenge the deaths of innocent civilians. The speaker states that 8 people were killed and 28 wounded in the attack.

The video discusses the recent terrorist attack in Moscow and the speculation surrounding its perpetrators. The speakers suggest that the CIA and Mossad may be involved, as they have been closely linked in the past. They question the timing and motives behind the attack, pointing out that ISIS has suddenly resurfaced after years of absence and is targeting countries that the US is fighting against. They also highlight the connection between Ukraine and the attack, with evidence suggesting that Ukrainian terrorists may be responsible. The speakers express concern about the potential escalation of the conflict and the possibility of it leading to World War III.

The speaker states they are not happy with Putin, who is killing many people. The speaker says they have known Putin a long time and always gotten along with him, but now Putin is shooting rockets into cities and killing people. The speaker expresses surprise at Putin's actions. When asked what they are going to do about it, the speaker doesn't say, and then accuses the questioner of being fake news. The speaker reiterates they do not like what Putin is doing, that he is killing people, and that something has happened to him.

The speaker argues that the Ukraine war is a distraction from a major event four days earlier, on 02/20/2022, involving a huge financial scandal in Switzerland connected to Putin’s circle and Swiss banks. The scandal is described as Swiss secrets (Suisse Secret in French), the largest leak from a major Swiss bank, Credit Suisse, revealing details on more than 30,000 clients and over $100,000,000,000. The Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that secret data had been obtained over a year via a secure digital mailbox. The speaker notes the timing as four days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 02/24/2022 and claims this scandal was the trigger for the war. The speaker alleges that “every war gets organized and decided out of Switzerland,” and cites prior videos about the “beast of the Alps” and the Knights Templars. He links Putin, the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Zelensky to Switzerland, asserting that important decisions are made there. He claims that on 02/24/2020 there was supposed to be a live broadcast about Credit Suisse and Swiss secrets by the Germans and their Zupeitsche Zeitung and the OCCRP, but the Ukraine war started and the discussion disappeared. The transcript lists a wide array of figures connected to the Swiss secrets list: dictators, aristocrats, drug lords, mafia bosses, and Putin pals. Notable named individuals include Alyaksay Aleksin (Belarusian businessman associated with Lukashenko, sanctioned in 2021), Alexander Lukashenko, Haji Saifula Khan Bangash, a minister of finance, and numerous others described as aristocrats, oligarchs, or corrupt. The list comprises 30,000 people, with names spanning Abdelaziz Bouteflika, King Abdullah of Jordan, Queen Rania, Abdul Khalim Khadom (Syrian official and Assad loyalist), Luis Carlos de Leon (aristocrat), former Ukrainian prime minister Lazarenko, various generals and intelligence officials from Egypt, Pakistan, Armenia, and other regions, as well as figures from South Africa and Rhodesia. The speaker emphasizes that these individuals allegedly channel money through Credit Suisse, and that many are connected to Putin, Lukashenko, and allied regimes. He asserts that many of these people, and their networks, are linked to the Wagner private military company (PMC) and that the list aligns with countries where Wagner has been active. The speaker claims that the Swiss secrets scandal is tied to global money flows and sanctions evasion, noting connections to the Paradise Papers (2017), Pandora Papers, and the Panama Papers, and argues that Swiss markets help pay for Russia’s war via oil, gas, and commodity trading. He asserts that commodities like oil, gas, and wheat are central to the instability and potential financial crisis. The narrator asserts that the money moved to Switzerland by wealthy Russians, to avoid sanctions, enabled the private banking industry and that the war in Ukraine was staged to distract from the scandal and to facilitate wealth transfers to safer locations. The closing stance asserts that Switzerland is the base of all evil, the cross of the Swiss flag symbolizes a door to wealth, and that the media, global elite, and oligarchs use distraction to cover the Swiss secrets scandal and the transfer of wealth while innocent Europeans suffer from the war. The speaker concludes that the war is a distraction and thanks Switzerland for making it possible, implying a broad conspiracy about finance, war, and power.