reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The acting director of the Secret Service denied cutting resources from Trump's detail, but a whistleblower claims otherwise. Secret Service agents who do threat assessments at events were allegedly cut by the director, Ronald Roe, before Trump's Butler rally. These agents had warned about security issues leading up to the event. Despite this, the Secret Service did not call local law enforcement who were providing backup that day. The lack of communication raises concerns of a cover-up in the investigation into an attempted assassination.

Kamala Harris, then VP-elect, was secretly in the DNC building on January 6th, but kept it hidden until recently. The Secret Service, responsible for her protection, showed bizarre behavior when a pipe bomb was discovered near their vehicles. They did not react or evacuate the area, even allowing children to walk near the bomb. The timing of the bomb's discovery coincided with the initial breach on the Capitol by the Peace Monument. This suggests coordination and raises questions about the true intentions behind the pipe bomb incident. The full truth is yet to be revealed, but it is clear that there is a cover-up and efforts to control the narrative. The story is expected to unravel in the coming months, possibly with the help of whistleblowers.

An individual from the Pittsburgh office, who may have failed training exams and was not a top agent, was inexplicably placed in charge of the president's entire trip from arrival to departure. Sources close to the Secret Service's internal investigation claim the Department of Homeland Security is pressuring the Secret Service to withhold documents requested by Congress. The speaker insists the American people deserve the truth.

The Secret Service has been accused of lying about the cocaine investigation. Initially, they claimed the cocaine was found in the library where the First Family lives, but later reports suggested it was found outside the situation room. The Secret Service then said it was found in a cubby with a blind spot, but the location of the cocaine remains unclear. The documents obtained through a FOIA request reveal inconsistencies and redactions. DNA was found on the baggie, despite initial denials by the Secret Service. The DNA sample is being preserved, but there are concerns that it may be destroyed in the future. The investigation has raised suspicions of a cover-up.

A recent House report on the January 6th pipe bomber claims the FBI has engaged in a cover-up, halting its investigation in 2021 and refusing to cooperate with Congress. A whistleblower indicated that law enforcement was instructed to stand down just two days after the bombs were discovered at the RNC and DNC. Despite initial investigative efforts, the FBI has not identified the bomber nearly four years later. Conflicting information has emerged regarding whether the FBI received corrupted cell data from major carriers, with a former FBI official suggesting it might contain the bomber's identity. However, the carriers denied providing any corrupted data. The report highlights ongoing concerns about the FBI's handling of the investigation, which remains unresolved.

I met with Capitol Police today and learned some startling information regarding the January 6th investigation. The so-called "backpack guy," who I was told was a plainclothes police officer, was the one who discovered the pipe bomb. This revelation heightens my concerns about the timeline of events, especially regarding the Secret Service and Metro Police response. The timing of the pipe bomb discoveries is also suspicious. The first bomb at the Capitol Hill Club (mistakenly called the RNC bomb), was found just five minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter. Then, a second bomb was found only fifteen minutes after securing the first location. It seems incredibly coincidental that these events happened in such close proximity to each other.

Where is the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks? A report reveals that the FBI quickly cleaned up biological evidence from the crime scene after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. Congressman Clay Higgins, who investigated the scene, found alarming actions by the FBI that raise questions about the investigation's integrity. Notably, the FBI released Crooks' body for cremation just ten days after the incident, without informing local authorities, hindering the verification of autopsy reports. Higgins expressed concerns that without examining the body, the accuracy of the reports cannot be confirmed. This situation, along with the rapid cleanup of evidence, suggests possible obstruction of justice in the investigation.

Credible rumors suggest that cocaine was found in its charge, affecting our sleep and dogs. Additionally, it stayed in the hotel room for two days without coming out. The President, our country's leader, did not attend the dinner. People speculate that drugs were involved.

President Biden claimed that the documents he stored in filing cabinets were locked, but photos from the special counsel's report showed a damaged box in his Delaware Garage containing highly sensitive, top-secret information about the war in Afghanistan. He also claimed that none of the documents were highly classified, but the special counsel's report stated that he possessed multiple highly classified documents, including some marked as top secret. Lastly, Biden denied sharing classified information with his ghostwriter, but the special counsel explicitly stated that he did share classified information from his notebooks with the ghostwriter. While the evidence does not show that Biden knew the information was classified, his claim that the special counsel did not say what he said is not a factual defense.

Speaker 0 raises a series of pointed questions and concerns about FBI and government actions surrounding the monitoring and reporting of online activity and potential threats, urging a demand for answers: - Why did the FBI present only early pro-Trump posts and hide the anti-Trump phase? Two answers are implied: under Biden, the existence of a narrative, and a need to ask who was involved in that decision and why it happened. - After the election, why did the FBI continue to toe that line, and who made that decision? - The speaker notes that authorities are monitoring people who ask how to build bombs or evade assassination scenes, and asks how such monitoring relates to successful assassinations and the future locations of political actors; suggests an algorithmic tie and notification so someone is watching. - Why did they ignore Crooks’s really unbelievable threats? Why were ordinary Americans arrested for memes, while Crooks’s behavior appeared to be ignored? - Why did intelligence agencies monitoring extremism miss a kid openly fantasizing about assassinations, who connected with a Swedish individual allegedly part of a large Nazi movement in Sweden? - Why was the scene cleaned prematurely? Why did every digital trace of his political shift get kept out of public discussion? Why did authorities claim he had almost no footprint when, in fact, the footprint seemed large but scrubbed? - The speaker notes a pattern: every single mistake by the FBI and government seems to point toward ignorance, negligence, hiding inconvenient data, and shaping a political narrative; questions whether the pattern indicates incompetence or intentional action. - Is this incompetence or something more problematic? The speaker says they aren’t asserting a conspiracy but emphasize something feels wrong and that the official story is hard to believe. They ask why the government that supposedly monitors everything would become blind, deaf, and mute when a presidential assassin emerges on their radar. - The question is posed non-partisan: under different presidents, why would the narrative stay the same if the government can see everything? What does that imply about the FBI, DOJ, and CIA—whether they are lying, incompetent, or selectively monitoring—since any of these possibilities should be unsettling. - The FBI and mainstream media, including MSNBC, are said to have referenced leaks from Crooks’s social media indicating pro-Trump and anti-immigration stances, while being described as having almost no online footprint; Crooks reportedly had Discord, Snapchat, and an active YouTube presence, with violent 2019 YouTube comments about decapitating government officials, followed by a shift. - The speaker asserts the iceberg is deep and suggests a broader pattern of concerns about oversight, control, and the potential overreach or misalignment of intelligence agencies, with a friend claiming the CIA may be completely out of control and implying limits to accountability, while noting it could extend beyond the CIA. Overall, the remarks center on questioning the completeness, transparency, and motivation behind FBI monitoring, narrative shaping, data handling, and the handling of Crooks’s threats and online footprint, while expressing concern about systemic issues within intelligence agencies.

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

Critics of the investigation claim there is no evidence, but there are 176 suspicious activity reports and witness testimony. The most damning evidence so far is the discovery of transactions that went to Joe Biden, where the money was spent on his behalf. This implicates him directly. Additionally, there is a cover-up happening within the FBI and Department of Justice. Federal prosecutors were being stonewalled, which is unprecedented according to Scott Brady. This suggests that elements within these agencies were protecting the president. These are the two significant pieces of evidence uncovered, and further investigation will continue to follow the evidence.

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

The speaker believes the individual involved in a recent political attack did not act alone, citing a lack of requisite skill and the media's quick dismissal. They question if the individual was honey-trapped by a foreign entity and criticize the FBI's handling of the situation, including the rapid cremation of the body and the claim that the individual acted alone. Senator Ron Johnson also finds the situation suspicious, particularly the rush to dispose of evidence. He highlights the fact that the body was cremated before autopsy and toxicology reports were released. He notes the FBI immediately declared the individual acted alone without a thorough investigation. The speaker points out the FBI's history of spying and questions why, if the individual acted alone, the FBI doesn't release the data they likely possess. They cite a counter sniper's concern over the scrubbing of the roof and question the need for a high-powered attorney if the case is straightforward. Senator Johnson states that the Secret Service and FBI are stonewalling the senate investigation, providing heavily redacted documents and delaying transcribed interviews. The speaker concludes that the agencies are hiding something, as transparency would dispel conspiracy theories.

The White House refuses to comment on whether they would support the prosecution of the person responsible for bringing cocaine into the White House. They defer to the Secret Service, who are investigating the matter. The White House is confident that the Secret Service will uncover the truth. They decline to provide any further information at this time.

Surveillance footage shows Sicknick walking in the Capitol after his alleged death, appearing healthy and wearing a helmet, which contradicts claims of him being killed by a head injury from the mob. This footage challenges the narrative pushed by the January 6th committee, which had access to it but chose not to release it to the public. The decision to withhold this evidence suggests a deliberate attempt to maintain a misleading political narrative. The committee's actions indicate a willingness to distort the truth about Sicknick, raising questions about their overall integrity and motives.

Following an assassination attempt on Trump, questions remain unanswered, such as why the shooter's house was professionally scrubbed, leaving no digital or physical footprint. Despite being filmed with a rangefinder before the event and CNN streaming the rally live, there was no formal report or press conferences detailing the investigation. The Secret Service's explanation for restricting roof access also seemed illogical. The possibility of a coordinated assassination attempt is considered, where the shooter would be eliminated post-attack, mirroring a Lee Harvey Oswald scenario. The shooter's willingness to die suggests radicalization or manipulation. The presence of multiple phones and a phone potentially linked to the FBI traveling to the shooter's residence raises further suspicion. The lack of personal items in the house, including cutlery, adds to the mystery. The potential use of psychotropic drugs, hypnosis, and mind control, reminiscent of MK Ultra, is also discussed.

A recent meeting with Capitol Police revealed that the person who found the pipe bomb on January 6th was an undercover Capitol Police officer. This raises concerns about the response time of other law enforcement agencies. The timing of the bomb's discovery, just minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter, seems suspicious. The ATF director refused to comment on whether the bombs were operable, suggesting a cover-up. The bombs were sent to Quantico for inspection, not to the ATF. The discovery of the bombs also prevented reinforcements in the form of bike racks from reaching the Capitol, potentially making it easier to breach. The motive behind planting the bombs remains unknown.

The speaker believes the individual in question did not act alone in what they consider a significant attack on democracy. They question the media's quick dismissal and suggest the individual could have been targeted by a foreign enemy. Senator Ron Johnson questions the rush to dispose of evidence, such as washing the roof and cremating the body, before autopsy and toxicology reports were released. He notes the FBI quickly declared the individual acted alone without a thorough investigation. Johnson also mentions the individual had encrypted accounts in different countries. The speaker highlights concerns about the FBI's history of spying and suggests they possess the individual's metadata. They challenge the FBI to release the information if the individual acted alone. They cite a counter sniper who found it concerning that the roof was scrubbed down so quickly. Johnson states that the Secret Service and FBI are stonewalling the senate investigation by providing heavily redacted documents and delaying transcribed interviews. He believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. The speaker argues that the FBI and Secret Service should be transparent with congressional representatives to address concerns, and their lack of transparency suggests they are hiding something.

The Secret Service is refusing to cooperate, stonewalling efforts to uncover the facts. They have not testified or provided documents, which raises serious concerns. The director, Ron Rowe, should be removed for his inadequate response that endangered the president's life. This lack of transparency follows two assassination attempts and parallels the FBI's current stonewalling regarding drone incidents in New Jersey and elsewhere. It's time for accountability and a thorough overhaul of these agencies.

Specific observations indicate police officers and Capitol Police entered rooms in uniform and emerged as Trump supporters and construction workers. This raises questions about why video evidence hasn't been released. Navigating the Capitol's maze-like layout requires extensive familiarity. Trump supporters leading the way inside the Capitol before doors opened likely coordinated with FBI agents and assets embedded in the crowd, possibly for months. The speaker believes the American people deserve to know this truth.

Cocaine found in Capitol Police headquarters, sparking investigation. No suspects or video footage. Speculation includes Democrat senate staffer and California delegation. Stay tuned for updates.