TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The central bankers have a goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs. They have used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

They are now pushing wearables on the population. And starting with external wearables and then going into internal wearables in the future, we do know as well Gates Foundation funded what's called microneedle patch implants that install quantum dots in skin for about five years to for use as vaccine passports. Again, this is on the National Library of Medicine website. So, yeah, the plan appears to be going from external wearables, get them to wear that, and then you go into the internal wearables, these implants.

Central banks are considering the introduction of central bank digital currency (CBDC), but there is little information on what it actually looks like. Some central banks have reportedly developed the final stage of CBDC, which is the size of a grain of rice and serves as a digital ID and wallet. This aligns with the trend of contactless payments using RFID technology. However, the idea of implanting microchips under the skin raises concerns about privacy and human dignity. The concept of universal basic income has gained support from billionaire elites since the technology for microchip implants became available. The COVID-19 pandemic has further facilitated the agenda for digital ID implementation.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

"While many people rightly say that money is already digital, when world leaders say digital money today, it means cryptocurrency, which is now part of a worldwide scheme to monitor your actions and control your money." "This new form of currency will require you to have a unique digital wallet, which is essentially a digital ID." "Last spring, European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde said that the ECB will be ready to launch the digital euro by this October." "According to the Atlantic Council, a 137 countries and currency unions are preparing for a crypto digital currency." "Three countries have already launched theirs, The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria." "CBDCs in the advanced stages are the digital euro, China's digital yuan, India's e rupee, The United Kingdom's digital pound, Brazil's digital reel, and Russia's digital ruble." "The Trump family even have their own stablecoin, the USD 1 stablecoin from World Liberty Financial."

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

Joe Biden's administration is prioritizing the creation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), with the Federal Reserve and the Bank for International Settlements involved. The goal is to eliminate cash and have everyone use CBDCs for better tracking and control. CBDCs can be programmed to restrict certain purchases, like if someone exceeds their carbon footprint. This is seen as a dangerous tool for tyranny and a step towards a surveillance state. The idea of CBDCs is highly unpopular among Americans, but the plan is to gradually push it through and eventually demonize cash. It is crucial to resist this development, as once implemented, it will be difficult to reverse.

Digital money offers significant benefits, beyond just being a digital version of physical currency. It allows for programmability, such as central bank currency with expiry dates. In my book, I discuss the potential for a world where the government can restrict the use of central bank money for certain purchases it deems undesirable, like ammunition, drugs, or pornography. This concept has the potential to be both better and darker, but it highlights the power of a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Speaker 0 discusses what central bank digital currency (CBDC) might look like, noting that many people won’t like its appearance. He claims several central banks have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC, which would come in stages—initially through a mobile phone, but the final stage being small, the size of a grain of rice. He says this grain of rice is the entire wallet and digital ID, serving as your wallet, passport, and key. Speaker 1 asks if that grain of rice is the entire wallet. Speaker 0 confirms: yes, it’s your digital ID and wallet. He observes that debit and credit cards have moved to RFID chips for contactless payments, conditioning people to wave instead of swiping. He suggests the next rationale is that waving is faster, but raises concerns about losing or having cards stolen, implying a broader move toward implanting a microchip under the skin. He argues this would be a step too far for many due to human dignity concerns, requiring persuasion. Speaker 0 then connects universal basic income (UBI) to this technology, noting UBI has been discussed for a century, but billionaires and the World Economic Forum only supported it in recent years. He states that since February 2015, big billionaires and the World Economic Forum have endorsed UBI. He claims Bill Gates stated in February 2017 that UBI is a good idea but too early to introduce it, and he asserts the missing element then was a digital ID. He attributes the timing to the COVID agenda, arguing the sequence was to develop the technology first, then the ID. Speaker 0 explains a supposed usual game plan: central banks create boom-bust cycles and economic crises, then present a new idea as the solution. He contends that resistance to an implant would be high, so they sought another approach. He claims there is a World Economic Forum insight that once people accept electronic implants, there is a legal angle under which those with implants could be encouraged to be viewed as enhanced and not necessarily human, while the transhumanist movement entertains the idea of humanoid robots. Speaker 1 asks about a potential consequence, and Speaker 0 reiterates the idea that once someone has a microchip implant, the next question is whether they will still have human rights. He claims the World Economic Forum has conducted surveys asking whether humanoid robots should have human rights, and that most people say yes once the implant is accepted. In summary, the speakers discuss CBDC progression to a grain-sized digital ID wallet, RFID conditioning, the push for implantable chips, UBI advocacy by elites, a COVID-era trigger, a crisis-based rollout tactic, transhumanist legal considerations, and potential human-rights implications for humanoid robots.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided a convenient excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the lack of strong justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

The Bank of England has developed a microchip implant RFID chip for under-the-skin use. There is a growing conversation about universal basic income from various grassroots movements and billionaires. The concerns about privacy and freedom are alarming, especially with the introduction of central bank digital money. The ability for governments to digitally track every purchase and sale is unsettling. Additionally, programmability is seen as a way for central bank digital currencies to enhance financial inclusion.

- Central bank digital currency (CBDC) design: There is talk of a final stage that is small and grain-of-rice sized, with initial access via mobile phones as an intermediate step. - A grain-of-rice-sized CBDC would function as your entire wallet and digital ID, potentially serving as your wallet, passport, and key. - Payment infrastructure evolution: Debit and credit cards have moved to RFID chips for contactless use, conditioning people to the idea of waving rather than inserting or typing. - Future payment modality: The next rationalization is that waving a device will be faster than queuing and entering numbers, but there is concern about losing or having cards stolen, which leads to the idea of a system where you cannot lose it and nobody can steal it. - Implant concept and human dignity: A microchip implant under the skin is discussed as a means to realize such a system, with the claim that some people may view this as a violation of human dignity. - Universal basic income (UBI) and timing: The idea of universal basic income has existed for about a century, but billionaire elites and the World Economic Forum have endorsed it more recently. Since 02/2015, there is said to be broad support among major figures, and in 02/2017 Bill Gates stated that UBI is a good idea but too early to introduce it. - Missing component and COVID-19 impact: It is claimed that the technology for the microchip implant existed earlier, but digital ID had not yet been introduced. The COVID agenda is described as having made the digital ID useful or relevant, enabling the planned sequence. - Strategy for introduction: Traditionally, central banks would create boom-bust cycles to push new ideas as solutions during crises. In this account, resistance to implants was anticipated to be high, so an alternate approach was pursued. - Transhumanism and law: There is a view that once electronic implants exist in the body, there is discussion in the World Economic Forum about the legal consequences, including the possibility of people being classified as not human if they have implants. - Humanoid robots and human rights: The discussion mentions attempts to persuade people by claiming enhancements, and raises the question of whether humanoid robots should have human rights; the World Economic Forum has reportedly conducted surveys asking whether humanoid robots should have human rights, with most people responding that it could apply to you once you accept the microchip implant.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

Central banks are developing central bank digital currency (CBDC), but there is little discussion about what it actually looks like. It is said to be the size of a grain of rice and can function as a digital wallet, passport, and key. The move towards contactless payments with RFID technology is conditioning people for this transition. The next step could be microchip implants under the skin, eliminating the risk of losing or stealing cards. However, this idea may face resistance due to concerns about violating human dignity. The concept of universal basic income has gained support from billionaire elites since the technology for microchip implants became available. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an opportunity to introduce digital IDs, further advancing this agenda.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided a convenient excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

The central bankers have a goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, even though the justification wasn't strong. Their ultimate aim is to create a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

When Elias Brotberger goes to work, he uses a microchip in his hand for keys, ID, and wallet. The chip, like a grain of rice, allows him to access the building and buy snacks. In Sweden, microchip implants are common, similar to credit card technology. Despite concerns about loss of privacy and humanity, many see the value in having a smart device under their skin. The process is quick and painless, with estimates of 510,000 people already chipped. Human microchipping is a reality in Sweden, with potential for widespread adoption in the future.

The speaker discusses Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), specifically the digital euro, and its upcoming introduction planned for 2029, noting that the European Parliament has some resistance. Rapporteur Naharete Rogas opposes the plan, arguing that the current design adds nothing for ordinary people, i.e., ordinary citizens like you and me. The speaker counters a common claim that CBDC is not a replacement for cash and that the digital euro is not programmable. The speaker argues that, by definition, central bank money can be programmable. The explanation focuses on how the central bank’s balance sheet works when money is spent. When the central bank issues money (spends), it increases its balance sheet. Cash sits on the right side of the balance sheet. To keep the balance, on the asset side there are government bonds (and potentially other bonds) that earn interest, which means the central bank collects money from society. The Dutch central bank has written in a report about design choices for a digital euro that the central bank can influence society by increasing the money supply, because it earns interest, a process often referred to as seigniorage. The speaker emphasizes that if cash exists in a given quantity and the central bank issues CBDC in addition to that cash, the central bank’s balance sheet grows. To prevent this imbalance, the only way to keep the totals equal is implied: every time you issue 1 euro of CBDC or even a 10-euro note in digital form, you would need to keep the physical cash in ATMs from being replenished or refreshed. Under the digital euro scenario labeled “scenario 4,” CBDC would thus be the replacement of cash, with the overall sum being kept in balance through this mechanism. The speaker concludes with “Dus dut,” underscoring that the outcome depends on how the total money supply is managed and whether CBDC is deployed in a way that maintains or replaces cash.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

Many people are a little worried about what will happen to them with the digital euro. Can you encourage them? Why is the digital euro good for people like you and me? The digital currency, where it has been piloted, and there is only one which is clearly now launched in in a very small country, but it is piloted on a fairly large scale in in China, is of use and of service to all citizens. So it is not something that is good for the elite or is good for the young or is good for some versus others. If it is well done and if it is well implemented, it would be of service to all citizens.

The speaker claims the UN has partnered with Bill Gates on 'digital public infrastructure,' calling it 'a giant digital gulag for all of humanity.' The UN development program has launched to impose major elements of this digital public infrastructure within five years. '2020 passport Digital IDs' are emerging, with airport scans of digital ID QR codes common. Central bank digital currencies are being developed; '98% of the governments and central banks in the world are working on these CBDCs' to wage a 'war on cash.' Digital health certificates and digital vaccine passports build on EU work, promoted in May 2019 by the European Commission. BIS pursues a 'universal blockchain ledger' to tokenize every asset and require biometric digital IDs and CBDCs for transactions; purchases would involve a blockchain transfer, not cash. This is described as a mechanism for controlling humanity, unprecedented in human history.

Speaker 0 asserts that the control grid arrived in America via Apple, stating they worked for Apple for seventeen years and still hold stock, so they find no joy in revealing this. They claim there are no good guys here and argue that we need to shut it down while we can. They state that Apple just rolled out digital ID integration and acknowledge it sounds convenient, but warn that every convenience has a price. According to them, once identity goes digital, it becomes programmable, and once programmable, it becomes controllable. They contend that individuals are handing over their entire identity wrapped in a product, a file that can easily be deleted. If one does not comply, access is lost; if opinions are not liked, accounts are frozen. They claim that stepping out of line results in travel restrictions, bank transfer blocks, and loss of benefits. They insist this is not speculation and that it is already live. Examples are offered to illustrate the claim: Thailand has programmable digital currency; Europe introduced biometric wallets; Canada froze accounts during protests; China is described as having started the pilot and now in full production mode with a live social credit system. They assert that China is secretly building the infrastructure at a global level right now, not through laws or force, but through updates and convenience. They claim that in Vietnam, 86,000,000 bank accounts were deleted because people wouldn’t agree to a digital ID. Concerning the European Union, they state that by 2027, large cash payments will be outlawed, forcing people onto digital rails that can be controlled. They describe this as just the on ramp, arguing that freedom becomes conditional when identity is controlled by a corporation or a government that can revoke it with a keystroke. They describe the arrival of dystopia as occurring not with tanks or force, but with app updates or convenience. They conclude by urging listeners to pay attention and push back while they still can. The message ends with an appeal to “Let’s go,” emphasizing urgency to resist the rollout of digital identity and programmable control embedded in convenient updates and services.

The speaker suggests that the agenda to implement CBDCs has been delayed, but the technology has been ready since 2015. They mention that CBDCs could initially be phone-based apps, but the ultimate goal is to implant a small chip under people's skin. The speaker believes this violates human dignity. They explain that to convince people to accept this, there will be a push for universal basic income due to unemployment and crises. However, to efficiently run this system, the speaker suggests the need for a CBDC chip implant. They acknowledge that a surprising proportion of people may agree to this.