reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to Brett Weinstein, vaccines with aluminum can trigger an immune response that, when combined with certain foods, may lead to food allergies. This is supported by medical literature, including the book "Dissolving Illusions." Vaccines with aluminum skew the immune system towards the Th2 arm, responsible for allergic responses and autoimmunity, rather than the Th1 arm, which is crucial for fighting infections. Unlike live attenuated vaccines, killed vaccines like DTaP contain aluminum. Breastfeeding helps babies develop tolerance to antigens by introducing them through the mother's milk. Some argue that developing tolerance is more important than creating a defensive response to every microbe. Vaccine scientists are focused on getting antibodies and ramping up an infant's immune system.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine adjuvants, particularly aluminum, and their potential link to allergies. They highlight the paradox of using inflammation-inducing substances to make vaccines work in a nonspecific way, especially when inflammation is generally considered harmful. The speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should necessitate specific instructions to minimize the risk of triggering reactions to non-pathogens, potentially leading to lifelong reactivity. They claim to have never heard such instructions being provided.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Brett Weinstein believes that vaccines with aluminum can trigger food allergies if certain foods are eaten around the time of vaccination. According to the speaker, this is supported by medical literature, including the book Dissolving Illusions. Vaccines with aluminum skew the immune system toward the Th2 arm, which is associated with allergic responses and autoimmunity, rather than the Th1 arm, which is important for fighting infections. Live attenuated vaccines do not contain aluminum. Breastfeeding helps babies develop tolerance to antigens by introducing them through the mother's breast milk. The speaker claims that developing tolerance is more important than becoming defensive against every microbe. Vaccine scientists are allegedly too focused on antibody production in infants.

In the U.S., babies are vaccinated with aluminum-containing hepatitis B vaccines hours after birth, even if the mother tested negative. At two months old, babies receive another multidose of vaccines containing 1,200 of aluminum at two, four, and six months. Injected aluminum is 100% absorbed, unlike aluminum consumed in breast milk, which is only .3% absorbed and more easily metabolized. Injected aluminum goes into the brain, spleen, and liver and is not excreted in urine. Studies show minimal aluminum is excreted in urine after vaccination at two months. In animals, injected aluminum goes into the brain via macrophages and accumulates in tissues and bone. Vaccinations continue through toddlerhood, with additional doses at ages four and five. Gardasil vaccines given in high school contain unique and large amounts of aluminum. College students are told they need more doses, and parents are told they need shingles and pneumonia shots, creating cradle-to-grave vaccination.

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. And, you know, there’s two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't.

Vaccines are considered a pillar of medicine and are rarely questioned, but everything in science should be questioned. Research is being conducted on aluminum, a common vaccine adjuvant, and its impact on the nervous system. Injectable aluminum, unlike dietary aluminum, is designed to remain in the body. An experiment was conducted involving injecting aluminum hydroxide into mice to mimic vaccine schedules. The mice rapidly developed behavioral symptoms, motor function issues, and cognitive deficits. Upon examination, massive damage to motor neurons was discovered. This raises concerns about potentially creating conditions for diseases like Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's later in life. Despite concerns about backlash when the study was released, the response was largely silence from pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies. No counter-studies have been presented to refute the findings.

We studied the impact of injectable aluminum in vaccines on the nervous system. Injected aluminum stays in the body longer than dietary aluminum, leading to behavioral, motor, and cognitive deficits in mice. Brain and spinal cord damage was also observed, potentially increasing the risk of diseases like Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's in the future.

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

Aluminum is a common vaccine adjuvant, crucial for long-term protection. Research examined the impact of injectable aluminum on the nervous system, contrasting it with dietary aluminum, which is rapidly excreted. An experiment injecting aluminum hydroxide into mice to mimic vaccine schedules revealed rapid behavioral symptoms, including motor and cognitive deficits. Upon examination, the brains and spinal cords of the mice showed massive damage to motor neurons. The research suggests that injectable aluminum may create conditions for diseases such as Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's, potentially manifesting decades later.

Rats can be given food allergies by administering aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a specific protein like peanut or dairy. This induces a permanent allergy to that protein. Vaccines not only contain aluminum adjuvant but also peanut oil excipients, potentially contributing to peanut allergies in a generation. The aluminum adjuvant can also trigger allergies to substances in the environment at the time of vaccination, such as Timothy weed. A study by Mawson indicates that vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. The speaker claims that the prevalence of allergies in children is linked to the aluminum in vaccines.

Aluminum is ingested from the environment and food, but only 0.1% is absorbed, while 100% of injected aluminum is absorbed. Most vaccines on the childhood schedule contain too much aluminum. The hepatitis B vaccine has more aluminum than is considered safe to ingest. The FDA had a document in 2001 stating aluminum consumption should not exceed five micrograms per kilogram per day. For a three-kilogram baby, the limit is fifteen micrograms, but 250 micrograms are injected via the vaccine. A study by James Landsweil found that aluminum content in infants exceeds safe toxicity levels on vaccine days, regardless of whether it's the CDC schedule or a vaccine-friendly plan.

The study allowing aluminum in vaccines was based on just four New Zealand white rabbits, which is statistically inadequate. After losing one rabbit's results, only three remained, and their outcomes were alarming. No behavioral or cognitive tests were conducted, and upon sacrifice, significant amounts of aluminum adjuvants were still found in their bodies—94% and 70% respectively. Contrary to the belief that aluminum is excreted through urine, it remained in critical organs like the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite these troubling findings, the FDA and CDC deemed aluminum adjuvants safe and effective, raising serious concerns about the validity of the study and the safety of aluminum-containing vaccines.

The cause of the peanut allergy epidemic is unknown. One hypothesis suggests a correlation between peanut snack consumption and lower allergy rates in Israel, but this doesn't prove causation. There are also virtually no allergies in the Amish community. One speaker's son had severe peanut allergies, leading to the formation of the Food Allergy Initiative, which funded research at Mount Sinai. Scientists there could induce allergies in rats using an aluminum adjuvant and a protein. The speaker claims this adjuvant is also in the hepatitis B vaccine, which sometimes contains peanut oil. A study by Moss and Cowlings allegedly showed that environmental factors at the time of vaccination can also cause allergies. They also found vaccinated children are thirty times more likely to have allergic rhinitis than unvaccinated children. The speaker suggests examining the aluminum in vaccines, as the allergy explosion began in 1989 when the vaccine schedule expanded. Another speaker notes Israel uses the same vaccines. The first speaker counters that Israel doesn't use as many vaccines, nor do they administer the hepatitis B vaccine within the first 24 hours of life, unlike the US.

In the U.S., babies are vaccinated with aluminum-containing hepatitis B vaccines hours after birth, even if the mother tested negative. At two months old, babies receive a multidose of vaccines containing 1,200 of aluminum, and continue at four and six months. Injected aluminum is 100% absorbed, unlike aluminum consumed in breast milk, which is only .3% absorbed and easier to metabolize. Injected aluminum goes to the brain, spleen, and liver and is not excreted in urine. Studies show minimal aluminum is excreted in urine after vaccination at two months. In animals, injected aluminum goes into the brain via macrophages, and accumulates in tissues and bone. Vaccinations continue through toddlerhood, with more doses at four and five years old. Gardasil vaccines, containing unique and high amounts of aluminum, are given in high school. College students are told they need more doses, and parents are told they need shingle and pneumonia shots, creating cradle-to-grave vaccination.

Lab rats were induced to develop allergies by injecting them with aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a protein, such as peanut protein. This combination resulted in the rats developing a permanent peanut allergy. The aluminum adjuvant can cause allergies not only to materials in the vaccine but also to materials in the environment. Therefore, vaccination during a Timothy weed outbreak may lead to a lifelong allergy to Timothy weed. Studies by Mawson and Cowlings allegedly show that vaccinated children have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. It is claimed that widespread allergies have been created by early vaccinations.

The aluminum safety study that allowed aluminum into US vaccines was based on a study of four New Zealand white rabbits, but the results from one rabbit were lost, leaving only three. The rabbits were killed after 28 days with no cognition tests. Upon sacrificing the rabbits, the aluminum adjuvants were still present in their bodies. 94% of one type of aluminum adjuvant and approximately 70% of another remained. The aluminum was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite the study's flaws and horrifying results, the FDA and CDC declared aluminum adjuvants in vaccines safe and effective. The speaker asserts that anyone who reads the study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines.

We studied the impact of injectable aluminum in vaccines on the nervous system. When injected into mice, aluminum caused rapid behavioral, motor, and cognitive deficits, along with damage to motor neurons. This may lead to conditions like Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's diseases in the future. Dietary aluminum is excreted quickly, but injectable aluminum is designed to stay in the body as an adjuvant for long-term protection.

A study compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children and found that nasal allergy, allergic rhinitis, and autism were significantly higher in the vaccinated group. The risk of nasal allergy was 30 times higher, while autism was 4.2 times higher in vaccinated children. Additionally, vaccinated children were four times more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia compared to the unvaccinated group. This study highlights the potential risks associated with childhood vaccinations.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. They take the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, add a latex molecule, and that rat now has a permanent latex allergy. You add a peanut molecule and it has a permanent peanut allergy.

Aluminum in vaccines can trigger food allergies. Brett Weinstein believes there's a connection between aluminum in shots and the development of food allergies. According to dissolving illusions, vaccines with aluminum skew the immune system. The immune system has two arms: Th1 and Th2. Th1 includes T cells and lymphocytes, which eliminate garbage. Th2 deals with parasites and is mostly an antibody arm. Vaccinologists prioritize making sure there are enough antibodies. Vaccines with aluminum trigger the Th2 response, which is the allergic response and can set up the body for autoimmunity. DTaP and killed vaccines contain aluminum. Live attenuated vaccines do not contain aluminum.

Speaker 0 says: Today’s discussion covers the Lyme situation and claims about vaccines. The claim is that you were injected with gelatin as a child through vaccines, which made you allergic to ticks. Ticks are said to not cause disease, just to be aware. A PubMed article is cited about the association between tick bites, allergic reactions, and gelatin-containing vaccines causing the allergic reaction. Some people insist they didn’t get vaccines with gelatin, but Speaker 0 argues childhood vaccines actually contain it. Speaker 0 claims that the vaccine intended to save you is new, yet there was a past version that resulted in many lawsuits, implying a repeated pattern. The discussion then shifts to Lyme disease: if someone has Lyme, they allegedly had a PCR test that amplified the results to tell them they had an illness to sell a treatment and induce fear of ticks. Speaker 0 lists symptoms claimed to be Lyme disease: fevers, chills, headaches, fatigue, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes, and facial palsy. These are described as side effects of vaccines as well. Even someone who says they didn’t take any vaccines is asked about exposure to wireless technology at home (microwaving), and pesticide exposure, which are claimed to cause the same symptoms. Speaker 0 references books on related topics: Peanut Allergy Epidemic, Contagion Myth, and The Poison Needle. The overarching claim is that “almost all illnesses result from vaccines, wireless, and pesticides.” Speaker 0 offers a supposed remedy: for any bug bite, use dragon’s blood and coconut oil, saying it heals ticks bites, wasps, spiders, bees quickly. The statement is presented as an example of why people were allergic to peanuts, tying vaccine use to broader allergy development. Speaker 0 concludes by reiterating the pattern: you get vaccinated, you become allergic to ticks; you get vaccinated, you become allergic to peanuts; the same mechanism is claimed to be at play.

An expert conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker mentions that vaccines may shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker also claims that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study. They argue that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and explaining the mechanism of action involving aluminum.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.