TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

If ICE agents attempt to detain you or a loved one while wearing masks and driving unmarked vehicles without badges, you have the right to shoot them on-site in self-defense. Their behavior resembles that of gang members or the mafia, making it difficult to identify them. It is questioned why anyone would want to be an ICE agent, especially given their role in separating children from parents and deporting students. Deporting criminals is understandable, but targeting innocent people is considered ridiculous.

FBI. We have a warrant. Open the door. Hey, Bill, what's inside? Come on in. George, put your hands up.

I've asked the DOJ where the line is regarding impeding or interfering with law enforcement. Some members of Congress are educating people on how to evade law enforcement, claiming they're educating about constitutional rights. But in reality, they're telling people who are in the country illegally, have committed crimes, and been ordered removed by a federal judge to not open their doors and hide from ICE. As a member of Congress, they should let us enforce the laws that have been enacted. If someone physically prevents an arrest, that's obstruction, but where's the line when it's just telling people to hide? I want to know where that crosses into impeding law enforcement, so I've asked the Department of Justice to define that line.

There's someone in our community whose immigration status is unresolved. We decided to let her stay in our house above the garage, making it difficult for authorities to intervene. I took note of this situation. If it turns out that he is knowingly harboring an illegal alien, it would violate Title 8 United States Code 1324, and we will pursue prosecution. He might be bluffing, but if he's not, we will address it accordingly.

Are you worried about migrant groups working to obstruct ICE? Federal officials report that activists are increasingly tracking ICE movements and educating migrants on their rights, such as not answering questions or allowing entry without a warrant. Some believe these actions protect criminals and hinder law enforcement. In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has housed a migrant at his home, challenging federal authorities to find her. This approach is seen as reckless, with concerns that it endangers people and defies legal processes. If charges arise against the governor for his actions, some believe he deserves them for protecting someone unlawfully present in the country.

Speaker 0 asks whether you need to show ID, questions if that has a warrant, and asks if you don’t have an ID.

A speaker asked if the department could use AI to identify non-City of LA agents from neighboring towns to warn the business and immigrant communities about potential due process issues and lack of warrants. The speaker clarified that they were asking what the department could do to warn them about outside agencies coming in from other cities, so they could warn their people. The department representative stated that they could not warn about an enforcement action being taken by another agency before it happens because that would be obstruction of justice.

The speaker discusses the importance of opening a building for inspection due to potential fraudulent evidence. They mention the possibility of personal prosecution or attention. The speaker asks for confirmation on whether they will be informed about the decision. The conversation then shifts to the warrant, which allows inspection inside buildings. The speaker requests the building to be opened, but the other person questions the requirement to open the door. The speaker mentions following their attorney's advice and not allowing entry. The conversation ends with the speaker stating that they will inform the judge about the situation. The other person offers to have a private conversation, but it is unclear if it takes place.

Hello? This is an officer with ICE conducting a routine check. Are you an American citizen? Yes, I am. We have some questions to verify that. How many points are scored in a football game? Six. What’s your stance on making America great again? We want to make America great again. Who’s the best female artist? Taylor Swift. Last question: can you say Walmart? Yes, I can say Walmart. Alright, thank you.

I firmly believe that no one from ICE will ever come into my classroom to remove a student, especially since I have no undocumented students. Even if I did, the Plyler v. Doe ruling ensures that everyone is entitled to a free and appropriate education. I'm currently engaged in teaching and cannot answer the door right now. You'll have to come back later, which means never, because I stand firmly against any actions that threaten my students' rights.

At a recent seminar, I advised Somalis in the U.S. illegally on their rights regarding deportation. If questioned by ICE, you are not required to answer. Simply state you’ve been advised by a lawyer not to answer. Providing your name, immigration status, or mode of entry isn't mandatory. Learn the laws, prepare yourselves, and avoid disclosing unnecessary information. Know your rights.

CPS is facing a massive nationwide investigation at the highest level. If your case involves multiple state jurisdiction or interstate compact, email details for review. CPS is described as the largest child trafficking organization. Trust the process and send your case for shocking results. Spread the word to those dealing with CPS. Never allow a CPS agent in your home without a warrant.

There's someone in our community whose immigration status needs improvement. We decided to let her stay in our house above the garage, making it difficult for authorities to intervene. I took note of the situation. If it's confirmed that he's knowingly harboring an illegal alien, it violates Title 8 United States Code 1324, and prosecution will be pursued. He might be bluffing, but if not, we will address it accordingly.

FBI, we have a warrant. Come to the door. Close your hands. Hands empty. It's you. Close your hands. Keep your hands up. Alright. Yep. I got watch me. Watch me. He's on the top. I'm here. Come here. Come to the door. Turn around slowly.

FBI, we have a warrant. Please come to the door. Come on, open up. Come on, let's go. Come on, we need you to respond. Come on, we’re waiting. Come on, this is important. Come on, we need to get inside. Come on, please cooperate. Come on, we’re here to serve a warrant. Come on, we need your cooperation. Come on, this is serious. Come on, we’re asking you to open the door. Come on, we’re not going away. Come on, please answer us. Come on, we need to proceed. Come on, let’s make this easier. Come on, just open the door. Come on, we’re here for a reason. Come on, we’re waiting for you. Come on, please let us in.

If you prefer not to answer questions, you can say so. You’re not willing to sign anything or talk without a lawyer, but you’ll remain cordial. Since we lack a proper facility, we’ll explain your situation privately. We have a search warrant for your residence and are sending people there now. Is someone home? You can call them. This is a federal arrest warrant against you for civil disorder and entering a restricted area. You can review the warrant, which is from DC. You’ll be detained for a few hours today, and there will be a search of your house. I’ll explain the process to help ease your stress. We’re concluding our conversation now.

A heated exchange unfolds between Speaker 0, who identifies as part of a community protection group, and Speaker 1, who represents ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Speaker 0 confronts the ICE team as they arrive in the neighborhood, insisting on seeing a warrant and demanding identification. The dialogue centers on whether the agents have a warrant signed by a judge and whether they should reveal badge numbers or other identifying information. Speaker 0 repeatedly presses for documentation: “Could you show me it, please?” and asks, “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” He questions the legitimacy of the officers’ presence, asking, “What’s your badge number, sir? Do you have a badge number? Can you identify yourself, please?” He emphasizes that “you’re coming into my city” and challenges why they would be in the area. Speaker 1 responds briefly and evasively, asserting identity as ICE and insisting that Speaker 0 has no business being present: “I’m ICE. Immigration. Immigration. Immigration. Customs enforcement. Okay. That’s all I am.” He adds, “You don’t have business when we get out of here, sir,” and later, “We’re looking for somebody,” though Speaker 0 pushes to know the name of the person they are pursuing: “Do you know his name? Do you have his name or her their name? What is their name?” Speaker 0 emphasizes community scrutiny and accountability, stating, “These are one of my neighbors, so I just wanna,” and challenges the officers’ transparency, asking for their identifications and accusing them of hiding their faces: “Why are you covering your face? Why don’t you take your mask down?” He taunts them with a threat to publish the encounter: “I’m gonna get this on the Internet. Your family is gonna be ashamed of you when they learn what you’re doing.” As the exchange escalates, Speaker 1 asserts authority and tries to disengage: “You don’t have business when we get out of here,” and “Okay. That’s all I am.” The confrontation intensifies with Speaker 0 inviting an on-the-record discussion and challenging the officers to converse “down” with him instead of remaining in their vehicle. The dialogue culminates with a physical and verbal standoff as Speaker 0 steps back and the officers retreat, while Speaker 0 continues to voice distrust, calling the actions “Gestapo”-like and insisting that the officers come talk to him in the street rather than remaining behind a door or in a car.

Every ICE agent engaging in aggressive overreach and attempting to conceal their identities from the American people will fail. This is America, not the Soviet Union or the 1930s. Every single one of them will be identified, regardless of the effort or time required.

Viewer discretion is advised. This special edition of immigration and customs enforcement is filmed on location with the men and women of law enforcement. All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

The NEA has been fighting attacks on immigrant rights, including the removal of safe zones, which previously limited ICE access to schools and churches. Now, ICE agents are reportedly abducting students and faculty, even grade school children, causing fear and disrupting education. There are also threats to defund schools through Title VI enforcement, starting with higher education. To combat this, schools should develop safe zone policies. Under Plyler versus Doe, all students have a constitutional right to attend public school, and schools should not collect immigration status information. Schools should designate a person to verify the authority of ICE agents before allowing them on the property, distinguishing between judicial and administrative warrants. Universities and colleges should also designate public and private areas on campus. Red cards, available in multiple languages, can be used to assert the right to remain silent and demand a judicial warrant when confronted by immigration enforcement.

Who are you, people of policing? Are you enforcing tyranny? No, you're not. You've broken into this property and are making an arrest without a warrant. Where is the warrant? It doesn’t exist. What are the charges? Why are you taking money? I just want to know your name.

Breaking immigration news: each of the 25 ICE field offices must make 75 arrests daily, or officers risk termination. Agents are primarily targeting individuals with serious criminal records, those with final removal orders who haven't left, and those who re-entered the U.S. without permission after a removal order. Given this increased enforcement, remember your rights. You have the right to remain silent. It's advisable to download a "Know Your Rights" card. If ICE approaches you, you can state your name, but then exercise your right to silence.

Here are some helpful tips for undocumented migrants looking to avoid ICE. First, go back to your own country. Second, obey immigration laws. Third, take off your sombrero so you can blend in. Fourth, resist the urge to lead an armed gang to forcibly take over an apartment complex. Fifth, don't murder anyone. Sixth, learn English. Seventh, go easy on the murdering. Eighth, get your MS 13 face tattoo removed. Ninth, ask Selena Gomez to hide you in one of her mansions. Finally, find the perfect hiding place, like Venezuela. Following these tips is a surefire way to evade capture and deportation. You'll escape the clutches of ICE and be back hanging out in the Home Depot parking lot in no time. If you have any other tips for undocumented migrants avoiding ICE, please leave them in the comments below.

We're reporting on anti-ICE activists in California who are actively obstructing immigration enforcement. Some activists are using bullhorns and sirens to warn migrants of ICE presence, advising them of their rights not to speak or open doors without a warrant. These activists claim to be working with dozens of organizations across the LA area. Separately, flyers revealing the identities of ICE agents have surfaced, causing concern. This doxxing puts agents at risk. As someone who has experienced similar threats, I can say that these agents don't deserve this treatment. They are working to make their community safer by focusing on criminal threats and national security.

Do many of you speak English? We want to talk to as many workers as possible. There’s a lot of concern about immigration issues, but you should know that you don’t need to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office, or the police regarding immigration matters. We do not handle immigration enforcement.