reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Cell phone towers and 5G radiation concerns are unfounded. Even if you had cell phones around your head and genitals, there would be no need to worry. One person believed his cell phone caused his bone cancer, but there is no evidence to support this. Radiation from cell phones is not the same as that from nuclear bombs. Everything emits radiation, but it's the wavelength that matters. Only high-frequency radiation like ultraviolet and beyond can cause DNA damage. Your phone's radiation is nowhere near that level.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

Speaker 0: Kevin Matas, with the California Brain Tumor Association, collaborates with emfscientist.org and other groups—two hundred doctors and scientists from 39 countries—who have looked at health effects from wireless radiation. From their work and others, we can clearly say that wireless radiation can cause cancer, neurological problems, immune system disorders, and reproductive harm. Our scientists, along with other groups, include people developing wireless health effects from various sources—brain tumors from cell phone radiation, neurological symptoms from Wi-Fi in schools, neurological and cancerous health effects from simple smart meters. Smart meters are wireless meters on homes to avoid manual readings. Regardless of the source, the health effects can be the same. Cell towers are the most powerful source of wireless radiation emissions. What brings me here today is the rollout of five Gs technology, which is very different from 2G, 3G, and 4G. This is because the wireless radiation uses a higher frequency. Our current wireless technology uses about 1 gigahertz to 4 gigahertz; this new five G technology is ultra high frequency, ultra high intensity, at 24 gigahertz to 90 gigahertz. To put this in perspective, 90 gigahertz is 90,000,000,000 electromagnetic waves per second hitting your body. We know people are already getting sick from the lower frequencies and we expect, our scientists expect, that these higher ultra high frequency microwaves are going to bring people to disease quicker and in a more intense form. The other problem with five G technology is these microwaves are very short. Old microwaves were about two and a half to three feet long; these are now about an inch to a half an inch long, and they don't travel very well. So they're going to have to put a little cell tower transmitter in front of about every two to 10 homes. This is a big problem because cancer rates around regular cell towers are about three or four times what they are normally, so we’re seeing a lot of things. It’s going to be continuous exposure as with other cell towers, but it will be emitting a much more higher frequency, high intensity wireless radiation. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, not only are these five G death towers going to double cancer rates in our country, they are going to be used to target individuals in a way never seen before. Since most people keep their smartphones on them like a tracking device, and since their political profiles are linked to their phones, it only makes sense that this is going to be an easy way to target people silently and without a trace. As you can see with these new five G death towers, they are going to be focusing beams of high frequency energy at a user's location. These five G death towers are in fact particle beam weapons that can be aimed at people. These particle beams move at the speed of light and track you wherever you go, and in most cases you'll be hit with particle beams coming from multiple directions. This truly is a national emergency considering who controls this technology. You saw how the IRS targeted conservatives. You saw how the FBI covered up the Las Vegas and Hillary investigations. Well, what do you think this beast system is going to do with Christians and conservatives on their networks? Zap, zap, and double zap. That's what admit it. That's what you would do if you were doctor evil. You'd poison the food, the air, the water, and you'd use these death towers to slowly induce cancer. Have no doubt about it. These five G death towers are bad news any way you look at it. So go to your city council meetings. Protest these bad boys from coming up in your neighborhood before it's too late. If you're listening to this, you are the resistance.

The speaker discusses the difference in radiation exposure between Switzerland and the US, stating that the Swiss use significantly less radiation and have no excess deaths. They claim that 5G is a weapon of mass destruction and can cause mass casualties within minutes by depriving people of oxygen. The speaker emphasizes the need for understanding this technology and taking steps to protect oneself. They suggest taking back power and electing honest individuals to positions of authority while shutting down complicit agencies.

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It can penetrate the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, along with various health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting this. I've litigated on this topic and won in federal court, similar to a case involving Monsanto and glyphosate. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones next to their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I'm currently involved in litigation on this matter. If given a fair trial, I believe we will succeed.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

The speaker raises concerns about the dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation (EMF) from Wi-Fi and mobile phone boosters in the Vienna International Center. They urge the Secretary General to remove these devices and halt the rollout of 5G until an independent health and safety assessment is conducted. They highlight the potential global health catastrophe and the need for more protective EMF guidelines. The speaker also suggests using the UN office in Vienna as a case study to investigate any abnormal health consequences caused by EMF exposure. The Secretary General admits his ignorance on the issue and promises to raise it with the World Health Organization (WHO).

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

Speaker 0 explains how to switch from 5G to LTE: Settings, then cellular data, five g plus or five g, turn that to LTE or four g; it takes less than five seconds. He claims, "you'll start feeling better, you won't have headaches, you'll probably get your sense of smell better, you won't be dizzy anymore, have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five gs is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." "But they're not gonna tell you that because that gets censored." He adds, "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." There were people who testified in front of Congress asking, "do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now." "Happy to visit with you as to what opportunities you think there needs to be more studies, and we're always for more science." "We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "Let me follow-up with you, senator. To my knowledge, there's no active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff. That's why I don't use AirPods and smartwatches and all the other stuff because you don't know what you're putting into your body or doing to your body. That's for sure." Speaker 0: "And they're gonna sell it as safe because they tested it on a plastic dummy. So you gotta ask yourself, do you wanna be the plastic dummy? I don't want to. That's for sure."

In 2020, 5G was introduced in Sweden, intended to provide faster transmission speeds using higher frequencies and emitting higher levels of microwave radiation. Its deployment occurred without prior studies on health impacts. An oncologist researching environmental agents and cancer, including radiofrequency radiation, found increased risks of brain tumors and acoustic neuroma linked to mobile phone use. A journalist investigated 5G's introduction, accompanying a person measuring radiation in homes. In one instance, a woman reported her daughter experiencing nosebleeds near 5G antennas. The journalist experienced physical symptoms in the woman's apartment. Scientists called for safety studies before 5G deployment, concerned about potential health consequences due to increased radiation exposure. People reported symptoms like sleeping problems, headaches, and heart issues after 5G base stations were deployed. Case studies have investigated health impacts on people exposed to 5G in real life, revealing symptoms consistent with microwave syndrome, such as headaches, fatigue, and sleep difficulties, which often disappear when people leave the area. One individual reported heart palpitations after 5G antennas were installed near their apartment, directed toward their home.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks from EMF exposure. Crown Castle International in Houston, Texas, disclosed in their 10-K report that negative health effects from wireless handsets could impact their operations. Currently, there are 418,000 cell towers in the US, set to increase by 300% in the next 6 years. The speaker urges consideration of these facts.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

Speaker 0 describes living about 120 miles north of London in a pleasant countryside setting with a city about 10 miles away. There could be a five G tower about a mile from them, so they acknowledge that five G is everywhere now. Speaker 1 responds with a metric they use for risk mitigation. In the United States, big cities require you to be 75 miles away due to airports and military bases. Then they offer a counterpoint: five G antennas aren’t always as bad as they’re made out to be. The key factor with a five G antenna is how many obedient idiots are connected to it. They illustrate this with Destin, Florida, a place known for its beaches. In December, Destin has hardly anyone there, maybe 20,000 residents, but in the summertime, there can be a million people in the city because of vacations. Therefore, those five G antennas in the summertime are way worse than in the wintertime due to the number of people connecting to the tower and radiating. They then discuss how light interacts with the inverse square law, noting that the inverse square law is not only about the closest distance to the antenna but also how much use the antenna is getting. They emphasize that people often forget that second part of the inverse square law. The speaker’s advice is to consider population density when deciding where to live. The speaker acknowledges that the listener has already chosen a place with sparse population density and supports that choice. They conclude by suggesting that when living in an area where light is plentiful, one should embrace all the other good things that nature brings. Overall, the conversation juxtaposes practical geographic placement with how population dynamics influence exposure to five G antennas, arguing that the number of connected users, driven by population density and seasonal occupancy, can significantly affect potential exposure. It also highlights the importance of considering natural surroundings and density when choosing where to reside.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, causing significant health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting these claims. I've successfully litigated on this topic in federal court, as well as on issues related to glyphosate and its connection to Hodgkin's lymphoma. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones near their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I am currently involved in litigation regarding this issue.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks. Sonar's 2019 report from Zurich, Switzerland highlights concerns about EMF effects. Crown Castle International in Texas discloses potential health impact risks in their 10-K report to shareholders. With 418,000 cell towers in the US expected to increase by 300% in the next 6 years, the issue is growing. The speaker urges consideration of these facts and leaves documents with the city clerk.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

Speaker 0 urges switching from five g to four g: "Takes less than five seconds. I guarantee you'll start feeling better." He asserts benefits and adds: "You won't have headaches. You won't be dizzy anymore. Have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five g is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." He states: "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." He asks: "There were people who testified in front of congress and asked them, do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1 replies: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now. Happy to visit with you... we're always for more science. We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "No active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0 concludes: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff... AirPods and smartwatches..."

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Today’s discussion centers on Elon Musk and the technocrat, claiming that "Matt from Cultivate LV lacks medical credentials on five g, and there's no link of any dangers of five g or WiFi," and that AI has been programmed to say this. It references "the studies done by the US Navy in 1971 of 2,000 studies on the biological responses to radio frequencies, five gs wireless, and microwave radiation." It lists side effects: "impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, hallucinations, sleepiness, insomnia, restlessness, chest pain, no side effects," plus "hair loss." It notes that in 1996, "Bill Clinton signs an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits," and claims "No dangers," including that "insurance companies don't cover cell phone companies." It adds that "cell phone safety testing is done on a plastic dummy" and that "The safety standard in The US, Canada, and Australia ... is off the charts, while in other countries, actually very low." It links "the rollout of five g" to the "root cause of the pandemic" and ends with "Here you go."

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.