TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Cell phone towers and 5G radiation concerns are unfounded. Even if you had cell phones around your head and genitals, there would be no need to worry. One person believed his cell phone caused his bone cancer, but there is no evidence to support this. Radiation from cell phones is not the same as that from nuclear bombs. Everything emits radiation, but it's the wavelength that matters. Only high-frequency radiation like ultraviolet and beyond can cause DNA damage. Your phone's radiation is nowhere near that level.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

The speaker discusses the difference in radiation exposure between Switzerland and the US, stating that the Swiss use significantly less radiation and have no excess deaths. They claim that 5G is a weapon of mass destruction and can cause mass casualties within minutes by depriving people of oxygen. The speaker emphasizes the need for understanding this technology and taking steps to protect oneself. They suggest taking back power and electing honest individuals to positions of authority while shutting down complicit agencies.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It can penetrate the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, along with various health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting this. I've litigated on this topic and won in federal court, similar to a case involving Monsanto and glyphosate. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones next to their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I'm currently involved in litigation on this matter. If given a fair trial, I believe we will succeed.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

The speaker raises concerns about the dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation (EMF) from Wi-Fi and mobile phone boosters in the Vienna International Center. They urge the Secretary General to remove these devices and halt the rollout of 5G until an independent health and safety assessment is conducted. They highlight the potential global health catastrophe and the need for more protective EMF guidelines. The speaker also suggests using the UN office in Vienna as a case study to investigate any abnormal health consequences caused by EMF exposure. The Secretary General admits his ignorance on the issue and promises to raise it with the World Health Organization (WHO).

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

Speaker 0 explains how to switch from 5G to LTE: Settings, then cellular data, five g plus or five g, turn that to LTE or four g; it takes less than five seconds. He claims, "you'll start feeling better, you won't have headaches, you'll probably get your sense of smell better, you won't be dizzy anymore, have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five gs is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." "But they're not gonna tell you that because that gets censored." He adds, "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." There were people who testified in front of Congress asking, "do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now." "Happy to visit with you as to what opportunities you think there needs to be more studies, and we're always for more science." "We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "Let me follow-up with you, senator. To my knowledge, there's no active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff. That's why I don't use AirPods and smartwatches and all the other stuff because you don't know what you're putting into your body or doing to your body. That's for sure." Speaker 0: "And they're gonna sell it as safe because they tested it on a plastic dummy. So you gotta ask yourself, do you wanna be the plastic dummy? I don't want to. That's for sure."

In 2020, 5G was introduced in Sweden, intended to provide faster transmission speeds using higher frequencies and emitting higher levels of microwave radiation. Its deployment occurred without prior studies on health impacts. An oncologist researching environmental agents and cancer, including radiofrequency radiation, found increased risks of brain tumors and acoustic neuroma linked to mobile phone use. A journalist investigated 5G's introduction, accompanying a person measuring radiation in homes. In one instance, a woman reported her daughter experiencing nosebleeds near 5G antennas. The journalist experienced physical symptoms in the woman's apartment. Scientists called for safety studies before 5G deployment, concerned about potential health consequences due to increased radiation exposure. People reported symptoms like sleeping problems, headaches, and heart issues after 5G base stations were deployed. Case studies have investigated health impacts on people exposed to 5G in real life, revealing symptoms consistent with microwave syndrome, such as headaches, fatigue, and sleep difficulties, which often disappear when people leave the area. One individual reported heart palpitations after 5G antennas were installed near their apartment, directed toward their home.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks from EMF exposure. Crown Castle International in Houston, Texas, disclosed in their 10-K report that negative health effects from wireless handsets could impact their operations. Currently, there are 418,000 cell towers in the US, set to increase by 300% in the next 6 years. The speaker urges consideration of these facts.

Electromagnetic communication systems like 5G and WiFi are causing infertility, cancer, and death, and that the scientific community is aware of this. Studies show that WiFi and 5G radiation inhibit seed sprouting and growth. Insurance companies are hesitant to underwrite 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks, as indicated in a 2019 Swiss Re report. Crown Castle International acknowledges in its 10K filings that potential health claims related to wireless emissions could adversely affect their operations. RF radiation from 5G can disrupt the blood-brain barrier and is associated with cancers like glioblastomas. There is a need for better regulation and warnings about the dangers of cell phone usage, especially for children. Radar operators in World War II experienced frequency sickness and cancer. Alex Jones is promoting products at the alexshowstore.com, including methylene blue, Shilajit, and various supplements. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been seen taking methylene blue. Jones's improved health and weight loss are attributed to his dedication and hard work.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

Speaker 0 describes living about 120 miles north of London in a pleasant countryside setting with a city about 10 miles away. There could be a five G tower about a mile from them, so they acknowledge that five G is everywhere now. Speaker 1 responds with a metric they use for risk mitigation. In the United States, big cities require you to be 75 miles away due to airports and military bases. Then they offer a counterpoint: five G antennas aren’t always as bad as they’re made out to be. The key factor with a five G antenna is how many obedient idiots are connected to it. They illustrate this with Destin, Florida, a place known for its beaches. In December, Destin has hardly anyone there, maybe 20,000 residents, but in the summertime, there can be a million people in the city because of vacations. Therefore, those five G antennas in the summertime are way worse than in the wintertime due to the number of people connecting to the tower and radiating. They then discuss how light interacts with the inverse square law, noting that the inverse square law is not only about the closest distance to the antenna but also how much use the antenna is getting. They emphasize that people often forget that second part of the inverse square law. The speaker’s advice is to consider population density when deciding where to live. The speaker acknowledges that the listener has already chosen a place with sparse population density and supports that choice. They conclude by suggesting that when living in an area where light is plentiful, one should embrace all the other good things that nature brings. Overall, the conversation juxtaposes practical geographic placement with how population dynamics influence exposure to five G antennas, arguing that the number of connected users, driven by population density and seasonal occupancy, can significantly affect potential exposure. It also highlights the importance of considering natural surroundings and density when choosing where to reside.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, causing significant health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting these claims. I've successfully litigated on this topic in federal court, as well as on issues related to glyphosate and its connection to Hodgkin's lymphoma. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones near their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I am currently involved in litigation regarding this issue.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks. Sonar's 2019 report from Zurich, Switzerland highlights concerns about EMF effects. Crown Castle International in Texas discloses potential health impact risks in their 10-K report to shareholders. With 418,000 cell towers in the US expected to increase by 300% in the next 6 years, the issue is growing. The speaker urges consideration of these facts and leaves documents with the city clerk.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

- The speaker discusses a potential connection between electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and diabetes, noting that there has been a slight increase in diabetes rates associated with the rapid expansion of cellular towers, such as after Bill Clinton’s policy changes. - They acknowledge that EMR is not claimed to be the sole cause of diabetes, but suggest that historical data and curves make it tempting to believe EMR could be a significant factor. - The speaker points out that the topic has been present in scientific literature since at least 1931, and asserts that conventional medicine would push back against this viewpoint, with medical education focused on sugar and other factors. - They emphasize that they are not naive and do not claim EMR is the only cause; rather, the implication is that EMR could contribute to diabetes risk. - The argument culminates in a warning: if power systems and telecommunications infrastructure are not designed more carefully, there will be health and national budget costs, implying broader consequences for public health and economic burden.

"This is a small sample of uranium." "five g radiation is nonionizing radiation and has a wavelength in the millimeter range, very close to what microwave range frequencies just like Wi Fi and microwave ovens give off." "So technically, the main damage we need to worry about with five g is if it's giving enough power to heat your body up like in a microwave." "Let's see how strong the signal is from my phone." "Woah. 89." "you actually get way more radiation holding your phone to your head than being near a tower." "it's orders of magnitude lower than the amount that could cause heating to your body." "the battery warming up in your phone is gonna cause more heating on your body than the five g radiation is." "Aren't you glad cell phones don't use uranium?"

Speaker 0 urges switching from five g to four g: "Takes less than five seconds. I guarantee you'll start feeling better." He asserts benefits and adds: "You won't have headaches. You won't be dizzy anymore. Have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five g is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." He states: "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." He asks: "There were people who testified in front of congress and asked them, do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1 replies: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now. Happy to visit with you... we're always for more science. We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "No active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0 concludes: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff... AirPods and smartwatches..."

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Today’s discussion centers on Elon Musk and the technocrat, claiming that "Matt from Cultivate LV lacks medical credentials on five g, and there's no link of any dangers of five g or WiFi," and that AI has been programmed to say this. It references "the studies done by the US Navy in 1971 of 2,000 studies on the biological responses to radio frequencies, five gs wireless, and microwave radiation." It lists side effects: "impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, hallucinations, sleepiness, insomnia, restlessness, chest pain, no side effects," plus "hair loss." It notes that in 1996, "Bill Clinton signs an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits," and claims "No dangers," including that "insurance companies don't cover cell phone companies." It adds that "cell phone safety testing is done on a plastic dummy" and that "The safety standard in The US, Canada, and Australia ... is off the charts, while in other countries, actually very low." It links "the rollout of five g" to the "root cause of the pandemic" and ends with "Here you go."

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.