reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Believing in the separation of powers is essential for institutionalists. With Donald Trump potentially controlling the executive branch, the Senate, the House, and a majority of the Supreme Court, maintaining checks and balances becomes challenging. It's crucial to rely on Republican officials and justices to hold the executive branch accountable. If unlawful orders are given to the military, I trust that they will refuse to carry them out. Similarly, CIA personnel will not allow their work to be politicized; they are committed to truth. There is a loyalty to the Constitution that transcends political power, and we can have faith in those who uphold these institutions.

Speaker 0: Our only opportunity, our only chance to save our democracy is to fight fire with fire right now. Speaker 0: So, yeah, do I bemoan the fact that, you know, we're now blowing up norms? Yes. Speaker 0: So you have to be willing to do whatever is necessary in order to save the country. Speaker 1: When I hear that, I wonder if Is there enough people that believe that same thing? And until you get more to believe that, that may be why the Democrats aren't rowing in the same direction yet. Speaker 0: You can't get people to believe it if you don't act like it.

What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether the people control it. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has benefited from the government while the people have suffered. The establishment has protected itself, but not the citizens. This is all changing, starting now.

When one side consistently disregards the rules, it creates a significant issue. In such situations, we must stand firm for our beliefs. There may be instances where one side attempts to manipulate the system to maintain a lasting hold on power.

There may be situations where one side attempts to secure power by suppressing votes, politicizing the military, or using the judiciary and criminal justice system against opponents. In such cases, we cannot remain passive or uncertain. When a line has been crossed, it is essential to take a firm stand.

If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything. You will likely face an ultimatum where you must choose between complying or not complying. If you comply when the rule violates your values, then your values don't mean anything, and you won't have any self-respect.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

We must not be afraid to tell the truth that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy in America. We need to stop him at the ballot box.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

It takes courage for those who criticize others to stand on stage and lecture about morality. Everyone here is part of a tolerant majority that has endured insults and disrespect for too long. It's unjust to reward the most destructive individuals in society while hard-working, decent people are overlooked. If we allow bad behavior to continue unchecked, it will only escalate. Just like a parent must discipline their children, society must set limits on unacceptable actions. The upcoming election represents a chance for change, and the atmosphere suggests a return to freedom of expression. People are tired of being misled and manipulated. It's time to reject the narrative that has dominated for years and assert that enough is enough. We will no longer tolerate the destruction of our communities and values.

When long-time politicians treat honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law lightly, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas rather than genuine concern.

Sometimes you have to confront the presidential nominee of your party and speak your mind directly to them.

We are entering a political period with life-altering consequences, demanding unwavering commitment. History shows us mass movements mobilized to protect against fascism and authoritarianism, an era we are now approaching. Donald Trump has suggested deploying the military against US citizens he considers political enemies. Authoritarian regimes often jail political dissidents and legislative opponents. This is the reality we may face.

When will you resist? How far will things go before you say no? Liberty means drawing a line and standing your ground, even if no one else does.

Yet the leadership of the Democratic Party cannot seem to find the front of the battle line. Americans are begging for more. American history has given us leaders who met the existential threats of their time head on. Lincoln did not preserve the union by managing the crisis. FDR did not confront fascism abroad or at home by splitting the difference. So if you are a political leader in this country and you are not prepared to fight with both hands, you're not prepared to make good trouble, then perhaps you should step aside and make space for those who will. They broke the China. This is not a left versus right fight inside the Democratic Party. The choice before us is simply democracy versus authoritarianism. And where is the party is not a rhetorical question.

We're facing a situation of corporate and medical oppression, which feels like tyranny. The question arises: when do we take a stand? How many elections must be compromised before we take serious action?

We need to be ruthless in exercising power. American conservatives have lost control of major institutions, except for churches. To make real change, we must replace the ruling class. Compromise is unlikely with the current power holders. Overthrowing them is necessary to stop losing.

We are entering a critical political period with lasting consequences. History shows us that mass movements have mobilized to protect one another against fascism and authoritarianism, and we may soon face similar challenges. Donald Trump has suggested using the military against those he considers political enemies. This aligns with authoritarian practices seen globally, where political dissidents and opponents are often jailed. We must recognize the serious implications of this potential reality.

They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.

Refusing to honor the results of a fair election is a coup, but acting against a government that hinders a legitimate transfer of power is not. Every vote should be counted, and we must protect democracy. It's crucial to focus on what we know is right amidst different narratives.

I believe the United States is in a type of civil war. By that, I mean we have irreconcilable differences. Each side is willing to fight for the outcomes that they want. In that kind of environment, the question becomes, how will the legal system function? Will it stand in the way of the fight, or will the fight itself become more important than anything else? That's the type of situation we're currently facing.

We must be ruthless in exercising power. American conservatives have lost control of major institutions. To make real change, we need to replace the ruling class. Compromise is unlikely; overthrowing them may be necessary to avoid continued losses.

The extent of corruption in our elections is unknown. Many candidates, regardless of party, may have paid to manipulate the system for personal profit. This isn't just about seizing power; it's incredibly lucrative. Consider the global interests influencing news organizations and the pressure from social media to silence dissent. This is a massive, well-funded campaign to undermine our fundamental right to preserve our republic. This is a critical moment, a pivotal struggle for our nation's future, echoing the fight of 1775.

We have to remain vigilant to maintain our rights; it's just the nature of it. Look at history. Many people had to suppress so much, but they knew the risks. We have to be clear-eyed, but it doesn't mean we don't see the beauty in everything. These things coexist. I believe we fight *for* something, not *against* it, and that's our optimism.

We begin our final sprint, having arrived at the point in the election season where we've said all we can. We've laid out the stakes in this crucial election where one side stands for freedom, while the other side would have the military execute the whims of a strongman dictator. They would control and suppress the press, education, and the arts, rewrite history to suit a favored racial class, and foment extravagant corruption to enrich the dictator and his friends.