TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The central bankers have a goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs. They have used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

They are implementing a digital transaction control grid that restricts how you use your money, when, and where. Your money could be disabled beyond a certain distance from your home, or taxes could be deducted directly from your account. This system will likely be overseen by global entities like the Bank of International Settlements, rather than national central banks.

Central banks are considering the introduction of central bank digital currency (CBDC), but there is little information on what it actually looks like. Some central banks have reportedly developed the final stage of CBDC, which is the size of a grain of rice and serves as a digital ID and wallet. This aligns with the trend of contactless payments using RFID technology. However, the idea of implanting microchips under the skin raises concerns about privacy and human dignity. The concept of universal basic income has gained support from billionaire elites since the technology for microchip implants became available. The COVID-19 pandemic has further facilitated the agenda for digital ID implementation.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The G7, under the UK's presidency, is introducing public policy principles for retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). These CBDCs are digital versions of money, similar to digital banknotes, that can be used alongside physical currency. Unlike other digital money, CBDCs are issued directly by central banks like the Bank of England in the UK.

Joe Biden's administration is prioritizing the creation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), with the Federal Reserve and the Bank for International Settlements involved. The goal is to eliminate cash and have everyone use CBDCs for better tracking and control. CBDCs can be programmed to restrict certain purchases, like if someone exceeds their carbon footprint. This is seen as a dangerous tool for tyranny and a step towards a surveillance state. The idea of CBDCs is highly unpopular among Americans, but the plan is to gradually push it through and eventually demonize cash. It is crucial to resist this development, as once implemented, it will be difficult to reverse.

Digital money offers significant benefits, beyond just being a digital version of physical currency. It allows for programmability, such as central bank currency with expiry dates. In my book, I discuss the potential for a world where the government can restrict the use of central bank money for certain purchases it deems undesirable, like ammunition, drugs, or pornography. This concept has the potential to be both better and darker, but it highlights the power of a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Speaker 0 discusses what central bank digital currency (CBDC) might look like, noting that many people won’t like its appearance. He claims several central banks have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC, which would come in stages—initially through a mobile phone, but the final stage being small, the size of a grain of rice. He says this grain of rice is the entire wallet and digital ID, serving as your wallet, passport, and key. Speaker 1 asks if that grain of rice is the entire wallet. Speaker 0 confirms: yes, it’s your digital ID and wallet. He observes that debit and credit cards have moved to RFID chips for contactless payments, conditioning people to wave instead of swiping. He suggests the next rationale is that waving is faster, but raises concerns about losing or having cards stolen, implying a broader move toward implanting a microchip under the skin. He argues this would be a step too far for many due to human dignity concerns, requiring persuasion. Speaker 0 then connects universal basic income (UBI) to this technology, noting UBI has been discussed for a century, but billionaires and the World Economic Forum only supported it in recent years. He states that since February 2015, big billionaires and the World Economic Forum have endorsed UBI. He claims Bill Gates stated in February 2017 that UBI is a good idea but too early to introduce it, and he asserts the missing element then was a digital ID. He attributes the timing to the COVID agenda, arguing the sequence was to develop the technology first, then the ID. Speaker 0 explains a supposed usual game plan: central banks create boom-bust cycles and economic crises, then present a new idea as the solution. He contends that resistance to an implant would be high, so they sought another approach. He claims there is a World Economic Forum insight that once people accept electronic implants, there is a legal angle under which those with implants could be encouraged to be viewed as enhanced and not necessarily human, while the transhumanist movement entertains the idea of humanoid robots. Speaker 1 asks about a potential consequence, and Speaker 0 reiterates the idea that once someone has a microchip implant, the next question is whether they will still have human rights. He claims the World Economic Forum has conducted surveys asking whether humanoid robots should have human rights, and that most people say yes once the implant is accepted. In summary, the speakers discuss CBDC progression to a grain-sized digital ID wallet, RFID conditioning, the push for implantable chips, UBI advocacy by elites, a COVID-era trigger, a crisis-based rollout tactic, transhumanist legal considerations, and potential human-rights implications for humanoid robots.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

The G20 has announced a plan for a global framework for digital currencies and digital IDs. The IMF and FSB are working on a regulatory framework for crypto assets. This move towards Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) allows for monitoring, regulation, and taxation. It also raises concerns about a potential digital prison and social credit system. India has already developed digital public infrastructure, including digital identity and fast payment systems. The G20 announcement aligns with Elon Musk's plans for X, which involve collecting biometric data and personal information. This development confirms some conspiracy theories about a digital surveillance and police state.

Speaker 0 says that each country will crash its fiat currency and there will be no paper money globally in eighteen months; it will all be digital. Once each country has its own digital currency, that’s the small step. They can’t move to a global digital currency all at once, because that would tip people off to “the whole scam.” So they are doing it one country at a time to make it look like it’s not all connected. After each country cuts off paper money and implements its digital currency, they will finish crashing the whole world’s economy, and then they will come out and say, we need a one world digital currency, but they’ve already got it. The UN is already talking about this; they’ve been working on it for two years and it’s already in place. They’ll say we need a one world digital currency to stop all these crashes and things from happening ever again. It’s for your protection. That’s how they get the one world currency in.

Speaker 0 says the biggest question for central banks is the role of tokenization and digitization, including how quickly they should digitize their own currency and what that means for the role of the dollar, bank payments, and payment companies like Mastercard and Visa. They note that while much discussion centers on AI, not enough attention is paid to how quickly every financial asset will be tokenized and the opportunity to use a digital wallet to move assets such as ETFs. They believe this will happen worldwide very rapidly and that most countries are ill prepared for it, with an underappreciation of how technology is changing this, not unlike how technology is changing AI. It will change the technology around the plumbing of finance.

There's a coordinated global policy push for digital IDs, as the new form of government issued identification credentials. Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs and this new digital financial system. And UN documentation and also documentation from the Bank of International Settlements, they very overtly state that CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist. One of the reasons it can't exist without that is because of the KYC functionality built into this digital financial system. They have to know who you are. They give you a unique identifier, a digital ID, and it's inherently tied to a digital wallet. It's called building blocks. It involves refugees scanning their irises.

The central bankers have a goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, even though the justification wasn't strong. Their ultimate aim is to create a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

Infowars discusses the implementation of central bank digital currency as a means of social control. They highlight the shift from paper to digital money, which allows for tracking and control of transactions. The requirement for a digital dollar, digital dollar wallet, and member bank to receive government stimulus payments is mentioned. The speakers also mention the potential connection to biblical prophecies and the use of crises to implement these changes. The United Nations' proposal for emergency authority in response to global shocks is discussed, with potential triggers including climatic events, pandemics, digital disruptions, and events in outer space. The speakers urge listeners to spread awareness, support Infowars, and pray for their success.

The central bankers have been working towards introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital IDs since 2020. They used the pandemic as an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. Their ultimate goal is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs. This would be the most extreme form of control in human history.

We are preparing for the possibility of a new currency, but the decision won't be made until October 23. We don't want companies like Meta, Google, or Amazon to create a currency that takes over Europe's sovereignty. Currently, in Europe, cash payments above €1,000 are considered on the gray market, risking fines or jail time. The digital euro will have some level of control, but we are considering allowing no control for very small amounts, around €300 or €400.

The speaker discusses Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), specifically the digital euro, and its upcoming introduction planned for 2029, noting that the European Parliament has some resistance. Rapporteur Naharete Rogas opposes the plan, arguing that the current design adds nothing for ordinary people, i.e., ordinary citizens like you and me. The speaker counters a common claim that CBDC is not a replacement for cash and that the digital euro is not programmable. The speaker argues that, by definition, central bank money can be programmable. The explanation focuses on how the central bank’s balance sheet works when money is spent. When the central bank issues money (spends), it increases its balance sheet. Cash sits on the right side of the balance sheet. To keep the balance, on the asset side there are government bonds (and potentially other bonds) that earn interest, which means the central bank collects money from society. The Dutch central bank has written in a report about design choices for a digital euro that the central bank can influence society by increasing the money supply, because it earns interest, a process often referred to as seigniorage. The speaker emphasizes that if cash exists in a given quantity and the central bank issues CBDC in addition to that cash, the central bank’s balance sheet grows. To prevent this imbalance, the only way to keep the totals equal is implied: every time you issue 1 euro of CBDC or even a 10-euro note in digital form, you would need to keep the physical cash in ATMs from being replenished or refreshed. Under the digital euro scenario labeled “scenario 4,” CBDC would thus be the replacement of cash, with the overall sum being kept in balance through this mechanism. The speaker concludes with “Dus dut,” underscoring that the outcome depends on how the total money supply is managed and whether CBDC is deployed in a way that maintains or replaces cash.

First speaker asks what happens if the government issues digital currency. Second speaker responds that they’re talking about central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and acknowledges their appeal due to ease, but believes a lot will happen as this develops. Second speaker explains that with digital currency, transactions are easy, and it will be similar to money market funds in terms of practical use. A key question is whether CBDCs can offer interest. There is a debate on this; if CBDCs cannot offer interest, they may be less effective as a hold-in vehicle, since depreciation could make alternatives like money market funds or bonds more attractive. There will be no privacy with CBDCs, making them a very effective government controlling mechanism: all transactions would be known. This close surveillance could be beneficial for countering illegal activity but would also give the government substantial control. Examples include tax collection, the ability to take money, and the establishment of foreign exchange controls. These controls could be particularly challenging for international holders of CBDCs; for instance, sanctions could enable authorities to seize funds held by individuals in other countries. Privacy concerns relate to the possibility that politically disfavored individuals could be shut off. Second speaker reiterates that these privacy and control issues are part of the broader picture. He suggests that, for those reasons, CBDCs will not become a magnitude that changes everything; development will occur, but he does not expect CBDCs to be a huge deal in scale, even though growth is likely.

Many people are a little worried about what will happen to them with the digital euro. Can you encourage them? Why is the digital euro good for people like you and me? The digital currency, where it has been piloted, and there is only one which is clearly now launched in in a very small country, but it is piloted on a fairly large scale in in China, is of use and of service to all citizens. So it is not something that is good for the elite or is good for the young or is good for some versus others. If it is well done and if it is well implemented, it would be of service to all citizens.

The speaker claims the UN has partnered with Bill Gates on 'digital public infrastructure,' calling it 'a giant digital gulag for all of humanity.' The UN development program has launched to impose major elements of this digital public infrastructure within five years. '2020 passport Digital IDs' are emerging, with airport scans of digital ID QR codes common. Central bank digital currencies are being developed; '98% of the governments and central banks in the world are working on these CBDCs' to wage a 'war on cash.' Digital health certificates and digital vaccine passports build on EU work, promoted in May 2019 by the European Commission. BIS pursues a 'universal blockchain ledger' to tokenize every asset and require biometric digital IDs and CBDCs for transactions; purchases would involve a blockchain transfer, not cash. This is described as a mechanism for controlling humanity, unprecedented in human history.

Speaker 0 asserts that the control grid arrived in America via Apple, stating they worked for Apple for seventeen years and still hold stock, so they find no joy in revealing this. They claim there are no good guys here and argue that we need to shut it down while we can. They state that Apple just rolled out digital ID integration and acknowledge it sounds convenient, but warn that every convenience has a price. According to them, once identity goes digital, it becomes programmable, and once programmable, it becomes controllable. They contend that individuals are handing over their entire identity wrapped in a product, a file that can easily be deleted. If one does not comply, access is lost; if opinions are not liked, accounts are frozen. They claim that stepping out of line results in travel restrictions, bank transfer blocks, and loss of benefits. They insist this is not speculation and that it is already live. Examples are offered to illustrate the claim: Thailand has programmable digital currency; Europe introduced biometric wallets; Canada froze accounts during protests; China is described as having started the pilot and now in full production mode with a live social credit system. They assert that China is secretly building the infrastructure at a global level right now, not through laws or force, but through updates and convenience. They claim that in Vietnam, 86,000,000 bank accounts were deleted because people wouldn’t agree to a digital ID. Concerning the European Union, they state that by 2027, large cash payments will be outlawed, forcing people onto digital rails that can be controlled. They describe this as just the on ramp, arguing that freedom becomes conditional when identity is controlled by a corporation or a government that can revoke it with a keystroke. They describe the arrival of dystopia as occurring not with tanks or force, but with app updates or convenience. They conclude by urging listeners to pay attention and push back while they still can. The message ends with an appeal to “Let’s go,” emphasizing urgency to resist the rollout of digital identity and programmable control embedded in convenient updates and services.

"We move into this digital currency era where the banks are issuing these stable coins, these deposit tokens that are programmable money." "They're going to be sharing this data in the same database that the CIA and any other intelligence agency can access whenever they want without a warrant." "No more secret FISA courts or you don't need any of that infrastructure anymore. It is the new system." "Retail CBDC is not nearly as common today as wholesale CBDC." "Wholesale CBDC works as this two tier system." "the CBDC really only serves as a means of interbank settlement and isn't public facing at all." "FedNow, for example, of the Federal Reserve, that was launched solely as a means of interbank settlement, really." "When you have people like Trump and Ron DeSantis say no CBDC, they mean no public facing CBDC. They don't mean no wholesale CBDC."