TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Trump and his lawyers seem to forget that they are not yet the president. If the Supreme Court grants the president complete immunity from prosecution, what would stop the actual president, Joe Biden, from launching a preemptive strike on Mar-a-Lago to engineer regime change? However, I don't believe Biden has the authority to attack his political rival, as it would violate Pazzi Conicatus and murder laws. If Biden were to do so, he would likely face prosecution. Trump and his supporters fail to understand that the powers he claims for himself would also apply to future presidents.

You confirmed you were asked to obstruct justice? No, that’s not what I confirmed. The Mueller report clearly stated there was no collusion or obstruction. That’s not accurate. Did you read the report? No, I haven’t. Then how do you know? Congress members clarified it. I read the entire report, and it lists ten examples of obstruction. That’s not true. Here are the examples: asking Comey to drop the Flynn investigation, firing Comey, trying to remove Mueller, and influencing witnesses, among others. Legal experts agree these are obstruction. How can they determine that without knowing all the facts? The report outlines actions that would have led to charges for any citizen. Attorney General Barr and the deputy AG found no obstruction. A thousand former federal prosecutors, from both parties, stated there was evidence of obstruction that would have led to charges for a regular citizen.

President Trump is correct that the immunity decision would help President Obama. However, it doesn't help him with impeachment. The Democratic Party and House managers in the second impeachment trial argued that a former president is still subject to impeachment after leaving office. This means figures like Lincoln or George Washington could be impeached. As predicted, this could backfire, as President Obama could be impeached if certain evidence holds true. Impeachment could strip Obama of immunity because, according to the Democrats' argument based on Article One Section Three Clause Seven of the Constitution, it bars one from holding further office while still being subject to criminal prosecution or indictment.

The Department of Justice may indict Donald Trump the day he leaves office. I strongly support indicting a president after they leave office. Threatening political opponents with jail time is unacceptable presidential behavior in a democracy.

I will challenge this illegitimate president when our rights are at stake. The President can be indicted for criminal offenses. He threatens our rights daily. We must focus on Donald Trump, his abuses, and follow his money. We need to uncover any money laundering or conspiracy. The days of Donald Trump are ending. As Attorney General, I will sue him, defend your rights, and go home.

Breaking news from the Southern District of Florida (SD-FL): two junior assistant US attorneys have resigned after being asked to participate in a broad investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. A source familiar with internal concerns tells MSNBC that US Attorney Jason Redding Quinones called a division-wide meeting this afternoon to address the resignations and the investigation. The reporting notes that at least 30 subpoenas were sent out late Friday by SD-FL to individuals including former CIA chief John Brennan and former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. In addition to the resignations, it is reported that one of the junior ASAs who resigned felt unable to participate because doing so would violate their ethical responsibilities. The resignations are notable because it would be unusual for junior ASAs to be pulled into such a major investigation. Significantly, the subpoenas were signed by SD-FL’s number three, the executive assistant US attorney, rather than by a career prosecutor in leadership. This is presented as abnormal, with a comparison made to past instances where leadership signatures were absent from such actions, such as Lindsay Halligan signing indictments in the Northern District of Virginia due to a lack of available career prosecutors. The developments prompted SD-FL US Attorney Quinones to convene a unit-wide meeting of two to three dozen prosecutors in the major crimes division. The scope of the ongoing investigation remains unclear, but it is connected to the broader claim—involving Trump administration officials—that former Obama and Biden administration officials undertook to undermine the candidacies and presidencies of Donald Trump. The report also notes that President Trump has explicitly called for the jailing of Barack Obama and referenced other individuals in relation to the investigation. Subpoenas have been issued, and at least two SD-FL assistant US attorneys have resigned so far. In summary, two junior ASAs resigned after being asked to participate in a high-profile investigation tied to claims of Russian interference in 2016, with subpoenas issued to notable former officials, and the sign-off on those subpoenas coming from the office’s number-three official, prompting an internal meeting at SD-FL.

The DOJ is moving to end cases against Donald Trump before he takes office, citing a policy that prevents prosecuting sitting presidents. There was speculation that special counsel Jack Smith would push to complete the cases, but the DOJ believes there’s no chance for trial before Trump’s inauguration. Legal complexities and appeals make it unlikely these cases can proceed. Trump’s lawyers may have influenced this decision by requesting the cases be dropped. While there are ongoing appeals related to the classified documents case involving other defendants, Trump himself will not be part of these proceedings. This means he likely won't face accountability for serious federal charges, leaving unresolved questions about his potential guilt.

If Trump wins, DOJ won't stop ongoing cases. Cases in Florida and DC could continue until January if Trump is reelected. Garland would still lead DOJ for a while after inauguration. Trump is using the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity to delay his sentencing in New York until September. Uncertain how things will unfold in the coming months.

The nation cannot move forward unless senior people are held accountable, starting with Obama. While a former president may not be imprisoned, John Brennan, Jim Clapper, and Susan Rice should be questioned under oath about who directed them, with the threat of prison for treason. Treason is the only thing that cannot overcome a pardon. The speaker claims the outgoing Obama administration committed treason through a conspiracy to undermine a duly elected president, which hasn't stopped. Mueller and Weisman would have charged the speaker with treason if it were true. The speaker claims treason was committed against him, as a national security advisor, by the outgoing administration.

There are rumors that Donald Trump may be indicted, but the specific charges are unclear. The focus seems to be on a payment he made to Stormy Daniels, a porn actress, during his presidential campaign. However, federal investigators previously concluded that no criminal activity occurred. The Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, who has expressed a desire to indict Trump, is downgrading felonies to misdemeanors and releasing violent criminals while targeting Trump. If Trump is indicted, it sets a dangerous precedent of using the justice system to eliminate political opponents. This could lead to a breakdown of the justice system and individuals seeking their own form of justice.

This Friday is significant as it marks the day grand jury indictments may be announced. It’s preferable to avoid the Ides of March next week for such announcements. There are expectations for more indictments, particularly concerning criminal conspiracy involving U.S. persons and Russians. The investigation was ongoing during my tenure, focusing on potential collaboration between U.S. individuals and Russian entities. I anticipated that some individuals would face issues with the Department of Justice, and several have already been indicted or pled guilty. If any Trump family members are to be indicted, it would likely occur at the conclusion of Mueller's investigation, as such actions could jeopardize the special counsel's office's future.

The FBI investigated Donald Trump due to concerns about his ties to Russia, based on observable facts indicating a potential threat to national security and the possibility of a crime. The decision to investigate was made because the FBI is obligated to open a case when there's an articulable basis to believe a threat exists, regardless of the subject's position. Contributing factors included Trump publicly undermining the investigation, referring to it as a hoax, and the intelligence community's assessment of Russian support for his campaign. By May 2017, there were ample facts suggesting potential obstruction of justice. The speaker couldn't explain Trump's repeated leaning towards the Russians and defense of Vladimir Putin, but noted that his actions and words were concerning. The investigation grappled with a president who may have committed a federal crime and posed a national security risk. The national security risk related to the counterintelligence case, specifically Trump's potential obstruction of justice to negatively impact the investigation into Russian interference and potential connections with his campaign.

Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work. Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.

The president's lawyers are arguing in court about whether he can be charged for inciting an insurrection. They are using examples of previous presidents, such as George W. Bush and Barack Obama, to question if they could be prosecuted after their presidency. The lawyers claim that Bush lied about going to war with Iraq, while Obama's killing of an American citizen by drone is also brought up. These arguments are being presented in front of a three-judge panel in the DC appeals court. The court has not answered this question before, and it could potentially reach the Supreme Court in the future.

The special counsel did not charge President Biden with a crime, citing his failing memory. This report highlights a double standard, as President Trump is facing charges for the same offense. The Democratic party is trying to convict and imprison Trump to prevent his re-election, which is what you would expect in countries like Pakistan or Brazil, not in the United States.

In a potential second Trump presidency, there are concerns about the misuse of power within the Justice Department. The speaker believes Trump could target his enemies, such as Andrew McCabe, by ordering criminal investigations. This could lead to a significant threat to the rule of law in America.

Russia hacked the election. President Trump still doesn't sound convinced. If he admits it, it casts a shadow on his victory over Hillary Clinton. Russia is doing it again now with election-related cyber hacking. The CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and 17 intelligence agencies all conclude that Russia hacked the election. If Donald Trump was colluding with Russia while they were hacking the election, that is completely impeachable. A dossier alleged a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian effort to hack the election. The director of national intelligence, the head of the National Security Agency, and the head of the FBI all say Russia hacked the election. To believe that's wrong, you have to believe they're all involved in an elaborate conspiracy to get Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is facing multiple legal investigations, including criminal cases in Florida, Georgia, and related to the January 6th incident. There are also civil lawsuits, such as the defamation suit by E. Jean Carroll. The timeline is uncertain, but the goal is to conclude these trials before the next election. Joe Biden is not exempt from legal issues either, as Republicans have initiated a formal impeachment inquiry against him. They allege bribery and violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, is also facing legal troubles, including firearms and tax offenses. The outcome of these cases could potentially impact the Democratic race.

We will challenge this illegitimate president and focus on Donald Trump. Investigating his finances fuels my determination. As the attorney general, I sue him regularly.

Some suggest waiting for all witnesses and documents before proceeding with impeachment, but President Trump obstructed the investigation. He instructed his senior aides not to testify and defy subpoenas. He also told agencies not to provide relevant records, hindering our investigation.

I will sue Donald Trump as the next attorney general because he is an illegitimate president. I believe he should be charged with obstructing justice and can be indicted for criminal offenses. I will challenge him and defend your rights every day. The days of Donald Trump are coming to an end.

Trump's immunity as a sitting president is temporary, and there have been significant actions taken regarding investigations. The DOJ, under Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco, expanded the investigation into Rudy Giuliani to include January 6th. They established an investigations unit to look into various individuals, potentially up to Trump himself. However, the FBI remains cautious due to past controversies like the Comey incident and the Mueller investigation. A report on the investigations is expected to be submitted to the Attorney General, which could vary in detail. The key question is how Garland will handle the report, with a strong sentiment that it should be released promptly, regardless of its content.

The special counsel found no evidence that any US person or Trump campaign official conspired or knowingly coordinated with Russia's interference efforts. While criminal charges were brought against Russian nationals, the key point is that collusion was not found. This supports what the president has maintained. The White House, the president, and his attorneys should be pleased with this report. After two years of asserting there was no Russia collusion, the president is now backed up by Mueller. The evidence does not establish that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference. This conclusion is supported by the special counsel's extensive investigation, which included over 2,800 subpoenas, nearly 500 search warrants, and interviews with approximately 500 witnesses.

"58 house Democrats have recently voted to advance articles of impeachment." "Impeach him first and then indict him." "Yes. The president, a sitting president, can be indicted." "On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the justice department may indict him." "It's clear that Trump is the target, and he'll be indicted eventually." "The only thing worse than indicting him would be not indicting him." "Merrick Garland, if you indict Trump, you'll be my person of the year of the decade." "There should be no case in which they wouldn't indict." "The only reasons Trump hasn't been indicted by now is because he's a former president and because he has handpicked judges on his side."

In 1968, Pentagon engineer Ernie Fitzgerald exposed a corruption scandal involving the Pentagon overspending by $2 billion on shoddy military aircraft from Lockheed Martin. Fitzgerald sued President Nixon for retaliation but lost the case due to presidential immunity. Currently, a poll shows Donald Trump leading Joe Biden by 12 points in Michigan, causing Democrats to make legal attempts to charge Trump for challenging the election. Trump argues that as president, he had the authority to enforce election laws and investigate fraud. The prosecutor argues that if immunity is removed, future presidents could be charged with crimes. The discussion also touches on the possibility of assassinating political rivals, which is deemed outside the scope of presidential actions. Democrats are now considering strategies like institutionalizing Trump or using straight jackets to discredit him.