reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Riley Gaines recounts her experiences as a competitive swimmer and her advocacy for women's rights in sports, particularly in light of transgender athletes competing in women's categories. She describes a troubling incident at San Francisco State University, where she was invited to speak about her experiences. Upon arrival, she found herself in a hostile environment, with protesters outside chanting slogans against her views. Despite being prepared for opposition, the situation escalated when a mob of protesters stormed the room, turning off the lights and creating chaos. Gaines was approached by an officer who did not identify herself, leading to confusion and distrust. As the mob grew outside, she was barricaded in a room for over three hours, fearing for her safety. The protesters yelled threats and expressed their desire to confront her directly. The campus police were hesitant to intervene, fearing backlash and accusations of discrimination. During her speech, Gaines shared her journey as an athlete, the sacrifices she made, and the challenges faced by female athletes competing against transgender women. She highlighted the unfairness of allowing a biological male, Leah Thomas, to compete in women's events, emphasizing the impact on female athletes' opportunities and mental health. Gaines expressed heartbreak for her fellow competitors who felt their hard work was undermined. After the event, the university administration sent an email praising the protesters for their "bravery," further illustrating the disconnect between the administration and the concerns of female athletes. Gaines remains committed to advocating for women's sports, testifying in various legislative settings, and raising awareness about the implications of allowing transgender women to compete against biological females. She believes that accountability and acknowledgment of the harm caused to women in sports are crucial for future changes. Despite the challenges, she feels empowered to continue her fight for fairness and equality in athletics.

Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer, gained prominence after competing against Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete, in the NCAA finals. Despite placing fifth, Gaines faced backlash for speaking out against the unfairness of allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports. In her new book, "Swimming Against the Current: Fighting for Common Sense in a World That's Lost Its Mind," she shares her experiences and advocates for fairness in athletics. Gaines recounts a pivotal moment when she was assaulted during a protest, which solidified her commitment to fighting for women's rights in sports. She emphasizes that there are two sexes and that both deserve equal opportunities and safety. Gaines highlights the emotional toll on female athletes who feel their rights and privacy are being violated, particularly in locker rooms. She discusses recent legal cases, including a West Virginia court ruling against a young girl competing against a transgender student, illustrating the broader implications of these policies. Gaines argues that the current narrative dismisses the concerns of female athletes, who are often silenced. She calls for a return to fairness and safety in sports, urging society to recognize the inherent advantages that biological males possess.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the start of Pride Month, expressing skepticism about the ongoing celebrations for a community that has already achieved significant rights. She references Bruce Bawer’s article questioning the need for continued celebration of LGBTQ identities, stating that being gay is an attribute, not an accomplishment. Kelly shares her evolving views on preferred pronouns, recounting her past support for them and how her perspective has shifted due to various societal changes, particularly regarding transgender issues. She highlights the impact of transgender athletes in women's sports, citing cases where biological males have outperformed female competitors, leading to legal battles and feelings of unfairness among female athletes. Kelly expresses concern over schools affirming children's gender identities without parental consent and the medical interventions being promoted for minors, emphasizing the potential long-term harm these decisions could cause. Kelly recounts the case of Leah Thomas, a transgender swimmer who dominated female competitions, and the backlash faced by female athletes who spoke out against this. She emphasizes the need to protect women's spaces and rights, arguing that the current discourse around gender identity often disregards biological realities, which she believes leads to harm for women and girls. In her conclusion, Kelly resolves to stop using preferred pronouns, motivated by a desire to uphold truth and reality in discussions about gender. She expresses empathy for individuals with gender dysphoria but insists that children should not be subjected to medical interventions without thorough consideration of the consequences. The conversation shifts to a discussion with Rich Lowry and Jim Garrity from National Review, where they reflect on the cultural implications of recent events, including corporate responses to LGBTQ issues and the backlash against brands like Bud Light. They discuss the political landscape, particularly regarding the upcoming presidential elections, and the challenges facing both parties, including Biden's age and the potential for a lack of debates among GOP candidates. The segment concludes with a focus on CNN's internal struggles under Chris Licht's leadership, highlighting the network's identity crisis and the challenges of transitioning back to a news-focused brand after years of opinion-driven content. The hosts express skepticism about CNN's future and the effectiveness of Licht's strategies.

Megyn Kelly and her guest Kristen Wagner dissect the day’s Supreme Court arguments over whether states may bar transgender athletes from girls’ sports, weighing Equal Protection and Title IX against the backdrop of dozens of state bans and a broader national debate about biology, fairness, and female athletic opportunity. The hosts frame the case as a test of whether the Court will anchor policy in biological reality or, as they argue, allow identity-based classifications to erode longstanding protections for women and girls. Wagner offers practical insights from years of litigation, the athletes’ experiences, and the tension between compassion and truth, highlighting Adelaide Cross and Becky Pepper Jackson as emblematic victims of shifting standards. The discussion touches on the potential implications for locker rooms, scholarship access, and the integrity of women’s sports, with a sense of urgency about preserving Title IX guarantees while acknowledging scientific complexities. The conversation shifts to how the media and public discourse shape these legal battles, critiquing coverage that they say obscures the voices of the young female athletes and overemphasizes ideological rhetoric. They criticize attempts to avoid defining sex in legal terms, arguing that the law relies on stable biological distinctions to protect fairness. The exchange also probes how the judiciary’s concept of decorum can clash with live political controversy, and how Supreme Court dynamics—such as the posture of several justices and the role of textualism—could influence a landmark ruling that affects more than one state. Throughout, the speakers insist that the core issue is protecting women’s and girls’ opportunities in sport, not singling out or demonizing transgender individuals, and they warn about the long-term consequences of eroding biological categories in law. The episode then pivots to a postscript on Scott Adams’s death, with Kelly reflecting on his influence, the cost of principled dissent, and how public figures are remembered in media narratives. Andrew Klavan joins to discuss the broader cultural clashes, the fragility of civility, and the power of media to shape political identities. The hosts juxtapose Adams’s legacy with contemporary debates about free expression, censorship, and how the right navigates a rapidly evolving information landscape. Interwoven are critiques of how headlines frame controversial figures, the ethics of journalism, and a call to stay committed to truth in a climate of partisan polarization. The episode closes with tribute to Adams and a forward-looking note about continuing to defend foundational values in public life.

Megyn Kelly welcomes former NFL star Marcellus Wiley to discuss various topics, including the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and its implications for the economy. Kelly highlights the ongoing debate about the bank's bailout, with Steve Forbes suggesting that SVB's management made significant mistakes, particularly in risk management and asset-liability mismatches. Forbes criticizes the bank's focus on "woke initiatives" over sound banking practices, leading to its downfall. Forbes emphasizes that the Federal Reserve's monetary policies contributed to the bank's issues, as SVB's deposits surged during a period of low interest rates, prompting risky long-term investments. He argues that while the bailout may have prevented broader economic fallout, it raises questions about accountability for bank management and the role of the FDIC in facilitating a sale of the bank's assets. The conversation shifts to the implications of the FDIC's actions and the potential for consumer confidence in smaller banks to be restored through guarantees. Kelly and Forbes discuss the need for a thorough investigation into the bank's collapse, including the actions of its executives and auditors. The discussion then transitions to the topic of transgender athletes in sports, particularly in women's competitions. Wiley asserts that biological differences between men and women necessitate separate categories in sports. He supports a Vermont Christian school's decision to withdraw from a tournament due to a transgender player on the opposing team, arguing that it is unfair for biological girls to compete against biological boys. Wiley also addresses the controversy surrounding transgender athletes in powerlifting, citing examples of biological men competing in women's events and dominating. He stresses the importance of maintaining fairness in sports and suggests that transgender athletes should compete in their own category. Lastly, Kelly and Wiley touch on Colin Kaepernick's recent comments about his adoptive parents and the complexities of identity and race. Wiley argues that Kaepernick conflates racism with parental concern over appearance, emphasizing the importance of understanding the context of such discussions. The conversation concludes with a call for more open dialogue about these issues.

Megyn Kelly discusses the ongoing legal battles involving the Trump administration, particularly focusing on deportations of Venezuelan gang members. She highlights a conflict with Judge Boasberg of the DC federal court, who has challenged Trump’s authority regarding these deportations, suggesting it could lead to a constitutional crisis. Kelly emphasizes that the judge's actions reflect a misunderstanding of presidential powers, particularly in foreign policy, and criticizes the ACLU's involvement in directing these legal challenges. Charlie Kirk joins the conversation, asserting that the concentration of power in Washington, particularly among unelected judges and bureaucrats, undermines the founding principles of the U.S. Kirk argues that the judiciary should not interfere with the president's foreign policy decisions, citing historical precedents where judicial overreach could have impeded national security. He praises the Trump administration for strategically choosing to fight back against judicial interference and for their efforts to deport gang members, framing it as a necessary action to protect American citizens. Kirk also discusses the implications of the Alien Enemies Act, arguing that it grants the president significant authority to act against foreign threats without judicial oversight. He expresses concern over the left's willingness to side with criminals and terrorists, illustrating a moral decline within the Democratic Party. The conversation shifts to the deportation of individuals involved in serious crimes, emphasizing the need for strict immigration policies. The discussion then transitions to Gavin Newsom's podcast, where Kirk reflects on his appearance as the inaugural guest. He believes engaging with Newsom provided an opportunity to expose his weaknesses and challenge his policies, particularly regarding gender issues in sports. Kirk argues that while some conservatives may hesitate to engage with Newsom, doing so can help educate a broader audience and highlight the inconsistencies in his positions. Lastly, Kelly interviews Mina Vard, a Swedish athlete who faced competition against a transgender woman in the NCAA championships. Vard recounts her experience of losing a championship title to a competitor who had previously competed as a man, expressing her frustration over the NCAA's handling of the situation. She calls for the NCAA to recognize the unfairness of allowing transgender athletes to compete against women and advocates for the restoration of titles and recognition for female athletes affected by these policies. Vard emphasizes the emotional toll of losing her hard-earned victory and the need for protections for women in sports.