reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed, failing to resolve many ongoing conflicts. The primary purpose of the UN should be to assist in settling these disputes, and there is a need for improvement in its operations to fulfill this potential.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

The UN has a significant number of employees who are perceived as unproductive, with estimates suggesting around 90% are not actively contributing. The organization operates in a bureaucratic manner, making it inefficient, especially with negotiations among 190 countries. Employees are restricted from political campaigning, as their allegiance is to the UN rather than their home countries. While there are personal preferences among staff regarding political figures, the UN maintains a neutral stance. Discussions also touch on the challenges of global issues, like the Middle East, which remain unresolved due to the complexities of international diplomacy.

The speaker discusses how the world is controlled by a system where leaders like the Bundescanceler or president work for the oligarchs rather than the people. They argue that the United Nations (UN) is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum (WEF) because they are controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. The WEF creates leaders through their young global leaders program, ensuring they are politically correct. However, they also need intelligent opposition. The speaker suggests that the UN controls people by offering high salaries, free access to various amenities, and a UN badge, but this does not make them more important than ordinary people.

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. While the UN has great potential, it is currently not meeting expectations and is poorly managed. Many conflicts remain unresolved, and the UN should be more effective in helping to settle these issues. The organization needs to improve its operations to fulfill its primary purpose.

In this video, Carlin Georgesco, a former high-ranking member of the United Nations, discusses his experiences and observations within the organization. He reveals that the UN is controlled by oligarchs and is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum. Georgesco criticizes the UN for failing to fulfill its purpose of maintaining peace and claims that discussions within the organization are often focused on war rather than peace. He also highlights the manipulation and control exerted by the oligarchs, who exploit natural resources and control political leaders. Georgesco emphasizes the importance of individual sovereignty, connecting with nature, and saying no to the UN and its manipulative agenda.

Cognitive dissonance arises when beliefs clash with actions, hindering UN's SDG progress. People struggle with sacrificing freedoms for collective goals or feeling overwhelmed by climate collapse. Resolving dissonance involves changing beliefs, actions, or perception of tasks. UN faces challenges in persuading individuals to support SDGs by rewiring beliefs and actions. For instance, transitioning to sustainable energy may lead to energy scarcity and higher prices, deterring those valuing personal freedom. To overcome this, UN aims to manipulate empathy, mindfulness, and critical thinking to align individuals with collective goals.

The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945 to maintain peace. However, it is argued that the UN is controlled by the World Economic Forum and oligarchs. The leaders of countries are seen as employees of the oligarchs, and the World Economic Forum selects and influences these leaders through programs like the Young Global Leaders program. The UN also prioritizes political correctness and controls its members through financial incentives, such as high salaries and free access to various amenities. This lack of power to say no is attributed to the influence of money. Consequently, the UN is seen as indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum, both being controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs.

Disinformation and hate speech have created a toxic environment, forcing the UN to act strategically in its communications. The UN aims to shape debate, educate, and deliver facts about global issues like human suffering, climate change, and war. However, UN content was being down-ranked on platforms, and the organization faced online attacks. Every Sustainable Development Goal is impacted by disinformation and hate speech. To combat this, the UN introduced global principles on information integrity, a blueprint for a healthy information ecosystem. These principles emphasize safety by design and transparency, aligning with calls to elevate information integrity.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The UN security staff trafficked young girls from Moldova to Bosnia during the war, holding them as sex slaves in nightclubs. Aid workers also exploited vulnerable families, demanding children in exchange for access to refugee camps. The UN knew about these abuses and covered them up. During a pandemic spread by bodily fluids, WHO staff abused women in Eastern Congo. Now, women in Eastern Congo are protesting, demanding the UN leave because they were supposed to bring peace and security, but instead, they were raped. Also, Mark Zuckerberg should go to jail. And, publicly sharing for the first time, my DNA reveals that I am Donald Trump's fourth cousin once removed through his mother.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experience and perspective on how the United Nations operates and its relationship with global oligarchic power structures. He begins by noting his initial belief in the UN as a fantastic institution capable of advancing welfare and harmony with nature, informed by his background in environmental protection and sustainable development. However, through field experience, he came to see a different reality: the ground truth reveals how the system serves a small, powerful elite rather than universally beneficial aims. Georgescu argues that the UN functions as a platform and bridge for what he calls the world oligarchic system, controlled by Davos-centered interests and aligned with the World Economic Forum’s agenda, particularly Agenda 2030. He contends that the organization is effectively indistinguishable from, and subordinate to, the same oligarchs who influence the Club of Rome and other major NGOs. He cites his own observations at meetings where participation by a representative from developing regions was stifled or marginalized, while the discussions prioritized consumption and corporate-friendly outcomes over genuine development. A central claim is that the UN and its related NGOs manipulate language and outcomes to mask aggressive aims. Peace and justice are reframed to justify or enable power and war, while sustainable development often ends up accelerating consumerism. Georgescu reports that many in UN circles pursue easy prestige, perks, and funding rather than principled leadership, describing a culture of political correctness and material incentives that ensure loyalty to the system. He asserts that leaders within UN structures and other NGOs are “employees” of the oligarchs, not independently accountable to their populations. Georgescu emphasizes intense exploitation of natural resources and asserts that most sovereign control over resources is lost to global interests. He gives the example of resource-rich but vulnerable African countries, such as Guinea Conakry, where vast mineral wealth is present but political and economic power is effectively centralized outside local populations. He contends that the same dynamics operate across Europe and beyond, with leaders installed or influenced to serve external interests rather than national sovereignty. A recurring theme is the manipulation of fear to maintain control. He links fear to the acceptance of surveillance, digital devices, and the erosion of personal sovereignty, arguing that fear-based governance underpins health, climate, and security narratives. He critiques the World Health Organization as an NGO that operates without democratic elections, arguing that its leadership is appointed rather than elected. He also criticizes the pandemic response and lockdowns as criminal acts against humanity and accuses the system of pushing transhumanist and post-transhumanist trajectories aimed at replacing human autonomy with robotic control. Georgescu recounts his personal turning point in the Marshall Islands, where he witnessed the environmental and human harm from U.S. nuclear testing. He describes attempts to suppress his UN report on the Marshall Islands mission, which reinforced his decision to exit and resist a system that, in his view, prioritizes oligarchic interests over populations. To end, he asserts that true sovereignty and quality life come from harmony with nature, personal consciousness, and authentic human connection, not from UN-led global governance or NGO-driven agendas. He and his interlocutor stress the need for people to say “no” to the prevailing system and to reclaim political agency, recognizing that fear and manipulation are central tools used to maintain control.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

Improving government is incredibly difficult. The most difficult challenge is overcoming entropy, a battle physics tells us is impossible to win. The second most difficult is overcoming bureaucracy. It's a monumental struggle; bureaucracy is the penultimate battle in the fight for better government.

An executive order has been prepared to withdraw the United States from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA, a refugee organization, due to perceived anti-American bias. Additionally, American involvement in UNESCO will be reviewed. The order emphasizes a reassessment of U.S. funding to the UN, highlighting disparities in contributions from different countries that are seen as unfair to the U.S. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed for a long time. While there are hopes for improvement, the organization needs to better address ongoing conflicts and enhance its operations.

The average American worker's wages and incomes have flatlined, causing anxiety and fear of globalization, which has been fed by politics. Globalization is a powerful potential tool for good and is here to stay. It is important to ensure everyone can access the benefits of globalization.

American contractors are bidding to rebuild the area, making the defense department seem like their bodyguards. The speaker criticizes the United Nations, claiming the US government controls it and foots the bill. They believe the UN does what the US wants, except for Libya and Cuba. The speaker implies that the US essentially controls the UN, with other countries voting as the US desires.

UN peacekeepers have been accused of sexually exploiting vulnerable individuals they are meant to protect. The documentary investigates this global crisis, featuring interviews with victims and confrontations with those responsible. The lack of criminal accountability is highlighted as a fundamental issue, with calls for perpetrators to face jail time. The United Nations is pressed on its actions regarding the abuse. The video also raises concerns about the UN's overall effectiveness and questions its logo and the World Health Organization's logo. The documentary reveals disturbing testimonies from victims and exposes the organization's failure to address the issue adequately.

We love all countries and their people, but we oppose the United Nations' goal of a one-world government. They want to erase our languages, cultures, and personal rights. They even want to control our bodies and force vaccinations. The United Nations is a fraud, aiming to implement a digital currency that tracks and controls our every transaction. They have treaties that supersede constitutions and plan to implant microchips in our heads. This is not a conspiracy theory; it's the truth. We need to protect our borders, cultures, and languages, and reject the United Nations' control.

USAID has been unresponsive and often operates independently of U.S. foreign policy, which is concerning given that it uses taxpayer dollars. There is a need for alignment between USAID's programs and the national interest, as outlined by the State Department and the National Security Council. Despite attempts to reform the agency over the past few decades, it continues to resist cooperation and transparency regarding funding and program details. This lack of accountability cannot persist, and it is essential that taxpayer money is used to support U.S. national interests. The ongoing frustration with USAID's operations has spanned multiple administrations and must be addressed.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experiences to explain how he views the United Nations today. He says the UN was set up in 1945 with the simple purpose “to keep the peace,” but in his view it has become a platform for an oligarchic system that controls the organization and its agenda. He contends that the UN serves as a bridge for a world oligarchy, sharing the same agenda as the Davos/world economic forum, and that it operates in close alignment with actors like the World Economic Forum, Club of Rome, WWF, Greenpeace, and other NGOs. He argues that the UN’s structure and personnel are increasingly selected for political correctness and loyalty, with incentives such as high salaries and perks used to secure compliance, making it difficult for individuals to say no. Georgescu recounts his personal observations from field work in sustainable development programs, including his roles with the United Nations Development Programme and the International Involvement Programme for Europe. He distinguishes between the idealistic aims of the UN and the practical realities he encountered: while nature provides for human needs, he believes greed—driven by a small segment of society and the oligarchy—drives exploitation and control. He identifies natural resource exploitation as a major issue, citing Guinea Conakry as an example of immense richness that is often exploited by outsiders, with local leadership acting as employees of the oligarchy rather than as representatives of their people. He claims that discussions within UN meetings are manipulated and that the true outcomes usually favor increasing consumption and the interests of the oligarchs, rather than addressing genuine welfare. He notes that the UN’s connection to Davos and elite networks facilitates control over resources, leaders, and policies, and that many leaders are chosen or shaped to align with these interests rather than to serve their populations. The World Health Organization is described as another NGO that fits into this pattern, with him criticizing its governance and questioning how leaders like Tedros Ghebreyesus attained high positions without being elected by the people. Georgescu discusses the role of fear in governance, describing fear as the ultimate instrument of control and warning against narratives like climate change and pandemics that he claims are used to manipulate populations and expand oligarchic power. He asserts that fear and engineered crises enable the prescribing of policies and the extraction of wealth, while ordinary people are kept in a state of dependency and subservience through educational systems, consumer culture, and media. He recounts his own decision to leave the UN after experiences such as the Marshall Islands nuclear legacy, where he says US nuclear testing caused widespread ecological and health damage and was suppressed from reporting. He describes attempts to stop him from presenting his findings and the censure of his press conference, which reinforced his perception that the UN is under oligarchic control. Georgescu emphasizes the need for a “quality life” rooted in connection with nature rather than accumulation and manipulation by global institutions. He argues for personal sovereignty, direct engagement with nature, and conscious living as a political act. He calls for resistance—“say no, no consent”—to the UN’s agendas and the broader oligarchic system. He concludes that humanity should reconnect with nature, reject fear-based control, and redefine life beyond the constructs of political campaigns, NGOs, and transnational governance.

The discussion centers on alleged child sex abuse within the United Nations and how it is handled internally. The second speaker asserts that many UN employees, including those at the UN, treat child sex abuse as “a cost of doing business.” They state that French peacekeepers were abusing children in the Central African Republic, with children as young as eight years old being forced to perform sexual acts in exchange for food. This claim is described as despicable and the opposite of the UN’s mission. The second speaker further contends that, according to their account, anyone involved in cover-ups of child sexual abuse “without exception, has been promoted.” In contrast, those who report abuses or attempt to stop them are said to have been fired or resigned. They claim the UN has spent more than 3,000,000 US dollars on silencing them personally. A broader critique is offered of the UN’s stance on whistleblowing, summarized by the assertion that “the UN's position on whistleblowing, whether it's this, child's excuse, or anything, is destroy the whistleblower.” The first speaker appears to challenge whether such allegations are being spoken about publicly by someone within the organization who knows about ongoing abuse, implying fear of job loss as a deterrent to speaking out. The second speaker presses the point with a direct personal inquiry, noting that an assistant secretary general is “not speaking out about someone he knows who is raping multiple children because he's worried he's gonna lose his job,” and asking, “Yeah. What's his name?” Overall, the exchange attributes a systemic pattern of abuse and retaliation to silence whistleblowers within the UN, highlighting specific alleged incidents in Central African Republic involving French peacekeepers and a broader accusation that reporting abuse is penalized while cover-ups are rewarded.

The organization has strayed from its founding principles, evolving from a protector of peace to an entity imposing a global ideological agenda. The 2030 agenda, while well-intentioned, undermines national sovereignty and individual rights, perpetuating issues rather than solving them. The UN has failed to uphold human rights, allowing oppressive regimes to thrive and promoting harmful policies that hinder economic growth. This has led to a loss of credibility and effectiveness in addressing global conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine. Argentina is undergoing a transformation, embracing freedom and individual rights, and will no longer support policies that restrict these freedoms. Argentina calls for a new agenda focused on liberty and invites other nations to join in this pursuit. The country will actively defend freedom and reject any agenda that violates natural rights.

The organization has strayed from its founding principles, evolving from a peace-seeking entity into one that imposes an ideological agenda on nations and citizens. The 2030 agenda, while well-intentioned, undermines national sovereignty and individual rights, deepening issues like poverty and inequality. The UN has allowed oppressive regimes to participate while failing to address real global conflicts, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Argentina is undergoing a transformation, embracing freedom and individual rights, and will no longer support policies that restrict these freedoms. Argentina calls for a new agenda focused on liberty and cooperation among free nations, rejecting the current trajectory of the UN and advocating for the defense of human rights.

The US federal government employs over 3,000,000 people. Excluding the post office and armed forces, that number is roughly 2,400,000. A March report from the America First Policy Institute using Freedom of Information Act requests on work emails across federal agencies found that 95% of career employees who emailed about politics were liberals who hated Trump, cheered Biden and Harris, and celebrated Trump's defeat in 2020. OpenSecrets.org shows that the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the biggest organization for federal government employees with 820,000 members, donated 96% to the Democrat party and only 4% to Republicans. This has been the trend for at least thirty years. Of the entire government workforce, only 5,000 are presidential employees who serve the president and his mission.