TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed, failing to resolve many ongoing conflicts. The primary purpose of the UN should be to assist in settling these disputes, and there is a need for improvement in its operations to fulfill this potential.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

American contractors are bidding to rebuild this place, making the defense department just bodyguards for them. The speaker criticizes the United Nations, claiming the US government owns it and foots the bill. They say the UN does what the US wants, except for Libya and Cuba. The speaker asserts that the US controls the UN, influencing their votes. They call the UN a US puppet and imply they could take over Libya and Cuba if they wanted.

The UN has a significant number of employees who are perceived as unproductive, with estimates suggesting around 90% are not actively contributing. The organization operates in a bureaucratic manner, making it inefficient, especially with negotiations among 190 countries. Employees are restricted from political campaigning, as their allegiance is to the UN rather than their home countries. While there are personal preferences among staff regarding political figures, the UN maintains a neutral stance. Discussions also touch on the challenges of global issues, like the Middle East, which remain unresolved due to the complexities of international diplomacy.

The speaker discusses how the world is controlled by a system where leaders like the Bundescanceler or president work for the oligarchs rather than the people. They argue that the United Nations (UN) is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum (WEF) because they are controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. The WEF creates leaders through their young global leaders program, ensuring they are politically correct. However, they also need intelligent opposition. The speaker suggests that the UN controls people by offering high salaries, free access to various amenities, and a UN badge, but this does not make them more important than ordinary people.

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. While the UN has great potential, it is currently not meeting expectations and is poorly managed. Many conflicts remain unresolved, and the UN should be more effective in helping to settle these issues. The organization needs to improve its operations to fulfill its primary purpose.

In this video, Carlin Georgesco, a former high-ranking member of the United Nations, discusses his experiences and observations within the organization. He reveals that the UN is controlled by oligarchs and is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum. Georgesco criticizes the UN for failing to fulfill its purpose of maintaining peace and claims that discussions within the organization are often focused on war rather than peace. He also highlights the manipulation and control exerted by the oligarchs, who exploit natural resources and control political leaders. Georgesco emphasizes the importance of individual sovereignty, connecting with nature, and saying no to the UN and its manipulative agenda.

Cognitive dissonance arises when beliefs clash with actions, hindering UN's SDG progress. People struggle with sacrificing freedoms for collective goals or feeling overwhelmed by climate collapse. Resolving dissonance involves changing beliefs, actions, or perception of tasks. UN faces challenges in persuading individuals to support SDGs by rewiring beliefs and actions. For instance, transitioning to sustainable energy may lead to energy scarcity and higher prices, deterring those valuing personal freedom. To overcome this, UN aims to manipulate empathy, mindfulness, and critical thinking to align individuals with collective goals.

The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945 to maintain peace. However, it is argued that the UN is controlled by the World Economic Forum and oligarchs. The leaders of countries are seen as employees of the oligarchs, and the World Economic Forum selects and influences these leaders through programs like the Young Global Leaders program. The UN also prioritizes political correctness and controls its members through financial incentives, such as high salaries and free access to various amenities. This lack of power to say no is attributed to the influence of money. Consequently, the UN is seen as indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum, both being controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention and response. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

Disinformation and hate speech have created a toxic environment, forcing the UN to act strategically in its communications. The UN aims to shape debate, educate, and deliver facts about global issues like human suffering, climate change, and war. However, UN content was being down-ranked on platforms, and the organization faced online attacks. Every Sustainable Development Goal is impacted by disinformation and hate speech. To combat this, the UN introduced global principles on information integrity, a blueprint for a healthy information ecosystem. These principles emphasize safety by design and transparency, aligning with calls to elevate information integrity.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The UN security staff trafficked young girls from Moldova to Bosnia during the war, holding them as sex slaves in nightclubs. Aid workers also exploited vulnerable families, demanding children in exchange for access to refugee camps. The UN knew about these abuses and covered them up. During a pandemic spread by bodily fluids, WHO staff abused women in Eastern Congo. Now, women in Eastern Congo are protesting, demanding the UN leave because they were supposed to bring peace and security, but instead, they were raped. Also, Mark Zuckerberg should go to jail. And, publicly sharing for the first time, my DNA reveals that I am Donald Trump's fourth cousin once removed through his mother.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

Improving government is incredibly difficult. The most difficult challenge is overcoming entropy, a battle physics tells us is impossible to win. The second most difficult is overcoming bureaucracy. It's a monumental struggle; bureaucracy is the penultimate battle in the fight for better government.

American bureaucracy is under significant threat, with current elections featuring candidates openly advocating for its dismantling. The Republican agenda appears focused on attacking and destroying bureaucratic structures, which raises concerns about the future of governance in the U.S. Many believe we are on the brink of a pivotal moment, where the stability and existence of bureaucracy are at stake. The upcoming vote could determine the fate of American bureaucracy, emphasizing its critical importance in maintaining order and function within the government.

An executive order has been prepared to withdraw the United States from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA, a refugee organization, due to perceived anti-American bias. Additionally, American involvement in UNESCO will be reviewed. The order emphasizes a reassessment of U.S. funding to the UN, highlighting disparities in contributions from different countries that are seen as unfair to the U.S. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed for a long time. While there are hopes for improvement, the organization needs to better address ongoing conflicts and enhance its operations.

The average American worker's wages and incomes have flatlined, causing anxiety and fear of globalization, which has been fed by politics. Globalization is a powerful potential tool for good and is here to stay. It is important to ensure everyone can access the benefits of globalization.

American contractors are bidding to rebuild the area, making the defense department seem like their bodyguards. The speaker criticizes the United Nations, claiming the US government controls it and foots the bill. They believe the UN does what the US wants, except for Libya and Cuba. The speaker implies that the US essentially controls the UN, with other countries voting as the US desires.

UN peacekeepers have been accused of sexually exploiting vulnerable individuals they are meant to protect. The documentary investigates this global crisis, featuring interviews with victims and confrontations with those responsible. The lack of criminal accountability is highlighted as a fundamental issue, with calls for perpetrators to face jail time. The United Nations is pressed on its actions regarding the abuse. The video also raises concerns about the UN's overall effectiveness and questions its logo and the World Health Organization's logo. The documentary reveals disturbing testimonies from victims and exposes the organization's failure to address the issue adequately.

We love all countries and their people, but we oppose the United Nations' goal of a one-world government. They want to erase our languages, cultures, and personal rights. They even want to control our bodies and force vaccinations. The United Nations is a fraud, aiming to implement a digital currency that tracks and controls our every transaction. They have treaties that supersede constitutions and plan to implant microchips in our heads. This is not a conspiracy theory; it's the truth. We need to protect our borders, cultures, and languages, and reject the United Nations' control.

USAID has been unresponsive and often operates independently of U.S. foreign policy, which is concerning given that it uses taxpayer dollars. There is a need for alignment between USAID's programs and the national interest, as outlined by the State Department and the National Security Council. Despite attempts to reform the agency over the past few decades, it continues to resist cooperation and transparency regarding funding and program details. This lack of accountability cannot persist, and it is essential that taxpayer money is used to support U.S. national interests. The ongoing frustration with USAID's operations has spanned multiple administrations and must be addressed.

The organization has strayed from its founding principles, evolving from a protector of peace to an entity imposing a global ideological agenda. The 2030 agenda, while well-intentioned, undermines national sovereignty and individual rights, perpetuating issues rather than solving them. The UN has failed to uphold human rights, allowing oppressive regimes to thrive and promoting harmful policies that hinder economic growth. This has led to a loss of credibility and effectiveness in addressing global conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine. Argentina is undergoing a transformation, embracing freedom and individual rights, and will no longer support policies that restrict these freedoms. Argentina calls for a new agenda focused on liberty and invites other nations to join in this pursuit. The country will actively defend freedom and reject any agenda that violates natural rights.

The organization has strayed from its founding principles, evolving from a peace-seeking entity into one that imposes an ideological agenda on nations and citizens. The 2030 agenda, while well-intentioned, undermines national sovereignty and individual rights, deepening issues like poverty and inequality. The UN has allowed oppressive regimes to participate while failing to address real global conflicts, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Argentina is undergoing a transformation, embracing freedom and individual rights, and will no longer support policies that restrict these freedoms. Argentina calls for a new agenda focused on liberty and cooperation among free nations, rejecting the current trajectory of the UN and advocating for the defense of human rights.

The US federal government employs over 3,000,000 people. Excluding the post office and armed forces, that number is roughly 2,400,000. A March report from the America First Policy Institute using Freedom of Information Act requests on work emails across federal agencies found that 95% of career employees who emailed about politics were liberals who hated Trump, cheered Biden and Harris, and celebrated Trump's defeat in 2020. OpenSecrets.org shows that the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the biggest organization for federal government employees with 820,000 members, donated 96% to the Democrat party and only 4% to Republicans. This has been the trend for at least thirty years. Of the entire government workforce, only 5,000 are presidential employees who serve the president and his mission.