TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Doctors reportedly risked losing their licenses for prescribing ivermectin. The Federation of State Medical Boards, a private entity in Texas that oversees state medical boards, allegedly sent a directive to state medical boards concerning ivermectin and misinformation, encouraging them to target doctors. Some doctors are reportedly still dealing with medical boards to clear their names. This reportedly occurred in the fall of 2021, when Biden mandated the shots.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I have a chart that shows the CDC and FDA's own numbers on adverse events. Despite social media censorship, these are the true numbers. Over 28 years of reporting, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and Dexamethasone are shown to be safe drugs. However, since the COVID pandemic, remdesivir and the COVID vaccines have had adverse events. Our response to COVID has been a failure, with 4% of the world's population but supposedly 16% of the deaths. The VAERS system has recorded 1,600,000 adverse events from the COVID vaccines alone.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses how CNN portrayed them as taking horse medication, specifically Ivermectin, which is actually a medication used more commonly in humans. They mention that Ivermectin has been prescribed to billions of people and even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited because of a federal law that states emergency use authorization for vaccines cannot be issued if there is an existing medication proven effective against the target illness. They argue that acknowledging the effectiveness of Ivermectin would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that is effective against the target disease. If Fauci had acknowledged the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin against COVID, it would have been illegal to approve the vaccines. The medical community, including 17,000 doctors, supported the use of these medications, but Fauci dismissed them as dangerous. It is speculated that Fauci had a strong incentive to discredit these medications. Many doctors, such as Harvey Reach, Peter McCulloch, and Pierre Corey, who have successfully treated COVID patients, believe that hundreds of thousands of American lives could have been saved if these medications were not suppressed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

This case involves the FDA's informational statements about the dangers of using certain drugs. The FDA made these statements in response to reports of consumers being hospitalized after using horse Ivermectin without a prescription. The FDA did not require or prohibit anything, despite using language like "stop it." The tweets were meant to advise consumers against using animal Ivermectin, stating it could be unsafe. The plaintiffs argue that the FDA's statements were commands, but the FDA argues they were just quick tweets sharing information. The FDA has the authority to provide information on drugs, such as warning about the dangers of opioids. The FDA did conduct scientific analysis on Ivermectin, but the specific process is not mentioned in the record. The FDA does not regulate off-label use of drugs and explicitly recognizes that doctors have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID treatment.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

FDA attorney Ashley Chung Arnold acknowledges that doctors have the right to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID treatment. The FDA claims sovereign immunity and cannot be held responsible for misleading statements. The judges question whether the FDA's advice is based on scientific views or personal opinions. The FDA attorney argues that the agency is not required to go through a formal process and that they are accountable to the political process. The court is not responsible for fact-checking the FDA's scientific statements.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

This year, it was revealed that $2.3 billion was allocated by the government, specifically the CDC and FDA, to pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS to discourage the prescription of ivermectin and other treatments recommended by doctors. The federal government has now acknowledged that these treatments were effective and expressed regret for suppressing them, admitting that this has led to unnecessary deaths. The influence of big pharma, particularly figures like Bill Gates, has resulted in restrictions on what healthcare professionals can prescribe, leading to consequences such as decertification and job loss for those who defy these guidelines. This situation highlights the dangers of a powerful cartel controlling medical practices.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Manufacturers of nasal products were allegedly warned against promoting or researching their products for COVID-19. One company was allegedly denied FDA permission to study its product's effect on COVID-19. Another company, COFIX Rx, allegedly received warnings to stop promoting its product for COVID-19. The speaker claims anything that worked for COVID-19 faced strict government opposition, including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and virucidal nasal sprays. Higher dose corticosteroids, zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin, over-the-counter famotidine, and colchicine were also allegedly effective treatments. A high-quality trial allegedly showed colchicine reduced hospitalization and death, but the federal government never mentioned it. Aspirin and blood thinners were allegedly not mentioned for blood clot prevention. The speaker asserts the only advice given was to fear the virus, lockdown, social distance, wear masks, use hand sanitizer (none of which allegedly work), and repeatedly get vaccinated. The speaker concludes the COVID-19 response was allegedly about mandating vaccines.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I don't speculate on the motives of individuals like Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates; I focus on their actions. The narrative reveals serious immoral behavior linked to government positions. Recently, the FDA's chief attorney acknowledged there was no justification for discouraging the use of Ivermectin, which was an effective treatment for COVID. By withholding it and other existing remedies, millions died unnecessarily. The push for vaccines was prioritized, despite a federal rule preventing emergency use authorization if effective treatments were available. This led to a lack of proper testing for vaccines, resulting in alarming health issues, particularly myocarditis in young athletes. The rising number of athlete deaths on the field is unprecedented, and there remains a need for accountability as the science continues to emerge.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Joe Rogan announced on social media that he has COVID and mentioned taking Ivermectin as part of his treatment. However, Ivermectin is primarily used as a dewormer for horses and is not proven to be effective against COVID. In fact, it can be dangerous and potentially deadly. The CDC and FDA have issued warnings against using Ivermectin for COVID. Some doctors claim that Ivermectin is effective and have faced backlash for advocating its use. There are allegations that pharmaceutical companies and the media have influenced the narrative against Ivermectin due to financial interests. Studies on Ivermectin have shown mixed results, but some countries have reported success in using it to treat COVID.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that effectively treats the target disease. If Fauci or anyone had acknowledged that Ivermectin works as a treatment for COVID, the vaccine would not have received authorization. Despite many doctors and publications supporting Ivermectin, Fauci actively dismissed it as a dangerous medication to drown out its effectiveness. It is unclear why he continued to do so after receiving authorization, but there is a strong incentive for him to discredit Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Notable doctors like Harvey Reich and Pierre Cory have successfully treated thousands of COVID patients.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker didn't use ivermectin until the government took over distribution of monoclonal antibodies. In March, the government put out information on why people should not take ivermectin for COVID on the FDA's website. At the same time, they launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund to feed out propaganda.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Ivermectin is a widely used and safe drug that has been effective against SARS CoV 2. It could have saved many lives if it had been used more widely. Doctors who tried to use it faced prosecution, despite its safety and effectiveness. One doctor worked 715 continuous days without a day off because no one else wanted to care for indigent patients. The doctor's hospital had a low mortality rate compared to the rest of the country, thanks to protocols that included Ivermectin. However, the media ignored their success and the use of repurposed drugs. The doctor faced censorship on social media platforms for mentioning Ivermectin. The FDA claims there are no adequate alternatives to the vaccines, but many believe unnecessary deaths occurred due to censorship and lack of access to Ivermectin.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The FDA's website advises against using ivermectin for COVID-19, yet links to clinical trials, half of which indicate it may be effective. For three years, the FDA has warned against ivermectin while referencing studies that support its use. Additionally, there is increasing research suggesting ivermectin could be a vital treatment for COVID-19. The strong opposition from the federal government appears to be linked to the desire to maintain emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines. For more insights, consider subscribing for additional videos.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Some people are refusing the COVID vaccine and instead taking horse dewormer, which has no evidence of effectiveness and can be dangerous. The speaker got COVID and tried various medications, including Ivermectin, which is commonly used for deworming horses. The mention of Ivermectin as a horse dewormer is not flattering. The speaker believes there is clear evidence that Ivermectin can be effective and that people should be informed about it.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Vaccines were oversold, leading to mandates that caused people to lose their jobs. The intent behind vaccine liability laws was well-meaning, but companies must be held accountable for vaccine injuries. Early treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were undermined, preventing effective therapies from being available and allowing emergency use authorization for vaccines. This approach resulted in unnecessary loss of life. The suppression of alternative treatments benefited pharmaceutical companies financially. Despite evidence supporting treatments like corticosteroids and ivermectin, these options were dismissed, paving the way for vaccine mandates. The public response to vaccine injuries has been inadequate and unacceptable.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

There is a growing problem of people using a drug meant for animals to treat COVID-19. This false information started with a viral video from a group called America's frontline doctors, claiming that hydroxychloroquine could cure COVID. They later started promoting another drug called Ivermectin as a cure for COVID, despite warnings from the CDC, FDA, and other health organizations that it is not effective and could be harmful. Ivermectin is actually meant to prevent parasites in animals like horses. It's important to rely on approved treatments and vaccines to prevent COVID-19.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker addresses the issue of vaccines, claiming the FDA has lost the trust of Americans. Autism rates are cited, stating that in the 1980s, it was 1 in 10,000, but a recent Children's Health Defense study indicates it's now 1 in 33 among children ages 5 to 8. Parents are said to point to vaccines as a cause, but are dismissed. The speaker criticizes the emergency use authorization of COVID vaccines, alleging the process took only days compared to the typical 10-15 years for vaccine development. VAERS reports are referenced, citing 1,662,426 reports, including 38,541 deaths, 220,494 hospitalizations, and other adverse events. The speaker contrasts this with the alleged dismissal of Ivermectin as "horse paste," despite its effectiveness against COVID. The speaker asks if the addressee objected to the removal of Doctors Gruber and Krausz for opposing mandated booster shots, to which the addressee said no. The speaker claims vaccinated and boosted individuals keep getting and spreading COVID-19, while those with natural immunity do not.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The FDA issues emergency use authorization for medical products when there are no approved alternatives. The effectiveness of Ivermectin as a treatment is questioned, as it would have affected the authorization of vaccines. Powerful forces with financial interests oppose Ivermectin, as it threatens global vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna have made significant profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Ivermectin is a cheap and widely available drug, but its safety is disputed by Merck, despite distributing it when it was under patent. It is important to be cautious of articles that may be biased or paid for.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He argues that this portrayal is a clear indication of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited in order to promote the COVID-19 vaccines, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there is an existing effective medication. Acknowledging Ivermectin's effectiveness would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The FDA settled in court and admitted to intentionally deceiving Americans about Ivermectin. They discouraged its use despite over 100 studies supporting its effectiveness in treating COVID-19. This misinformation led to unnecessary deaths. The FDA's actions also affected other drugs used in treatment protocols. This revelation is significant. Translation: The FDA admitted to intentionally misleading Americans about Ivermectin, leading to unnecessary deaths. This misinformation also impacted other drugs used in treatment protocols. This admission is significant.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

According to a lawyer representing the FDA, doctors are now allowed to prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. This is a surprising development, as the FDA previously discouraged the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19. The case was brought by three doctors who claimed that the FDA unlawfully interfered with their medical practice by discouraging the use of Ivermectin. The FDA stated that Ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19. However, the doctors feel vindicated by this recent decision and are calling for accountability from the FDA. Stay tuned for more updates.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A physician recounts being attacked for offering alternative COVID treatments and questioning vaccine efficacy. Despite treating thousands of patients and being proven more accurate than public health authorities, she is still fighting to keep her medical license. The physician describes treating a sheriff's deputy with COVID in February, following the vaccine rollout, when ivermectin was difficult to obtain. She notes primary care doctors often did not treat viruses, leading to catastrophic outcomes. After President Trump touted hydroxychloroquine, the Texas State Board of Pharmacy restricted its prescription. The government then launched a PR campaign against ivermectin, influencing hospitals to mandate vaccines. The physician observed more vaccinated individuals contracting COVID with similar or worse symptoms. Monoclonal antibodies, which worked effectively, were removed as an option, allegedly to promote vaccination. A urology department considered refusing unvaccinated patients. The physician faced obstacles in obtaining emergency privileges to administer ivermectin to the sheriff's deputy, who ultimately survived but suffered long-term health issues and later passed away. The Texas Medical Board is pursuing charges against the physician for recommending COVID therapy. The expert witness against her is a Planned Parenthood lab director. She highlights the politicization of medicine, the loss of power for doctors, and the influence of corporations and insurance companies. She expresses concern over COVID shot injuries, the shots being added to the childhood vaccine schedule, and the potential for long-term immune system damage.

Tucker Carlson

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden: How Vaccines Got Politicized and the Medical Industry Lost All Credibility

Guests: Dr. Mary Talley Bowden

reSee.it Podcast Summary

Tucker Carlson interviews Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, a Texas physician who treated COVID patients and faced backlash for questioning government-recommended therapies and vaccines. Initially skeptical of the vaccines, Dr. Bowden observed that they were not effective, leading her to explore alternative treatments like ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies. Despite her efforts to provide care, she faced professional repercussions, including threats to her medical license from the Texas Medical Board. Dr. Bowden recounts a case involving a sheriff's deputy who contracted COVID and was denied ivermectin, leading to a legal battle for emergency treatment. She highlights a pattern where primary care physicians were reluctant to treat COVID patients early due to a dogma against treating viral infections. Dr. Bowden argues that this approach resulted in preventable deaths and severe complications. She discusses the politicization of medicine, noting that many doctors are now employed by hospitals or corporations, limiting their independence. Dr. Bowden expresses concern over the ongoing administration of COVID vaccines, particularly to children, citing high rates of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). She criticizes the lack of accountability for vaccine manufacturers and the government's failure to address the injuries caused by the vaccines. Throughout the conversation, Dr. Bowden emphasizes the need for transparency in medical data and the importance of empowering patients to make informed health decisions. She reflects on her journey from a non-political physician to an advocate for patient rights and safety, expressing hope for future changes in the healthcare system. Dr. Bowden plans to continue speaking out and may pursue a podcast to further share her experiences and insights.