reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The speaker believes cooperation with companies developing vaccine technology should be outlawed due to "nefarious intent" and financial incentives. They claim the pharmaceutical industry profits from vaccine-induced adverse outcomes, leading to costly medical treatments and prescriptions. Vaccines are described as an "economic loss leader" for the medical-industrial complex. Healthy, unvaccinated children don't generate revenue, while vaccines can lead to health issues like asthma, allergies, ADD/ADHD, diabetes, and cancer. The speaker compares vaccines to a free gift that lures people into purchasing more expensive products or services. They argue that "free" vaccines can cost individuals their health, citing potential side effects like Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, encephalitis, and neurological issues, as well as turbo cancers, respiratory problems, and myocarditis. A forthcoming study will allegedly reveal a significant number of deaths from chronic renal disease linked to vaccines. The speaker concludes that the pharmaceutical industry fiercely defends the vaccine schedule because it drives their profits, especially with the advent of mRNA technology.

The speaker highlights several concerns regarding vaccines. They mention the lack of education on vaccines, including their contents, safety records, and informed consent. They also discuss conflicts of interest in payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules, as well as patients being dismissed from practices for vaccine safety concerns. The speaker expresses frustration with employers forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine and the lack of informed consent. They question the transparency of vaccine complications and the presence of adjuvants in placebo studies. The speaker also raises concerns about the increasing rates of autism spectrum disorder and other chronic diseases. They emphasize the need for unbiased research on vaccine safety and efficacy. The speaker announces the opening of their new medical practice to continue fighting for patient rights and uncovering the truth about vaccines.

In 1989, 10 shots were given as part of the vaccination schedule, twice as many as in other Western countries. The speaker questions why this is the case and encourages parents to educate themselves. They express concern about the motives of those in charge of public health and emphasize the importance of making informed decisions. The speaker also suggests that doctors may not be interested in learning more about vaccines due to financial influences from drug companies. They argue that vaccines are a profitable industry and that medical schools prioritize pharmaceuticals over prevention and nutrition. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty of convincing these institutions to prioritize children's well-being over profit.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine hesitancy caused by lack of transparency and honesty. They mention being skeptical despite previously being pro-vaccine, and reading books like "Dissolving Illusions" and "Turtles All the Way Down" to understand why certain information is not being discussed. The speaker questions the laws passed in 1986 to protect vaccine manufacturers, suggesting that they may have unintentionally led to an increase in childhood vaccines without liability for manufacturers. They mention a conversation with Bobby Kennedy about vaccines, who highlights the significant increase in the number of vaccines administered compared to when they were growing up.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

The discussion centers on the credibility of vaccine safety claims made by various health organizations and the FDA. One speaker argues that vaccines undergo rigorous testing, while the other contends that no vaccine has ever completed a long-term placebo-controlled trial before being licensed. They express distrust in the FDA, citing past issues with drugs like Vioxx and opioids, suggesting that the FDA misled doctors and the public about their safety. The speaker believes that pharmaceutical companies influence these agencies, leading to misinformation about vaccine safety. The goal is to address and rectify this perceived corruption.

The speaker expresses concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, stating that they believe these vaccines are the most toxic and damaging pharmaceutical products ever released. They highlight the profitability of the industry, mentioning the revenues of Pfizer and other companies. The speaker claims that around 10-15% of vaccine recipients have experienced serious injuries, with 1% being permanently disabled and 0.1% dying. They emphasize that these statistics are based on CDC and US insurance data.

The speaker discusses the issue of liability protection for vaccine manufacturers and the lack of safety testing for vaccines. They explain that in 1986, liability was taken away from manufacturers, leading to an increase in the number of vaccines given to children. They argue that vaccines should be tested for safety like any other pharmaceutical product, but this is not happening due to the lack of liability. The speaker also addresses the claim that vaccines do not cause injury, particularly autism, and highlights the lack of studies supporting this claim. They conclude by discussing the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccine development and the objections raised by religious groups.

I'm speaking out because my fully vaccinated son, Jackson, had health issues. With SB277, my perfectly healthy, vaccine-free five-year-old can't attend school in California. I cried for weeks, feeling I was meant to fight a company bigger than some countries. I used to sell Vioxx at Merck, which was later found to have manipulated data and covered up heart attack risks. This made me realize things on the market aren't always safe. If a vaccine is added to the schedule, drug companies can make billions. I cannot stay silent. Pharma influences medical education and research, leading to biased studies. The FDA and CDC are compromised, with conflicted leaders and revolving doors. Pharma creates customers for life, especially with vaccines for kids. They prioritize profit over people, and it's up to us to take back our health.

This video discusses the lack of safety studies and transparency surrounding vaccines. It highlights the conflicts of interest within government agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as the limited research on the long-term effects of vaccines. The speaker emphasizes the need for a vaxxed versus unvaxxed study to determine the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. The video calls for greater accountability and transparency in the vaccine industry to protect the health and well-being of children. (147 words)

Brandi Vaughan, a former pharmaceutical representative, discusses the dangers of vaccines and the need to take action against the pharmaceutical industry. She highlights the lack of safety testing for vaccines and the harmful ingredients they contain. Vaughan emphasizes the importance of a healthy immune system and questions the effectiveness of vaccines in providing real immunity. She warns that vaccines are being mandated for both children and adults, and urges people to join the fight against this infringement on personal medical rights. Vaughan encourages support for her nonprofit marketing campaign, Learn the Risk, which aims to raise awareness about the risks associated with vaccines.

The speaker expresses feeling disconnected from their profession and society due to corruption. They criticize the belief that vaccines have saved lives, arguing that highly vaccinated countries had high fatality rates. They highlight concerns about underreporting vaccine injuries and criticize public health leaders for dismissing the connection between deaths and vaccines. The speaker mentions the strict actions taken for other products causing harm, contrasting it with the lack of action regarding vaccine-related deaths. They also mention a rise in autism, which they believe is linked to the vaccine schedule. The speaker dismisses claims that there is no evidence of a vaccine-autism link.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

The speakers discuss the increased number of vaccines since 1990 and question if all are necessary. One speaker claims the US vaccine schedule includes twice as many shots as other Western countries. They suggest parents should educate themselves, space out or delay vaccines, and clean out toxins. One speaker believes public health officials may not always have people's best interests at heart. They claim the AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies and that vaccines are the pharmaceutical industry's largest growing division, worth $13 billion. They suggest asking pharmaceutical companies to take a loss for the good of children is a tough sell.

The speaker states the vaccine recommendation panel has been under attack for 20 years. A 2002 congressional investigation allegedly found 97% of panel members had conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. One instance cited four out of five members working for a company when they approved its vaccine, and one voting member held a patent on that vaccine, later sold for $186 million. The speaker says the goal is to ensure the panel consists of individuals without conflicts of interest who are not profiting from their votes. The speaker claims that since the panel's inception in 1986, the vaccine schedule has expanded from 11 doses of five vaccines to 69 to 92 doses of 19 vaccines, none of which have been tested for safety. The speaker asserts this is malpractice and aims to ensure all vaccines are tested for safety so physicians and patients understand the risk profile and benefits of each vaccine.

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, particularly in relation to autism. They criticize the lack of long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on vaccines and highlight the conflict of interest between vaccine manufacturers and regulatory bodies. The speaker also discusses the high number of lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies and the exorbitant markups on popular drugs. They argue that the current scientific evidence does not support the trust placed in vaccines and advocate for freedom of choice in healthcare decisions. The speaker claims to have a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy of flu vaccines and mentions dissenting opinions on the connection between vaccines and autism.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

After 1989, the U.S. administers twice as many vaccines as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves on vaccine choices, questioning the necessity of certain shots like the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. There is concern that public health officials may not always prioritize individuals' best interests. The speaker questions why doctors wouldn't want to learn more about life-saving vaccines, suggesting financial ties between pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions influence vaccine promotion. Advocating for children's well-being may clash with the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

If regulatory agencies continue to rush products to market without long-term safety trials, the planet is in danger. The speaker questions what would happen if a vaccine wipes out fertility. They state that no childhood vaccines on the schedule have gone through randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The speaker finds it alarming that Dr. Martin Macri's statement that no future vaccine will be licensed without a proper randomized controlled placebo trial is shocking to some. They accuse mainstream media of spreading misinformation by denying the absence of placebo trials, then admitting it to avoid delaying vaccine advancement. The speaker asserts the pharmaceutical industry has lied about drugs like Fenben and Vioxx and is now making vaccines. They call for accountability from the industry and the media, warning of grave danger if this does not happen. They disapprove of five-day safety trials with no placebo, especially for products given to healthy children.

The speaker, who used to work in the pharmaceutical industry, criticizes the industry for prioritizing profit over people's health. He shares his own experiences of being involved in corruption and unethical practices. He highlights the lack of transparency and the influence of the industry on doctors and politicians. He also discusses the overprescription of medication to children, particularly psychotropic drugs, and the harmful effects they can have. The speaker calls for public awareness and action to hold the pharmaceutical industry accountable and protect the health of future generations.

The speaker is questioned about his stance on childhood vaccines, with many scientific and medical organizations disagreeing with him. The audience asks how they can help him align with science. The speaker clarifies that he is not anti-vaccine, but believes vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medicines. He criticizes the lack of prelicensing placebo-controlled trials for vaccines and cites examples of potential risks and lack of long-term studies. The other speaker argues that there is evidence of vaccines preventing diseases and highlights the importance of distinguishing between association and causation. The speaker emphasizes the need for good science and questions the trustworthiness of pharmaceutical companies. The conversation ends with a discussion about the speaker's family not supporting his views on vaccines.

The speaker discusses concerns about the negative effects of vaccines on children, citing a study that linked paralysis in Indian children to a polio vaccine. They criticize the Gates Foundation for pushing vaccines without medical expertise, leading to harm in vulnerable nations.