reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker stumbled upon the involvement of the CIA in vaccine production, specifically with Pfizer and Moderna. They discovered that Resilience, a biotechnology company, partnered with Moderna and received significant funding from the US government, Department of Defense, and other organizations. The speaker also highlighted connections between Resilience's team members and the intelligence community, as well as ties to big banking. They expressed concerns about the influence of these individuals and organizations in the production of vaccines and emphasized the need for transparency and control. The speaker also mentioned the involvement of Illumina and the connections between various board members.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates. The NIH co-owns the vaccine, as shown in the agreement. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

Moderna, currently in stage 3 of vaccine development, is believed to have already developed the vaccine. Interestingly, Anthony Fauci, the first CEO of Moderna, was a Cornell graduate and roommates with Bill Gates. Moderna has connections to IG Farben, a company involved in World War II, which was later broken up by George Soros, who then formed Moderna. Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and George Soros are all associated with Moderna. Additionally, Jeffrey Epstein was a major financial backer of Moderna until his alleged death.

The top agencies leading Operation Warp Speed were the NSA and the Pentagon, not public health agencies like HHS, CDC, or NIH. The vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military tractors, with Pfizer and Moderna being paid to put their names on them. The speaker believes that Operation Warp Speed is not new, as it has been happening since 1980 at Fort Detrick, a bioweapons lab. They claim that the government has been involved in unethical practices, such as injecting the military with HIV in the 1990s.

I discovered the CIA's involvement in vaccine production while researching Pfizer. Notably, the CEO of In-Q-Tel, the CIA's investment group, is on the board of Resilience, a biotech company that partnered with Moderna. Resilience has received significant government funding and has ties to various high-profile investors. Key figures like Bob Nelson and Luciana Borio, who have connections to the intelligence community and the FDA, are involved with Resilience. During Operation Warp Speed, Moderna collaborated with this newly formed company, which aims to innovate biomanufacturing and develop gene therapies and vaccines. The connections between these organizations and individuals raise questions about the intertwining of intelligence, big pharma, and government interests in public health initiatives.

The vaccines were developed by the NIH, not Moderna or Pfizer. The patents are 50% owned by the NIH, and they were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their names on the vaccines, but it was a military project from the start.

This transcript discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government dating back to 2015. It notes "Frankenstein coronavirus" and that "the NIH and Moderna were collaborating with Doctor. Barrick" with "His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement." It says "the NIH appears to be transferring the mRNA tech to Doctor. Barrick." It asserts "'mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.'" The transcript also states "'the government co owns the vaccine.'" It adds "'This is not part of that.'" It emphasizes "This is 2015." It concludes with "The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. You better share that one quick. Don't know how long it's gonna last."

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna or Pfizer, but by the NIH. The patents are owned by the NIH, and the vaccines were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, but this was originally a military project.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, when the Frankenstein coronavirus was first discovered. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, especially considering they are now mandating its use. It is important to note that this agreement predates any current political context.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. They mention the collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and doctors Barrick and Xi regarding the Frankenstein coronavirus. The speaker highlights that the NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to doctor Barrick and points out that the government co-owns the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by the NIAID and Moderna. They emphasize that this information is not related to the Trump administration and express surprise at the government's ownership of the vaccine. The speaker suggests sharing this information quickly.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

This is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. It reveals that the NIH collaborated with Dr. Barrick on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by NIAID and Moderna are jointly owned by the government. It's surprising that the same government now mandating the vaccine actually owns it.

Trump gave Moderna's COO a billion-dollar check to develop a vaccine quickly, bypassing FDA regulations. Human trials began after testing on mice. Many doubted the speed and safety of the process, but the vaccine was developed in 6 months. Concerns were raised by vaccine experts about the rushed development.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. Furthermore, the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were allegedly paid to put their stamps on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but it was supposedly a military project.

This video discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. It reveals that in 2015, the NIH collaborated with doctors Barrick and Shi on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement shows that the NIH transferred mRNA technology to doctor Barrick, and it states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates are jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna. The video highlights the irony that the government, which now mandates the vaccine, co-owns it. The speaker suggests sharing this information quickly, as its longevity is uncertain.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, the same time when a paper on the Frankenstein coronavirus was published by Doctors Barrick and Shee. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, and clarifies that this agreement is not related to any recent political events.

The speaker discusses the development of a COVID-19 vaccine in collaboration with Moderna. While some companies see it as a moneymaker, the CEO of Moderna suggests that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The speaker also mentions funding for gain-of-function research and the possibility of a deliberate bioterror attack. There is a dispute over whether gain-of-function research was funded, with accusations of lying to Congress. The speaker addresses conspiracy theories and emphasizes the positive impact of vaccines. They also highlight the need to be prepared for future pandemics, whether natural or intentional.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

In 1965, coronavirus was identified as a pathogen that could be modified for various purposes. In 1966, the first transatlantic biological experiment using a coronavirus model was conducted. In 1967, human trials were conducted on modified coronavirus. In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. It was found that coronavirus mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. The CDC filed a patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans in 2003. The RT PCR test for coronavirus was identified as a bioterrorism threat in 2002. Gain of function research on coronavirus was exempted from a moratorium in 2014. In 2016, a journal article stated that SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. In 2019, Moderna modified patent applications to include the term "accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." The goal was to create a universal vaccine template. The intent was to use coronavirus to achieve this. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA tech for a coronavirus vaccine. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about government involvement in vaccine ownership.

Welcome to Liberty Talk Canada. Bill Gates has been linked to COVID-19 vaccine preparations before the pandemic was officially declared. Through a Freedom of Information request, emails reveal that Gates' foundation was already discussing vaccine development with BioNTech's CEO in early February 2020, even before the WHO labeled it a pandemic in March. The Gates Foundation had also invested in BioNTech in September 2019, suggesting prior knowledge of the virus. Additionally, an email from March 2020 indicated that NIH officials were more concerned about market sentiment regarding vaccines than saving lives, highlighting a profit-driven approach. This raises questions about the NIH's role, suggesting it operates like a for-profit entity, with officials potentially benefiting from vaccine success.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccines. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

This document is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government dating back to 2015. At that time, researchers were working on a new coronavirus. Notably, the NIH and Moderna collaborated with Dr. Barrick, whose signature appears on the material transfer agreement. The NIH is transferring mRNA technology to Dr. Barrick, but it's important to note that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates are jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna. This agreement predates the Trump administration's initiatives, highlighting that the government co-owns the vaccine it is now mandating. This information is crucial and should be shared quickly.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.