reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The United Nations is providing $1.6 billion to 17 Latin American countries to assist migrants from Venezuela, including illegal migrants, through debit cards funded by US taxpayers. This is part of a larger initiative to spend $1.59 billion to help 3 million people in 17 countries. The UN is supporting and rewarding individuals who have violated US law by facilitating and funding their migration.

Currently in Panama at Bajo Chiquito migrant camp, a map shows routes for migrants, with HIAS and UN involvement. Criticizes NGOs like HIAS for human trafficking under the guise of Judaism. Calls for defunding and prosecuting these organizations. Describes dangerous conditions, including rape, disease, and lack of basic necessities. Urges shutting down these operations for the safety of migrants. Translation: The speaker is in Panama at a migrant camp, discussing routes for migrants and criticizing NGOs like HIAS for human trafficking. They call for shutting down these operations due to dangerous conditions and lack of basic necessities.

UNHCR receives millions in donations, mainly from the US, yet only provides basic tents and trash cans in the Darien Gap. The organization profits from human suffering, failing to address the ongoing crisis and educate migrants on safe migration. This mass migration is destroying culture and values. Funding is misused, lining pockets instead of aiding those in need.

The United Nations is confirmed to be funding the migrant crisis, as revealed by the Center for Immigration Studies. Public documents show that the United Nations plans to allocate $372 million in cash and voucher assistance to approximately 624,000 immigrants heading to the United States in 2024. This information eliminates any need for speculation, and the article link is provided for further reading.

A tragedy unfolds in the canal zone of Panama City, where a former U.S. military base is now dominated by the United Nations and NGOs. The Organization of International Migration (OIM) has been criticized for providing birth control to migrants instead of discouraging dangerous journeys. This facility houses various UN operations, including UNICEF and UNHCR, which have expanded due to increasing demands. There are calls for defunding these organizations, with accusations of complicity in human trafficking linked to cartels. These groups are seen as inviting perilous migration while living in comfort, raising concerns about their role in the crisis. The situation is framed as a consequence of support for globalist organizations.

The speaker questions the ACLU's stance on 85,000 missing children and suggests that the sponsors of these children are not real. They claim that the sponsors are involved in a racket and are not answering the phone. The speaker believes that a large number of these sponsors are involved in sex trafficking and accuses the current administration of supporting this through their policies. They also mention a partnership with cartels for human trafficking.

The speaker is at a migrant center in San Antonio, Texas, alleging that NGOs are facilitating human smuggling into America. He claims San Antonio police officers are contracted by NGOs to guard the area in their official uniforms and cars. The speaker questions the officers about the alleged conflict of interest and whether they are being paid by NGOs, but they offer "no comment." He accuses the NGOs of lying about paying for migrants' flights and scamming the federal government. He asks why the police are not investigating this and are instead taking money from NGOs. The speaker follows a bus allegedly transporting migrants to the airport and back to the migrant resource center. He questions a woman involved in the pickup about her NGO affiliation. He also questions an airport employee about working a side contract approved by the San Antonio PD.

In the Canal Zone of Panama City, the US government used to control this military base to protect the Panama Canal. However, it was given away by Jimmy Carter and is now under the control of the United Nations and NGOs. One of these organizations is the Organization of International Migration (OIM), which provided condoms and birth control to illegal aliens crossing into Panama. These organizations, like UNICEF and UNHCR, have taken over almost every building in the facility. The Clinton Foundation is also present. These organizations should be defunded and investigated for trafficking, as they contribute to the cartel's activities. Taxpayer dollars should not support them. They are responsible for encouraging people to illegally travel to the US.

Chairman Perry and members of the caucus, I thank you for inviting me to discuss what I describe as the most historic mass migration crisis ever to strike The United States. What has happened at the Southern border is history-making in scope with long-lasting second, third, and fourth order implications for American citizens. The mass migration that began around inauguration day 2021 calls for a broader public discussion about what it is and how it works. During its first year and now into its second, I interviewed hundreds of immigrants, most recently on an eight-day fact-finding journey to Tapachula, on the Guatemala–Mexico border. From my vantage point, there is one root cause most often cited by the immigrating foreign nationals for coming now: that President Joe Biden opened the American southern border wide to them. They see on social media, from hundreds of thousands who have gone before, secure quick releases and resettlement into America—the ultimate golden chalice—and they decide to gamble large smuggling investments that criminal smuggling gangs will get them in to stay too. With such an enticing return on smuggling investment, no thinking person should wonder why this global migration hit a national record of nearly 2,000,000 border patrol apprehensions in a single year with probably 500,000 more gotaways, an undercount. The caucus should know that nonprofit advocacy groups and, more notably, the United Nations appear to be working alongside the criminal smuggling organizations on the same mission. United Nations agencies such as the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are providing hard cash, food, shelter, legal services, and psychological services along the migrant trails, which also materially facilitate journeys that everyone involved knows lead to illegal American border crossings. In various forms, the UN and the nonprofits it funds contribute to the current mass migration crisis. I found a UNHCR stamp booklet discarded on the Rio Grande riverbank on the Mexican side, and I observed handout cash debit cards to migrants in long lines. Workers reported that they give $400 every fifteen days to families of four, renewable every two weeks. The UN tells me only the most vulnerable receive this cash, yet in Reynosa and Tapachula, long lines at UNHCR offices revealed regular family units, many with debit cards, who said they might have to leave the migrant trail and go home without this money. The cards are part of a vast and escalating UN program called cash-based interventions along the migrant trail through Latin America, including unrestricted, unconditionally usable plastic cash cards, cash-filled envelopes in some areas, money transfers for lodging and pharmaceutical prescriptions, and something called movement assistance—transportation money to move forward when camps empty and reform further north. Credible reporting shows the UN is providing these forms of assistance along the trail from South America to Texas. On a Kakuta to Bogota, Colombia segment, the UN was seen handing out food, clothing, and necessities worth an estimated $200 to $300 per migrant per day. Non-cash assistance keeps migrants on the US trail; in Tapachula, Mexican asylum approval is important for permission to move legally beyond the southern provinces toward the US border. But many coming from Guatemala tell Mexican immigration they are seeking US jobs, which is not an eligible asylum claim, so they are denied. I did learn of a UN-funded migrant advocacy center where a full-time staff of certified psychologists helps migrants recover repressed memories of more eligible persecution. This manager said his group also trains migrants on how to pass muster with Mexican asylum interviewers the first time around, producing a 90% success rate for thousands a year. Other UN-funded psychologists offer similar work. If true, the UNHCR in Mexico has found another way to keep thousands more on the trail toward the American border. Some will defend this UN assistance as lifesaving; others will view it differently, and they will want to know more. Americans deserve to know the full extent of it, because the United States is the UN’s largest donor, and the US Congress appropriates a huge amount of money to the UN each year. Thank you. I note that the border is a national security concern. Recently, I reported a Venezuelan crossing the Rio Grande from Matamoros to Brownsville, and the FBI-wanted individual held in ICE headquarters here in Washington, D.C. intervened and demanded he be ordered released because he might get COVID in detention. He is now living freely pursuing an asylum claim in Detroit. Thank you.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy involving the US government and NGOs bringing illegal immigrants into the country. A DHS employee reveals how NGOs receive millions of dollars to facilitate this operation. The employee mentions Jewish Family Services receiving $600 million for a few months, with subcontractors requesting more funds. The partnership between NGOs and the government is described as a massive money laundering scheme.

The area was filled with migrants, but they were moved inside when filming began. Signs offer free travel tickets out of New York City in multiple languages. The migrants disappeared when approached for questioning.

The Biden administration is flying migrants from South America to the United States, regardless of documentation, aiding human trafficking. Most lack documentation.

It feels like we woke up in a new America, especially after the recent unraveling of US aid. Everything is starting to make sense. Remember the migrants dropped off at the southern border, supposedly walking 500 miles through Mexico? Or the bricks that appeared during racial unrest? How did those migrants afford a stay at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City? It raises the question: did we inadvertently fund our own issues in this country?

I recently visited the southern border and spoke with the head of the border guards union. Children are coming over with phone numbers and addresses written on them, but we are not thoroughly checking them. This could be leading them into dangerous situations like prostitution and sweatshops, all funded by American tax dollars.

Today, January 20, 2025, President Trump declared a state of emergency at the southern border, citing an invasion of the United States. He identified the International Organization for Migration, linked to the United Nations, as a key player in this crisis. We are at the former Fort Clayton in Panama City, now the Ciudad del Saber, which has been overtaken by adversaries since the Panama Canal was relinquished. The organization has offices worldwide, including New York, Tokyo, Bangkok, and a major office in Switzerland. This situation justifies defunding these organizations and investigating their actions.

I saw water jugs near the San Diego border, set up by someone, possibly an NGO. They were near the Hotel Indigo. I'm curious if this is a Hotel Indigo initiative, a targeted strategy, or if the water was stolen and placed there. Perhaps Hotel Indigo can clarify their involvement. Was this a deliberate action, or was their water improperly used? I'd appreciate any information to understand the situation.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

We're providing free meals for fire victims today, but some individuals taking food from the distribution center do not have burned homes. I confirmed that their houses did not burn down. To investigate further, I visited an evacuation shelter and found that they do not inquire about the legal status of those present. It appears that tax-funded resources are being redirected by the Red Cross to provide food and shelter for illegal migrants instead of solely for fire victims.

UNHCR, OIM, and UNICEF are part of a globalist contract of immigration and mass migration. The border remains open, and these organizations are waiting tactically for the 2028 election, in case a leader says the border will be open or CBP one will be operating again. OIM, UNHCR, and UNICEF never want to talk or say anything to anyone because they don't want anyone to know they are still operating effectively.

Chairman Perry and members of the caucus, I am here to discuss what I term the most historic mass migration crisis ever to strike The United States, noting that what has happened at the Southern border is history making in scope and will have long lasting second, third, and fourth order implications for American citizens. During its first year and now into its second, I have interviewed hundreds of immigrants, most recently on an eight day fact finding journey to the Guatemala–Mexico border city of Tapachula. From my vantage point, there is but one root cause that the immigrating foreign nationals most often cite for coming now: that President Joe Biden opened the American southern border wide to them. They see over their cell phones, social media, hundreds of thousands who have gone before, secure quick releases and resettlement into America, the ultimate golden chalice, and they gamble huge smuggling fee investments that criminal smuggling gangs will get them in to stay too. With such an enticing return on smuggling investment, no thinking person should wonder why this global migration hit the all time national record of nearly 2,000,000 border patrol apprehensions in a single year with probably 500,000 more gotaways, and that’s an undercount. But the caucus should also know that nonprofit advocacy groups and, more notably, the United Nations appear to be working side by side with the criminal smuggling organizations on the very same mission. United Nations agencies such as the International Office of Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are providing hard cash, food, shelter, legal services, psychological services along the migrant trails, which also materially facilitate journeys that everyone involved very well knows despite any protestations to the contrary always lead to an illegal American border crossing. In whatever small or large way the United Nations and the nonprofits it funnels money to can reasonably be said to contribute to the current mass migration crisis. I found my first clue on a Rio Grande riverbank on the Mexican side, a discarded UNHCR stamp booklet. Hand out cash debit cards to migrants in long snaking lines. The workers handing them out said they give $400 every fifteen days to families of four, renewable every two weeks. The UN tells me only the most vulnerable get this cash. But in Reynosa, and again most recently in Tapachula, Mexico, where I saw the same long lines at the UNHCR office, nothing about them indicated acute vulnerability. They were regular family units of the sort crossing by the tens of thousands right now. Some showed me their debit cards there too and said, were it not for this money, they might have to leave the migrant trail and go home. Further inquiry showed the cards are just part of a vast and sharply escalating UN program called cash based interventions all along the migrant trail through Latin America. According to the UN documents and migrants, these include the unrestricted, unconditionally usable plastic cash cards, but also cash filled envelopes in some areas. Never a good look cash filled envelopes. Money transfers for lodging, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and something called movement assistance, which means transportation money to move forward when camps empty and reform further north. Credible reporting shows that the UN is providing these forms of assistance all along the migrant trail from South America to Texas. On a Kakuta to Bogota Colombia segment, the UN was seen handing out food, clothing, and necessities worth an estimated 200 to $300 day per migrant. And then there’s important non-cash assistance keeping migrants on the US trail. In Tapachula, approval for Mexican asylum these days is important for permission to move legally beyond the southern provinces where I was, always to The US border, of course. But many coming in from Guatemala innocently tell Mexican immigration they’re going for US jobs, which is not an eligible asylum claim. So they get denied. But I found a UN funded solution recently. The manager of a UN funded migrant advocacy center told me a full time staff of certified psychologists help these migrants recover repressed memories of more eligible government persecution. This manager told me in a recorded conversation that his group also trains migrants on the front end of the process how to pass muster with Mexican asylum interviewers the first time around. He said these operations produce a 90% success rate for thousands a year. Other UN funded psychologists offer what sounds like similar work. If all this is true, the UNHCR in Mexico has found another way to keep thousands more on the trail over the American border. Many can and will defend this UN assistance as lifesaving, but others who learn of it reasonably interpret this in a very different way, and they wanna know more, of course. However, Americans wanna interpret this assistance to migrants, they undoubtedly know they are joining a historic mass migration. All Americans deserve to know the full extent of it because The United States is the UN’s largest donor, and the US Congress appropriates a huge amount of money to the UN every year. I’ll also mention that the border is a national security concern. Just recently, I reported that a Venezuelan crossed the Rio Grande from Matamoros to Brownsville and that the FBI wanted that FBI watch listed individual held in that ICE headquarters here in Washington DC intervened and demanded that he be ordered that he be cut loose because he might get COVID in detention. That individual is now living freely pursuing an asylum claim in Detroit. Thank you. I thank the gentleman.

The speaker shows how NGOs like HIAS are closely connected to migrant camps, providing maps and instructions for migrants to reach the US. Despite attempts to get information from HIAS, they remain secretive. The speaker calls for these groups to be shut down and their employees arrested for aiding illegal immigration. The speaker emphasizes the need for border security and an end to funding organizations facilitating illegal immigration.

Secretary: Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country. It's amazing to me the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been spent by the federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate this invasion of our country. I have taken action to stop that funding, to reevaluate it, and to make sure that we're actually using taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country and keeps us safe. People are curious how grants given out by federal agencies are utilized, and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending another dime to help the destruction of this country. We're going to follow through on what president Trump promised, to secure our border, depart those who are here illegally and committing criminal actions, and ensure taxpayer dollars aren't spent to assist it. Speaker: And, Madam Secretary, I don't think people fully understand the role that NGOs play in facilitating illegal immigration. I want to share these numbers up on the screen: we spend over $380,000,000 in 2024 for sheltering and service programs for illegal immigrants. But the vast network of NGOs that help facilitate it through Panama, through Mexico, and make it a landing spot here in the United States is a massive contributor to illegal immigration. So what you're telling us today is that now stops? At least the federal funding of that stops? Secretary: Yes. The Department of Homeland Security has stopped spending those dollars to fund those NGOs. What’s been revealing is that many of these NGOs actually have infrastructure and operations set up in Mexico on that side of the border, telling illegal immigrants to come to them, and they will get them across the border. So they're not just operating in the United States. They're operating outside of the United States to help make it easier for those who want to break our laws. And while I was one of those Americans years ago when somebody said NGO to me, I thought, oh, that's amazing—a nonprofit telling somebody about Jesus or spreading faith and charitable work, helping people less fortunate. Then I realized over the years it's been perverted into this shadow government. An NGO is sometimes an operation that does things the government cannot do, can't legally do, so they create an entity to use government dollars, taxpayer dollars, to do something that the federal government isn't allowed to do—to perform a shadow government operation that has recently been used to undermine our country's national security.

Since Joe Biden took office, over 8 million illegal immigrants have crossed the US southern border. Many wonder why the US allows this "invasion." Alejandro Mayorkas, the head of the US border, is an immigrant himself and was a board member of HIAS, an NGO advocating for open borders. HIAS receives over $100 million annually from the government and is now found to be assisting immigrants in crossing the Darien Gap to reach the US. They have a processing facility and provide maps in Spanish to guide immigrants. Despite this conflict of interest, mainstream immigration discussions rarely address it.

In the Canal Zone of Panama City, the US government used to control this military base to protect the Panama Canal. However, it was given away by Jimmy Carter and is now under the control of the United Nations and NGOs. One of these organizations is OIM, which provided condoms and birth control to illegal aliens crossing into Panama. These organizations, like UNICEF and UNHCR, have taken over almost every building in the facility. The Clinton Foundation is also present. These organizations should be defunded and investigated for trafficking. They are complicit in the cartel's actions. Taxpayer dollars should not support them. They encourage people to risk their lives and illegally travel to the US. This is the root cause of the problem, supported by leftist, godless, globalist organizations like Kamala Harris.

The speaker describes a massive UN and NGO–driven immigration infrastructure in Mexico and Central America. In Tapachula, Mexico, the UNHCR is constructing a 75,000 square foot “illegal immigration mall” on Mexican land, with the UN and various NGOs under one roof. There is also a large tent city space, indicating a planned, long-term hub for migrants. The speaker notes similar NGO complexes in Colombia and Panama, where NGO villages resemble big swap meets with storefronts for different organizations and permanent billboards directing immigrants to resources needed to continue their journey. They claim hundreds of NGOs operate in the region, including US NGOs, European NGOs, and Latin American NGOs, many affiliated with Catholic dioceses or well-known groups like Doctors Without Borders. These NGOs are described as receiving substantial US taxpayer money to build a cross-border safety net, facilitated by UN agencies and then doled out to national NGOs via US appropriations from the State Department, USAID, and related sources. Financial figures are presented to illustrate the scale: $1.9 billion spent in 2024, $2.2 billion in the previous year, and about $45 billion over the last few years, with 2019 at $377 million in comparison. The speaker suggests this funding is intended to sustain a long-term, high-volume flow of migration from South America to the US border, with Tapachula identified as a key strategic city and the surrounding NGO towns on the migration corridor highlighted as part of the infrastructure. The speaker contends the operations are designed with an expectation of a political outcome, stating they are “betting on a Harris win” and that the system would halt “within an hour of his inauguration” if certain policies were enacted. Specifically, they claim the remain-in-Mexico policy could be immediately implemented, with orders to border patrol and possible invocation of Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to push back and deny asylum to 100% of border crossers. The claim is that this would deter migrants from attempting entry, and that the migrants themselves are closely watching US politics, with many believing that if Trump is in office, entry and asylum access would be substantially harder. The speaker observes that about 50,000 to 60,000 migrants arrive at the border monthly, noting a socioeconomic stratification: wealthier migrants tend to pay human smugglers to reach the border, while the poorer migrants—often from lower-income backgrounds—struggle to finance the final stages of the journey, sometimes needing to borrow or sell assets to reach Mexico, where the poorest end up on the streets in Tapachula. They remark that some nationalities, such as many Chinese and Venezuelans, are described as wealthier within this context.