TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

On January 6, 2025, we may need to confront the violent Trump supporters and declare him disqualified. This situation could lead to a need for bodyguards for everyone, creating conditions reminiscent of a civil war.

President Trump and his supporters have used violent rhetoric, with Trump warning of chaos if charged and not re-elected. Supporters are angry, especially after January 6th. The campaign faces challenges moving forward. President Trump will address this in Milwaukee, while President Biden must navigate the situation.

Chief Justice Roberts anticipated potential issues regarding Trump's eligibility, particularly concerning the 14th Amendment's Section 3, which bars individuals engaged in insurrection from holding office. The Supreme Court ruled against efforts to remove Trump from the ballot in Colorado, emphasizing the chaos that would ensue if states could independently decide on his eligibility. The justices agreed that Congress would need to pass a new statute to enforce Section 3, which led to differing opinions among them. Looking ahead to January 6, 2025, there are concerns that if Democrats control the House, they may attempt to block Trump's certification as president, potentially leading to an emergency Supreme Court case. This situation could have been addressed earlier in March.

This is about the accusation of election rigging against Donald Trump. The decision to remove him from the ballot is likely to be overturned by the US Supreme Court. The insurrection clause in the 14th Amendment does not apply to Trump's situation, as it was meant to prevent confederates from holding office after the Civil War. Trump has not been charged with insurrection, and removing him from the ballot violates his right to due process. Colorado officials have manipulated the clause for political reasons, interfering with the election process. This is seen as anti-democratic and equivalent to rigging the ballot box, potentially increasing support for Trump.

The court supports the freedoms and equality of the American people, but it won't be our savior. True change requires people actively amending the constitution. However, constitutional protections can quickly erode, as seen with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which is being disregarded. It will be up to us on January 6, 2025, to inform the Trump supporters that he is disqualified. This situation creates a need for protection and raises tensions, all because some justices refuse to interpret the 14th Amendment properly. Cherilyn's new center aims to revive this important discussion while we continue to push for constitutional amendments.

The speaker expresses concern about the erosion of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, urging action on January 6, 2025 to prevent Trump's disqualification. They criticize Supreme Court justices for not interpreting the amendment properly, leading to potential civil unrest. The speaker praises Sherlyn for establishing a new center to address these issues.

On January 6, 2025, it will be up to the people to tell "rampaging Trump mobs" that Trump is disqualified, necessitating bodyguards and creating "civil war conditions." This is because the Supreme Court justices "simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th amendment means." The speaker is glad Sherlyn is creating a new center to bring the amendment back to life, even as they continue to amend the constitution.

The speaker claims Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is being ignored. They suggest it will be up to the public on January 6, 2025, to tell "rampaging Trump mobs" that Trump is disqualified, potentially leading to civil war conditions. This is because the justices, who have few cases and ample resources, are allegedly unwilling to interpret the 14th Amendment. The speaker expresses support for Cherilyn's new center, presumably related to this issue.

Trump is calling for a rally with his supporters on January 19th, just before the inauguration. This raises questions about his intentions, especially since he may not be able to be sworn in due to the 14th Amendment, Section 3. He seems aware of this situation. However, this time, there are preparations in place to address his actions.

We've warned for over a year that Trump could win by a landslide, but the deep state may prevent his inauguration. Reports suggest preparations for martial law to stop him. Instances of ballot boxes being set on fire in swing states where Trump is polling well raise concerns about election integrity. Many Americans have already voted, but trust in the process is waning. A former state department cyber expert predicts intense unrest if Trump wins, with protests framed as pro-democracy movements. This could lead to Congress blocking his inauguration. Whistleblowers highlight the potential for organized protests against a Trump victory, indicating a planned response to maintain control. Awareness of these tactics is crucial as the situation unfolds.

If Congress can't prevent Trump from being on the ballot, there's a backup plan. Congress can refuse to seat ineligible candidates who have won the election under Section 3. However, this could create complications if the court decides there's no procedure to determine Trump's eligibility until after the election. On January 6th, when Congress counts the electoral votes, they might choose not to count votes for Trump because he's disqualified under Section 3 of the Electoral Count Reform Act. This scenario is likely to occur.

The speaker discusses a lawsuit filed by their organization, arguing that it is necessary for the future of democracy. They counter the argument that not letting voters have their say goes against democracy by pointing out that in 2020, voters had the opportunity to choose Donald Trump as president, but he refused to accept the result and incited a violent insurrection. They explain that the provision in the 14th Amendment was included in the constitution to defend the republic from such attacks on democracy. The speaker also mentions the qualifications to be president, including not having engaged in insurrection.

In a second term, Donald Trump is predicted to take extreme actions, including violence, suppressing opposition, shutting down the media, and using martial law against the American people. He may terminate and rewrite the constitution, establish internment camps, and target minority groups. Trump's armed extremist base could pose a threat, and he may unravel democratic institutions, cozy up to Putin, and destroy the justice department. Transgender rights, the rule of law, and political opponents could be targeted. Trump's reelection could lead to the end of democracy as we know it, with the potential for him to stay in office indefinitely. Urgent action is needed to prevent this outcome.

The speaker discusses the disappearing importance of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, urging action on January 6, 2025 to disqualify Trump. They criticize the Supreme Court justices for not interpreting the amendment, leading to potential civil war. They express gratitude for Sherilyn's new center to address these issues.

The election results are deeply troubling. We now face a Trump administration with significant power, raising concerns for the working class, the elderly, and future generations. Civil rights have regressed, and the 14th Amendment's failure to prevent an insurrection participant from becoming president is alarming. If someone can be president, the stigma against convicted felons in employment should be reconsidered. The healthcare system is at risk, and economic forecasts predict massive debt increases. The election reflects cultural resentment rather than policy issues. Despite the disappointment, there's a commitment to continue fighting for marginalized communities, including LGBTQ individuals, immigrants, and women. Today, we can feel sadness, but the fight for justice will persist.

A group of public interest organizations and lawmakers are quietly planning to prevent former President Trump from pressuring the US military to carry out his political agenda. The concern is that this could undermine civilian control of the government. The article specifically mentions Trump potentially using the military to suppress domestic protests, similar to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The groups involved in this plan were also involved in previous protests against Trump. The fear is that if Trump were to win the election, these tactics would be used to destabilize his entire term and prevent him from stopping protests, even if they turned violent or occupied federal buildings. The speaker warns people to watch a movie about the Serbian revolution to understand how these tactics work.

The Constitution can be easily undermined, as seen with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which is being overlooked despite its clarity. The responsibility now falls on us to address this on January 6, 2025, and inform the Trump supporters that he is disqualified. This situation creates a tense atmosphere, requiring protection for everyone involved. The justices, who have limited cases and resources, seem unwilling to interpret the 14th Amendment's significance properly. It's encouraging that Sherlyn is establishing a new center to address these issues.

If Trump wins, there will be anger and fighting. Implementing measures to take away rights will lead to death. You don't understand what that's like. Talking about civil war without experiencing it is ignorant. You're not prepared for it.

Democracy relies on trustworthy systems to hold untrustworthy individuals accountable. Trump has a talent for undermining institutions, and if he were to be elected from prison, it would be a powerful act of defiance. The Georgia case, which is a state charge and cannot be pardoned by Trump, will be a crucial test. If he wins, it could lead to a constitutional crisis and possibly even violence. The ongoing struggle between democracy and the constitution is complex and difficult to interpret.

Speaker 0: Question about the danger of a Trump presidency if reelected. Speaker 1: I think he poses a a near existential threat to the rule of law. He will do everything he can in a new term to try to tear down the institutions that he sees as threats and dismantle them and the people who occupy them, the apolitical people who occupy them. So there is a lot on the ballot in 2024 if he's a candidate, but the rule of law, in my view, is at the very top of the list. I'm gonna pull the whole thing down. I'm gonna bring the whole fucking diseased, corrupt temple down on your head. It's gonna be biblical.

I will ask the Justice Department and the President to address the potential threat of violence if he loses. I am concerned about right-wing groups connected to him training in the hills and planning attacks on communities.

Donald Trump has presented himself as someone who can finish the job outside of the norms of legislating. Democrats need to focus on the potential consequences of a second Trump term, with loyal advisers and no guardrails. Trump's team is prepared and he knows how to drive the bus. It will be even more chaotic than before. We must make it clear that Trump is not fit for office. He only cares about his power and success. He poses a threat to American democracy and could potentially overthrow the government. His actions could lead to imprisonment and execution for those who oppose him.

The speaker discusses the possibility of removing Donald Trump from the ballot using the 14th Amendment. They mention that the mugshot of Trump has generated significant support and raised concerns among those who want to remove him. Legal scholars argue that the 14th Amendment can be used independently of criminal proceedings, impeachment, or congressional legislation. Examples are given of individuals in New Mexico and New Hampshire who are working to remove Trump from the ballot. Lawsuits in Florida also aim to remove him. The speaker suggests that the Democrats may be trying to incite anger and unrest to delay the election and maintain power. They urge people to pressure their state election officials to keep Trump on the ballot.

The speaker discusses how the justice department's goal is to go after President Trump by using convictions from the January 6th cases to invoke section 3 of the 14th amendment. However, there are several reasons why this is not applicable. Firstly, the 14th amendment was written for Confederates in the Civil War and does not apply to modern-day situations. Secondly, the text of the 14th amendment explicitly states that it can only be enforced by Congress, not state courts. Additionally, the amendment does not apply to the presidency itself. It would also create practical issues if local courts were able to enforce it. Furthermore, there is no evidence of an insurrection on January 6th, and this has already been litigated in Congress during the second impeachment trial. Finally, there are First Amendment concerns as the conduct in question relates to political speech.

This ruling raises concerns about states having the power to decide who can run for president without due process. The Colorado court disqualified him based on the 14th Amendment, claiming he committed insurrection. However, section 5 of the 14th Amendment clearly states that it is Congress's responsibility to enforce it, not state courts. The Supreme Court is likely to strongly oppose any state's attempt to enforce section 5. The writers of the 14th Amendment, who were radical Lincoln Republicans, intended for Congress to have centralized power, not individual states like Alabama and Mississippi, to determine presidential eligibility.