TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The record cites page 55 of the committee’s interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow, conducted on 07/17/2023. The line records a question: If someone were to leave the interview and suggest or imply that when you said the laptop was real, that it meant the FBI had affirmatively determined in October 2020 that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden, that the contents belonged to Hunter Biden, and that the contents had not been manipulated in some way, would they be representing what you said? Correct? Miss Demlow’s answer: They would be representing what I said because I don't have much knowledge of that. They would be misrepresenting what I said because I don't have much knowledge of that. The statement continues with the speaker noting that this committee “likes to misrepresent or leave off complete sentences of what individuals said,” and adds, “I'd like to introduce this into the record.” The speaker then references the FBI's usual “no comment” stance, noting that such a response is common “when there's an ongoing investigation, particularly when it's a couple of days before an…” The transcript ends there, but the portion presented emphasizes Demlow’s caveat about knowledge limits and the record-keeping concern about misrepresentation by the committee, alongside the referenced context of no-comment responses in ongoing investigations.

Republicans in the House plan to investigate Hunter Biden, the president's son, and are interested in data from his laptop. CBS News obtained this data directly from the source, who provided it to the FBI under subpoena. An independent forensic review confirmed the authenticity of the data. The laptop was taken to a Delaware computer shop for repair in 2019 but was never paid for, leading the store to consider it abandoned. The FBI later subpoenaed the store's owner for the laptop and its data. The laptop and its contents have fueled Republican interest in Hunter Biden's business dealings, but there is no evidence that President Biden directly benefited from them. The White House declined to comment.

The speaker states that whether something was stolen is up to the Harris team to disclose. The Biden-Harris campaign can decide if the FBI can see what was stolen and whether Donald Trump, a competitor, can see what was taken. In some instances, the FBI can demand information. In other instances, they have to ask the owners of the information to provide it. The speaker confirms they can ask on behalf of others. The speaker concludes that the situation is "quite bad."

Mike Morell, former CIA director, emailed John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, just before a debate between Trump and Biden regarding the Hunter Biden laptop. Morell asked Brennan to sign a letter because he was, quote, "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The letter in question is the one from 51 intelligence professionals that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Morell, according to the speaker, knew he wasn't creating an intelligence product, but rather a political moment. The speaker claims this email is proof that the letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign.

According to the speaker, 53% of people aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. The speaker claims this constitutes election meddling by the FBI on behalf of Democrats, funded by US taxpayers. The speaker characterizes this as collusion, corruption, and unconstitutional.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now share an FBI document, labeled 10/23, with the American people. This document sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. The FBI needs to clarify their actions regarding this matter. It's important for the American people to have access to the same information I read three months ago. It's worth noting that this document was unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become available to the public.

Speaker 0 is demanding to know the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's laptop, expressing concern about potential national security risks. The FBI Cyber assistant director admits to not knowing the laptop's location, despite it being turned over to the FBI in 2019. Speaker 0 requests to enter the contents of the laptop into the committee's record.

The FBI initially refused to take the copy of Hunter Biden's laptop in October 2019, indicating their reluctance to get involved. They approached the speaker in November 2019 to understand their concerns but still hesitated to take the laptop. Eventually, in December 2019, they obtained it through a subpoena. However, during the impeachment trial, the laptop did not surface, leading the speaker to believe that the FBI prioritized protecting the Bidens over the truth or safeguarding.

During the committee's interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow on July 17, 2023, a question was posed regarding the implications of her statement about the laptop being real. The inquiry focused on whether someone leaving the interview could suggest or imply that her acknowledgment of the laptop's authenticity significantly impacted the rates.

During the interview, they discussed an email mentioning "10 held by H for the big guy." They inferred that the "big guy" referred to President Biden. The AUSA interjected and said she didn't want to ask about the "big guy" or dad, implying that Joe Biden may be involved in Hunter Biden's transactions.

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now release an FBI document, labeled 10/23, that sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. It's important for the American people to have access to this information, which I read three months ago. This document is unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become public. Now, it's up to the FBI to disclose their actions regarding this matter.

I want to introduce page 5055 from the committee's interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow on July 17, 2023. If someone suggests that when Demlow said the laptop was real, it meant the FBI confirmed it belonged to Hunter Biden in October 2020, would they be misrepresenting her words? Demlow confirmed they would be misrepresenting her because she does not have much knowledge on that matter.

The discussion revolves around the authenticity of the Hunter Biden laptop. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the New York Post article, stating that the laptop was not authenticated and suggesting possible manipulation by Rudy Giuliani or Russia. Speaker 1 asks for evidence of this claim. Speaker 0 agrees that transparency is crucial and asks if public testimony by Hunter Biden would be more transparent than private testimony. Speaker 1 admits to never considering this and refers to the First Amendment. The conversation abruptly ends.

FBI employee Roya Demlow confirmed in an interview that the laptop mentioned earlier was indeed real. However, she clarified that this did not mean the FBI had definitively determined its authenticity in October 2020.

A team of six people took two and a half weeks to investigate a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden. It is claimed that with more staff, the story could have been reported within a week. It is argued that a story could have been run stating that a laptop had emerged, purported to be Hunter Biden's, noting that its authenticity had not been completely verified, but that it corresponded with government records released a week prior. The speaker claims that the media often reports on unverified information, citing the anonymous dossier as an example. They suggest that the New York Times or other mainstream media outlets could have reported on the laptop by October 21st, even if they first learned about it from The New York Post.

Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed that the Intelligence Community believes Hunter Biden's laptop and its emails are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. However, the Director of National Intelligence stated that there is no intelligence supporting this claim and no evidence has been shared with Schiff or any other member of Congress. The Director emphasized that using the intelligence community to push a political narrative is unacceptable. He made it clear that Hunter Biden's laptop is not involved in any Russian disinformation campaign, and he believes the American people are aware of this.

I want to introduce page 55 from the committee's interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow, which took place on July 17, 2023. The discussion centers on whether Demlow's statement that the laptop was real implied that the FBI had confirmed in October 2020 that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. Demlow clarified that if someone were to suggest that, they would be misrepresenting her statement, as she does not have sufficient knowledge on that matter.

More than 50 ex-intelligence officials claimed the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden referenced this at a debate to counter Trump's accusations of Russian involvement. Translation: Over 50 former intelligence officials stated that the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden used this information during a debate to refute Trump's accusations of Russian involvement.

When Joe Biden ran for president in 2019, his federal forms and tax returns showed a $5 million discrepancy in his income for 2017 and 2018. These forms were prepared by the same person, so it wasn't a case of innocent confusion. That $5 million also happens to be the amount mentioned in the FBI document that Christopher Wray lied about having. The FBI never revealed the informant's name until they arrested him, and the media claimed he lied to the FBI. However, they never specified what he lied about. Years before the laptop came out, this informant mentioned $5 million, and Hunter did receive $5 million but got a W-2 form for it. Hunter was charged for not paying taxes on Ukraine money, which he received a W-2 for. He never paid taxes on the Chinese, Romanian, Kazakh, and Russian money.

The investigation confirmed the authenticity of the laptop as early as late 2019, with both the DOJ and FBI aware of its legitimacy. In October 2020, reports emerged labeling the laptop as potential Russian disinformation, including comments from the current Secretary of State, which were tied to emails from the laptop. This appeared to be a coordinated effort to discredit the information ahead of the election. The assertion by former intelligence officials that the laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian operation was recognized as false. As a criminal investigator, it was clear that the narrative was misinformation aimed at obscuring the truth.

Speaker 0 asks about Hunter Biden's laptop, questioning FBI Cyber's knowledge. They mention the laptop was turned over to the FBI in 2019, but the assistant director doesn't know its current location. Speaker 0 requests to enter Hunter Biden's laptop contents into the record. Speaker 2 praises Matt Gaetz's questioning and criticizes the FBI. Translation: Speaker 0 inquires about Hunter Biden's laptop and questions the FBI Cyber's awareness. The laptop was given to the FBI in 2019, but the assistant director is unaware of its current whereabouts. Speaker 0 requests to include Hunter Biden's laptop contents in the record. Speaker 2 applauds Matt Gaetz's questioning and condemns the FBI.

I will introduce page 5055 from the committee's interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow on July 17, 2023. Demlow stated that suggesting the FBI had determined Hunter Biden's laptop ownership in October 2020 based on her comment that the laptop was real would be misrepresenting her words, as she lacks knowledge on the matter.

Jessa News obtained an email between former CIA director Mike Morell and John Brennan. It concerns "the 51 intelligence professionals who tried to fake you into thinking that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when it wasn't." Morell tells Brennan to "sign this letter because I'm, quote, trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The speaker notes "A man with a security clearance, a man with the title of CIA director knew that he wasn't creating an intelligence product, American civic duty with 51 people." He says this was to create "a political moment." "Damning evidence." "It is the ultimate proof that what went out on that letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign."

The speaker asks how much the source of the Hunter Biden laptop story matters, given that the information is coming out through Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. The interviewee responds that the source and timing matter a lot, and that this appears to be classic Soviet Russian tradecraft. According to the interviewee, the Russians understand that the president and his enablers crave dirt on Vice President Biden, so whether the information is real or contrived doesn't matter to them. The interviewee believes emails could be contrived, especially if they appear without metadata. The interviewee states that if the FBI has the computer, they will be able to determine if it is genuine or not, but the timing is curious.