TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Dr. Pretorius and a colleague discuss unusual clotting observed after COVID-19 vaccination, including embalmers reporting back pressure when introducing embalming fluid and the extraction of very long, congealed clots—six inches to several feet—as well as patients with long brachial clots. They note thousands of clotting reports in VAERS across all vaccine types, describing these clots as not normal. Some clots cause major emboli affecting circulation to the lungs, detected by scans and perfusion studies, while others are microclots with a branching pattern visible in imaging. A clinician also shared a photo of a clot with a complete branching pattern into medium and smaller vessels. Dr. Pretorius’ work is cited to explain the mechanism: spike protein can induce immediate clumping of proteins in platelet-poor plasma in the absence of platelets, a highly unusual clotting pathway not relying on the classical coagulation cascade. This is described as a proteinaceous, pseudo-amyloid–like clot. The spike protein is reported to circulate after vaccination, with studies in the Journal of Immunology showing spikes in circulation and exosomes up to four months after shots. Long-haul COVID data (Patterson’s study) reportedly shows S1 protein present in nonclassical monocytes in blood, suggesting persistence of spike protein, whether from infection or the vaccine, which can induce clotting pathways on its own. Dr. Pretorius discusses observations of upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs) on leukocytes within clots, causing white blood cells to adhere in addition to fibrin, contributing to difficulty in dissolving these clots. Concerning treatment and detection, the speakers describe depletion of plasminogen, reducing the body’s ability to break down clots, and note that standard anticoagulants are less effective against these clots, which are described as amyloid-like and atypical. They emphasize that these are not the classical clotting pathways involving platelet activation and typical thrombin–fibrin cascades. They contrast this with expectations of standard clotting mechanisms and reference the unusual, non-classical pathway highlighted by Pretorius. The discussion also mentions the idea that spike protein in circulation can drive clotting without the usual platelet activation, and that some patients have continued to experience spike-related effects long after vaccination. They assert that vaccines were developed targeting the original Wuhan strain and may not cover Omicron; they suggest the shot’s risk-benefit balance is unfavorable given ongoing clotting, immune suppression, and cancer-inducing pathways, and they claim data indicate those who receive two or three shots may acquire Omicron at a higher rate than those unvaccinated. They conclude that the shot is expired for a virus that is no longer circulating in its original form and argue that vaccination induces dangerous pathologic processes with no protective benefit.

I got the vaccine. Did you really? Yeah, even the fourth one. Were you pressured into it? Kind of. I went to the doctor for blood work, and we noticed some unusual particles. I asked what they were, and the doctor revealed they were related to the vaccine. I was shocked. This is why some people experience severe issues, like having numerous white blood clots in their blood.

In this video, the speaker discusses the presence of white fibrous clots in bodies. They conducted a survey last year to determine if this phenomenon was real. The survey revealed that around 70% of embalmers were seeing these clots, with most of them noticing them after the rollout of vaccines in 2021. Some embalmers reported seeing these clots in up to 50% or more of the corpses they worked with. The speaker is currently conducting another survey to gather more information on what embalmers are observing in 2023.

The speaker suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be causing more harm than good. They claim to have conducted a study of over 300 autopsies, finding that 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. They also state that 100% of cardiac arrest and sudden deaths had no other explanation but the vaccine. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these findings, as death is usually attributed to known causes.

Tom Haviland, a retired major in the US Air Force and an experienced embalmer, discusses the presence of white fibrous clots found in the circulatory systems of deceased individuals. These clots, which have been observed in a high percentage of corpses over the past three years, are believed to be made of amyloid protein and fibrin. Embalmers have noticed an increase in the size and prevalence of these clots, as well as an increase in microclotting or "coffee ground" clots. The data collected from embalmers suggests that these clots may be linked to the spike protein produced by the COVID-19 vaccines.

The symposium covers the potential safety and threat of “replicating” vaccines, especially LepriCon (leprecon) vaccines, in the context of Covid-19 vaccines and genome‑editing concepts. The speakers present a chain of claims and concerns, some drawing on reports and others presenting theories about how these next‑generation vaccines could behave in humans and populations. Key points and claims presented - Emerging mechanisms and risks: The panel notes that blood vessel inflammation and thrombosis mechanisms are increasingly observed, including in vaccine contexts, with examples from individuals who needed limb amputation and others who developed severe vascular events after vaccination. One case involved a 70‑year‑old man who, after a third dose, developed embolic events necessitating shoulder joint surgery, and another where a 60‑year‑old man developed acute limb ischemia and died; both are presented as suggesting a serious vascular mechanism linked to vaccination, though causal connections are not established. - Replicating/vector vaccines and their concerns:荒川博士 and others discuss LepiCon vaccines as vaccines that replicate inside the body. The concept involves “replicating viral vectors” where the genome can mutate and evolve during replication. The green‑highlighted segment in a slide (the antigen gene) plus a blue/orange segment (replicating gene cassette) is used to describe how LepriCon vaccines are designed to carry viral genes and replicate, with the assertion that replication, mutation, and recombination can occur, potentially generating new variants inside the host. - Differences from conventional vaccines: The discussion contrasts LepriCon vaccines with standard mRNA vaccines. In conventional mRNA vaccines, messenger RNA is delivered and translated into antigen proteins, then degraded; in LepriCon vaccines, replicating RNA/DNA can persist and continue producing antigen, with mutation and recombination possible. The panel emphasizes that LepriCon vaccines use replicating/copying mechanisms and that the genetic material can be copied in ways that differ from natural human biology, potentially creating unpredictable variants. - Central dogma and exceptions: The speakers reference the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) but note exceptions in viruses, including RNA viruses that can reverse‑transcribe to DNA (retroviruses) and RNA viruses that replicate RNA directly. They discuss how LepriCon vaccines would rely on replicative processes that do not follow the usual linear flow and why this could complicate predictions about safety and behavior in humans. - Potential for unintended spread and environmental impact: A major concern raised is that self‑replicating vectors could spread beyond the vaccinated individual, via exosomes or other intercellular transport, creating secondary infections or non‑target spread. Exosomes could ferry replicating genetic material, raising fears of new infection chains or “outbreaks” stemming from the vaccine itself, and even suggesting the possibility of vaccination‑induced spread akin to an attenuated or modified pathogen. - Safety signals and immunology concerns: The discussion touches on immune system risks, including immune dysregulation, autoimmune phenomena, and unexpected inflammatory responses. IGG4‑related disease is highlighted as a potential adverse outcome post‑vaccination, with descriptions of glandular and systemic involvement and the idea that high IGG4 levels could have immunosuppressive effects that alter responses to infection or vaccination. The panel notes observed increases in certain immunoglobulin subclasses after multiple LepriCon doses and discusses the possibility of immune tolerance or enhanced immune responses that could be harmful. - Historical and theoretical context: References are made to past epidemics and speculative pandemics caused by misused or dangerous vaccine platforms, drawing on central molecular biology concepts and historical anecdotes about how vaccines can be designed and misused. The discussion frames LepriCon vaccines as a high‑risk platform that could, in theory, generate recombinants, escape mutations, or cause unintended immune and inflammatory consequences. - Clinical and regulatory implications: The speakers call for caution, arguing that more evidence is needed before approving or widespread use of LepriCon vaccines. They emphasize the need for long‑term observation and transparent communication about risks, and criticize the potential for insufficient understanding among healthcare workers and the public. They also urge that any future vaccine development should consider the possibility of genome editing, recombination, and exosome‑mediated spread, and stress the importance of not underestimating possible adverse effects. - Real‑world observations and skepticism about hype: Several speakers underscore that the danger is not merely hypothetical; there are reports of adverse events, including stroke‑like conditions, inflammatory diseases, and immune dysregulation in vaccinated individuals. They stress that the evolution and mutation of replicating vaccines could outpace current surveillance methods, and that “information manipulation” or lack of transparent reporting could mislead the public about risks. - Final reflections and call to action: The concluding messages advocate recognizing the potential failures of messenger RNA vaccines and acknowledging that both conventional and replicating platforms may carry risks. The speakers urge ongoing critical analysis, cautious progression, and robust verification of claims through transparent, independent investigation. They close with thanks to the organizers and a hope that the discussion may contribute to broader public awareness and informed decision‑making. Notable emphasis and unique considerations - The core concern centers on LepriCon vaccines’ replication, mutation, and potential to spread beyond the vaccinated person; exosome transport and genomic/cellular integration are highlighted as mechanisms that could generate new risks not present with non‑replicating vaccines. - The discussion stresses that IGG4 responses could become alarmingly high after certain doses, potentially leading to immunosuppressive effects or autoimmune phenomena, and presents IGG4‑related disease as a potential complication to monitor. - The speakers insist that safety and transparency are paramount, and that misinformation or optimistic narratives about rapid vaccine development could lead to harm if new platforms are adopted without comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the symposium foregrounds cautious scrutiny of replicating vaccine platforms, frames potential biological and regulatory risks, and calls for careful, evidence‑based assessment before broader deployment.

US life insurance companies have reported a significant increase in all-cause deaths among 18 to 49-year-olds, along with certain medical conditions such as miscarriages and blood clots. Concerns have been raised about the unique changes in blood observed in individuals who have died, including those who were vaccinated. The Malthusian theory, which suggests that there are too many people using up resources, is discussed as a potential explanation for the increase in deaths. The video also highlights the experiences of embalmers who have noticed unusual clots in bodies, as well as the impact on pregnancy and stillbirth rates. The speaker emphasizes the need for open discussion and investigation into the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

In the past, we did not see blood clotting like this before COVID-19 vaccinations. A marathon runner had severe issues walking after vaccination, requiring treatments like plasma freezes. Clot formations indicate ongoing damage to blood vessel linings, leading to clot formation. Multiple vaccinated individuals experience circulation problems in cold temperatures, with symptoms improving in warmer weather.

The speaker discusses the alarming findings of a study on vaccine injuries, highlighting red flags in the data. They mention white blood clots found in deceased patients and question the safety of COVID vaccines. The speaker emphasizes the importance of fact-checking and following the money in the pharmaceutical industry. They urge viewers to prioritize truth over profit and advocate for open scientific debate.

A UK doctor and a US cardiologist have whistleblowers revealing an increase in white fibrous clots being removed from patients. Traditional clot-busting drugs are ineffective against these clots, requiring manual extraction in cath labs. The whistleblowers link the presence of these clots to COVID vaccine recipients, with 99% of patients having received 1 to 8 doses. The issue worsens with more vaccine doses. The whistleblowers fear repercussions for speaking out.

The data indicates that vaccinations have led to serious health issues, including blood clots, strokes, and amputations. A simple d-dimer test can reveal the presence of blood clots, yet the government has not mandated this test for vaccinated individuals. Studies by two cardiologists found that over 80% of vaccinated patients had elevated d-dimer levels, suggesting microemboli, which can cause gradual organ failure and increase the risk of severe thrombosis, particularly in the brain. Cases of thrombosis in young people are rising, likely due to microemboli and the spike protein from the vaccine affecting blood vessel walls. This connection has been established through clinical observations.

In this video, Richard Hirschman, an embalmer, discusses the abnormal blood clotting issues he has observed in bodies since early 2021. He shares that these clots are different from typical blood clots, as they are white, fibrous, and rubbery in texture. Hirschman believes that these clots may be caused by aberrant proteins resulting from the COVID vaccines. He emphasizes the need for further research and understanding of these clots and their potential impact on health. Another guest, Jamie, a funeral service professional, supports Hirschman's observations and urges people to critically evaluate the situation. The video also includes a discussion on the suppression of information and the need for scientific investigation.

A data analyst and former Air Force Major conducted a survey among embalmers nationwide. 72% reported seeing white fibrous blood clots in corpses in 2023. The analyst, Tom Haviland, conducted the survey after hearing reports of these clots. He sent out surveys to over 3 dozen funeral associations and 1700 funeral homes worldwide. The survey found that 7 out of 10 embalmers observed the clots, with most seeing them after the vaccine rollout in 2021. A follow-up survey is currently underway to gather more data for 2023.

The spike protein, according to research in South Africa, induces fibrin from fibrinogen, forming the backbone of clotting in a way not previously seen. Unlike normal fibrin clots that are easily broken down, clots formed from COVID or the spike protein from the vaccine are difficult to break down, causing issues for many people. A cardiologist stated that in their decades of practice, they have never treated as many blood clots as in the last five years. These blood clots occur after the virus infection and the vaccine because the spike protein causes blood clots. Therefore, it is reckless to continue vaccinating people and loading the body with spike protein, causing more blood clots. According to a paper in Cell (July 2021), the nucleoprotein, not the spike protein, supplied broad and durable immunity for the prevention of infection. The speaker questions why the vaccine wasn't changed to target the nucleoprotein once this information came to light.

I recently conducted a survey of embalmers, and 73% of the 269 respondents reported finding white fibrous clots in corpses during 2023. These clots, which consist of fibrin, platelets, and amyloid-like material, are suspected to be a contributing factor in strokes and heart attacks. Embalmers are finding these clots are making it necessary to use multiple injection sites, lengthening the embalming process. While similar clots were observed in 2020, during the initial COVID outbreak, their prevalence exploded with the introduction of vaccines in 2021. The spike protein from the virus and vaccines may be responsible for the formation of these clots. Additionally, embalmers are reporting increases in microclotting and traditional grape jelly clots. One theory suggests "frame shifting," where ribosomes misread the modified RNA code from vaccines, creating aberrant proteins that form amyloid material. I can be contacted at thomashaveland@sbcglobal.net.

The speaker, a cardiologist, claims that the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines has been proven to cause four major domains of disease. These include cardiovascular issues like myocarditis and cardiac arrest, neurological problems such as stroke and Guillain Barre syndrome, blood clots that are resistant to treatment, and immunologic abnormalities. The speaker asserts that these adverse effects have been observed in young individuals who received the vaccine without medical necessity. They emphasize that the vaccines are responsible for these conditions until proven otherwise. The speaker concludes by expressing concerns about who might be affected next.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot. Over 50% of these deaths had a cardiovascular cause. According to the speaker, these findings contradict the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. The speaker claims this research represents the largest series of autopsies indicating patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's position.

They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.

The speaker presents a set of dramatic pathological observations and a charged political critique. They show the myocardium of a man who died from unknown causes after the third vaccine injection, describing heart muscle as red with yellow islands identified as dead cells or scars. They claim that in a 77-year-old who had no prior heart history, the muscle was simply bedridden with scars, and that these scars were microscopic and would not have been seen unless the heart had been opened and examined. The speaker questions how the scars could have formed, asserting that the damp vaccine had been injected into the man’s blood, caused the vessels to become leaky, and allowed the vaccine to seep into the muscles. They describe the muscle tissue as red with islands of what they call “normal muscle” that were not normal, and refer to Michael Mertz as having found dead and dying heart muscle cells in these normal islands, specifically mentioning “numbers three and four.” They urge the audience to consult a publication that they claim is now available to everyone and describe it as “damning, so damning.” They challenge others to stop talking about the issue and to halt “this madness, this criminality.” They then name political and health authorities—“Biden,” the FDA, the CDC, and the WHO—and assert that these entities are killing millions and soon billions of people on the planet because they claim there is an effort to introduce mRNA vaccines for everything, listing measles, mumps, hepatitis, flu, and “you name it, you have it.” In sum, the transcript alleges that: - A man died after the third vaccine injection, with pathological cardiac findings described as red myocardium containing microscopic scars and islands of dead cells. - In a 77-year-old with no prior heart disease, the heart muscle supposedly carried microscopic scars and was bedridden, with the scars attributed to the vaccine entering the bloodstream and causing leaky vessels that allowed seepage into the muscles. - Michael Mertz is cited as having found dead and dying heart muscle cells within what appeared to be “normal” muscle tissue. - A publication is claimed to exist and be readily accessible, described as damning. - The speaker calls for stopping political and health authorities (Biden, FDA, CDC, WHO) and asserts that the introduction of mRNA vaccines for widespread use is leading toward mass and eventually billions of deaths.

In this video, Cody shares his experience of having a pulmonary embolism after receiving the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 2021. It is now 2023, and he is back in the hospital. He has a blood clot in his leg, and the doctors are checking if he has another embolism in his lungs. Cody mentions that these health issues occurred after getting the vaccine.

In this video, the speaker discusses a documentary about embalmers finding strange white fibrous clots in corpses. They highlight a statement made by an embalmer at a conference, where all attendees claimed to have seen these clots after the rollout of safe injections. The speaker contacts the Ohio Embalmers Association and confirms that the vice president also sees these clots. This prompts the speaker to conduct a survey, which reveals that 66% of embalmers have witnessed the clots, with some seeing them in up to 50% of corpses. The clots can be as long as 2 feet and may cause strokes and heart attacks by blocking veins and arteries.

The speaker, a cardiologist, claims that spike protein, found in COVID-19 vaccines, has been proven in numerous studies to cause four major diseases: cardiovascular disease, myocarditis, acceleration of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and posterior orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. They argue that young individuals who received the vaccine without medical necessity have experienced cardiac arrests and passing out. The speaker firmly believes that these adverse effects are caused by the vaccine until proven otherwise.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot, and in over 50% of cases, the single cause of death was cardiovascular. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. According to the speaker, these autopsy results are incontrovertible evidence that patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's stance. The findings have gained significant attention online and on social media.

Speaker 1 reports observing massive vaccine injuries following the rollout of mRNA injections, including rapid multi-organ failure resembling sepsis, uncontrollable seizures leading to encephalopathy, and blood clots unlike any previously seen. Radiologists allegedly documented multiple stent placements in patients, and some individuals in their twenties required leg amputations due to clots. Spinal gangrene cases also occurred. Speaker 1 states that the pressure to get the COVID-19 shot led them to research potential effects, referencing vaccine trials and experts who predicted possible outcomes like Guillain-Barré syndrome and strokes. They claim doctors didn't connect these issues to the vaccine, instead diagnosing them as strokes, heart attacks, or blood clots. Speaker 1 concludes that they would never take another vaccination of any kind.

The speaker claims injections result in blood clots, stroke, heart attack, and lost limbs, and questions why the government hasn't ordered D-dimer tests for vaccinated individuals to assess blood clot risk. Two cardiology studies allegedly found over 80% of vaccinated patients had high D-dimer levels, indicating microemboli. Microemboli in the brain, heart, or kidneys can cause organ failure and increase susceptibility to disease, potentially leading to strokes. The speaker reports seeing more cases of thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus in the brain, particularly in young people. They attribute this to microemboli and embolism caused by the spike protein from the vaccine and a nanolipid carrier entering the blood vessel wall, which they claim has been proven.