TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I want to understand why thousands of people tried to overturn the US constitution by assaulting this building. As a white person, I'm curious about white rage. I believe it's important for leaders to comprehend this, as our military comes from the American people. Just because I've read Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, and Lenin doesn't mean I'm a communist. So, what's wrong with gaining situational understanding about the country we defend?

If you have a significant dental issue, you can't deploy, which is why some soldiers get teeth pulled before deployment. However, we now allow individuals transitioning genders to serve, which can make them non-deployable due to medical dependencies. This creates challenges in training and deployment. There's also a narrative that the military is systemically racist, but studies show extremism is much lower in the military compared to society. Leaders like Mark Milley have perpetuated this narrative for political reasons, despite knowing the truth. The military has historically addressed racism effectively, and recent initiatives aimed at combating extremism have introduced more division rather than solving the problem. Those in the military understand that racism is not a significant issue within their ranks.

We need to have a conversation about what's preventing us from approaching things differently. Flight operations are heavily dominated by white males, and we need to acknowledge that. Let's imagine a future where the program is representative of the whole world. These discussions may be uncomfortable, but change won't happen unless we embrace discomfort and support each other.

Alright, so I want to talk about the Freemasons' influence in the Army, based on my four years of experience. I saw a Staff Sergeant reading Freemason material in Afghanistan, who said it was a fraternity necessary to advance to E8. I saw "M" markings on soldiers' Enlisted Record Briefs, indicating Freemason membership. I believe E8s and above, key leadership roles, are influenced by Freemasons. While Eagle Scouts get a small pay bump, Freemasonry has a much larger impact. My concern is, with historical figures being Freemasons, and their agenda being pushed through infiltration, it seems that some really evil people are Freemasons. I even overheard a general talking about securing a pipeline while I was doing personal security detail for him. I'm convinced the Army is run by Freemasons.

It's crucial to address racial diversity. The Rhode Island federal court, with its all-white judicial officers and mostly white staff, exemplifies a lack of diversity. This is partly due to low turnover, making change difficult. However, our probation department, previously all-white, has transformed. We intentionally hired people of color to better reflect the community it serves. Imagine being a young African American defendant, entering a majestic courtroom, led by a white U.S. Marshal, surrounded by white faces. You might wonder, "Do they understand me? Can they relate to my life?" When your life is in their hands, representation matters.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

I was an F-15 pilot and a commander in the newly created U.S. Space Force. I was fired and lost my pension for criticizing DEI trainings in the military, which I believe are divisive. Thank you for acknowledging the issue with woke generals. I propose establishing a special task force to prevent such ideologies from returning to the Defense Department. I appreciate your willingness to put me on that task force.

How many relatives, including in-laws, do you have on your payroll? We hire based on qualifications only. Assuming they are all qualified, how many are related to you, and what are their roles? Everyone on my staff is uniquely qualified. What are their relationships and salaries? There’s a transport portal for transparency. So, the portal reveals family connections? I stand by my team; they are the best. Did you hire a brother-in-law for over $100,000? I appreciate the question. You did, didn’t you? We have the best staff in our office. I've never seen such refusal to disclose information while asking for budget increases. I will vote against your budget due to your lack of transparency regarding contracts and relatives. Thank you for your time.

I notice a lack of diversity in this crowd, particularly regarding people of color, and I'm curious about the reasons behind it. On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we acknowledge Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court, appointed by Joe Biden, who aimed to follow in Jimmy Carter's footsteps by appointing more women and Black women to federal judgeships. General Brown, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, may also be present, though it's hard to confirm. I did see Jim Clyburn here.

I want to talk about the Freemasons and their influence in the Army. I've seen evidence of their presence and power firsthand. A staff sergeant I was deployed with was studying Freemasonry, saying it was essential for career advancement. I also saw ERBs, military resumes, marked with an "M" for Masons, especially among E8s and above, who hold key leadership roles. While Eagle Scouts get a small rank boost upon entry, Freemasonry seems to be a bigger factor in rising through the ranks. This concerns me because of the questionable history and potential agenda of high-ranking Freemasons. I even overheard a general discussing securing a pipeline in Afghanistan, showing where their priorities really are. Based on my experiences, Freemasons run the Army.

Secretary Austin, are you confident in President Biden's mental capacity? Why are military members being discharged for not getting vaccinated while Hamas supporters like Aaron Bushnell are allowed to stay?

If you're an American air traffic controller who has worked hard and earned your position, being required to answer irrelevant biographical questions about race and origin during the job application process can harm morale. Many in the industry have expressed their concerns and even filed a lawsuit against the FAA due to DEI hiring practices prioritizing identity over merit. When flying with loved ones, no one hopes for a pilot of a specific skin color; they simply want a safe flight. As President Trump stated, this is a matter of common sense.

How many genders are there? Two. What is the diameter of an M4A1 rifle round? It's 5.56. How many push-ups can you do? I did 5 sets of 47 this morning. What's the most important strategic base? Guam is significant. How many rounds fit in an M4 magazine? Standard is 30. What does the M9 Beretta fire? A 9 millimeter. What batteries for night vision goggles? Duracell. Your qualifications show you understand the battlefield. Decisions made here can lead to the deaths of young Americans, often from lower middle-income families. When they join the military, they do so for various reasons, and when mistakes happen, they don’t come home. My priority is ensuring you support the warfighters. That’s what matters most to me, and you have my support despite the process.

I understand your reservations, but consider this: President Trump has authorized significant pay raises for the military. More importantly, promotions are now merit-based, meaning your race or gender won't hold you back; your hard work determines your success. Wouldn't you agree that having the ability to support your family and advance based on your own merits is ideal? I've served under four presidents, and this is a good time to be in the military. If you're worried about war, remember conflicts can arise anytime. Choose a job you enjoy and feel secure in, maybe a support role. Regardless, you'd be defending the Constitution and the freedoms it provides. Let's discuss this further because your current perspective might be costing you an opportunity that is better than you think.

The speaker emphasizes the need for more diversity in the public service, particularly in senior positions. They suggest setting targets and implementing dedicated recruitment campaigns to encourage people from ethnic minority backgrounds to join. They highlight the lack of representation in various sectors, including the health service, defense forces, education, and civil service. The speaker believes that visibility and opportunities for people of color are crucial. Another speaker lists numerous positions and roles that are predominantly held by white individuals, ranging from high court judges to trade union leaders, highlighting the lack of diversity in these areas.

Initially, USAID was created with good intentions. However, the agency has broken the trust with the American people and hasn't been transparent about where our taxpayer dollars are going. In 2021, the special operations command put out an instruction manual with instructions and examples on how the military could work with the state department, intel services, and USAID using race riots in order to destabilize nations. They also advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these riots so that disaffected workers could gain employment. These operations are taking place without government oversight, without the authority of the president, without the authority of congress. USAID needs to condemn this and provide oversight to congress on exactly where our tax dollars are going. Do you agree that this is wrong?

Transformational cultural change requires leadership from the top. Over 400 anti LGBTQ+ laws have been introduced at the state level this year, posing a threat to service members, their families, and overall force readiness. When selecting candidates for squadron command, I prioritize job performance and relevant experience. However, personal circumstances and family are also important factors. If a candidate doesn't feel safe or able to perform at their best due to discriminatory laws in a certain state, or if their family could be denied critical healthcare, I'm compelled to consider other candidates, even if they may be less qualified.

I reject your question about why I would expect an underqualified retired lieutenant general to be the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Next question please.

Women have served in combat, and when it comes to the battlefield, it doesn't matter who pulls the trigger; the outcome is the same. Our military should be based on standards and merit. Factors like race, gender, or religion are irrelevant. What truly matters is whether individuals meet the required readiness standards. If you do, then you should be able to serve, regardless of your background.

A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.

Patrick Crusius was white, correct? I don't know his parentage. He was white. I don't understand why you're focusing on race. Because black lives matter, sir. All lives matter, sir. Every single life matters—white, black, Asian. Professor Butler.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.

Speaker 0 questions the General about the number of white officers in the Air Force, referencing a memo that suggests a reduction of white officers. Speaker 1 explains that the memo is based on application goals and demographic representation. Speaker 0 challenges this, asking about specific percentages for different racial groups. Speaker 1 clarifies that the goal is to provide opportunities for anyone who wants to serve. Speaker 0 criticizes the administration for injecting race-based politics into the military and argues against the use of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. They express concern about racial quotas and advocate for a merit-based approach. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 questioning the leadership's support for divisive policies.

I want to talk about the Freemasons' influence in the Army. While deployed in Afghanistan, I saw a staff sergeant studying Freemasonry. He said that to get your E8, you have to be a Freemason. Your military record even indicates if you're a Mason. E8s and E9s are key leadership roles, but they're just relaying orders from Freemasons. Eagle Scouts only get you a higher pay grade when enlisting. I'm concerned because some evil men in history were Freemasons. They want to push their agenda through infiltration. They want to eliminate people to depopulate the world. I'm against that. The Army is run by Freemasons. A general even slipped up, saying we needed to secure a pipeline to leave Afghanistan. Most high-ranking people in the Army only care about themselves.

Senator Schmidt questions General about the representation of white officers in the Air Force, referencing a memo that suggests a 9% reduction in white officers. He expresses concern over what he perceives as race-based politics affecting the military. Schmidt asks how the demographic percentages for officer representation were determined, specifically questioning the figures for various racial groups. The General clarifies that the memo reflects application goals based on national demographics, not the current makeup of the force. Schmidt challenges the rationale behind these percentages, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive approach to representation in the military.