reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

Speaker 0 asked about a report and how concerning it is, questioning whether “10” is the real number. Speaker 1 said the main concern is that the report “dramatically understates the problem.” They argued that analyses rely on doctors and that it was difficult to obtain autopsies during the pandemic. Speaker 1 stated that medical professors did not want to know, resulting in very few autopsies. They said NIH, CDC, and FDA reviewed 96 autopsies of children and identified about 10 cases they considered possible or probable. Speaker 1 then pointed to VAERS, stating there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They said that of the 39,000 deaths, 24% occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. They acknowledged FDA officials say VAERS does not prove causation, but said that if someone was perfectly healthy and died on that day or within one or two days, they would assign blame. Speaker 1 also said there may be cases where people were already in bad health and vaccination “tipped them over,” with death ultimately caused by something else. Speaker 1’s “bigger revelation” was described as information they said was not covered by mainstream media. They stated that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks, head of CBR within FDA, was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS safety would hide and mask safety signals. Speaker 1 said that 26 days later, Marks ran a new algorithm that unmasked 49 cases of extreme masking and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. Speaker 1 said that in the next three months, similar data runs with the new algorithm showed more safety signals and more types of sudden death. They said the report described not “pin[ning] a badge” on doctor Anna Scharzman (identified as the dad of Speaker 1’s expert), ordering her to cease and desist, and continuing to use the algorithm the briefing warned would hide safety signals “to this day.” Speaker 1 said Peter Marks later went to work for Eli Lilly and claimed that the world is in denial. They stated they could not get the story broadcast or interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MS Now, or CNN, and said they challenged Jake Tapper, sending the report and requesting an additional appearance.

These ten deaths are the tip of the iceberg. There is a vast number of deaths in the peer reviewed literature. These have cases have already been vetted. We don't need FDA officials to comment to them on them. They're deeply concerning. And then our US CDC vaccine administration adverse event system, VAERS, has in total now, this is shocking for United States residents, nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty deaths. About two thousand of these have occurred right within forty eight hours of the shot, and then nineteen thousand two hundred seventy nine Americans reported to be permanently disabled. These are reported to VAERS by doctors like myself who have already determined the vaccine is the cause of the injury, disability, or death. Because if the vaccine was not the cause, then we wouldn't do the report to VAERS. So this is the VAERS does indicate causation by proxy of reporting. This is very important. The VAERS system, I'll say it again, indicates the vaccine is the cause of the problem because the doctor or the health care provider in the field at the scene who's examined the patient, examined the autopsy and the medical record information, examined the clinical record, the vaccine administration has determined the vaccine is the cause. Otherwise, a VAERS report would not be made. So this is very important. I would say at this point in time, both Macron and Prasad should immediately call for the COVID nineteen vaccines to be removed from the market. Every day they continue to delay on this, the more Americans will be hurt by boosters. We've already had several hundred deaths this year that have occurred on their watch. B, they should initiate a safety review of the 19480 deaths with an independent panel to review all the information. The CDC has the patients and their families' phone numbers, emails, addresses. There ought to be interviews of family members for the deceased, interviews of the patient themselves for injuries and disabilities to to get their side of the story. The CDC has all that information. The review should be done independently by people who are not CDC or FDA employees, And there should be multiple reviewers and should be an adjudication process and finally, a determination of causality for the vaccine. And then I would say, finally, the FDA officials, including Macari and Prasad, needs to start showing up to important proceedings in Washington. There have been multiple hearings on vaccine safety. One that I was the lead witness on, 05/21/2025. Yeah. We published a report indicating that there was a government cover up of COVID nineteen vaccine induced mild pericarditis, including fatal cases.

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

During a discussion, the speaker expresses surprise that there is a lack of information on vaccinated hospitalizations, ICU visits, and deaths at a national level. The other speaker agrees, acknowledging the challenges in data collection and the importance of providing complete information to the public. The first speaker then mentions the extensive paperwork they have to fill out for patients but notes that data on vaccinated patients and the effectiveness of hospitalizations, ICUs, and deaths was not collected. The second speaker clarifies that while they were looking at that information for vaccine effectiveness studies, they did not receive aggregated data on vaccination and hospitalizations. They emphasize the need for accurate data reporting.

In my practice, we have administered around three to four thousand vaccinations. Initially, we didn't see many side effects, but they gradually increased throughout the year. More and more people started experiencing post-vaccination symptoms such as heart rhythm disorders, extreme fatigue, persistent muscle pain, and nerve inflammation. We formed groups of doctors who also administer vaccines, and they observed the same issues in their patients. However, discussing these concerns was difficult, as it was dismissed as a psychological overreaction. It was shocking to find that scientific discourse on the matter was not allowed. The increasing number of patients created an internal conflict for me and many other doctors who genuinely want the best for their patients. One case that stood out was a sixteen-year-old boy who developed nausea and chest pain forty-eight hours after the second dose. His EKG showed significant abnormalities, and he was diagnosed with severe myocarditis and heart swelling. Thankfully, he recovered, but this made me pause and reflect, especially when other people, including parents, expressed uncertainty and entrusted their lives to us. This trust carries a tremendous responsibility to be honest. Whether we have seen a particular case once or ten times, the connection to the vaccine remains uncertain. Until proven otherwise, we must inform people about what we observe and the experiences we have. This right belongs to individuals when they decide to undergo any form of physical intervention, no matter how small. It became an internal conflict for me because there was immense societal pressure to vaccinate as many people as possible across all age groups, while my personal experience as a doctor showed that it is not without side effects. That was the moment when I realized I couldn't continue vaccinating because I had to stay true to the truth and honor that trust. We have had around three to four hundred people come to us with post-vaccination symptoms. I have seen approximately sixty to eighty EKGs that showed clear abnormalities or rhythm disorders in previously young and healthy individuals. I have also seen a similar number of imaging results.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

The transcript recounts events described as starting in August 2014, when Bill Thompson made an admission that the CDC had lied and hid the fact that the MMR vaccine was associated with autism. The speaker describes the experience of talking with Thompson as feeling “like a spy movie,” and says it led them to secretly record phone conversations with Dr. William Thompson in Oregon because it is illegal to secretly record phone conversations in California. The speaker claims that Dr. Thompson freely admitted he covered it up and that his associates at the CDC also covered it up. Speaker 0 says, “Thimerosal causes autism-like features,” and adds, “I'm completely ashamed of what I did.” Speaker 0 states that “the higher-ups wanted to do certain things” and that Speaker 0 “went along with it.” Speaker 0 identifies Colleen as a center director, Frank as the director of immunization safety, and Marshall as the branch chief, and says they “are still all much more senior” than Speaker 0. Speaker 1 says Dr. Julie Gerberding was head of the CDC at the time, and that she went on to a “lucrative career at Merck,” the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine. Speaker 0 concludes with, “I'm like, oh my God, I cannot believe we did what we did. But we did it.”

The government tracked vaccine side effects using VAERS and v safe systems. V safe required all Americans to report any adverse events after vaccination. 10 million Americans signed up, with 7.7% seeking medical care within the first 6 months post-vaccination. Most visits were for emergency care or hospitalization.

The government tracked vaccine side effects through the VAERS system and the new v safe system for COVID-19 vaccines. V safe required all Americans to sign up and report any adverse events after vaccination. Around 7.7% of the 10 million participants sought medical care within the first 6 months, with over 70% needing emergency or urgent care. The CDC published 40 studies based on this data.

Speaker 0 asks about a report and how concerning it is, suggesting that if the reported figure is 10, there is a “real number” that could be higher. Speaker 1 says the main concern is that the analysis “dramatically understates the problem.” They describe the difficulty of getting autopsies during the pandemic and say medical professors didn’t want to perform them, resulting in very few autopsies. They state that NIH/CDC/FDA reviewed 96 pediatric autopsies and concluded about 10 were possible or probable. Speaker 1 then argues that safety signals were “screaming,” and points to VAERS. They claim there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They say 24% of the 39,000 deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Speaker 1 also references the point that VAERS doesn’t prove causation, while stating that if a person who was “perfectly healthy” died that day or within one or two days, they would “be blaming” the jab. They add that in some cases people may have been in bad health already, with death tipped over by another cause. Speaker 1 says the “bigger revelation,” which they claim was unveiled three weeks ago and is “still not being covered by the mainstream media,” involves FDA’s VAERS algorithm. They state that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks (head of CBER/FDA’s division approving vaccines and surveilling post-approval safety) was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS would “hide and mask safety signals.” They say that 26 days later, a new algorithm unmasked safety signals, producing 49 cases of extreme masking revealed and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. They claim that similar data runs over the next three months showed more safety signals and more sudden death. Speaker 1 further claims that FDA did not “pin a badge” on Anna Scharzman, referred to as the father of their expert, and instead “shunned her off to the side,” ordered her to cease and desist, and decided to use the algorithm they had been warned would hide safety signals, which they say is still being used. Speaker 1 states that Peter Marks left for Eli Lilly and claims “the entire world” is in denial. They say they have been unable to broadcast the story or get interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, and that they challenged Jake Tapper, who they say agreed to read the report but has not invited them back yet.

In spring 2021, our ER was busier than ever due to a sudden surge in patients falling ill after COVID vaccines were introduced. We observed a significant rise in stroke cases, blood clots, heart issues, and paralysis. This shift in patient conditions highlights the impact of the pandemic on healthcare systems and the need to understand the full scope of what medical professionals have been facing.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

I found many clinicians dismissing the importance of asking about vaccination status when treating patients with blood clots. Despite frustrations, I continue to see cases where this information is overlooked. Collaborating with physicians in Birmingham, we witnessed an increase in severe cases, including young individuals with atrial fibrillation. I made the decision to prioritize patient care over job security, treating over 2,000 patients, including those with vaccine injuries.

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to analyze vaccine injuries through cluster analysis. Led by Lazarus, the team tested the system at Harvard Pilgrim HMO, comparing its findings to VAERS data. The study revealed that VAERS captured less than 1% of vaccine injuries, while their system captured over 95%. The data indicated injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, roughly one out of every 37. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC allegedly shelved it in 2010. The speaker claims that for 22 years the CDC has continued to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that accurately tracks vaccine injuries.

The CDC planned to analyze VAERS data for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), where a score above two would trigger further inquiry. ICANN requested the PRR results via FOIA and found "incredibly concerning results," with some harms having PRRs of 30, 50, or 100. The CDC then switched to Empirical Bayesian (EB) analysis by the FDA. ICANN requested this data via FOIA, leading to two federal lawsuits before the data was released. This data was also "very concerning." Both the PRR analysis and the EB data are available on the ICANN website. The speaker encourages independent scientists to analyze and publish on the data, which confirms "incredibly concerning reports of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine." The speaker claims federal health officials hid this data from the public.

Yesterday, my last patient of the day, a healthy woman, got the vaccine and the booster. Four days after the booster, she's paralyzed, wheelchair bound. "Really? And four days." "Alan, you and I have been doing clinical trials long enough to know that that's a serious adverse event, right?" "Sure." "Nobody reported it. So nobody's looking at it. It's like, oh, no problem. A good site will eventually report that." "I mean, will eventually have to come out of me because that, I mean, we would Might have reached out to her and tried to mitigate to not have her speak too much." But we're seeing it. "I'm seeing it every day. I mean, I have hundreds of people that have been vaccine injured. So"

The speaker states that they were fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). They say they were required by law to report to VAERS, and they whistleblew on their organization on The HighWire show with Dell Bigtree. They also did a piece for the New York Times. This occurred when the man gays were coming down and they asked why the speaker wasn't getting the COVID vaccine, and the speaker talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after, without warning, they were surrounded in the middle of their shift. They had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They were surrounded and then literally thrown out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because the speaker was supposed to go back and see them for discharge, and they don’t know what happened to them.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.

They received texts claiming extraordinary lives, but the speaker asks how many people have suffered long-term health consequences from the vaccine. The other person, Helen, responds that there have been 10 cases of long-term consequences. In March 2023, MedSafe received 11,289 reports, with 1,062 listed as disabled, 118 as life-threatening, and 184 as deaths. The speaker clarifies if it's 100 or 1,000 cases, but Helen confirms it's around 10 for long-term effects.

As of February 2024, the number of reports for COVID-19 vaccines in VAERS is significantly higher than all other vaccines combined since 1990. The government was not fully prepared for this overwhelming influx of reports. They had to quickly reassign people and hold numerous meetings to increase their capacity to review these reports.

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to identify unique injury clusters related to vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The machine counting system's data on vaccine injuries was compared to VAERS data from the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. The study found that VAERS captured less than one percent of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over ninety-five percent. Data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of all vaccines, approximately one out of every thirty-seven. The CDC then shelved the system in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that actually works.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

These batches are different. So yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch. And you can check your batch at howbadismybatch.com, which uses the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many reports of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.