reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A team of researchers is investigating which politicians are receiving money from pro-Israel lobbyists. They recommend using open secrets.org, a website that tracks money in Congress. By searching "Israel" on the site, you can find a list of senators and members of the House who have received funds from pro-Israel political action committees (PACs). Chuck Schumer is currently leading in terms of money received in the current election cycle. The website also provides additional tabs with more information.

The Balfour Declaration is a 67-word letter, 100 years old, that changed the course of history for the Middle East and the Jewish people. The British government's support for a Jewish home in Palestine was sent to my great uncle Walter, Lord Rothschild because, at the time, Zionism was a movement from Eastern Europe without a clear leader. The British felt the Rothschild family should be the ones to receive it. The declaration states the government favors establishing a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, while ensuring the rights of existing non-Jewish communities are not prejudiced. My cousin Dorothy played a critical role as a facilitator for Chaim Weitzman, connecting him with the British establishment and teaching him how to integrate into British society to advance the Zionist movement.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a historic shift in American public opinion regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. - Speaker 1 notes that public opinion on who voters sympathize with shifted dramatically in the wake of the current war. In October 2023, Americans favored Israel by 48 points; now, they favor the Palestinians by 1 point. He says he reviewed polls since the question began in the 1980s and that this is the first time Palestinians lead on this question, marking a historic shift away from the Israeli position toward the Palestinians. - He emphasizes that the shift was led by Democrats, moving from Democrats favoring Israel by 26 points to Palestinians by 46 points, describing it as a roughly 70-point swing and stating that, for the first time ever, more Americans sympathize with the Palestinians over the Israelis. - Speaker 0 adds that the shift is “a first that I have seen in my lifetime” and credits independent media and journalists reporting from Gaza for bringing images to social media, including images of civilians and alleged Israeli actions. He asserts that without on-the-ground reporting, people wouldn’t have seen certain images, asserts that journalists were killed by the IDF, and claims those images contributed to waking people up. - He contends that APAC is panicking, citing a new ad and a rebranding as “America first,” and argues Israel has lost the media war and the narrative, including some conservative and evangelical support (referencing Charlie Kirk’s base). - Speaker 1 details a parallel shift within the Republican Party, noting a significant age-based divide. Among Republicans over 50, they sympathize with Israel by 66 points; among those under 50, they sympathize with the Palestinians by 25 points. This creates about a 40-point gap, with younger Republicans leaning more toward the Palestinians than older Republicans. - Speaker 0 adds that Israel has hired pro-Israel influencers—paid about $7,000 per post—targeting the youth to reel back pro-Israel sentiment in the conservative youth vote. He notes these influencers were primarily young, implying a deliberate strategy to mobilize younger voters, while older voters are less in need of such outreach. - The speakers conclude that this combination of media exposure, shifts in party and demographic alignments, and targeted influencer campaigns constitutes a broad, historic realignment in American attitudes toward the conflict.

In 1829, the Rothschilds purchased Jerusalem, a key step in establishing Israel. The First Zionist Congress in 1897, led by Theodor Herzl, aimed to secure Palestine for Jews. Herzl predicted a world body would grant Palestine to Jews, manipulating European powers to take it from the Ottomans. He believed wealthy Jews controlled governments, starting wars and making peace at will. In 1907, Doctor Wolfson echoed this sentiment in the New York Times.

Benjamin Netanyahu relies on US support to veto UN resolutions against Israel and for military assistance. The idea of Israel as a biblical prophecy has been present since the 1970s, particularly among evangelical Christians in the US. Amid the recent conflict in Gaza, American evangelical pastors continue to reference biblical prophecies. Christian Zionism, which predates Jewish Zionism, is a belief that the return of Jewish people to Israel will lead to the second coming of Jesus Christ. This movement heavily influences US foreign policy, with over 100 evangelical members in Congress. Evangelical support for Israel extends to fundraising, organizing tours of the occupied West Bank, and opposing the two-state solution. Netanyahu uses scripture to appease his main supporters, the Christian Zionist movement.

A man was told he should be in America because it would become a rising power and could make Britain recognize a Jewish state. He went to America and continued advocating for Zionism. In 1942, he approached Republican senator Taft to include support for unrestricted Jewish immigration and a Jewish state in the Republican National Convention platform. Despite opposition from Roosevelt, the Democratic National Convention later adopted a similar platform. This man played a significant role in establishing bipartisan American support for Israel.

Speaker 1 believes the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful, even for the interests of Israel, because they pressure too many people. They have many means at their disposal to pressure people. The President of the United States pays attention to the lobby because they are strong and control many things, including newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 1 believes the Jewish community in the United States is powerful enough to make the media reflect their view of foreign policy.

Hello, I'm Ted Pike, and this is my wife, Alain. Israel operates a powerful lobby in Congress through AIPAC, receiving nearly $5 billion annually. Elected officials avoid criticizing Israel due to fear of being labeled antisemitic, which can end their careers. The President also knows that to oppose Israel is political suicide. The media, largely controlled by Jewish interests, promotes the narrative that criticism of Israel equates to antisemitism. Consequently, our leaders are constrained by political correctness regarding Israel, unable to address its role in Middle Eastern conflict or suggest ending aid.

APAC, AIEF, ADL, mainstream media, IFCJ, CFoI, CUFI, and many other lobbying groups in Washington DC spend millions promoting Zionist causes and influencing Congress. They target critics of Israel, use large budgets for lobbying, and support Israeli settlements. These organizations play a significant role in shaping US policy towards Israel.

We, as Jewish people, have aimed to control the world for over 3,300 years. Our plan involves changing Americans' perceptions of reality, a brainwashing process completed through demoralization over generations by instilling Marxism-Leninism, Americans themselves further this through a lack of moral standards, making people unable to assess true information. Throughout history, Jews would lend money at interest, circumventing usury laws and eventually controlling economies, leading to expulsions. Jews revolutionized the adult industry, controlling it and eliminating antisemitism. Jews are overrepresented in finance and financial crimes, exploiting loopholes and sometimes acting contrary to their own laws and beliefs. Some claim that Zionists are controlling the media to change narratives about Israel and that there is a plot for a one world financial system.

Deborah said that this new form of antisemitism is not so new anti-Zionism. Speaker 0 responds that this is not new, noting that the first document of anti-Zionism is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, written in response to the world Zionist congresses. It was true: the Jews were gathering to hatch their international plans, and we still do. Right? But what I think is...

Hello, I'm Ted Pike, and this is my wife, Alain. Today, we discuss the powerful influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Congress, which secures nearly $5 billion annually for Israel. Elected officials avoid criticizing Israel due to fear of being labeled anti-Semitic, a serious political risk. The media, largely controlled by Jewish interests, reinforces this narrative, discouraging any dissent against Israel. As a result, politicians are constrained by political correctness regarding Israel's actions and the ongoing aid. This situation arises from deep-rooted religious beliefs within Christianity that have fostered a strong bond with Israel, blinding many to the suffering of Palestinians.

The video argues that evangelical support for Israel in the United States largely stems from a late-19th-century theological system that crystallized around the Schofield Reference Bible. The Schofield Bible is portrayed as a Cliff’s Notes for the Bible used by Christian Zionists to justify support for Israel, even as Israel is described as committing violence against innocents and Christians. A central claim is that the Schofield Bible was funded by Wall Street elites and backed by early Zionists long before the state of Israel existed. Cyrus Scofield, the Bible’s namesake, is described as a controversial figure. He is labeled by evangelical standards as a scoundrel: a philanderer who abandoned his wife and two daughters, sued frequently for fraud, and served time in prison for forgery. He was ousted as district attorney in disgrace after lying about his Confederate military record. Despite this, he became a prominent Bible teacher and later a celebrated Christian convert, though the narrative notes he never publicly corrected the stories about his supposed Confederate bravery or his wartime decorations. Scofield’s early life is summarized: raised in Michigan after his mother’s early death, he moved with his sister to Tennessee, briefly joined the Confederate Army but requested to leave, and shifted into religious circles after moving to St. Louis, where he married Leontine, a Catholic of French descent. He did not convert to Catholicism and later complained about her Catholicism. He had two daughters and a son who died in infancy. His ascent into religious influence came despite questions about his schooling and integrity, aided by his sister’s connections which helped him win election to the Kansas legislature and later serve as the District Attorney for the District of Kansas (1873). Fraud accusations continued, including forgery, but he eventually was pardoned and rose as a biblical leader. Scofield’s conversion is linked to a business figure in a mythic account, and he moved to Dallas where he remarried to Hetty after leaving his first wife. His network extended into Dwight L. Moody’s revival circles and the Niagara Bible Conference in 1878, where a new dispensational theology emerged. This theology divides history into eras, with Israel slated for a pivotal future role and the belief that the world would not be converted during the current dispensation—the church would decline before Christ's return and the millennial age would begin with Israel restored to its land. This “Israel-centered” prophecy would become central to American Christianity, even though at the time there was no modern Israel (it would come in 1948). Scofield’s influence extended into elite circles: he joined the Lotto’s Club in New York City, a club of financiers and writers including figures like Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie, JP Morgan, and Samuel Untermeyer, a Zionist heavyweight. It was through the Lotto’s Club that Untermeyer facilitated Scofield’s connection to Zionist goals and to publishers (Oxford Press) that issued the Schofield Bible. Scofield then traveled to England and reportedly to the Holy Land, though travel dates are uncertain. The Schofield Bible’s publication and widespread distribution—funded by Wall Street real estate magnates and Zionist elites—produced a widespread, enduring belief in a distinct Jewish track in Scripture and the idea that Israel should play a central role in end-times prophecy. The Bible significantly altered American Christianity by systemizing, funding, and distributing a dispensational theology with Israel at its core. The video closes by inviting viewer feedback on this history.

The Jewish lobby in the United States has significant influence, sometimes even counterproductive to Israel's interests. They exert pressure on various individuals and institutions, which may ultimately harm Israel. The president pays attention to this lobby due to its strength and control over numerous sectors, including media and finance.

Rothschild began buying up land in Palestine in the late 1800s, funding infrastructure and funding schools. By 1917, the Rothschild banking cabal had strong influence over the British government and brokered a deal later known as the Balfour Declaration. Essentially, Rothschilds claimed the US would enter the war and aid the Allies, and in return, the British stated that a Jewish homeland would be established in Palestine. About thirty years later, the creation of the CIA emerged to control the region around Israel, followed by Israel becoming an official nation the next year, and in 1949 the Mossad was created to run the internal defense. Sir Ostralis funded it, the CIA protected global western interests, the Mossad protected national Zionist interests. This power triangle was strong. It propped up regimes, destroyed governments from within, and silenced anyone who questioned it, including presidents. John F. Kennedy was one of them. He tried to inspect Israel's nuclear site. He tried to shut down the CIA. And then a few months later, he was gone. So follow along before the same thing happens to me. And remember, it's not a conspiracy. It's a business model.

The speaker describes a new book that makes provocative claims about Jewish influence. Key points include: - Christopher Columbus and the slave trade are framed with imagery of “tiny hats” associated with Jews, suggesting that slaves who resisted were targeted by a “malicious setup.” - The claim that the largest number of slaves were sent into New York through the seventeenth century by people described as “tiny hats.” - The idea that there were “tiny hat mayors of the South” in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with a proliferation of cities listed as led by these figures. - A claim that Jews “owned” 2% of the population and controlled both the slave ships and the banking system, in addition to politicians. - The assertion that the funding of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is connected to these same groups, described as “tiny hats.” - The claim that the KKK was actually led by or associated with Jews, described as “the tiny hats,” and that Masons are the same group under different names, with people changing names to avoid recognition. - A reference to the Rothschilds as the “kingpin of everything,” with a claim that they were previously known as the Bowers and changed their names to fit into the slave trade network. Overall, the speaker connects archival-era racial and criminal activities to a conspiratorial narrative centered on Jewish identity, suggesting a continuous, concealed influence across slavery, banking, political leadership, the KKK, and fraternal organizations such as the Masons, culminating in the assertion that the Rothschilds are the central figures behind these networks.

Christian Zionism, an influential movement in the US, is often overlooked. It predates Jewish Zionism and has gained popularity since the 19th century. Figures like Woodrow Wilson and Harry Truman, who read the Bible daily, are believers in biblical prophecies that promise land to Israel. This movement has expanded from elites to the masses, particularly with the rise of far-right evangelical Christians in the 1950s. They form a significant base for the Republican Party, supporting Israel fervently. However, their theology is both pro-Israel and anti-Semitic, as they believe that supporting Israel will lead to Armageddon, where only a small number of Jews will be saved. Despite the majority of Jewish support going to Democrats, the Republican Party remains more extreme in its backing of Israel due to this base.

To get into government, one faces headwinds if they oppose the US-Israel relationship, in both appointed and elected positions. The Israel lobby has incredible power over government decisions. Questioning Israeli government policies leads to accusations of antisemitism, which is unique. There are legitimate concerns about antisemitism on college campuses.

Speaker 0 believes the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful, even for Israel's interests, because they pressure too many people. This pressure, exerted through various means, ultimately doesn't help Israel. The president of the United States pays attention to this lobby because they are strong and control many things. When asked to elaborate on what they control, Speaker 0 lists newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 1 expresses surprise and asks if Speaker 0 really believes the Jewish community in the United States is that powerful.

The first speaker says the UK holds a special place because it helped birth the Jewish state in World War I through the Balfour Declaration, the San Remo Accords, and the mandate for Jewish Palestine, with the UK at the forefront. Then they “turned on us,” and he asks, “Can we turn it back?” The second speaker agrees and adds that while the British government has turned on Israel, the British people have not necessarily turned on Jews; the establishment has. He argues that if a democratic vote were held on recognizing the state of Palestine, “it would be a resounding no.” He states, “The people haven't turned on Israel,” and attributes this to the left-wing establishment appeasing their block vote and their future vote. He also draws a parallel to the American establishment under Joe Biden, noting that “the American people didn't support that.”

The speaker argues that the United States has, for about a century, supported Israel not only for strategic reasons but through a broad, coordinated influence network. The question is raised: why have we fought regime-change wars on Israel’s behalf, why do we back Israel in Gaza, and why do we provide foreign aid? The speaker states the answer is not solely because of APAC. The central claim is that there exists a vast network inside the United States—a “fifth column.” This network stretches from Silicon Valley and Stanford on the West Coast to Harvard and Columbia on the East Coast, including major businesses like BlackRock and large hedge funds, mainstream media, banking and finance, and Hollywood, all the way to Washington, D.C. through lobbying groups such as APAC and J Street and mega donors like Sheldon Adelson. The speaker describes this as a Jewish oligarchy that operates across industries and elite sectors, working either directly under Israeli intelligence or on behalf of Israel, to push America to support Israel’s well-being. The justification offered is that because they are Jewish, they care about the Jewish state; because they are Jewish, they have a special allegiance to Israel. The speaker asserts that after October 7, there was particular sympathy, and influence was used in various spheres—CBS, Harvard, Columbia, Silicon Valley, government, and Congress. The reference is made to a representative who served in the IDF and appeared in his IDF uniform, illustrating the claimed special affinity. The argument continues that when called upon, this network uses its influence across media, finance, academia, Hollywood, technology, and government. The stated purpose of this influence is to benefit their Jewish community at large and to benefit Israel.

The speaker's new book, "Lobbying for Zionism Across the Atlantic," examines how, starting in 1900, politicians in America and Britain were targeted and committed to Zionism and later to Israel early in their careers. While initially these politicians lacked significant influence, their growing numbers eventually allowed them to exert greater influence.

Hello, I'm Ted Pike, and this is my wife, Alain. Israel operates a powerful lobby in Congress, known as AIPAC, which secures nearly $5 billion annually. Elected officials avoid criticizing Israel due to fears of being labeled antisemitic, which can end their political careers. The President is also aware that to oppose Israel is political suicide. The media, largely controlled by Jewish interests, promotes the narrative that any criticism of Israel equates to antisemitism. Consequently, our leaders are constrained by political correctness, unable to address Israel's role in Middle Eastern conflict or suggest ending aid to the country.

Speaker 0 discusses the pressure being exerted by a powerful lobby, suggesting it won't benefit Israel. Speaker 1 questions why the US president pays attention to this lobby, to which Speaker 0 responds that they control various aspects, including newspapers and finances. Speaker 1 probes further, asking if the Jewish community influences media coverage on foreign policy. Speaker 0 clarifies that while not all media outlets are affected, some newspapers reflect their views. Speaker 1 mentions the Jewish ownership of the New York Times and asks if it is biased on topics like Zionism and US-Arab relations. Speaker 0 suggests analyzing all relevant articles to draw a conclusion, deferring to a computer for an answer.

According to John Fetterman himself, his Zionism puts him out of step with the rest of his party, which—“I'm sorry, only 13% stand with Israelis against the Palestinians.” The speaker argues that this is a party whose grassroots are currently captured by the left, and therefore Zionism does not have a future in the American left. The Democratic Party’s relationship with Zionism, the speaker says, depends on whether it is willing to repudiate that far left. The speaker emphasizes how appalling this is by noting that Jews built the left in this country and built the labor movement; “We broke the New Deal.” The speaker asserts that “70% of the lawyers who worked on civil rights cases were Jews” and that Jews have been at the forefront of every liberal and leftist issue in the country. The speaker condemns the idea of telling Jews they are not welcome, calling it a form of “absurdity” and drawing a vivid analogy: when bars banned smoking and the speaker, a former smoker, felt outraged and imagined a turf war where smokers would have to concede to the bars. The point is to illustrate how easily one can imagine a counterfactual in which the left in America reasons that opposing Zionism would cost them their beloved Jews who had stood with them at the forefront of the movement. The speaker asserts that this is not what happened; the left did not oppose Zionism to keep Jewish support. Instead, they did the opposite. The core claim is that Zionism is being pushed to the margins within the American left because the left’s grassroots have shifted leftward, and this shift is incompatible with Zionist alignment as presented by the speaker. The speaker argues that the left’s relationship with Zionism hinges on whether the left will repudiate its far-left tendencies, and he maintains that the left did not repudiate Zionism or push Jews away; they, in effect, embraced a stance that makes Zionism increasingly unwelcome within the party. The overarching message is that Jews have played a central, formative role in the left, and to claim otherwise or to bar Zionists from participation would be a betrayal of that historical involvement.