reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

In 2025, Dutch attorney Arnaud van Kessel, who was suing Bill Gates and others for COVID vaccine injuries, was arrested in a raid reminiscent of the Gestapo and detained. The European and American press have reportedly ignored both the civil trial and Van Kessel's arrest. According to an independent online journal, Van Kessel will be held for 90 more days because the Public Prosecution Service continues to designate him as a suspect in an investigation into a criminal network without presenting any evidence. Van Kessel and his colleague Peter Stassen announced in 2023 that they would file legal proceedings against Bill Gates, Marc Root, and the Dutch state to determine if the COVID mRNA injection was a vaccine or a bioweapon. The police linked Van Kessel to a criminal network of people adhering to anti-institutional ideology. Some believe Van Kessel got too close to the truth, similar to German lawyer Rainer Fuhlmich, who was allegedly kidnapped from Mexico for compiling evidence against those responsible for the COVID scam and the Great Reset. The term "sovereign" is now being used to frame people trying to live independently from the government.

A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates will face trial for allegedly misleading the public about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The case was brought by seven plaintiffs claiming vaccine-related injuries. Gates' legal team argued against the court's jurisdiction, but the judge confirmed it, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. Notably, other defendants include the Dutch Prime Minister, NATO Secretary General, members of the Dutch government, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and the Dutch state. This ruling is seen as a significant step forward, as those named must now defend themselves against these accusations.

Prominent figures like Fauci, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, and others are being called out for their alleged involvement in what is claimed to be the largest mass poisoning event in human history. Accountability is being demanded for their roles in this situation.

Pascal Nagiadi, the son of a World Economic Forum cofounder, is demanding justice for the global release of COVID-19 vaccines. He is joined by Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger in calling for the criminal prosecution of all involved. Nagiadi also wants the arrest of those responsible for crimes against humanity related to the pandemic, including the WEF, WHO, GAVI, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates. He believes he and his mother are victims of the vaccines and that the situation is a democide. If his demands are met, it could have significant global health and economic implications. The outcome of this call to action remains uncertain, but it highlights the power of individuals challenging established systems.

German prosecutors are reportedly preparing charges against Bill Gates for his role in the COVID vaccine rollout, following a study exposing high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccines. The study, led by Jurgen O'Koerchner and Professor Brigitte Koenig, found that the contamination exceeded regulatory safety thresholds. The German government has allegedly admitted that the pandemic was a manipulated operation to push experimental vaccines. Gates is accused of pressuring governments to adopt digital ID systems, biometric tracking, and vaccine enforcement. Singapore has already passed legislation mandating vaccination, and Gates allegedly pressured Indonesia to use children for mRNA tuberculosis vaccine trials. Gates has reportedly lost his immunity status in Kenya, where lawsuits are piling up over vaccine trials. The Gates Foundation was allegedly expelled from India after an investigation into deaths and injuries from vaccine trials. Citizens in Holland are also taking legal action against Gates over mRNA vaccines. The video promotes pillsforever.com, advertising medicines like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendazole.

This impromptu session of the International Crimes Investigative Committee features Pascal Najadi, who has filed a criminal complaint against several individuals, including the president of Switzerland. Najadi explains that he has filed charges in Switzerland and the United States, alleging violations of laws and rights related to the Pfizer vaccine. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and criticizes the World Health Organization. The case could have implications for others who have suffered similar damages. The conversation also touches on allegations of a population reduction program and the lack of testing for vaccine efficacy and safety.

Speaker 0 discusses “Bill Gates on trial,” asserting disbelief at the reality of the situation unless present in the courtroom, and notes that two connected legal cases are taking place in the Netherlands involving Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Baller, former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte, who is described as the current secretary general of NATO, and other senior government officials. Speaker 1 claims they can prove “without any doubt” that the official narrative of COVID-19 is fake, and notes the rapid developments in the case. They also reference the Epstein files, stating that there is a “very evil elite” led by bankers, described as harmful to the world and its people. Speaker 0 relays remarks from lawyer Peter Stassen in court, who purportedly said on the Global Elite Network that there exists a globally organized malicious elite at the top of which are some families who own central banks worldwide. He asserts Epstein “plays an important role in this network” and that Epstein is “the bankers’ agent.” According to these remarks, Epstein is shaping a transhuman agenda driven largely by the desire to eradicate much of the world’s population. Speaker 0 further describes a “satanic system,” in which bankers, secret services, media, Hollywood figures, government officials, universities, and many scientists are corruptly connected to this network and serve a transhuman, described as satanic, mind-bending system. On COVID and genocide, the statement is that “we are witnessing the largest genocide of the world’s population ever.” Speaker 1 adds emphasis with the word “This,” underscoring the claim that the narrative and events described are connected to the broader allegations. Speaker 0 concludes that the trial is “beyond the courtroom,” defining it as a test for the judiciary and posing the question of whether justice will reveal what it can still become.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

Jim Ferguson reports from Ireland on a court case in Luswarden regarding the Covid pandemic and mRNA "gene therapies." Accusations were made against figures like Bill Gates, Albert Buhler (Pfizer CEO), Mark Rutte, and Klaus Schwab, alleging genocide, biological weapons use, and media collusion. Lawyers for all but Bill Gates attended. A judgment is expected in six weeks. The lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, was arrested and detained in a maximum-security prison without charge, allegedly to stop the case. Ferguson thanks the Dutch people and millions of online supporters. He is in Ireland for meetings related to "unity," hinting at future developments. Ferguson emphasizes the importance of uniting against the "globalist agenda," including central bank digital currencies and digital IDs. He promotes Freedom Train International and thanks supporters for fueling the movement. He asserts the Covid pandemic was a "war on humanity" and those responsible must be held accountable. He praises the free independent media for getting the truth out.

This case addresses alleged crimes against humanity linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, which is characterized as a psychological operation rather than a true pandemic. Key points include the assertion that effective treatments were suppressed to promote dangerous experimental vaccines. The agenda is said to involve controlling the population, dismantling democracy, and establishing a one-world government through economic manipulation and public health measures. Numerous expert witnesses will testify about the origins of the pandemic narrative, the ineffectiveness of vaccines, and the economic destruction caused by lockdowns. Ultimately, the goal is to expose a long-term plan by powerful elites to gain control over global populations and resources, leading to recommended indictments for the key figures involved.

Dutch lawyer Arno Van Kessel, who was set to lead a major lawsuit against Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Borla, and former WEF chair Klaus Schwab over COVID policies and vaccine injuries, was arrested in a military style style raid and jailed without charges. He was arrested and imprisoned in The Netherlands. One month before trial against Bill Gates, and ours is set to begin. The Netherlands goes spooled fascists in a Gestapo reminiscent late night arrest of attorney Arno Van Kessel. That's from the McCullough Foundation. Arnold Van Kessel was arrested 06/11/2025 in a raid by Dutch special forces, blindfolded and detained in Vought Prison on suspicious suspicions of anti institutional activities and potential violence, not actual vie

Speaker 1, a former vice president of Pfizer, discusses his experience in the pharmaceutical industry and his concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic. He claims that global lockdowns indicate a supranational operation orchestrated by organizations like the WHO or the World Economic Forum. He accuses public figures of lying about the virus and asserts that the vaccines are intentionally harmful. Despite facing censorship and defamation, he remains convinced that the injections were designed to cause harm and even death. He expresses worry and believes that his knowledge and experience in drug development support his claims.

This impromptu session of the International Crimes Investigative Committee features Pascal Najadi, who has filed a criminal complaint against the president of Switzerland and others. Najadi explains that he has filed charges in Switzerland and the United States, alleging violations of laws and the presumption of innocence applies to the president. He discusses his reasons for coming to the US and emphasizes the importance of justice. Najadi also shares a notification sent to Pfizer's lawyers, outlining the alleged violations and the impact on citizens. He believes this case could have far-reaching implications and potentially become a tort law case for damages. He criticizes the World Health Organization and highlights the need for accountability. The conversation touches on the alleged lack of testing and the motivations behind the vaccine rollout.

A court hearing took place following the arrest of Arno van Kessel, a key figure in a case accusing Alfred Bourla from Pfizer, news channel editors, and Dutch politicians. The hearing addressed a request to hear expert witnesses, including Catherine Olsen Fitts, in a separate case brought by three victims. The defense argued against hearing these witnesses, citing readily available online information. The lawyer for the victims argued that court testimony is necessary. The discussion included Bill Gates' lack of defense, with his lawyer deferring to the court. Concerns were raised about van Kessel's arrest by a special police unit with alleged NATO links, his suspension as a lawyer, and his detainment in a prison described as a dangerous facility where prisoners can be interrogated without public access. The case involves charges of genocide and the use of biological weapons, potentially leading to a Nuremberg-style trial. Supporters believe this case is an international precedent and could spark justice globally, while his arrest is seen as intimidation.

The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic. Key facts asserted: - The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions. - Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf. - On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral. - The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD. - Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning. - February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency. - The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements. - The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation. - Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA. - Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify. - Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths. What happens next: - An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference. - The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview). - The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence. Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.

A Dutch government official revealed that the COVID pandemic was orchestrated as a military operation under NATO orders, suggesting that forced vaccinations and lockdowns were part of a hidden agenda rather than public health measures. This admission could significantly impact the ongoing trial of Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in the Netherlands, where they face accusations of misleading the public about COVID vaccinations. The Dutch health minister confirmed that pandemic preparedness was tied to treaty obligations and intelligence services. This revelation aligns with claims made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the military's role in vaccine production. The discussion raises concerns about the true motives behind the pandemic and the need for accountability from those responsible for the global health crisis.

Prominent Swiss citizens Pascal Nejadi, a British Swiss banker, and Dr. Astrid Stuegelberger, a Swiss researcher, discuss their actions against the Swiss president and Pfizer Inc. Nejadi has filed criminal charges against the Swiss president and a lawsuit against Pfizer in New York. The claim is related to the COVID-19 vaccination policy. Dr. Stuegelberger criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) and its role in the pandemic, calling it a criminal organization. They also discuss concerns about genetic editing, digitalization of care, and the sterilization effects of the mRNA injections. Nejadi expresses anger over the harm caused by the injections and vows to seek justice.

An international group, including Mark and me, delivered a letter to the UN rapporteur on torture, calling for an investigation into the unlawful imprisonment and torture of Dr. Reiner Fumich in Germany. He has been held for over a year, mostly in solitary confinement, which is effectively torture. This situation must end, and Fumich's imprisonment needs to be investigated. He played a crucial role in exposing COVID-related crimes, and his work has made some powerful entities fearful. If the courts want to maintain credibility, they must adhere to the law. Fumich is a leading figure in class action lawsuits and has gathered significant expert testimony, concluding that a false PCR pandemic was used to justify abuses against citizens. His findings have been validated by recent reports.

I was a former VP at Pfizer, overseeing respiratory and allergy research. In early 2020, I noticed global lockdowns happening simultaneously, indicating a coordinated effort beyond national levels. I believe the response was orchestrated by higher entities like the WHO or World Economic Forum. The pandemic measures were not in countries' plans, proving a deliberate agenda. I accuse those involved of lying about the situation and the safety of vaccines, which I believe are intentionally harmful.

A lawyer suing Bill Gates and Pfizer's CEO for COVID vaccine injuries was arrested in the Netherlands. According to the McCullough Foundation, the arrest of attorney Arno van Kessel occurred one month before the trial against Bill Gates was set to begin. Van Kessel was set to lead a lawsuit against Bill Gates, Albert Borla, and Klaus Schwab over COVID policies and vaccine injuries. He was arrested in a military-style raid and jailed without charges. Grock reported that Van Kessel was arrested on suspicions of anti-institutional activities and potential violence and detained in Vought Prison. His imprisonment was extended ninety days without formal charges. The speaker claims this violates habeas corpus and Magna Carta principles. The speaker suggests the arrest, a month before the lawsuit trial, indicates possible suppression, though officials cite security risks. The July 9 trial proceeded with a co-lawyer, Peter Stassen. The charge was suspicious suspicions of anti-institutional activities and potential violence.

Pascal Nagiadi, the son of a World Economic Forum (WEF) co-founder, is demanding justice for the global release of COVID-19 vaccines. He is joined by Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger in calling for the criminal prosecution of all involved and the arrest of those responsible for crimes against humanity related to the pandemic. Nagiadi has also criticized the WEF and wants to remove its diplomatic immunity. He believes he and his mother are victims of the vaccines and are now dying from it. This unprecedented call to action could have significant implications for global health and the economy. It remains to be seen if these demands will lead to any tangible change.

A lawyer suing Bill Gates and Albert Bourla for COVID vaccine injuries, Arnaud van Kessel, was arrested in the Netherlands and is being held for 90 days as part of a criminal network investigation, though he claims there is no evidence. His partner will proceed with the case, arguing the COVID mRNA injection was either a vaccine or a bioweapon. YouTube will use AI to monitor user behavior and psychology to verify ages in the US. In Australia, by December 2025, users will need to provide ID to use Apple and Google Maps, enabling real-time location tracking. GOP lawmakers are pushing to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email controversy, alleging the FBI mishandled the initial review. Trump suggests Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for insider trading. The Jace case offers emergency antibiotics and medications via online consultation with a physician. Block Trust IRA offers an AI trading platform for cryptocurrency investments.

Dr. Joseph Sanson, a Florida psychotherapist and licensed mental health counselor who litigates pro se, contends that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and argues Florida should stop facilitating these injections and related products. He frames his effort as part of a broader effort to stop what he calls a bioweapon program tied to the pandemic. Background and filings - Sanson began in May 2021, working about 18 months to pass a band of jab resolution at the county level declaring mRNA COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and urging action by the governor and attorney general. He claims that he got these resolutions passed in about 10 Florida counties, in Idaho, and in Arizona, and that they influenced the Florida Surgeon General to call for a halt to injections in early 2024. - He notes that the Florida Department of Health has said these mRNA injections are unsafe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome. - On 04/01/2023, while advancing these resolutions, Sanson says he suffered congestive heart failure and later underwent a triple bypass on 04/10/2023. He says he tried to rely on unvaccinated blood for surgery and consulted Dr. Francis Boyle, who helped endorse his band-and-jab resolution. Boyle is described as the author of the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention; Boyle died about two months after Sanson filed his December 2024 case, which Sanson says prejudiced his case. - Sanson’s first mandamus filing claimed the governor and attorney general were violating Florida statute 797.166 (as he asserts). The court found the writ of mandamus improper (ministerial duty limit) and he lost the appeal. Second case and remedies sought - On 12/01/2024 Sanson filed a second case seeking an injunction and declaratory relief, arguing that his April 2023 medical events and exposures were the result of involuntary environmental exposure through shedding of the technology in the injections. - He characterizes his hospital stay, the decision to obtain unvaccinated blood, and Boyle’s involvement as part of this exposure theory. He says the case includes an 80-page complaint with 50–64 pages of affidavits, including nine affidavits up front and two more recently. - One key affidavit is from Francis Boyle, whose affidavit is described as not only expert legal opinion but legislative intent, given Boyle’s role in crafting the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the biological weapons conventions. - The World Council for Health in Florida endorsed Sanson’s bill, and a 2025 paper titled COVID-19 Harms and Damages (COVID-19 harms and damages, non-exhaustive conclusion) is cited as stating that both the virus and the vaccine violated the Biological Weapons Convention; the paper has 11 coauthors, including doctors Villa, Zivjic, McCullough, and Maverkakis. Evidence and theory of harm - Sanson cites studies and affidavits suggesting shedding of the mRNA technology, transmission to unvaccinated individuals (including women), and possible environmental exposure from intimate contact or proximity. He references an Israeli study showing transmission of mRNA components to unvaccinated women and notes reports of menstrual-cycle interference and other immune effects. - He argues that involuntary environmental exposure through shedding constitutes a dangerous threat warranting injunctive relief under Florida Health Freedom Act and Civil Rights Act, as well as constitutional protections. He contends the Florida Surgeon General’s statements and the 2025 paper support these positions. - He also argues that the vaccines are illegal gain-of-function products, with derivatives of the spike protein present in injections, demonstrating specific intent; he cites Boyle’s arguments on gain-of-function, dual-use technology, and knowingness. He invokes malice of forethought (reckless disregard for human life) and informed consent issues, arguing there was zero informed consent for a bioweapon. Legal strategy and procedural posture - Sanson says his strongest immediate legal avenue is the Health Freedom Act, along with Civil Rights Act and constitutional provisions, rather than relying on the Weapons of Mass Destruction statute alone, which he dropped in an amended complaint. He argues the illness and exposure could violate civil and constitutional rights and that discovery is needed to develop evidence. - He claims the defense has not adequately addressed the merits, focusing on procedural arguments. He asserts there are procedural errors and seeks a new judge and evidentiary development, including testimony from multiple experts (Villa, Zeviets, Mihalchia) and the Surgeon General Ladapo under oath. - He has sought to reassign the case to a different judge due to perceived bias and past rulings; he notes the prior judge’s decision in a related whistleblower case against the Surgeon General. The Netherlands case and cross-border dimension - Sanson is involved as a witness in the Netherlands case against Bill Gates and Albert Borla of Pfizer, coordinated by Sasha Ladopova. The Netherlands appellate court limited live testimony, but Sanson has provided written statements and affidavits. A trial hearing in The Netherlands was set for October 22 in the cited case. Next steps - Sanson is pursuing an oral-argument motion for live, livestreamed proceedings; a decision is pending, potentially in September. He hopes for evidentiary development and more cases to challenge the PREP Act and related immunities. - He emphasizes public engagement and urges others to seek cases in other states or countries to push discovery and accountability. Overall, Sanson presents a narrative linking the mRNA vaccines to environmental shedding and alleged bioweapon characteristics, backed by affidavits, peer papers, and testimonies, and seeks injunctive relief in Florida and collaborative proceedings in Europe to halt the use and distribution of the injections.

A lawyer suing Bill Gates and Pfizer's Borla for COVID vaccine injuries was reportedly arrested and imprisoned in The Netherlands. Attorney Arno van Kessel's arrest occurred one month before his trial against Bill Gates, allegedly in a "Gestapo reminiscent late night arrest." Van Kessel was set to lead a major lawsuit against Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Borla, and former WEF chair Klaus Schwab over COVID policies and vaccine injuries. He was arrested in a military-style raid and jailed without charges. Grock reported that Van Kessel was arrested on June 11, 2025, by Dutch special forces, blindfolded, and detained in Vought Prison on suspicious suspicions of anti-institutional activities and potential violence. His imprisonment was extended ninety days without formal charges. The timing of the arrest, a month before his lawsuit against Gates, Borla, and Schwab over vaccine injuries, suggests possible suppression, though officials cite security risks. The July 9 trial proceeded with a co-lawyer, Peter Stassen.