reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on U.S. involvement in biological research in Ukraine amidst accusations from Russia. A U.S. official claimed that any biological or chemical weapon incidents would be attributed to Russia, which has been accused of using disinformation tactics. The conversation reveals that the U.S. has funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, which study dangerous pathogens. Despite denials from U.S. officials about developing biological weapons, there are concerns about the security of these materials in a conflict zone. The Chinese government has called for inspections of these facilities, highlighting international concerns about biological safety. The need for transparency and accountability regarding U.S. actions in Ukraine is emphasized, as the situation remains precarious.

In Ukraine, there were military biological programs experimenting with deadly pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. They are now trying to hide the evidence, but we believe they were creating components for a biological weapon. This poses a direct threat to Russia's safety. Ukraine and their US supporters rejected these claims, but their actions were bold and brazen.

Independent cybersecurity experts have confirmed that Hunter Biden financed biological laboratories in Ukraine. Russian officials claim these labs were producing biochemical weapons at the request of the "Biden crime syndicate," and Moscow demands that Biden explain his son's involvement. According to Russian officials, the "Kyiv regime" is engaged in military biological programs financed by the U.S. Department of Defense. Hunter Biden's firm, Rosemont Seneca, invested $500,000 in Metabiota, a San Francisco pathogen research company working in Ukraine, and secured an additional $1,000,000 in funding through other firms. Metabiota is a subcontractor for the Department of Defense's engineering firm, Black and Veatch. Government funding records allegedly show the Department of Defense awarded $370,000 to Bio Labs in Ukraine for COVID-19 research in November 2019, before the WHO officially named the virus.

The video claims that the conflict in Ukraine is a result of the US protecting its military labs conducting biological experiments. It suggests that Ukraine is controlled by the deep state and that President Zelensky is a puppet. The video alleges that these labs may have played a role in creating COVID-19. It also implicates Joe Biden and his son Hunter in the corruption surrounding these labs. The video highlights leaked phone calls and admissions from the US State Department confirming the existence of bioweapons labs in Ukraine. It accuses the US government of financing these labs and warns of the dangers they pose. The video concludes by blaming the US government for the conflict and calling for justice.

The speaker claims the original plan to eliminate older generations with a bioweapon failed due to incorrect tuning. They connect the arrest of Harvard professor Charles Lieber in 2019 for possessing nanobot technology to China's alleged attempt to steal this technology for bioweapon tuning. To protect the technology from China, it was supposedly redeployed to Ukraine. The speaker highlights that Pfizer was late in developing its COVID vaccine. They allege Pfizer used SV40, a cancer-causing agent, in their vaccine design, then attempted to remove the evidence before FDA approval. The speaker links this to the Cutter incident involving polio vaccines during FDR's presidency. They question how a monkey virus from the 1950s appears in COVID vaccines 75 years later, suggesting malice. The speaker recalls discussing two Pfizer patents in 2021, suspecting SV40 would be used in a vaccine, most likely Pfizer's.

To be. So I think we took everything offshore because it got gain of function got banned in The US, but I don't think we banned it. There were something like 36 bio weapons labs in Ukraine of US origin. So why is Ukraine perfect? Ukraine's perfect. To run a bioweapons lab, you need first world infrastructure and third world people to test shit on. Ukraine's pretty much got that, right? Fauci, for example, in The United States, when he had to do clinical trials, one of his lower rank they'd go to foster care. They would do clinical trials on foster children. You got to read Kennedy's book. He did an estimate they used an estimate of 13,000, 14,000 foster kids to do clinical trials. They said the kids would figure out they're getting sick and they wouldn't want to take the meds. Five gs has been been doing damage to people and killing people for many, many years.

Over a year ago, we knew about the biolabs, their experiments, and related documents. It started in 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency, which created the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with Nathaniel Wolf, later Meta Biota. Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm headed by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr., funded Meta Biota. This is a corrupt operation developed over the last decade to generate biological warfare against the Russians. They've been collecting DNA from Slavic people. General Igor Krylyov exposed this as a war crime because it violates the biological weapons agreement. America's 30 biolabs in Ukraine experimented on animal-to-human transmission, which is the origin of COVID-19. The research conducted in Ukraine will be directly connected to COVID-19. The United States created and opened this Pandora's box.

Four days ago, I wouldn't have believed the Biden administration was funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but Under Secretary of State Nuland confirmed their existence during a Senate hearing. Despite fact-checks dismissing it as Russian disinformation, these labs are real, and Nuland expressed concern about their contents falling into Russian hands. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed the labs were developing military biological programs with US funding, possibly involving deadly pathogens like plague and anthrax. The US embassy in Ukraine has a web page explaining that American and Ukrainian scientists have worked on a whole bunch of different experiments like this. The US government is downplaying the situation, with the Pentagon calling Russian accusations "absurd."

I hide my face due to my job. For almost a year, my team has gathered evidence on secret US labs in Ukraine, suspected by the Russian interior ministry of testing biological weapons. When the Ukrainian army retreated, we tried but failed to remove all materials. Investigators found evidence of deadly viruses and patient test paperwork in the abandoned lab. We don't know how many centers have been established in Ukraine over the past eight years, but the Russian military has found signs of them in most liberated major settlements. Many people worldwide are trying to find out who created this bioweapons factory network, how long it has operated, where, and how many deaths it's responsible for.

Oliver Stone reveals that the US has biological research facilities in Ukraine, which Bill Maher was unaware of. Stone suggests that the possibility of a lab leak in Ukraine is more likely than the theory of bats being the source of the pandemic. He questions the purpose of these American labs and wonders if they were involved in developing various types of research, including agriculture. Stone mentions that the information about these labs has been concealed, and he speculates whether they were involved in creating anthrax or other unknown substances. Additionally, he expresses surprise that Maher is unaware of this information. Ukraine has biological research facilities that are of concern due to the potential risk of Russian forces gaining control of the research materials.

Speaker 0 argues that the war is really about dark weapons, especially bioweapons, and focuses on labs near the Russian border that have moved from about 11 labs a decade ago to 30. He traces this back to President Obama, then Senator Obama in 2005, suggesting a long-running history that underpins current events. He contends there is substantial history to unpack and believes the investigation is worthwhile for understanding the situation. He notes that Gareth has long discussed American bio labs in Ukraine and acknowledges that people ridiculed that view in the past. He asks Gareth how he feels now that the topic is suddenly front and center in the news, suggesting a sense of vindication that the broader group knowledge is being disseminated. He claims to have an example in Andrew Weber, who worked with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, showing Obama, when he was a young senator in 2005, a vial of anthrax in Kyiv at a bio lab. Speaker 0 states that the claim there are no bioweapons in Ukraine is hard to believe, and asserts that people would not look at the evidence. He says it took a war for people to realize the situation and compares it to a Cuban missile crisis for Putin, arguing that as weapons get closer, the plans become more concrete and closer to execution. He emphasizes the proximity of weapons and labs to Russia’s border as a critical element, implying that the risk profile has increased over time. He frames the current conflict as one where the existence and proximity of bioweapons labs are central, and he uses the example of a 2005 scene involving Obama and a vial of anthrax to illustrate what he views as established evidence. Overall, he presents a narrative that the war reflects long-standing concerns about bioweapons labs in Ukraine and their strategic implications, culminating in a perception shift only after war began.

The investment fund Rosemont Seneca, headed by Hunter Biden, is linked to the bio labs in Ukraine. The Russian Defense Ministry also implicates George Soros' Open Society Institute, the Ministry of Defense and Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction. Rosemont Seneca is connected to MetaBioData and Black and Veatch, major suppliers of Pentagon Bio Lab Materials. Moscow claims these labs are associated with nuclear missile-related institutions and research organizations. The US denies these allegations, stating the labs are for research purposes. Ukraine acknowledges the existence of the labs and is collaborating with the US to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has made serious allegations against the US regarding the production of biological weapons in Ukraine. They claim that the US violated the Bioweapons Convention by using dual-use research to create bioweapons under the guise of defensive research. Russia also accuses the US of failing to implement measures to detect and regulate bioweapon production. The allegations involve government entities, non-government organizations, and big pharma companies. The Russian military claims that the US Democrat Party, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros, were the main ideologists behind this plot. They allege that money was funneled through non-government organizations to bio labs in Ukraine, which created biological weapons. These weapons were then used by big pharma companies to develop vaccines and treatments, ensuring profits and political power for the US Democrat Party. The allegations have been submitted to the UN.

Hunter Biden's involvement in financing biological laboratories in Ukraine has been confirmed by independent cybersecurity experts. Russian officials claim that these labs were producing biochemical weapons at the request of the Biden crime syndicate. They have called on Joe Biden to explain his son's connection to these labs. Hunter's firm, Rosemont Seneca, invested $500,000 in a San Francisco pathogen research company, Metabayara, which was working in Ukraine. Metabayara is a subcontractor for the Department of Defense's engineering firm, Black and Veatch. Government funding records show that the Department of Defense awarded $370,000 to Bio Labs in Ukraine for COVID-19 research in November 2019, three months before the virus was officially named by the WHO. This raises questions about the early funding of coronavirus research and the existence of these labs.

We were aware of the biolabs and their experiments over a year ago, tracing back to 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency's creation of the Global Viral Forecasting Institute, linked to Nathaniel Wolf. This evolved into Meta Biota, funded by Rosemont Fonseca, associated with Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr. This network suggests a corrupt operation under the Obama and Biden administrations aimed at developing biological warfare against Russia, including collecting DNA from Slavic populations. General Igor Krylyov has revealed evidence of war crimes, indicating that the U.S. operated 30 bio labs in Ukraine, conducting experiments related to animal-to-human transmission, which connects to the origins of COVID-19. This research exposes significant violations of international agreements on biological and chemical weapons.

The U.S. intelligence community has officially opened an investigation into more than 120 U.S. taxpayer-funded biological laboratories operating overseas, including 40 in Ukraine. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the probe aims to identify where the labs are located, what pathogens they contain, and what research is being conducted. Gabbard has previously accused officials of misleading the public about the existence and scope of U.S.-backed bio labs overseas, including claims tying the issue to the Biden administration and figures such as Anthony Fauci. The discussion references claims made during the Biden administration by Victoria Nuland, who admitted bio labs are in Ukraine and funded by the United States but said they were only for defensive research, while dismissing accusations as Russian disinformation. Questions are raised about claims of Russian findings, including reported COVID vaccine samples in labs during Russia’s takeover of territory, and claims of AIDS research on Ukrainian military personnel. Senator asks Ukraine-specific questions about chemical or biological weapons and whether there is doubt that any biological or chemical incident in Ukraine would be carried out by Russians. Ukraine is described as having biological research facilities, with concern that Russian troops may seek control of research materials, and statements that efforts are underway with Ukrainians to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands. The exchange asserts that Russian propaganda blames Ukrainians for plots involving biological weapons and coordination with NATO, and that it is “classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves.” Doctor Merrill Nass, a biological warfare epidemiologist and author, says it is notable that the government acknowledges such facilities, including about 40 in Ukraine and over 100 elsewhere, and adds that many countries have studied biological weapons agents, treatments, and vaccines since at least World War II. Nass argues that the law prohibits developing biological weapons and references the Biological Weapons Convention, noting that the treaty has no enforcement mechanism, and that there is no way to send teams to investigate other countries’ labs. He suggests there have been roadblocks to obtaining details, and that labs outside the United States reduce oversight. The conversation also discusses the idea of incentives and loopholes: Nass states that the U.S. has no legal control over private labs and that, in the U.S., it is possible to build high-containment laboratories and have scientists create whatever they like without a prohibition. Nass describes historical U.S. development and stockpiling of biological weapons agents, mentions evasion of antibiotics and vaccines, and argues that international restrictions do not prevent potential development efforts elsewhere. Nass says that specific biological weapon use is not known to have occurred within the United States except that “the potential exception of COVID,” asserting the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine should never have been developed “the way it was developed for COVID” because it included “the most toxic, problematic parts” of the virus. He also recalls work as a consultant to the Cuban Ministry of Health in 1993 regarding illness attributed to cyanide poisoning, describes reports that the CIA sent African swine fever virus to Cuba through Panama to dissidents, and notes that Cuba reportedly had to kill half a million pigs due to that outbreak. When asked whether researchers can be controlled and whether answers will emerge about roughly 120 labs, Nass says accountability and oversight are limited, citing a senate hearing where senators said the intelligence community is not under anyone’s control and is not accountable. He adds that if answers cannot be obtained in the U.S., they would not likely be obtained in other countries. Nass argues that lab-produced viruses could be distinguished from naturally occurring ones by analyzing genomes, describing prior work on reconstructing an epidemic and claiming that attention to whether viral genomes are natural or unnatural will enable future differentiation. He notes that he believes the risk of severe consequences reduces the likelihood of use. The segment ends with plans to bring Nass back as the investigation unfolds.

Real Smoke discusses the presence of bio labs in Ukraine and the false claim that Ukraine was developing biological weapons with US assistance. However, the US has been supporting Ukrainian bio labs to strengthen public health measures, and both countries have pledged to never produce or use biological weapons. The conversation also touches on the origins of the COVID-19 virus, with some arguing it came from a wet market while others believe it originated from a lab in China. The discussion highlights the political divide surrounding this topic.

COVID-19 had telltale signs of being made in a laboratory from the beginning. The CIA has stated the virus came from a lab, but what they didn't say is that it was almost surely made in a US laboratory, possibly at the University of North Carolina, and may have been tested in a Chinese laboratory. The Biden administration hid this. One theory is that US scientists wanted to test the virus on a specific bat population in the Wuhan facility. The FBI should crack the case, as it is an inside US job. The University of North Carolina is withholding 2019 emails and fighting to keep them from public scrutiny. There is reason to believe that Tony Fauci funded reckless, dangerous research that went awry.

The discussion centers on long-simmering claims about CIA programs from the mid-20th century and how those programs may have evolved into present-day operations, with a focus on secrecy, biowarfare, mind-control concepts, and weather- or environment-related tech. The participants reference recently republished unclassified CIA documents on Project Artichoke, described as a Cold War-era mind-control operation that involved injecting and using various drugs to control individuals. They connect Artichoke and MKUltra to a broader history of behavioral science programs, suggesting that the CIA has pursued mind-control and related technologies since its inception in 1947-1948, often under plausible deniability and without public accountability. The conversation broadens to contemporary concerns, notably CIA-linked biolabs in Ukraine. The speakers note that, during the Ukraine conflict, there were “CIA collaborative bioweapons labs scattered across Ukraine,” and that Victoria Nuland testified before Congress about such labs, implying that their existence is not new but ongoing. They recount an NBC News on-camera moment in Kyiv that was later understood to involve burning documents at a lab, rather than a Russian attack, as evidence of covert activity. The implication is that clandestine programs persist and have become more sophisticated than the original Artichoke/MKUltra programs. Dr. Merrill Nass describes the historical development of these programs, linking them to the post-World War II Paperclip era and the involvement of German scientists who worked on chemical warfare and mind control. He references attempts to create Manchurian candidates, multiple personality experimental concepts, and drug testing in various settings, including “safe houses” for blackmail and testing under extreme conditions. Nass also discusses Project SHAD (shipboard exposure of naval personnel to biological and chemical agents) and Operation White Coat (the Vietnam-era program using Seventh-day Adventists as human guinea pigs for chemical and biological testing). He notes the ethical and legal questions surrounding these programs, including cases where vaccines or illnesses were used in non-soldier populations and the long-term health effects. Kevin Ship, a CIA whistleblower who spent 17 years at the agency, emphasizes that the CIA has not changed its core goals or organizational behavior. He argues the CIA remains a “global juggernaut” with “billions of dollars” in off-the-books programs, continuing mind-control and behavioral science efforts, now employing more advanced technologies such as directed energy weapons and potentially telecommunication-like mechanisms (including insinuations about nanotech-based or electromagnetic methods). He maintains that the agency’s secrecy is so profound that it can operate independently of Congressional oversight or presidential intercession, with “upper level compartments” or an supra group within the CIA that conducts programs unknown to the President or Congress. The speakers discuss the possibility of modern-day applications, including “graphene oxide” or nanotech-based methods that could enable clandestine communication or “telepathy” for intelligence purposes, and weather-modification or geoengineering as a tool of strategic influence. They reference public figures such as John Brennan discussing strategic aerosol injection and geoengineering, which they present as evidence of the CIA’s ongoing interest in manipulating the environment for national security and warfare aims. The broader theme is that clandestine, off-the-books programs persist, adapt, and may operate under layers of compartmentalization that obscure their existence from public scrutiny. Towards the end, Nass highlights broader existential concerns beyond bioweapons, such as ecological disruptions, pollinator declines, insect and bird losses, and potential impacts on food security. He connects these concerns to possible geoengineering and electromagnetic field applications, suggesting that the combination of environmental manipulation and surveillance technologies could have far-reaching, harmful consequences for society. The conversation closes with references to the authors’ and speakers’ work: Nass’s Substack, Doortofreedom.org, and sofaf.org; Ship’s Twilight of the Shadow Government and his X (formerly Twitter) presence for ongoing updates.

Join us as we discuss a significant story involving U.S. government disinformation regarding biological labs in Ukraine. Victoria Nuland's Senate testimony raised concerns about dangerous labs in Ukraine, contradicting the narrative that these claims are false. Journalists often rely on government denials without investigating the truth, which undermines credible reporting. The government has a history of misleading the public, as seen with the anthrax attacks and the manipulation of the coronavirus. The choice of Ukraine for such research raises questions, especially given its medical infrastructure and the U.S.'s long-standing involvement in the region. This situation warrants scrutiny regarding U.S. intentions and actions in Ukraine. Thank you for joining the conversation.

Adrenochrome is described as a chemical compound produced in the human body when adrenaline oxidizes. It is claimed to cause a high related to the adrenaline flowing through the body, and a syringe is said to extract adrenochrome from the base of the neck or spinal column. A human victim purportedly produces only around 10 of adrenochrome, and after collection the drug is said to be sold on the deep black market and dark web at exorbitant prices. Speaker 1 adds that adrenochrome is created by the pineal gland when a person is fearing for their life, and it is said to stop or slow aging; if use stops, the person allegedly rapidly ages to their expected age or worse. It is described as very popular in elite Illuminati circles, with the cabal believing children are the best source for the highest potency adrenochrome—the younger the better, since potency declines with age. It is claimed to be the most expensive drug in the world and very rare, affordable only to the richest, including celebrities and billionaires. Speaker 0 notes that blood sacrifice has long been part of many cultures’ rituals, and that consuming fresh adrenaline-saturated blood from a terrified victim would produce a high, including increased senses, hallucinations, and euphoria, sometimes leading to supernatural attributions. The timing is said to be perfected so the victim is killed at the moment of maximum adrenaline, with knowledge passed down through secret societies and satanic cults. Speaker 2 explains that torturing children increases endomorphins, and Satanists who drink the blood experience a chemical high from the blood of a tortured victim. Speaker 3 states that these entities feed off human energy; during sacrifice, satanists and bloodlines drink the blood because adrenaline in the blood provides a high, and energetically, the entities feed off terror and fear. Speaker 0 adds that many satanic sacrifices include blood and possibly body parts, with a claimed preference for children’s blood due to potency, and that some elites drink it for known rejuvenating effects. Speaker 4 claims that drinking adrenalized children’s blood is an antiaging device, and that adrenalyzed blood from torture and killing is doubly effective; bone marrow from children is also harvested for antiaging. This is presented as a historic and ongoing practice. Speaker 0: today, many satanic elites are addicted to drinking adrenalized blood. Speaker 4 adds that any tortured animal at death secretes this adrenalchrome, making it a drug; users believe it confers increased power. Speaker 5 notes survivors attest to satanic rituals involving adrenalized blood and a high from adrenaline. Speaker 6 shifts to a broader conspiracy, alleging 26 CIA bio labs in Ukraine, with two-thirds not for dangerous pathogen work but as a hub of adrenochrome production. Ukraine is described as a major producer of adrenochrome and a large source of human trafficking. The claim extends to US-funded bio labs and the synthetic form of adrenochrome, allegedly cut with fentanyl. The speaker frames it as a cover-up involving global elites profiting trillions, linking human trafficking, torture, and adrenochrome production, tied to Ukraine’s supposed corruption and secrecy. Overall, the transcript connects adrenochrome to elite consumption, antiaging claims, ritual sacrifice, child victims, and a conspiratorial geopolitical narrative involving Ukraine and CIA labs, with ties to trafficking, drug adulteration with fentanyl, and systemic corruption. The original form is described as originating in torture, mostly of small children.

Russia released evidence linking Hunter Biden's investment fund to funding Ukrainian biolabs, where untested drugs were allegedly used on soldiers. The US is said to conduct such activities abroad due to legal restrictions at home. Ukraine's labs receive US funding for research on pathogens, but they are owned and operated by Ukraine and are part of a program to prevent deadly outbreaks. (Translation: Russia claims Hunter Biden's fund financed Ukrainian biolabs where untested drugs were used on soldiers. US conducts such activities abroad due to legal restrictions. Ukrainian labs receive US funding for pathogen research as part of outbreak prevention program.)

Metabiotas founder Nathan Wolf has affiliations with EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA's Defense Science Research Council. He has been associated with individuals like Jeffrey Epstein and Boris Nikolic, who was Epstein's successor executor. Claims have been made by Russia about the Pentagon having over 30 biolabs in Ukraine, while China claims to operate 336 biolabs in 30 countries. Some members of the US government dismiss these claims as a Russian conspiracy and anticipate a false flag attack from Russia. When asked about the possibility of a biological or chemical attack in Ukraine, it is believed by one speaker that the Russians would be responsible.

Over a year ago, we discovered the existence of bio labs and their experiments, along with documents and contractors involved. The Defense Intelligence Agency initiated the Global Viral Forecasting Institute in 2005, which later became Meta Biota. This organization received funding from Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm led by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr. These connections reveal a corrupt operation developed by the West under Obama and Biden, aiming to create DNA biological chemical warfare against Russia. General Igor Krylyov's findings expose a violation of the global biological chemical weapons agreement, as America's 30 bio labs in Ukraine conducted animal to human transmission experiments, likely contributing to the origin of COVID-19. This reveals a Pandora's box created by the United States.