reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kamala Harris allegedly spent $1 billion of FEMA money on housing for illegal migrants, including gift cards and luxury hotels, while veterans sleep on the streets. The speaker claims this occurred as a hurricane impacted North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee, Florida, and Virginia, and the Harris-Biden administration claimed to have no money for disaster relief because it was spent on illegal migrants. The speaker alleges the administration is trying to get illegal immigrants to vote for them.

A California neighborhood with houses around $800-900,000 is facing issues due to homeless encampments. Residents can no longer allow children to ride bikes or walk dogs because the sidewalks are blocked. The encampments are unsanitary, with people defecating in the streets. Propane tanks used in the encampments have caused fires. Residents say the city has ignored repeated complaints. They believe the situation would be different if the encampments were in the neighborhoods of politicians like Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi, or Mayor Karen Bass. The encampments are growing, and residents want their neighborhood back.

A city built over a hundred tiny homes, each fitting a bed and a bit more, to house homeless people. However, drug dealers then stormed the area, leading to open-air drug dealing, increased crime, robberies, looting, and homeless camps. The tiny homes are allegedly not helping and are hurting the neighborhood. The owners of these tiny homes are charging $150 a night. The city pays this amount to a corporation for each homeless person to live there. Drug dealing is allegedly being done from the tiny homes. Nonprofits operating the tiny homes are paid by the city for everything they do and are making a lot of money.

Politicians are not equipped to solve problems, as evidenced by the alleged disappearance of $24 billion earmarked for homeless aid in California. The homelessness issue was created by politicians and environmentalists who resisted growth, leading to insufficient housing and increased living costs. Wages have not kept pace with rising rents, resulting in economic homelessness. The speaker asserts that doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results is insanity, which is what is happening now. The city and state are unable to manage the situation. As an example, the speaker cited homeless veterans camping outside the Veterans Administration in Westwood. The speaker donated money to build small houses for them, demonstrating that solutions are possible with the will to act. They built homes for 25 people within two months, proving that progress is achievable.

The speakers claim California, the world's fourth-largest economy, smells like urine and weed, and is in a state of squalor. Despite four tax increases in the last decade to address homelessness, totaling $38 billion, the problem has worsened. One speaker suggests the incentives are to perpetuate homelessness. One speaker claims Gavin Newsom promised to fix the homeless problem decades ago when he was mayor of San Francisco. A gubernatorial candidate, Steve, is introduced. Steve interviews homeless individuals who state that no one is helping them. One individual claims that when Biden was in office, illegal immigrants were brought to the area and then disappeared, and that funds meant for the homeless went to them. He also states that despite increased spending, there are more people on the street. He expresses his support for Trump.

The speaker states that Portland, Oregon has spent over $1.5 billion in the past two years on homelessness, and during that same period the homeless population has risen by 60%. In contrast, Houston, Texas is described as having spent a small fraction of that amount on homelessness and managed to reduce their homeless population by 60%. The speaker expresses a strong opinion that state government is at least incompetent and likely corrupt, but notes that there will still be Oregonians who vote yes to raise taxes and give them more money.

So we're in the Pacific Palisades, 12 people and over 6,000 homes and buildings. All gone. And that's thanks to you, Gavin Newscom. Greens, the devil lives in California. He a politician. Keep passing bills that bring chaos and division. Yeah, the devil lives in California. Should be in prison. He got horns, but he tries to keep them hidden because the devil is a Democrat. And we don't play that. They say that. They love America. We know it ain't devil is a democrat. That's a wrap, it ain't news. And the way they treat America is proof. I swear the devil lives in California, $100 bills. He knows everyone at Hollywood and parties in the hills. Give you everything you ever wanted plus a cup of mail for your soul and your vote is a deal. Because the devil is a Democrat. And we don't

The transcript asserts that the government can provide funding to a so called nonprofit with very few controls, and that there is no auditing subsequently of that nonprofit. It emphasizes that with the 1,900,000,000.0 to Stacey Abrams, those involved “give themselves extremely lavish, like, salaries, expense everything” and that the nonprofit is used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things” and to “live like kings and queens” within the tax paradigm. The speaker reiterates that this pattern is not isolated to a single instance but is happening at scale. It is described as not being limited to one or two cases but as something being seen “everywhere.” Key points highlighted include: - Government funding to nonprofits occurs with very few controls. - There is an absence of auditing of the recipient nonprofit after the funding is provided. - A substantial amount, specifically 1,900,000,000.0, is directed to a high-profile figure identified as Stacey Abrams. - The recipients are portrayed as granting themselves lavish salaries, paying for expenses, and purchasing luxury assets such as jets and homes. - The overall implication is that funds are used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things,” leading to a lifestyle described as living “like kings and queens” within the tax framework. - The speaker stresses that this phenomenon is not isolated but is happening at scale, with examples seen “everywhere.” The speaker’s framing centers on alleged governance and accountability failures in nonprofit funding, pointing to large sums of money directed to an individual and the perceived use of nonprofit resources for personal luxury. The emphasis is on the scale of the practice and the lack of oversight, suggesting systemic repetition rather than isolated incidents.

California government is spending $837,000 per tiny home for the homeless, way more than the $25100 retail price. With a $73 billion deficit, they could have housed all 160,000 homeless for much less. Residents should focus on local government corruption rather than the presidential race.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

In 2008, Gavin Newsom promised to end homelessness in San Francisco within 10 years. He believed that food, shelters, and housing were the solutions to hunger, sleep, and homelessness respectively. However, today, California is home to one third of all homeless people in the United States.

Riots erupted in Los Angeles against ICE efforts to apprehend illegal aliens and employers. Karen Bass sided with protesters, while Gavin Newsom called ICE's actions "chaotic" and "reckless," claiming they were enforcing an arbitrary deportation quota. The speaker argues that with 12,000,000 people entering the country illegally, deportation is not a quota but an effort to stop an invasion. A CBS poll showed 54% of Americans favor continued deportations. The speaker criticizes Newsom for not intervening to stop the violence, drawing parallels to the 2020 riots. The speaker questions Bass and Newsom's stance on the 12,000,000 people residing illegally amid a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit. The speaker also questions the Mexican government's position, suggesting taxing remittances. The speaker concludes Newsom ruined his chances as a national candidate by siding with those committing violence.

The speaker asserts that last year California spent $9.6 billion on health care for illegal immigrants. They claim the media has misled people by saying that no federal dollars go to undocumented immigrants, stating that this is fundamentally wrong. The speaker points to Governor Newsom, who allegedly announced that California is the first state in the nation to provide health care to illegal immigrants. They also claim that San Francisco operates the only universal health care plan in America for all undocumented residents, expressing pride in that status. According to the speaker, a key mechanism behind federal funding for care provided to undocumented individuals is the expansion of medical access through emergency departments. They contend that emergency departments are backfilled and funded at a rate of one dollar from the federal government. The implication is that any time an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room, federal dollars are brought in to cover or support that care, effectively meaning there are federal dollars being spent on illegal immigrants. The speaker asserts that the statement that there are no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants is a lie, arguing that California is facilitating this funding. They also claim that the media is lying about this issue as well. Throughout the statement, the overarching themes are the existence of substantial state spending on undocumented health care, the involvement of federal funding through emergency department backfill, and the portrayal of these facts as being misrepresented by the media. In summary, the speaker emphasizes four main points: (1) California’s reported $9.6 billion expenditure on health care for undocumented immigrants, (2) Governor Newsom’s assertion that California is leading the nation in providing health care to illegal immigrants, (3) San Francisco’s universal health care plan for all undocumented residents, and (4) the mechanism by which emergency department funding from the federal government allegedly backfills care for undocumented individuals, leading to federal dollars being spent on them. The speaker concludes by asserting that the claim of no federal dollars supporting illegal immigrants is false and accuses the media of lying.

The transcript presents a long-form exposé-style investigation into what the speakers describe as widespread fraud in California’s caregiving sectors, focusing on hospice, home health care, and daycares, with emphasis on Los Angeles and Van Nuys. - Opening claim and context: - Speaker 0 asks why there is a thousand percent increase in hospice care in Los Angeles and whether paperwork exists to enroll a child named Joey. They claim California has the largest fraud risk, with Medi-Cal spending rising from 2022 to 2026 (from $108 billion to a proposed $222 billion) while population growth hasn’t matched spending growth. They allege “one out of every $10 of home health care in America is spent in Los Angeles.” They argue government-funded daycare programs are “filled with violations,” and that fraud could be “hundreds of billions of dollars.” - Daycare fraud focus: - The video claims daycares are used to receive government money (CalWORKS) by enrolling children on paper while not having real enrollments. They show various locations and describe conditions as suspicious or unsafe (graffiti, boarded-up buildings, dumpsters, a homeless person near a daycare). - Medina Learning Center is described as “now enrolling,” with “as their backup facility, the UMI Learning Center,” which was “convicted in federal court in 2024 of having a 150 ghost kids.” They seek paperwork to enroll a child named Joey. - Hayden Sarah Family Child Care is described as having “14 children enrolled” per state records but “zero present” when inspectors arrived; the facility roster and missing children records are cited as violations. - Jama Shukri Family Childcare is described as a daycare located in an apartment building (one-bedroom, eight capacity) with two children outside and no adult visible, raising concerns about supervision. - The video notes California allocates $6 billion to childcare, “over 39,000 facilities,” with a state audit error rate of 1.6%, and conservative estimates suggest “upwards of a $100,000,000 in fraud lost each and every single year.” - A recurring theme is “shell registrations” and unregistered CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) entities; seven of the four entities shown have “zero SMS data,” implying shell companies or fraud networks possibly connected to Armenian/Russian gangs. - Hospice and home health care fraud focus: - The group shifts to Van Nuys, California, claiming “home health care and hospice fraud” is pervasive there; they assert “one out of every $10 that goes towards home health care in the United States goes to a business here in LA.” They visit numerous hospice centers in a single plaza, naming Gardens of Angels Hospice and Blossom Hospice as examples of high billing with few services performed (e.g., Gardens of Angels: “billed $4,800,000 per beneficiary,” “$5,807 per claim,” 28.6 claims per patient, only two codes). Blossom Hospice is described as “$3,400,000” billed with “$927 per claim,” again with only one code and minimal services. - They claim “seven of the four entities have zero SMS data” and label some facilities as shell registrations; some locations appear “registering for hospice but not actually providing care,” with claims of “shell buildings” or storefronts that are empty or only used for billing. - The video notes the presence of luxury cars at these sites (Mercedes, Teslas, BMWs, a Cybertruck) and references a pattern of wealthy vehicles associated with hospice sites, suggesting profits from taxpayers’ dollars. - Miracle Healing Hospice is described as having billed $1,300,000 in 2023 with 38 beneficiaries: “$32,000 per beneficiary,” but the location was reported as an empty building when visited. - The presenters also describe finding a location that “received $19,000,000” over the past years for Healthy Life Adult Daycare, yet the building appears dilapidated and shows no adults present during visits. Phone lines and mailboxes are reported as failing to provide information or contacts. - Interviews and expert commentary: - A professional in the medical industry is interviewed to explain how fraud could occur: someone could obtain a Medicare number and use it to bill Medicare for hospice services; fraudsters reportedly can open a hospice license without being a physician, then bill the system and receive payments quickly. - The interview suggests Medicare numbers can be stolen or purchased; the speaker emphasizes that “anybody can get a hospice license,” and that the process enables easy billings to Medicare/Medicaid. - A participant describes a trend of these facilities opening and billing, with the implication that people exploit the system for swift returns. - Overall framing and conclusions presented: - The speakers argue that there is a thousand percent increase in hospice openings in California, a surge in fraudulent activity across daycares and hospice/hom e health facilities, and that tax dollars are funding these entities with little-to-no accountability. They juxtapose luxury cars and upscale appearances with empty or non-operational facilities to illustrate alleged misappropriation of funds. They advocate scrutiny, data-backed investigation, and accountability for what they describe as widespread fraud affecting taxpayers and vulnerable populations. - Closing sentiments: - The narrative closes with a call to action against fraud, emphasizing the impact on ordinary Americans who face rising costs and debt, and claiming that exposing fraud is essential to protecting taxpayer dollars and national financial health.

The speaker describes spending in Los Angeles on homelessness, stating that last year $13,000,000,000 was used to combat homelessness in the city. They claim that this money went to “these trash nonprofits” where “a bunch of executives” earn “half a $1,000,000 a year.” The speaker asserts, “You’re working for a nonprofit dealing with homelessness. That’s my money. That’s my parents’ money.” They emphasize that hardworking people of California pay incredibly high taxes that fund this through the claimed expenditures. The speaker connects this spending to the broader political perspective by saying they are sick of it and describe their experience on the ground in California as causing them to question a lot about left-wing ideology.

The speaker states that the city of Portland, Oregon has spent over $1,500,000,000 in the past two years on homelessness, and that the homeless population has risen by 60%. In contrast, Houston, Texas, a significantly larger city, has spent a small fraction of that amount on homelessness and managed to reduce their homeless population by 60% in the same period. The speaker expresses ongoing astonishment that information points to the state government as at least incompetent, and likely corrupt, but asserts that there will still be Oregonians who vote yes to raise taxes and give them more money.

Joe Biden is purportedly in Delaware, sleeping in one of his many estates. The speaker questions how Biden, a politician, acquired so many houses. Kamala Harris is said to be in San Francisco, a city the speaker claims she has totally destroyed, at a fundraiser.

A taxpayer complains about the waste of their money by an unnamed individual. They claim $24 billion was spent on the homeless population, but it remained at 181,000. Another $5 billion was allegedly spent on water storage, yet there was no water during state fires. The speaker also claims $14.4 billion was spent on a high-speed railroad, with only 22 miles prepped and zero miles of track laid. Furthermore, they allege $105,000 of taxpayer money was used for billboards in red states advertising California as an abortion sanctuary, and $44 million was allocated to uninsured abortions. The speaker asserts that despite spending almost $50 billion, the homeless population grew, there is no water, and there is no high-speed train. They also claim property burned due to lack of water, and the individual is trying to buy it for pennies on the dollar for low-income housing.

In Downtown LA Skid Row, the speaker discusses the homeless situation, stating that in 2023, Gavin Newsom allocated $750,000,000 for tiny homes, and in 02/2019, $24,000,000,000 was designated for the homeless, but the money is unaccounted for. The speaker mentions Nancy Pelosi, who has served since 02/2007 and has a net worth over $120,000,000, and Maxine Waters, serving since 1990 with a net worth over $10,000,000. Gavin Newsom is reportedly building a $9,000,000 home in San Francisco. The speaker claims California's leaders have failed the people of Los Angeles and California, and that over 66,000,000 people have left California in recent years. The speaker criticizes Newsom for hosting a podcast and suggests he may be planning a presidential run in 2028.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

After being appointed to the budget committee, the speaker uncovered that Newsom's January budget, claimed to be modestly balanced, actually had a $10-12 billion deficit. The speaker pinpointed that free healthcare handouts to illegal immigrants at state taxpayer expense were driving the deficit, costing $10 billion with no federal reimbursements, contrary to claims of $6 billion with reimbursements. After being warned to be quiet, the speaker exposed money laundering in the second meeting, identifying contracts and grants used to fund 73 far-left wing groups through COVID-19 projects. Following this, the speaker was removed from the budget committee. Since then, the speaker has been running a "Doge California" program, uncovering billions in wasteful spending and posting clips to social media.

There is a "homeless industrial complex" where thousands of people make millions of dollars off the homeless. Fixing homelessness would cause these people and businesses to lose funding. Lobbyists, special interests, and legislators are in a special interest relationship, with kickbacks and free trips, that keeps the problem going. They can't solve homelessness, or they won't be able to launder taxpayer money back into businesses and organizations that are supposed to be helping. The people who own those businesses are not in favor of the speaker becoming governor.

I believe I've uncovered a significant money laundering scheme in California related to homelessness. Recently, $24 billion intended for addressing homelessness has gone missing, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria has been making questionable public housing deals. For instance, $145 million for 407 units and $150 million for 270 units seem excessive and ineffective. A recurring entity in these projects is the Chelsea Investment Corporation, which claims to focus on affordable housing but is based in the Cayman Islands. Their California headquarters is owned by a shell company linked to them. Notably, this property’s value skyrocketed from $3 million in 2016 to $68.7 million in 2023, with financing from the San Diego Housing Authority. This raises serious concerns about potential money laundering activities. There’s definitely something suspicious happening here.

The transcript presents a speaker arguing that Gavin Newsom’s welfare fraud problems are far worse than those attributed to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and that the liberal media is not addressing these issues. The speaker states that Newsom “allowed $30,000,000,000 in fraudulent welfare payments to be issued by the unemployment agency,” and that as a result, small businesses in California must pay off all of that debt through higher payroll taxes. The speaker contrasts this with Walz, who is “accused of allowing $250,000,000 of food stamp fraud to occur to Somali organizations.” The speaker asserts that Newsom’s food stamp fraud is at a multi-billion-dollar level and claims Newsom’s food stamp fraud rate is “thirteen point four percent,” describing it as “three out of every 20 benefits managed by Newsom's administration for food stamps completely fraudulent.” Additionally, the speaker contends that California funds “left wing NGOs,” including various Somali community organizations in Minnesota, and asserts that “a lot of those NGOs are using taxpayer money for politics.” The speaker claims that the liberal media is not covering any of these scandals and asserts that people should know these alleged facts because they are not being discussed by the media. In summary, the speaker asserts: - Newsom’s welfare fraud is exponentially worse than Walz’s, with $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment payments allegedly issued by California’s unemployment agency. - As a consequence, small California businesses must bear the cost via higher payroll taxes. - Walz is accused of allowing $250 million of food stamp fraud targeting Somali organizations. - Newsom’s food stamp fraud is claimed to be multi-billion in scope, with a fraud rate of 13.4% (three of every twenty benefits). - California is funding left-wing NGOs, including Somali-related organizations, with taxpayer money used for political purposes. - The liberal media is not covering these alleged scandals, and the speaker asserts these are important facts that should be known.