TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I'm leaving my favorite spa, Island Spa and Sauna in Edison, New Jersey, after eight years of visiting. It's my refuge for relaxation. Today, after my usual routine, I unexpectedly encountered a trans woman in the women's bathhouse, which shocked me. I felt violated because I was seen naked without my consent. The staff explained they couldn't ask her to leave due to New Jersey law, and I was overwhelmed with emotion. My safe space felt unsafe in an instant. The manager offered to comp my admission and food, but I still felt embarrassed and uncomfortable. I’ve been a loyal customer, and now I’m confused about my feelings. Am I wrong for feeling this way?

A person encountered a man in the women's locker room at Planet Fitness, leading to a dispute. The man claimed to be queer, but the speaker felt uncomfortable and took a photo. Planet Fitness supported the man, causing the speaker to feel unsafe and cancel their membership. They urge others to speak up against such situations.

A man is pretending to be a 13-year-old girl and showering with biological women. The speaker challenges anyone who has a problem with this to leave. The speaker threatens to call the police, claiming that a 50-year-old pervert is swimming with girls. The speaker questions if anyone has an issue with mature males swimming with girls, but receives no response. The speaker mentions seeing the person in question in the mornings and implies that they are biologically male.

Speaker 0, identifying as the only Black lesbian in the room, asks Senator Winner a direct question about women’s safety in female-only spaces, referencing an incident at Gold’s Gym where she was attacked in a locker room by a self-identifying trans woman with a documented history of domestic violence. She asks what Senator Winner would say to women seeking assurance that their safety will be protected from men who, under California law, can self-identify as women in women-only spaces. Speaker 1 responds that “we want everyone to be safe,” and notes that trans people exist as both men and women, saying, “if you're trans women or women.” He emphasizes the need to protect safety for all, acknowledging that trans women are part of the discussion. Speaker 0 continues, praising Senator Winner for housing bills and other actions, but asserts that “millions of women across America are being harassed and sexually assaulted in locker rooms.” She reiterates that she is a lesbian Black woman, not transphobic or homophobic, and stresses that some bills passed by Winner are dangerous for women and young children. She states she represents her community and urges protection for women in light of concerns about trans-inclusive policies. Speaker 2 interjects, urging Speaker 0 to allow Senator Winner to respond, while Speaker 0 reiterates the need for protection of women, specifying “Women. Women. Trans women are doing things. Women. Women.” She asserts that she was assaulted, adding, “They are not. They are men.” She describes the assailant as someone who “broke his wife’s jaw” requiring reconstructive surgery, and emphasizes her identity as a lesbian who is Black. She invites another Black woman to share her feelings, while also challenging the presence of others in the room. Speaker 1 reiterates the goal of protecting the safety of all women and acknowledges that “trans women are also brutalized in this country.” The conversation emphasizes a tension between protecting women’s safety and acknowledging the experiences of trans women, with Speaker 0 insisting, “We cannot be raped in the bathrooms by men that wanna say they're women. They're not women.” Speaker 2 responds by leaving, citing that the group is not protecting women, and remarks on the bills, stating she has read many of them and still finds issues “not right.” The exchange ends with Speaker 2, introducing herself as Tish Heine, and a comment about not allowing Blackness and civil rights to be used to justify laws for children to transform, followed by a remark about disparities in access to tampons versus transformation medication. The conversation also touches on broader political history, with Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 referencing political dynamics, including a note that “things were going so smoothly” before recalling an earlier moment in 2008 involving Aaron Peskin.

Speaker 0 describes an incident at the WE Spa where a man enters the women's section with his penis exposed, causing fear among women and young girls. “It's not okay. Now I can't even go and put my clothes on because he's down there. Yeah. I don't feel comfortable. We don't feel uncomfortable.” The speaker emphasizes that this behavior happened in the women’s section, with the implication that a man came into an area designated for women and girls, and asserts that “his dick is out. To the campus side? Yeah. His dick is slinging left and right, and we're women in there, and young girls are there.” The speaker challenges the arrangement, stating, “And you allow that. So then you're lying.” They argue that there is a distinction between gender rights and discrimination, claiming that “We cannot discriminate against gender rights. It's not discrimination. It's an impostor. You cannot identify a impostor, someone faking to be a woman just because they feel like they wanna call themselves a woman.” There is a dismissive stance toward the idea of recognizing someone’s gender identity in this context, with a reference to being “pre board” as a test they don’t care about. Speaker 1 interjects with a repetition of “a situation,” emphasizing that there will be consequences or a response: “You gonna have a situation.” Speaker 0 responds with escalating emotion, invoking religious language: “The blood of Jesus. You're gonna have a situation. There’s going to be a situation.” They report being at the WE Spa and witnessing a man slinging his penis, expressing disbelief and stating that some women are afraid to speak up, while they themselves are determined to speak out: “I couldn’t believe what I saw. I couldn’t believe that this man, okay, and these people up here and you got some women scared to say something. Baby, I'm not scared to say a thing.” Speaker 0 asserts a strong stance against a man asserting entrance into the men’s section or a person presenting as a woman while being male, stressing concern for children and mothers present: “The blood of Jesus against this wilding out lion spirit. Sit up here. Gonna bring him to let a man come in here, slinging his penis up in here. No. No. No.” The speaker insists that somebody who identifies as a man cannot enter the women’s area, or that someone claiming to be a woman but possessing male anatomy should be challenged. The speaker ends with a warning that “these people, they about to find out though. Watch.”

This speaker rails against transgender people in the women's bathroom, opening with, "This new world where these people wanna go into the women's bathroom with your guys' children, and we're gonna think that this is okay." "That's the root." They say, "You can be whoever the fuck you wanna be," then urge listeners to imagine mothers at Disneyland as "this thing comes in the women's restroom" and ask, "Are you out of your fucking mind? Are you out of your mind?" They insist, "But I'm a woman. Look. I'm wearing the dress. It's pretty hot." They ask, "do you want this person in the women's restroom? I don't, and I'm a male." They claim "society is trying to make that acceptable" and lament, "I'm sick to my stomach." The remark concludes with, "That is a grown man with a mustache telling Charlie that he wants to be called a she."

Speaker 1 expresses that the situation is traumatizing and asserts that as a woman there is a space reserved for women. She questions the right of a transgender person to be in that space, stating, "he has a penis. A full and testicle. Okay? And and I don't care what it it's a man. You got one? You're a man." She argues that if they entered the men's section based on anatomy, it would be a man, and notes that they may not like women, but that for her and many other women, they do not feel comfortable and "it's not okay." She adds, "I'm sorry to talk to Okay? So well, I yeah. Yeah. You're sorry. You should be, sweetie, and you're out of alignment, and this is not right." She implies the other person is out of alignment and suggests attention to the situation, even commenting on the other person’s personal circumstances: "it must be hard not being a real man. Try it." She urges that every woman get all of their information. Speaker 0 responds, discussing a security guard who said that this is not allowed. Speaker 1 disregards the security guard's stance, insisting she does not care what the security guard says. Speaker 0 clarifies that the security guard doesn't want to be involved, and Speaker 1 insists that the guard should not have been present or allowed in the space. The exchange centers on whether a transgender person should be in the women's space and the authorities' stance on access. The discussion highlights discomfort, boundaries, and perceived inappropriateness from the perspective of Speaker 1, while Speaker 0 defers to the security guard's position. The dialogue ends with an emphatic consolidation of their stance: "Exactly. Thank you. Exactly. No."

Planet Fitness allows biological men in the women's room, causing discomfort for a gym-goer who encountered a male employee exiting the women's restroom while she was changing. She felt violated and confronted the staff about the incident, expressing concern for underage girls using the facility. The gym's response was perceived as nonchalant, prompting her to speak out. The situation raised issues of privacy and safety. Like and subscribe for more news updates.

Patricia from Alaska shares her experience of a man shaving in the women's bathroom at Planet Fitness, leading to her membership being revoked. She expresses concern over policies allowing men in women's bathrooms based on self-identification. Patricia advises others to stand up for their rights and cancel memberships if necessary. Despite facing backlash and Facebook restrictions, she remains vocal about the issue. Patricia emphasizes the importance of safety and respect in public facilities.

Amy is upset because a man in the women's restroom made her uncomfortable, but she is being asked to leave instead of him. She questions why only trans rights are being prioritized over women's rights at Angel City Brewery. Another person suggests making the man leave instead. The situation escalates as Amy refuses to leave, feeling that women's rights are being ignored. The conversation becomes tense as the focus shifts to the brewery's stance on trans rights versus women's rights.

I saw a man shaving in the women's bathroom at Planet Fitness. He identifies as a woman, and I support him in Christ. However, I feel uncomfortable with him using the women's bathroom. He is a spiritual being experiencing life as a human, and he wants to change his gender. Just wanted to share my thoughts. Translation: I saw a man shaving in the women's bathroom at Planet Fitness. He identifies as a woman, and I support him in Christ. However, I feel uncomfortable with him using the women's bathroom. He is a spiritual being experiencing life as a human, and he wants to change his gender. Just wanted to share my thoughts.

A speaker alleges sexual harassment, stating that she and other college women, aged 18 to 22, were exploited and exposed without their consent to a naked man. The speaker claims a 6-foot-4 naked man entered the women's locker room at the university and saw her fully undressed. She says she was unaware of his access until she heard a man's voice, turned, and saw him naked a few feet away while she was unclothed. She accuses the university of allowing college women to be traumatized and violated and questions why they were not protected.

Our policy is that we direct people to the male or female area of the spa based on their genitals. So if you have male parts, you go to the male side, and if you have female parts, you go to the female side. Even if you identify as a different gender. I understand that many people disagree with this policy, and I've been told that it is discriminatory and anti-transgender. I've been told that in San Fransisco you can't determine a man or woman based on their parts. I've also been told that I need to publish this policy on our website so that people are aware of it before they come here. Customers have been complaining and as a business, we also have a right to refuse service.

A transgender activist was asked to explain the premise of the movement, but they deflected and changed the subject. The speaker believes it is their right to ask this question because there are civil rights specifically for women, such as special bathrooms and sports leagues. They argue that if men are claiming the right to enter these spaces, either all special rights for women need to be abolished or the activists need to explain how these men are actually women. The speaker is not willing to abolish women's rights and believes most women in the country feel the same way.

Leah Thomas is accused of having a fixation on autogynephilia, which is dressing as a woman for sexual pleasure. The speaker believes that Leah is taking advantage of being in women's spaces, such as locker rooms, and enjoying the attention. They express their frustration and call for Leah to be removed from these spaces. The speaker emphasizes that they are not willing to give up girlhood or womanhood to accommodate Leah's mental issues.

Trans women are women, but the speaker disagrees. They argue that nobody confronts the speaker's opinion and questions why anyone would want to be close to a trans woman. The speaker insults the trans woman, saying she doesn't look or act like a woman. The trans woman defends herself, stating that many people accept and support her. The conversation becomes heated, and the speaker asks the trans woman to leave their store. The trans woman mentions that some people find the situation hurtful, but the speaker dismisses their feelings, claiming not to care at their age. They mention their service in Vietnam as a reason for their indifference.

In the Sun Prairie School District in Wisconsin, a person named Raleigh shares their experience in a locker room with Leah Thomas, a biological male. Raleigh describes it as traumatizing, feeling betrayed and belittled. They express discomfort, embarrassment, and the shock of 14-year-old girls being exposed to male genitalia without consent. Raleigh explains that this situation is becoming more common, not just for them but for girls and women of all ages and sports across the country. They consider it a travesty.

One participant insists that it’s unacceptable for a man to enter the women’s section and expose his penis to women and young girls, arguing that WE Spa condones such behavior. They question, “Is that what you’re saying? Like I asked. It’s he’s he could stay there. He could stay there?” They assert a sexual orientation claim, stating, “Sexual orientation. What sexual orientation? I see a dick. Sexual orientation. It lets me know he’s a man,” and repeatedly declare, “He he is a man. He is a man. He is not no female. He is not a female.” They emphasize that “Girls down there, other women who are highly offended for what they just saw, and you did nothing, absolutely nothing. In fact, you sided with him.” They accuse WE Spa of being “an agreement with men that just say they are a woman and they can go down there with their penis and get into the women’s section,” asking, “Is that what you’re saying? What law?” They note that “They pulled everything back. So women can go into the men’s with their breasts,” and state they won’t return, saying, “Everything needs money. Yeah. Get your money back. Every everything. You got a man with his penis talking about he’s a woman. He ain’t no woman.” They question whether the person is transgender, asserting, “Are you talking to that I’m transgender? There’s no such thing as transgender. He has a dick. Shut the fuck up. Okay? He has penis hanging out.” They add, “He and your daddy.” They conclude they are a woman who knows how to stand up for their rights, insisting, “As a woman, I have a right to feel comfortable without a man exposing himself.” They reiterate, “No. He’s not a transgender. He has a penis just like…” The other participant briefly attempts to calm the situation, saying, “You don’t so it’s okay. I just wanna be clear with you. It’s okay.” They acknowledge, “Okay?,” and the discussion ends with the first participant asserting their stance against the presence of a man with a penis in the women’s area.

I'm a biological male in a dress. Should I be punished for what I wear? You should act like a man because you are one. Those affirming your belief you're a woman are lying and disrespectful. It won't help you. Masquerading as a woman infringes on women's rights to their own spaces. You don't have that right, no matter how sincerely you believe you're a woman. Translation: I am a man in a dress. Should I be punished for what I wear? You should act like a man because you are one. Those who support your belief that you are a woman are lying and disrespectful. It will not help you. Pretending to be a woman violates women's rights to their own spaces. You do not have that right, no matter how sincerely you believe you are a woman.

The speaker describes the shock of discovering a biological man in their locker room without prior notice. They approached an official who explained that the locker rooms had been made unisex to accommodate this situation. The speaker highlights the violation of privacy and safety for women and girls, questioning the message it sends to them. They express concern about their rights being dismissed in order to protect a small population. The overall sentiment among those in the locker room was a feeling of being disregarded.

Leah Thomas is accused of having a fixation on autogynephilia and deriving sexual pleasure from dressing as a woman. The speaker argues that Leah, who competes in women's sports and takes their trophies, is crossing a line. They express frustration with the idea of accommodating Leah in women's spaces and believe therapy is necessary. The speaker emphasizes that they won't surrender girlhood or womanhood to Leah's mental issues and urges them to leave swimming pools, locker rooms, and track meets.

I encountered a man in the women's locker room at Planet Fitness, causing concern for a young girl present. Despite raising the issue, the gym defended the man's presence. I expressed my discomfort and intention to involve the police. Thanked the staff for canceling my membership. Encouraged others to speak out against such situations.

A student expresses shock and embarrassment after being tricked into sharing a locker room with a male student. She questions why her school allowed this to happen without warning or alternative options. She feels uncomfortable having boys in the girls' bathroom and believes it is unacceptable. When her father complained to the school, they suggested she use a single-use bathroom far away from her classes. She argues that this solution is inconvenient and unfair to all the girls facing the same situation. She accuses the school of violating her privacy, modesty, and dignity. She asks for support from other parents and adults, as many students feel violated and concerned.

An 18-year-old high school student raises concerns about transgender individuals claiming to be women and using women's spaces. They mention an incident at MLK High School where a transgender woman, who is biologically male, had an altercation with a young woman. The student questions why the safety of women is being compromised by allowing mentally confused men to use women's spaces. They express that true girls like themselves, who are female down to their DNA, should have a say in this matter. The student urges action to protect the safety of women and calls on the school to address the issue. Another student shares their experience of being continuously bothered by the transgender individual and expresses frustration with the lack of action from the school.

The speaker asks if requiring women to undress in front of Leah Thomas and allowing Leah Thomas to undress in front of female athletes constitutes sexual harassment. The other speaker responds that students should not feel unsafe in any locker room. The first speaker then asks if it constitutes sexual harassment to force women to undress in front of biological males, to which the second speaker expresses concern about forcing women to undress in front of biological males. The first speaker further asks if requiring female swimmers to dress with Leah Thomas, who identifies as male, would constitute sexual harassment. The second speaker requests the question to be repeated and states that it is not a yes or no question for them.