reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Adam Gillette from Accuracy Media confronts Tamara Nowitzky about DEI work at the university, alleging that the department was still engaging in DEI in defiance of state law and that only wording had been changed. Gillette asks if this is true. Nowitzky repeatedly responds, I can't comment, to questions about compliance with the law and whether the department has subverted it by altering language. Gillette presses further, presenting a video in which Nowitzky allegedly said she had to change the words because people are dumb. He asks if she said that, and whether the department is complying with the law or subverting it by changing words. Nowitzky again declines to comment, saying, I can't comment, and does not provide direct answers to whether there were thoughts or criticisms about taxpayers who oppose funding DEI, potential loss of state or federal funds, or a message to legislators who passed a law banning DEI at universities. Gillette notes that Nowitzky had commented extensively in the video, and asks for clarification about whether she misspoke or if the statements are accurate. Nowitzky responds with fragmented phrases: “I can't come,” followed by partial words from Gillette’s prompt, and then, “Most of your progressive. Of your faculty faculty,” seemingly offering insufficient, disconnected remarks. Gillette continues to seek any thoughts on whether a predominantly progressive faculty fosters a welcoming environment for students who don’t share those values, but Nowitzky again says, I can't comment. Gillette indicates that investigators spoke with several staffers and found that the psychology department and other departments had changed wording but were continuing the same DEI work. He asks Nowitzky for comments on these findings. Nowitzky states that the university is “fully compliant with House Bill four and all federal laws and policies and procedures with respect to that issue.” He acknowledges this while also noting concerns raised by Tamara Nowitzky in the psychology department about the claim that they “just changed the words because people are dumb.” In closing, Gillette mentions the recorded comments and complaints alleging that the university continued DEI work in defiance of state law, despite the purported word changes. The exchange ends with Nowitzky reiterating the university’s position of compliance and presenting the conflicting claim from a department member about altering wording, rather than altering the underlying DEI work.

James O'Keefe reports on James Welch, an NIH genetic counselor, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch is allegedly coaching researchers to avoid using "banned words" like "women," "men," and "race" in grant applications, suggesting alternatives like "ancestry." Welch claims NIH intramural research can "basically do anything" if they have the money. According to O'Keefe, a senior administration official stated there's no specific policy regarding racial preferences in health, suggesting Welch is creating this algorithm in his own mind. O'Keefe alleges this circumvents the will of President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Welch also expresses disdain for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his boss, and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about buying guns, stating "they won't let me close enough to these people." O'Keefe calls for transparency and accountability within government institutions.

O'Keefe Media Group reported on a secretly recorded meeting with Florida Institute of Technology's president, John Niklow, alleging he changed wording to circumvent a presidential executive order and retain funding. The report claims Niklow discussed obtaining $7 million in funding after a meeting with a high-ranking Florida official, purportedly Ron DeSantis, and tweaked language to avoid being perceived as "woke." The report suggests Niklow went against an initial agreement to fight back with the $7 million. Niklow stated that changing some words allows the university to continue its work. The report also includes audio of a professor requesting an exemption to change course catalog information related to DEI. Niklow allegedly said the government isn't smart enough to find DEI courses, and advised being mindful of how courses are taught. O'Keefe Media Group was asked to leave the premises and threatened with legal action. The report concludes with advertisements for Fisher Capital and The Wellness Company.

An HR director for Summit Public Schools in California stated that when choosing between equally qualified white and black applicants, the school will choose the black applicant "no matter what," which is a violation of California state law and the school's own policy. The HR director said they specifically look for transgender people and people of color to teach. He stated that if the English department is all white male, they would want to add a person of color. The HR director said the school would avoid hiring MAGA people and that DEI questions are included in the hiring process to weed out politically misaligned candidates. An example of a DEI question is how a teacher would respond to a student expressing different political values. If the candidate says they want to teach the student conservative values, that is not what the school is looking for.

President Trump signed executive orders eliminating DEI programs, and federal offices are canceling DEI initiatives. Some people lost their jobs because they were hired exclusively to run DEI programs. However, similar cancellations occurred during Trump's previous presidency, and people worked around them by renaming DEI activities as multicultural activities or team building. Concerns arise about writing proposals with terms like "climate change" due to the administration's disbelief in it. A proposed solution is to replace "climate change" with terms like "natural hazards" to secure funding. Despite potential funding cuts, there's hope that space-related programs will remain funded due to Trump's interest in space exploration. Earth science programs may be defunded. People are trying to come up with alternative terms for climate change.

Universities are reportedly violating the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action, specifically racial quotas and set-asides, by not admitting students on a color-blind basis. Evidence suggests that university systems, especially medical schools, are engaging in race-based discrimination to evade the Supreme Court's ruling and federal statutes. Universities are now on notice and facing financial consequences for non-compliance. Harvard is cited as a clear example of repeat, systemic, and sustained violations of federal civil rights law.

O'Keefe Media Group reported on a secretly recorded meeting with the president of Florida Institute of Technology, John Niklow, concerning DEI and funding. Niklow allegedly changed wording to circumvent a presidential executive order and retain funding. Niklow reportedly obtained $7,000,000 in funding after a meeting with a state official, where he tweaked language related to climate change. The university president allegedly went against the deal made in that meeting. Niklow stated that changing words allows them to continue their work and avoid being targeted. Another professor, Julia Constopoulos, discussed renaming courses with Niklow. Niklow advised modifying branding or finding new funding sources. He also stated that the government isn't smart and is just searching the web for DEI courses. O'Keefe Media Group was asked to leave the premises and told to remain on the sidewalk. A cease and desist letter was sent to O'Keefe Media Group.

O'Keefe Media Group confronted the president of Florida Institute of Technology, John Niklow, with a covertly recorded meeting where he allegedly discussed changing wording related to DEI to secure funding, despite a presidential executive order. Niklow denied the claim. The recording also revealed Niklow discussing obtaining $7,000,000 in funding after a meeting with a state official who criticized the project as "woke." Sources claim Niklow went against the deal after the meeting. Niklow stated that changing words to avoid being targeted allows the university to continue its work. Another professor, Julia Constopoulos, is recorded asking Niklow about changing course catalog names related to DEI. Niklow advised her to modify the branding or find a new funding source. O'Keefe was asked to leave the premises and told he could remain on the sidewalk. O'Keefe claimed Niklow called the police and stated the president should be escorted off the property for his actions. Niklow allegedly stated that the government doesn't have smart people and are just searching the web for DEI courses. O'Keefe then promoted Fisher Capital as a gold investment partner and The Wellness Company's field emergency kit.

The speaker states President Trump is committed to eliminating antisemitism, which they claim is rampant. They assert the Biden/Garland administration did nothing to address it. The speaker says that under their leadership in the DOJ, the federal government is suing universities guilty of antisemitism under Title VI, with the goal of bankrupting them by taking away federal dollars. They mention an investigation into the entire UC system in California, citing harassment of both students and employees. The speaker believes the academic system has been hijacked by the left and Marxists, influencing young people from K-12 onwards. They express embarrassment at what happened at UCLA, their alma mater. They criticize local officials in blue cities for allegedly turning their backs on Jewish Americans and are sending letters to mayors and DAs of major cities, threatening federal intervention and hate crime charges. The speaker says they are targeting 13 schools and plan to remove professional agitators and expel students involved in antisemitic acts. They warn universities to cooperate or face federal action.

Federal offices are ending DEI programs due to President Trump's executive orders. State departments have already canceled DEI initiatives, but some suggest renaming DEI programs to circumvent the rules, such as using "multicultural activities" or "team building." Concerns arise about writing proposals with terms like "climate change" under the new administration, as they may not approve of such terms or provide funding. One workaround is to replace "climate change" with "natural hazards" in proposals to secure funding. While NASA may not lose funding as a whole due to Trump's interest in space, Earth science may be affected. There is a sense of depression and uncertainty, with concerns about potential funding cuts and the need to carefully adjust language in proposals.

O'Keefe Media Group reported on a secretly recorded meeting with the president of Florida Institute of Technology, John Niklow, concerning DEI and funding. Niklow allegedly discussed changing wording to circumvent a presidential executive order to retain funding, including a $7 million ask from Governor Ron DeSantis. Niklow said he tweaked language after DeSantis questioned the university being "woke." Sources claim Niklow went against the deal after the meeting, deciding to fight back. Niklow stated that changing words allows the university to continue its work. Another professor, Julia Constopoulos, head of the school of psychology, discussed renaming courses with Niklow. Niklow advised faculty to modify branding or find new funding sources. He also stated that the government isn't smart enough to find DEI courses. O'Keefe Media Group was asked to leave the premises and threatened with legal action. A cease and desist letter was sent on the eve of publishing the recording.

The speaker asks why Ivy League schools receive so much federal funding. Speaker 1 responds that the president has raised this question in discussions with Harvard, Columbia, and other Ivy League institutions. The president created an antisemitism task force with representatives from federal agencies who meet weekly to discuss this issue. Speaker 1 states that many Americans wonder why their tax dollars go to universities that are allegedly indoctrinating students and allowing egregious illegal behavior.

Maine's education commissioner is allegedly encouraging schools to disregard President Trump's executive order regarding men in women's sports, advising them to adhere to the Maine Human Rights Act and local nondiscrimination policies. According to State Representative Laura Libby, the commissioner previously de-prioritized academic learning in favor of social emotional learning and DEI. Libby claims these policies reflect a "woke agenda" misaligned with Mainers' priorities, resulting in the lowest test scores in 30 years. She says parents are displeased that their children's education is being replaced with an agenda. Trump has threatened to withdraw significant funding from Maine, which Libby says would dramatically affect the state, especially since the education budget has already increased by 65% in the last six years.

The Civil Rights Division is enforcing federal discrimination and civil rights laws for all Americans with a color-blind approach. Title IX aims to give women equal access to educational and sports opportunities. The Department of Justice (DOJ) got involved after California refused to mediate with the Department of Education regarding Title IX. Orange County had credible information about non-citizens on voter rolls. The DOJ sent letters to Harvard University asking them to confirm compliance with Students for Fair Admissions. If Harvard does not promptly improve conditions for students, they will face economic and legal trouble. The speaker believes the United States is the greatest country.

Adam Gillette of Accuracy and Media confronted Melissa Newhouse about a report that her department was “explaining how you do DEI and defiance of state law.” Newhouse denied knowledge of that claim, noting their offices were closed when approached by the investigator. In the video that Gillette referenced, Newhouse was shown or described as saying that the buildings “now have to allow the whites and the privileged people.” Newhouse responded that this was not true. She explained that, due to the law, signs and centers that previously targeted one group were changed to be “common” rather than center-specific. She stated that “the whites are there … to help effort” and clarified that the change does not affect their curriculum. During the conversation, another speaker (Speaker 2) confirmed that the class content would still cover topics such as DEI and intersectionality, and that students would continue to learn DEI as part of the curriculum if that is what the class is about. Newhouse was asked if the video showed her voice, and she questioned whether the voice might be AI-generated. She later said, “No. I didn’t,” in response to whether the person in the video was her. Newhouse described changes to the center’s name—from Multicultural Center to Common Center—and claimed the purpose was to ensure “American white people” were represented too. She emphasized that the concept is for students to feel they belong, stating, “Belonging is very important.” She highlighted the leadership team’s diversity and noted ongoing efforts in equity, access, and education, including grants for equity. She claimed these initiatives were funded by corporate money (Apple) and had not been cut, though described as quieter and less university-sponsored. Adam Gillette pressed on whether the department was continuing DEI in defiance of state law and pressed for further clarity about the signs, centers, and curriculum. Newhouse denied that the video showed her saying that whites must be allowed; she insisted the claim was not true and suggested the visuals were AI. She reiterated that the department was still pursuing equity initiatives, with ongoing funding from corporate sources. Toward the end, Gillette stated the interview and Newhouse’s denial left an impression of a disconnect between the video and her stated position, highlighting that Newhouse had initially denied the video but then claimed the voice could be AI, leading to broader questions about authenticity.

O'Keefe Media Group reported on a secretly recorded meeting with the president of Florida Institute of Technology, John Niklow, concerning DEI and funding. Niklow allegedly changed wording to circumvent a presidential executive order and retain funding. Niklow reportedly obtained $7,000,000 in funding after a meeting with a state official, where he tweaked language related to climate change. The university president allegedly went against the deal after the meeting, deciding to fight back with the $7,000,000. Another professor asked Niklau if certain courses would be barred, to which Niklau responded that the government isn't smart and is just searching the web for DEI courses. The president said he would support getting an exemption to change the course catalog. O'Keefe Media Group was asked to leave the premises and told they could be on the sidewalk. A cease and desist letter was sent to O'Keefe Media Group.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the politicization of science and changes at the NIH. Over the last fifteen to twenty years, the NIH incorporated what Speaker 1 characterizes as political agendas rather than scientific agendas into its portfolio, with DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) being the most prominent example. A chunk of NIH funding went to projects focused on achieving social objectives rather than the health mission. Every NIH employee allegedly had to write a loyalty oath to DEI principles and was evaluated on devotion to the cause. Researchers inside and outside the NIH could access funds, with outside researchers more easily securing money if they promised to conduct DEI research, according to Speaker 1. Much of that research allegedly lacked a real scientific basis and was not science. Speaker 1 provides an example of projects they worked to deprioritize: a project asking whether structural racism is the root reason why African Americans have worse hypertension outcomes. The problem, they say, is that there is no way to test the hypothesis because, if structural racism is the cause, there is no workable control group to test the idea as true. They assert that such research did not translate into better health for anybody, including minority populations. They describe these projects as political agendas that do not belong in a science agency. The stated mission is to improve the health of everybody, including minority populations, but only if projects are clearly scientific, well defined, and have a real chance of improving health. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, summarizing that there were ideological or political projects receiving NIH funding. Speaker 1 confirms and adds another practice: when a good science project ended the year with leftover funds, program officers would approach researchers with leftover money and offer a “diversity supplement”—an add-on tied to DEI that was not actual science—to obtain extra funding. This, they claim, was a waste of taxpayer money with no real health benefit. They say they have since gotten rid of all of that.

An HR director for Summit Public Schools in California stated that in choosing between equally qualified white and black applicants, the black applicant would be chosen "no matter what," which is a violation of California state law and the school's own policy. The HR director said they specifically look for transgender people and people of color to teach. He stated that if the English department is all white male, they may want to add a person of color. The HR director said the school would avoid hiring MAGA people and that DEI questions are included in the hiring process to filter out politically misaligned candidates. An example of a DEI question is how a teacher would respond to a student expressing different political values. If the candidate says they want to teach the student about conservative values, that is not the answer they are looking for.

Federal offices are ending DEI programs due to President Trump's executive orders, mirroring a previous instance where DEI was rebranded as "multicultural activities" or "team building" to circumvent restrictions. State departments have already canceled DEI initiatives. Concerns arise about writing proposals using terms like "climate change" due to potential disapproval from the administration, with suggestions to replace it with "natural hazards." This strategy was previously used to secure funding. While NASA's overall funding may remain intact due to Trump's interest in space, Earth science funding is expected to decrease. There is uncertainty and concern about the future, with some expressing a lack of hope for the coming year.

President Trump inherited a crisis of racial discrimination via DEI policies, including in air traffic control and law enforcement, where hiring was allegedly based on race and sex rather than merit. Trump ended race and sex-based hiring across the federal government and intends to enforce civil rights laws, penalizing companies violating them. The administration is investigating universities for violating the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action and for sex-based discrimination under Title IX, threatening to withhold federal funds. The administration considers changing a child's gender without parental consent to be child abuse and opposes taxpayer-funded chemical castrations and sexual mutilations of children. HHS has removed pro-sex change science. Male prisoners will not be allowed in women's prisons. The administration aims to remove critical race theory from schools, promoting patriotism and civic values. Trump is fighting wasteful spending, the trade crisis, illegal immigration, and the economic crisis by reopening American energy, defeating inflation, and pursuing tax and deregulation reform. He aims to restore peace globally, reversing the economic, border, public safety, and cultural catastrophes he inherited.

I'm Representative Jamie Thompson. The Department of Education is requiring schools to remove programs promoting DEI, social emotional learning (SEL), and critical race theory (CRT) or risk losing federal funding. The deadline for removal has passed. Parents, if these programs still exist in your child's school, you can take action. Search on Google for "Department of Education letter to my colleague." This letter details the executive order and its impact, effectively notifying the school of the risk to their federal funding if they don't eliminate these programs. Stay informed and proactive about your child's education. If you have questions, contact me anytime.

The Department of Education is allegedly staffed by radical left Marxist bureaucrats who are hostile to Western civilization, American interests, and the nation's founding documents. These individuals are purportedly using their positions to force agendas such as radical gender ideology, critical race theory, and diversity, equity, and inclusion on American students and children. This allegedly takes away parents' ability to control their children's education. The plan under President Trump is to return authority to the local level, allowing parents to control outcomes, while ensuring that no federal funds support racism, gender ideology, or other ideas offensive to the American taxpayer.