reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Jews in Harlem are accused of running whiskey and food stores, controlling the economy for their benefit and Israel's. Speaking out against this led to backlash, with interviews being censored. The speaker emphasizes the need to expose this exploitation.

Usury, or lending money at interest, was historically illegal in Christian nations, leading to Jewish individuals filling that role. Over generations, this resulted in significant economic power for Jews, prompting kings to expel them repeatedly. This cycle of exclusion occurred across various countries for centuries, contributing to the Jewish diaspora. Napoleon highlighted the dangers of compound interest, suggesting it could lead to widespread property loss. Today, debt slavery has replaced traditional forms of slavery, with credit card debt and student loans binding individuals financially. Pareto's principle observed that a small percentage of families owned most of the land, coinciding with the rise of modern banking in Italy.

Jews in Harlem run the whiskey and rundown stores, and control Harlem's economy. Someone should be warned before violence erupts, but this is not antisemitism, just observation. The speaker claims that Jews control about 80% of the economy in most Black communities across the country. After he made this statement on Channel 13, Jews organized to prevent the interview from being re-aired. Morgan, another person involved in the program, disclaimed responsibility for the speaker's statements. The speaker believes that Jews exploit Black communities in Harlem and across the country, and that Jews believe in censorship more than anyone else.

Speaker 0: The Israelites is not Israel. And as Tony and I are both Catholic, and so when we talk about the Israelites that are talked about in the Bible, there is a clear distinction between this prophecy about the Israelites and the government of Israel and white Europeans settling into the holy land. Mhmm. And so when we say this, like, the Israelites, the Israelites in the bible are actually the Palestinian people who have been there for thousands of years, not the white European from Ukraine or Poland or America. The Israelites are the people who were indigenous to that land that lived there for thousands of years, and those are not the people who have Trump wrapped around his finger. It's this, like, settler colonial white Europeans that have settled into the land of the actual Israelites that have either blackmailed him or cut deals with him financially. I mean, we go back to greed. Right? Greed is always, like, a big factor decisions. So Trump, in all senses, is wrapped in intertwined with this government and the Zionist regime and the Rothschilds and the Vanderbilts and the 13 rich families that control the world, basically. Right.

There is a lack of Jewish rappers because Jewish owners and CEOs run the music industry. Kanye wished everyone a happy Kwanzaa and acknowledged that Jewish people hold power in Hollywood and the music industry. The speaker feels uncomfortable discussing this topic and doesn't want to be misunderstood. They have Jewish friends and contacts in their phone.

The transcript asserts that Jew capitalists and Jew communists form a tightly connected alliance within Gentile society, contradicting the common belief that communism opposes capitalism. It claims the big money flows from Gentile to Jewish hands, while the popular press creates a misleading image of revolution. It describes revolution as occurring quietly in banks, ledgers, and tax systems, transforming capitalism from Gentile to Jewish control, with Gentile bourgeois losing financial supremacy and political influence to Jews who also control communications. It states Marxism has succeeded in America without overt red flags over Washington, with Jews defeating the old Gentile financial leadership. The speaker contends the power is exercised by people who do not have to stand for election and by methods beyond voters’ reach, and that Jewish supremacy rests on a secret alliance between Jew capitalists and Jew communists. This alliance allegedly attacks Gentile wealth and gradually pushes Gentiles toward proletarian status over generations, avoiding rapid pressure that might provoke resistance. The aim, according to the transcript, is to push Gentiles out gradually to destroy Gentile leadership, so that an aristocracy of Jews will rule over a Goy rabble, admitting a few Judaized Gentiles into the new aristocracy at a high cost. Warren Buffett is named as an example of a Gentile who allegedly joins the Jews in undermining Gentile culture. Mike Piper comments that such collaboration compels Gentile capitalists to scuttle their own culture and fight the majority of their own race. Morris Horton is cited as saying they could name 50 or more social register families who have done this. The transcript states that the men who resisted emerging Jewish capitalism were not Marxists or proletarians; Henry Ford and Gustave Krapp are mentioned as fighters, even though defeated. The Ford Foundation and the transfer of Henry Ford’s wealth to a leftist political power are described as a sad consequence. The piece asserts that most old Gentile capitalists do not fight; they seek surrender to the Jews, remain right-wing and conservative, but their antisemitism is leveraged through speeches that assemble luminaries and denounce antisemitism.

Who runs most financial institutions? There's a perception that Jews dominate banking and law, which has led to accusations of anti-Semitism. A Jewish banker friend, Mari, shared that members of his community can access zero-interest loans in the U.S., a benefit I find deeply unfair since I pay interest on my loans as a venture capitalist. This raises questions about religious doctrines favoring one group over others. To qualify for these loans, one must be Jewish, as lineage matters—only those with a Jewish mother can claim this benefit. Hebrew free loans are available to Jewish individuals, while Gentiles do not receive the same opportunity. This disparity is surprising and highlights a significant financial advantage for one community.

Jewish people dominate the music industry and Hollywood due to their control of labels and businesses. Speaking negatively about them can lead to consequences. The speaker feels uncomfortable discussing this topic and prefers to avoid it. Despite having Jewish associates, the speaker believes black people lack power and organization in comparison.

Jews in Harlem run whiskey and food stores, control the economy for themselves and Israel. They prevent free speech and censor criticism. They control 80% of the economy in Black communities. Morgenthau denied responsibility for statements made about Jewish exploitation. Jews believe in censorship more than anyone else.

Speaker 0 argues that history gets deep when examining tiny hats and slavery, claiming this was left out of history books because “the history books” are owned by “tiny hats.” They state that those who owned slaves, were slave traders and auctioneers, also owned newspapers, and played a role in creating social division. They claim it becomes interesting to uncover the exploitation of slaves and the way people were treated, noting that those who defended slavery would be exposed as supporting it, and that slave dealing was “an extremely profitable business.” They connect these ideas back to the Rothschilds, saying this is a recurring topic they have discussed, and mention Malcolm X as another figure who talked about it, urging others to look into it. Speaker 1 contends that a Black person is not antisemitic when he says that the man exploiting him in his community is white, because it is a white man who owns all the stores. They question whether it is an accident that the whites who own these stores are Jewish, and assert that if it is an accident, then the statement that “the Jew on the corner is exploiting me” is not antisemitic but merely a description of the man exploiting him.

Some individuals express frustration about the perceived exploitation by certain Jewish business owners in their neighborhoods, suggesting that these owners profit from the community while contributing to its problems. They argue that instead of seeking support from others, these business owners should address the issues they create. There is a mention of a past interview that faced censorship, where the speaker highlighted the exploitation by Jews in Harlem. The speaker claims that there is a tendency among some Jewish individuals to suppress discussions about their influence and actions, implying a double standard regarding free speech.

The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. Another speaker suggests that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Jews, like Meyer Lansky in the mafia, are portrayed as orchestrating events while deflecting attention onto others.

In Christian nations, usury (charging interest) was illegal, so Jews became money lenders. Over time, they owned everything, leading to expulsion by kings. This cycle repeated for centuries, as kings feared Jews' financial power. Napoleon warned of compound interest's ability to consume property. Today, credit card and student loan interest enslave people, replacing physical slavery with debt slavery.

Jewish individuals have openly acknowledged their influence in Hollywood. Mentioned examples include a Jewish man's statement in the LA Times and an interview with the founder of Screw Magazine. The discussion also touches on the existence of Jewish gangs historically and the idea that questioning their presence today is not inherently anti-Semitic. Various artists, including Dave Chappelle and Kanye West, have suggested the existence of a Hollywood gang, with Michael Jackson even naming specific individuals. The conversation challenges the notion that exploring such claims is automatically anti-Semitic.

This transcript traces the emergence of international finance and the central role of the Rothschild family in the 18th–19th centuries. It states that during the two to three centuries before the rise of the House of Rothschild, international finance consolidated beyond local bankers, with operations centered in London and throughout Europe and largely in the hands of closely interconnected Jewish families. The Rothschilds rose to reign supreme in the first decades of the 19th century, with rival Jewish financial houses often intermarrying or cooperating with them, although there were rivalries. The Rothschilds are described as having become “the kings of kings,” accumulating staggering wealth, with multi-billionaires by the 1830s–1840s and remaining wealthy to the present. The speaker claims their wealth is global, spanning not only traditional banking but mining, oil, and various other interests, and notes the name Rockefeller as a later, lesser reference to oil compared with the Rothschilds. The transcript emphasizes that, due to their immense wealth, the Rothschilds have seeded fortunes and kept many others within their sphere of influence, embedding them into what the speaker calls a New World Order. It provides an example of how Rothschilds and their satellites seed powerful fortunes. It mentions the Bronfman family as an instance: the Bronfmans rose from involvement in organized crime-linked activities (bootlegging, prostitution, gambling) and became billionaires. The Bronfman fortune contributed to the rise of Mortimer Zuckerman, a Boston construction and real estate developer, who became a billionaire and acquired control of US News & World Report, the New York Daily News, and for a time the Atlantic; he also served as president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. The speaker then describes a further link: Zuckerman mentored a young man named Daniel Snyder, who would become a billionaire and owner of the Washington Redskins. Snyder allegedly built the largest primary database of Hispanic and Spanish-surnamed Americans through boiler room operations nationwide, targeting both legal and illegal immigrants to sell long-distance calling cards, mortgages, and credit products. The result, according to the speaker, is that Latin American immigrants in the United States experienced financial devastation due to these activities. Snyder is portrayed as a satellite of the Rothschild Empire, with substantial money behind him to fund others and generate billions for many associated companies. Overall, the narrative emphasizes the Rothschilds’ enduring wealth, global influence across industries, and their role in building an interconnected network of fortunes, culminating in a modern framework described as a New World Order.

Michael Jackson had a list of enemies in the industry, all of whom were Jewish. There was controversy over his will, signed in LA while he was in New York, leaving his estate to those he distrusted. He accused his former manager and Sony of financial misconduct. Rabbi Shmueli threatened the speaker, who was warned not to "mess with Jews."

The speaker questions why white men are blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish dominance in academia and literature allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians in the mafia. Meyer Lansky, a Jewish figure, is mentioned as handling the books for the mafia. The speaker implies that Jews manipulate situations to avoid scrutiny and continue their activities unnoticed.

The speaker questions the high representation of Jewish individuals in influential positions across various sectors like politics, education, entertainment, finance, and sports. They highlight examples such as Democratic party donors, Ivy League presidents, Hollywood talent agencies, NBA teams, the Federal Reserve, Black Rock, the Biden administration, and Donald Trump's connections. The speaker expresses confusion over the disproportionate presence of Jewish individuals in these areas.

The speaker questions why white people are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Meyer Lansky, a Jewish figure, is mentioned as being involved in the mafia's financial operations.

During slavery, cotton was like oil today. The rich controlled it, linking North and South. Jewish people dominated the cotton trade, sending it to England for cloth. Rothschilds and Lehman Brothers got rich from cotton. The truth must be told.

There’s a focus on the historical grievances of black people, emphasizing the suffering of 80 million black lives lost, while questioning the empathy shown towards Jewish suffering. It’s argued that Jewish individuals control local economies, profiting from communities without genuine support. Historical references are made to Jewish involvement in the slave trade, claiming they dominated it for centuries. The discussion connects the cotton industry during slavery to modern economic interests, likening cotton's value then to oil's value today. Jewish merchants in the South and North are noted for their roles in the cotton trade, leading to significant wealth accumulation. The speaker insists on revealing these truths for awareness and accountability.

Jews in Harlem run the whiskey and rundown stores, controlling Harlem's economy. Jews control about 80% of the economy in most Black communities across the country. After making this statement on a Channel 13 program, Jews organized to prevent the interview from being re-aired. The speaker claims that Jews are robbing and exploiting Black communities in Harlem and across the country, and that Jews believe in censorship more than anyone else.

Jews in Harlem run the whiskey and rundown stores, and control Harlem's economy. Someone should be warned before violence erupts, but this is not antisemitism. The speaker claims to have stated on Channel 13 that Jews control about 80% of the economy in most Black communities. Jews organized to prevent the interview from re-airing. The speaker did two interviews, one short and one thirty minutes long. After the interview, Morgan Price stated he was not responsible for anything the speaker said. The speaker believes that Jews prevented the showing of the interview because he stated that Jews are robbing and exploiting Black people in Harlem and across the country. Jews believe in censorship more than anyone else.

The speaker asserts that the Jewish mob is the most dangerous and evil criminal outfit on Earth, claiming there is extensive Hollywood representation of evil Italian mobsters and Catholic Church figures who welcome and shield them, and stating that the Jewish mob is responsible for the worst human rights crime in the world: the white slavery trafficking of millions of young women. The speaker says this trafficking is dominated completely by Jews, not Italians, and that tens of millions of women have suffered degradation, drug addiction, physical abuse, or loss of life. A hypothetical scenario is used to illustrate the harm, imagining a daughter or sister subjected to such defilement. An article dated 01/11/1998 is cited from “our foundation” in Israel, recounting the experience of a 21-year-old woman from Ukraine who moved to Israel and was led to a brothel, where her passport was burned and she was told she would be worked until she earned her way out, with threats of arrest and the claim that she had no papers and didn’t speak Hebrew. A quoted Israeli white slave master named Jacob Golan is cited: “the women who work there, like nearly all prostitutes in Israel, are Russian. Their boss is not. Israelis love Russian girls,” and comments about blond Russian girls and a past relationship. The speaker imagines a headline such as “Jewish Slave Traders Lure European Women” and contrasts it with “Mafia Slave Traders Lure Women,” arguing Mafia would be Italian-centered. The speaker then shifts to political and financial crime, mentioning in America that the biggest thieves in history included Madoff, Michael Milken, Ervin Boskey, and Wall Street swindlers, who allegedly received punishments equal to stealing a pack of gum. Mark Rich is named for theft of hundreds of millions and a pardon while a fugitive. The speaker contends that Jewish influence in politics led to favorable outcomes for these figures, including pardons. In the twenty-first century, the speaker claims Bernie Madoff stole from the world and faced criticism mainly for stealing from fellow Jews, citing Forbes Magazine’s list of top Russian oligarchs as involved in murder, extortion, and embezzlement, who have been prosecuted but sheltered abroad by influential media and men. The speaker references Goldman Sachs, Mr. Blankfein and Mr. Kahn, and larger robberies of the Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen. The Fed allegedly stole over 20 trillion dollars from the public and bailouts of international banks are described as crimes. The speaker attributes the promotion of drug abuse to Hollywood’s influence and accuses the Hollywood industry of enabling drug and alcohol abuse among “our people.” The speaker proclaims exposing media lies and promises deeper analysis, suggesting a small 5% effort can affect 90% of people. The audience is told why they may not have heard of “Wiki Meets cable” and why the same media censors information about alleged criminal leadership, while also accusing the ADL of criticizing the speaker. The speaker pledges to continue speaking and asks for financial support to fight for the future of listeners and their children.

Speaker 0 states that Jewish individuals own much of the media, fund politicians who demand reparations for the black community, and take the intellectual lead in combating initiatives proposed by the first group. Speaker 0 claims this results in black and white workers fighting each other while Jewish individuals profit and assume leadership. Speaker 1 agrees with Speaker 0, except for the claim that Jewish individuals profit. Speaker 1 believes Jewish leaders are doing what they think is correct. Speaker 1 states that Jewish individuals tend to take the intellectual lead in most movements. Speaker 0 claims that Jewish individuals create issues, and that the issue of reparations didn't exist until created by Jewish individuals. Speaker 1 is inclined to agree, and says Jewish individuals take the lead in civil rights generally. Speaker 0 claims they take the lead in opposing them, creating issues and dividing people.