reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and the food supply, highlighting a push for synthetic lab-grown food controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing control over transactions, which could lead to mandated consumption of artificial food products. The speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting farmers and fishermen to prevent the mass production of lab-grown meat in manufacturing plants and laboratories.

The speaker asserts that every time people consume natural flavorings, they could be ingesting substances developed by human fetal cells. They claim that major food companies—Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft—have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers, and that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue. Due to legal loopholes, these connections aren’t required to be disclosed to consumers. The speaker explains how the process allegedly works: the food industry recognizes that processed foods lose flavor, so they hire biotech firms to develop flavor enhancers rather than using real ingredients. They state that Ceramics found HEK293 cells, which originated from fetal tissue, respond to flavors in a way similar to human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, additives were created to enhance processed foods, purportedly making them more appealing and contributing to widespread addiction to these products. These chemical compounds were then rebranded as natural flavors. Why this matters, according to the speaker, is that the food industry operates as a single, deceptive system that uses loopholes to keep consumers uninformed. They claim that today even “natural flavors” can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed using biotech processes that consumers aren’t told about. The overarching message is that the pursuit is profit rather than health, and that consumers are being used as experimental subjects. If such information has been hidden for decades, the speaker questions what else might be concealed, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. The speaker also warns that if companies can manipulate what people eat, they could influence how people think and feel. They exhort viewers to expose the truth together and to share the video with others who care about food provenance. The closing call to action emphasizes education as power and urges collective effort to uncover and understand hidden information about natural flavors. Throughout, the speaker asks viewers whether they have been fooled by natural flavors and invites discussion in the comments, framing knowledge and collective action as the path to greater freedom.

Speaker 0 summarizes that days after Bill Gates visits Singapore for a high-level meeting, the government quietly passes a new law granting the power to mandate injections and jail anyone who refuses. The law is laid out in the Infectious Diseases Act. Section 47 states that during any outbreak or even the suspicion of one, the director general of health can order any group of people to undergo vaccination or other prophylaxis. If individuals do not comply, they can be fined up to $20,000 or imprisoned for up to a year. Further, Section 67 ensures no accountability if something goes wrong, with no lawsuits or liability for the health officer, the doctor, or the government. The account notes that this is in Singapore, described as one of the strictest nations on earth, contrasting it with Singapore’s harsh anti-drug stance—public banners warn that possession of even 15 grams of heroin can carry the death penalty, with different penalties for drug offenses depending on age. The speaker then asserts a broader claim: beyond injections, the policy is about what those injections are doing. A new peer-reviewed study from Turkey is cited, claiming that mRNA COVID shots reduced female rats’ egg reserves by up to 60%, described as permanent destruction of primordial follicles, which determine how long a woman can have children. The speaker links this to a wider pattern observed in women, including menstrual disruption, early menopause, infertility, miscarriages, and fetal death, while asserting that no one is allowed to say it. The narration concludes by arguing that if this were any other drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market years ago, but instead the “pop agenda” is being pushed, with the implication that authorities and researchers are doubling down on the policy.

The difference between a food chemical and a drug is intended use; if intended for food, almost anything can be synthesized and added. The speaker claims we are being mass-drugged and poisoned by 10,000 virtually unregulated chemicals in our food. Monsanto's glyphosate litigation revealed ghostwritten papers claiming its safety, illustrating corruption. The speaker believes these unregulated chemicals are making us sick. Evidence-based approaches requiring long studies to prove harm from substances like glyphosate are flawed. The speaker asserts that the synergistic combination of toxins causes pleiotropic health issues, requiring common sense to understand the problem.

Speaker 0 argues that the food supply is treated with a chemical called folic acid, which is not a natural vitamin and did not exist until the 1980s. According to the speaker, folic acid is not found anywhere on the surface of the earth, whereas folate does exist in nature. The speaker notes that during pregnancy, women are told to take high doses of folic acid, and questions why a man-made chemical that didn’t exist until the eighties is deemed absolutely necessary for a healthy pregnancy. The comparison is made between folate and methylfolate, implying a distinction between natural forms and synthetic forms. The speaker also states that in the United States, the entire grain supply—flour, rice, bread, pasta, grains of any kind, and cereals—is required to be sprayed with folic acid, although this is not openly labeled as such. Instead, it is described as fortified or enriched foods. The speaker claims that these fortified or enriched nutrients are fed to children, and asserts that half of the population has a gene mutation that prevents them from processing folic acid effectively. The consequence, according to the speaker, is that when a person cannot process a high amount of something introduced into the body, it becomes dysfunctional. The speaker then connects this to a broader societal issue, describing a common scenario: a child goes to school, comes home with a phone call reporting inattention and poor ability to follow directions, and the ensuing medical response is the prescription of stimulants such as Adderall or Ritalin. The speaker characterizes this as a solution that uses amphetamines to accelerate the central nervous system to match the pace of a racing mind, rather than addressing underlying factors. Ultimately, the speaker presents a proposed solution: remove folic acid, fortified, and enriched nutrients from the diet, and observe changes in behavior. The underlying claim is that eliminating these synthetic nutrients would calm behavior and improve function, implying that the current approach relies on artificial chemistry rather than natural nutrition.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccinating children, as it may have long-term effects on future generations. They mention recent studies showing epigenetic effects of glyphosate, where consuming it can impact future generations. While these studies have been conducted on rats, the speaker believes it can be extrapolated to humans. They emphasize the importance of considering the future and potential unknown effects of mRNA vaccines on future generations. The second speaker agrees, highlighting the lack of knowledge about medium and long-term consequences of injecting substances without sufficient understanding. They argue against mandatory vaccination, stating that while not everyone will die from vaccines, some will suffer adverse effects that are unacceptable. These effects may include unknown side effects and potential generational impacts.

The speaker says they want dyes removed from food, noting that products like Froot Loops contain dyes in the US but not in Canada or Europe. They are launching a review of Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) standards, which were adopted in 1958 to avoid testing common foods like flour, dairy, and eggs. The speaker claims industry took advantage of GRAS to add chemicals to food without review, resulting in 10,000 ingredients in US food compared to 400 in Europe. They state the US has the worst chronic disease burden globally. The plan is to eliminate GRAS standards for new products, review old ingredients for safety, and encourage companies to remove harmful ingredients.

Glyphosate is described as the biggest enemy in food, with the speaker asserting it is “proven to cause and tons of evidence” and noting billions of dollars Bayer and Monsanto have paid in glyphosate damages because it is connected to a very specific form of cancer. The current battle is described as state by state, with Bayer trying to pass a bill that says if the EPA says glyphosate is safe, then damages do not have to be paid. The speaker compares this to seeking the same “nineteen eighty six vaccine immunity” but for glyphosate, arguing that glyphosate must be a top priority for the administration. Attention has been given to preservatives and food red dyes, but the speaker emphasizes that parents can choose not to feed their children certain foods, whereas glyphosate enters water systems and can drift from one field to another, affecting crops even if they are organic. It is claimed that glyphosate contaminates our food systems in ways that are very hard to prevent, even with active efforts to avoid exposure, and that it also impacts farmers. Red dye 40 and sodas are described as secondary priorities, though easier to address because the mechanisms are understood. The speaker mentions possible actions such as regulating the purchase of soda with SNAP as a straightforward policy: “regulating the use of SNAP for purchasing of soda” is presented as a reasonable and easy measure to enact. In contrast, glyphosate management is described as a much harder battle due to entrenched systems, and banning it is described as very challenging, with the EPA allegedly still protecting its use. Overall, the speaker stresses that glyphosate is a far more systemic and difficult-to-address problem than other additives, due to its environmental spread, its alleged health risks, and the political and regulatory protections surrounding its use.

The focus on food safety and toxicity is a distraction from vaccine discussions. There's a push for clean food and new nutritional guidelines, but this could lead to higher food prices and starvation. Recent bans, like that of RAD 3, lack scientific backing for cancer claims. The narrative is driven by individuals like Kelly and Casey Means, who present themselves as health experts but have questionable backgrounds and connections to pharmaceutical lobbying. Their influence in political campaigns aims to regulate food supply heavily, potentially harming small farms and creating food shortages. This strategy appears to be a new method to control the population, shifting focus from vaccines to food regulation.

Synthetic molecules in medicines are intentionally being used for sterilization and population control, according to the speaker. They claim that a billion-dollar enterprise is working to eliminate billions of people, starting in Africa. Multilateral agencies and health authorities are accused of colluding against the people and engaging in chemical warfare.

The speaker discusses the harmful additives in food and water, such as aspartame, GMOs, and fluoride, linking them to health issues. They highlight the dangers of genetically modified organisms, toxic chemicals in food, and the need for consumer awareness. The speaker urges caution in consuming processed foods and advocates for organic options. They emphasize the importance of researching and making informed choices to avoid being exposed to harmful substances. The speaker concludes by encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their health and well-being.

The speaker asserts that preservatives are toxic to the body and rejects putting any preservatives into it, stating that if what you’re consuming is not three ingredients or less (basically food), you should not put it into your body. They argue that common additives like citric acid, maltodextrin, vegetable glycerin, and soy lecithin should be avoided, describing each as problematic. Key claims include: - Citric acid is a toxic mold sprayed with aluminum, and it was created by Pfizer, so people are aware and should avoid it in supplements, food, cleaning products, and shampoos. - Maltodextrin is derived from corn that has been sprayed with pesticides and is a cheap filler. - Vegetable glycerin could come from canola, soy, or corn, and you have no idea; solvents and chemicals are used in its production. - Soy lecithin is another cheap filler used in vitamins, supplements, and foods and it causes bloating. - Xanthex gum (Xantham gum) is another additive mentioned. The speaker emphasizes keeping intake simple: if you’re eating, stick to the simplest things—meat, dairy, honey, fruit, vegetables, nuts, and superfoods. They claim all of these are single-ingredient foods. If you want to add flavor, you can use some spices, but there isn’t much needed beyond that. They criticize highly processed products, suggesting that items like cookies with many ingredients are “garbage” that will pollute the body. The speaker contends that dietary issues people encounter are often attributed to genetics, but in their view, the root cause is having “poisoned” the body with processed foods. The conclusion presented is that avoiding processed additives and focusing on simple, whole foods will lead to better gut health, whereas consuming processed, multi-ingredient products will lead to negative outcomes. The speaker closes with a blunt affirmation: “It’s great.”

The speaker warns that Codex Alimentarius will harm fertility by weaponizing food globally. Various organizations are part of a genocidal agenda to reduce the population for a sustainable planet, eliminating people as "useless eaters." This vision includes clean air, water, and green landscapes, but at the cost of human existence.

The speaker discusses the food industry and its questionable practices, particularly in targeting children with products like Lucky Charms. They highlight the concerning ingredients in Lucky Charms, such as Trisodium Phosphate (TSP), which is a cleaning compound. The speaker also mentions the negative effects of Red 40, including hyperactivity and behavioral changes, and the risks associated with Yellow 5 and 6. They conclude by stating that Yellow 5 should not be allowed in foods, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

The speaker asserts that a common vitamin C supplement has a problematic underlying issue. They state that vitamin C supplements are ascorbic acid, and that synthetic ascorbic acid is produced from GMO corn. The speaker notes that the vast majority of GMO corn is sprayed with Roundup, the glyphosate weed killer. They claim that, in head-to-head studies, naturally occurring vitamin C found in foods such as oranges versus synthetic ascorbic acid shows benefits for humans, whereas the synthetic form does not appear to have the same impact. The speaker refers to a specific head-to-head study comparing camu camu berries to ascorbic acid in smokers, and they report that only naturally occurring vitamin C from camu camu berries lowered oxidative stress. They also mention observational studies in which the consumption of synthetic vitamin C has been associated with worsening metrics of cardiovascular disease. Based on these points, the speaker presents a takeaway: the synthetic form of vitamin C is derived from GMO corn, and consuming more of this synthetic form may be less healthy, while consuming the naturally occurring vitamin C from sources like camu camu berries or other natural sources could be more beneficial. The overall message emphasizes two main claims: (1) synthetic ascorbic acid is produced from GMO corn, which is largely treated with Roundup glyphosate, and (2) evidence from head-to-head and observational studies suggests that naturally occurring vitamin C provides benefits or oxidative stress reductions that the synthetic form does not, with observational data linking synthetic vitamin C to worse cardiovascular metrics. The speaker concludes that, to be healthy, one should eat more of the naturally occurring vitamin C sources and less of the synthetic ascorbic acid.

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and food supply control, highlighting the push for synthetic lab-grown food by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing natural food sources and emphasize the importance of preventing financial transaction control to avoid being forced to consume lab-grown meat. The ultimate goal is to maintain support for farmers and fishermen to prevent the widespread adoption of synthetic food.

Speaker 0 explains that you can lose weight eating pasta and bread in Europe, but in the United States a bowl of pasta and a basket of bread can leave you sleepy and in a bad mood; in Italy, a fat bowl of pasta makes you feel amazing. The reason given is that in 1993 the chemical industry allegedly convinced the federal government that grain supplies needed to be sprayed with folic acid, so all flour, bread, pasta, and cereal became enriched. Enriched foods are described as being sprayed with folic acid. Folic acid is labeled as a man-made chemical produced in a laboratory and not found naturally anywhere on Earth. The speaker emphasizes that folic acid is the most prevalent nutrient in the human diet. The message is not to avoid grains, rice, pasta, cereals, or bread, but to eat non-enriched versions of those foods—the organic versions.

The speaker asserts that arsenic is present in vitamins and in chocolate, saying, "even with vitamins by the way, you would be surprised about how many vitamins have arsenic in there." They add, "Oh yeah. And you would be surprised chocolate has arsenic." "Did you know that? We all think chocolate has arsenic." They further state, "So when you talk about, well, how do I, you know, benefit myself? You're living in a toxic world and the food that you're presented are not even the real foods. So that's the problem." The focus is on alleged arsenic in everyday items and a claim that the foods available are not real foods.

Speaker 0 posits that every time you consume natural flavorings, you could be eating something developed by human fetal cells. They claim that major food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers. The disturbing part, they say, is that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue, and that due to legal loopholes they don’t have to tell consumers. They insist: natural flavors don’t necessarily come from nature; they can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. The explanation provided is that the food industry knows processed food loses its flavor, so instead of relying on real ingredients, they turn to biotech companies to develop flavor enhancers. Ceramics reportedly found that HEK293 cells, originally from fetal tissue, react to flavors like human taste buds, and by testing these flavors on cells, additives were created to make processed food better, allegedly addicting millions of people worldwide. These chemical compounds were then rebranded as natural flavors. Speaker 0 asserts the why behind it: the food industry is described as one giant deceptive machine that uses loopholes to keep consumers in the dark. They claim that today, even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed using biotech processes that consumers aren’t told about. The overarching claim is that the motive is profit, not health, and that people are the experiment. If this has been hidden for decades, then they ask what else might be hidden, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. They warn not to trust food giants that profit from deception, arguing that if manipulation of what people eat is possible, it could extend to manipulating how they think and feel. They conclude by stating that the truth is out and invite viewers to share whether they’ve been fooled by natural flavors in the comments.

Folic acid, a man-made chemical created in a laboratory, is not a natural vitamin B9 and does not exist in nature, unlike folate. Pregnant women are advised to take high doses of folic acid. In the United States, the entire grain supply, including flour, rice, bread, pasta, and cereals, is sprayed with folic acid through fortification or enrichment. According to the speaker, half the population has a gene mutation preventing them from processing folic acid, leading to dysfunction. The speaker suggests that this may cause behavioral issues in children, such as difficulty paying attention and following directions, which are often treated with drugs like Adderall or Ritalin. The speaker proposes removing folic acid from children's diets to improve their behavior, rather than medicating them.

The speaker asserts that every time people consume natural flavorings, they may be eating something developed by human fetal cells. They claim that some of the biggest food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers. The speaker emphasizes that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue, and that due to legal loopholes, companies do not have to disclose this information. They repeat that natural flavors do not necessarily come from nature; they can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. The explanation continues with a description of how the process works: the food industry knows that processed food loses flavor, so rather than using real ingredients, biotech companies are brought in to develop flavor enhancers. Ceramics (likely a misspoken or misnamed term) is cited as identifying that HEK293 cells, derived from fetal tissue, react to flavors like human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, additives were created to improve the flavor of processed food, allegedly addicting millions of people worldwide. The speaker claims that these chemical compounds were rebranded as natural flavors. The broader assertion is that the food industry operates as a large deceptive machine, using loopholes to keep consumers uninformed. The message is that even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed via biotech processes that consumers are not told about. The speaker claims the issues are driven by profit rather than health, and that people are the experiment. They ask what else has been hidden if this has been kept secret for decades, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. The speaker warns against trusting food giants that profit from deception, arguing that if they can manipulate what people eat, they can manipulate how people think and feel. The speaker ends by declaring that the truth is out and invites the audience to share whether they have been fooled by natural flavors in the comments.

The speaker claims the U.S. has 10,000 food ingredients due to the FDA's GRAS standard, which presumes chemicals are safe until proven guilty. Europe, in contrast, has only 400. Kellogg's Froot Loops in the U.S. contain red, blue, and yellow dyes, unlike the version sold in Canada, which uses vegetable dyes. A U.S. McDonald's French fry has 11 ingredients, while the same product in Europe has three. The speaker believes companies are mass poisoning American children due to their influence over regulatory agencies and asserts they are the only one who can stop it.

The speaker argues that modern medicine creates enormous financial incentives around chronic diseases. Diabetes is described as a $110 billion per year industry, leading to the suggestion that there might be meetings in big pharma to undermine efforts to end the disease. If asked to design a diet that guarantees diabetes, the speaker would download and pass along the American Diabetes Association’s dietary guidelines, claiming that the guidelines themselves promote an insulin-dependent diet. The breakfast example given is a glass of orange juice, a bowl of oatmeal with crushed brown sugar and natural honey, and a snack of yogurt with fruit on the bottom, totaling 44 grams of sugar. The discussion shifts to pharmaceutical acquisitions, noting that Pfizer paid $6.6 billion for Arena Pharmaceuticals and asserting that Arena “fixes myocarditis, pericarditis, and diffuse vasculitis as a consequence of vaccine injury,” labeling this as a factual claim about Arena’s products. The speaker links folic acid production to Monsanto with other medications, asserting that folic acid is the leading cause of ADD, ADHD, and manic depression and that these conditions are treated with Ritalin, Vyvanse, and Adderall, dismissing it as a coincidence rather than a conspiracy. Vitamin D deficiency is highlighted as a major health issue, with the speaker claiming that 50% of the audience is clinically deficient in vitamin D3, and that 85% of African American and Latino populations are deficient due to skin pigment. This deficiency, they argue, correlates with higher all-cause mortality and weaker immune systems, and is used to explain why COVID affected minorities disproportionately—not due to minority status but pigment. The pandemic period is criticized for weakening immune systems through social distancing, residential quarantining, and masking. The speaker contends that humans are meant to interact, and such interaction builds a strong immune system. A personal maxim is shared: aging is the aggressive pursuit of comfort; the more comfort sought, the faster aging occurs. The speaker urges resisting discomfort—exercising, taking cold showers or plunges, dieting, and tolerating some hunger—arguing that avoiding discomfort leads to negative health outcomes. Finally, they caution against restricting activities for older people based on weather, asserting that people should go outside regardless of heat or cold and embrace discomfort rather than avoiding it.

Clayton opens by arguing that Agenda 2030 is not dead but advancing more aggressively than ever, reshaping how people live, eat, travel, work, own property, and how populations are managed. He notes the plan was rolled out by the United Nations in 2015 as a global mission to tackle poverty, hunger, and promote health, education, equality, DEI, and a move toward a one-world governance system. He contends that, despite promises of peace and prosperity, evidence suggests Agenda 2030 has pushed forward a broader globalist control agenda, including depopulation theories, the end of private property, and a shift to digital ownership. He highlights “fifteen minute cities” and other reforms as developments seen in real time, while claiming the policy has not fulfilled its stated health or sustainability goals. Clayton emphasizes a specific disconnect: while Agenda 2030 promised safer agriculture and reduced chemical exposure, actual agricultural data show increasing chemical dependence. He cites FAO data indicating that total pesticide use in 2023 reached 3,730,000 tons of active ingredients, a 14% rise over a decade, with pesticide use intensity over two pounds per acre—twice the 1990 level. He notes that other global studies show pesticide use up about 20% over the previous decade. Despite rhetoric about sustainability and reduced chemical inputs, Clayton argues agriculture has moved toward greater chemical dependence, implying a contradiction between promises and outcomes. He also references a curb in insects he previously observed, suggesting ecosystem disruption consistent with rising chemical use. Clayton then critiques a recent executive order that he sees as protecting Bayer and Monsanto in glyphosate production, despite allegations linking glyphosate to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. He frames the move as counter to the stated goals of better health and safer food, calling out a tension between official health claims and policy action. Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to unpack these concerns. She agrees Agenda 2030 marches forward regardless of administration, noting that the policy has created chaos and confusion. She argues farmers have become dependent on pesticides for quantity of food production, not necessarily quality, leading to soil degradation and diminished ecosystem health. She asserts glyphosate and other pesticides are harmful to human health and soil microbiomes, and she emphasizes the need to regain local control of farming inputs to reduce dependence on foreign manufacturers. She argues that even organic farming cannot fully avoid pesticide exposure due to global contamination, and she highlights chlorpyrifos as particularly damaging to DNA, cardiovascular and respiratory systems, and cognitive health. She discusses the link between environmental toxins and increases in dementia and other neurocognitive disorders, suggesting environmental exposure plays a role alongside other factors. Bright stresses that the gut microbiome is central to health and cognitive function, describing the gut-brain axis via the vagus nerve, where gut microbes influence mood, digestion, and cognition. She explains that a degraded soil microbiome leads to a degraded gut microbiome, reducing the body's ability to produce serotonin and other essential compounds, contributing to anxiety, depression, and chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes. She notes that antibiotics and modern medical practices can disrupt the microbiome, and she criticizes the tendency for physicians to treat symptoms rather than root causes. In discussing mitigation, Bright advises careful food sourcing, supporting organic or regenerative farmers, and prioritizing prevention while acknowledging that some pesticides cannot be entirely avoided. She highlights kimchi as a potent natural modulator of the gut microbiome, pointing to its 900+ probiotic strains, prebiotics, and postbiotics that work together to support gut health. She cites studies showing kimchi improves cognitive function impaired by amyloid beta, reduces aging in human cells, and may lower body fat when eaten daily. She argues kimchi provides a robust, multi-pathway benefit beyond typical probiotic supplements and emphasizes daily consumption for health gains. Bright explains that kimchi fermentation degrades chlorpyrifos, a pesticide with high toxicity, and notes that kimchi’s gut-protective properties help shield against toxins. Bright further discusses the superiority of a diverse microbial ecosystem over sheer CFU counts, arguing that complex microbial ecosystems more accurately predict health. She shares anecdotal success stories of Kimchi One customers experiencing brain fog relief and mood improvements, attributing these outcomes to gut health. The conversation concludes with Bright reiterating that Agenda 2030 remains active and urging proactive personal health measures, including daily kimchi intake and informed food choices. She encourages readers to take responsibility for their bodies and to seek reliable information while resisting uniform passivity.

The speaker claims that the synthetic vitamin industry is a scam created by Big Pharma to sell more products. They argue that even organic vitamins are made from industrial waste such as coal tar ash, petroleum oil, black mold, and cyanide. The speaker explains that the push to sell vitamins began in the 1920s, with organizations lobbying for iodine to be added to table salt. This was followed by the fortification of milk with vitamin D and the identification of new vitamin deficiency diseases. The speaker suggests that this created a cycle of new vitamin discoveries and the need for chemical substitutes to keep people healthy.