TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The spike protein from various vaccines can bind to cancer-related genes, induce cancer pathways, and inhibit DNA repair. It can turn cells into spike factories, leading to immune system attacks and potential cancer development. Reports of increased cancers and harmful effects on organs have been observed. Military data was allegedly suppressed. This situation is seen as a crime against humanity.

Kevin McKernan recently discovered that there is contamination in the mRNA shots with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called SV40. SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and impairs tumor suppressor systems. This means that the shots not only promote cancer through SV40 but also inhibit our ability to fight cancer. The increase in cancer rates is undeniable, but the question remains: how much of this is due to the vaccines?

Well, Alex, honestly, the the way I look at this sort of attack on fertility and just attack on humanity in general is that it wasn't necessarily that they wanted people to die. And what you're seeing is the suppression of the information in terms of the damage that's being done to people is most intense in several areas. They don't want to know that these shots cause cancer long term. There's at least twenty cases in VAERS already right now. I believe that every child who has taken at least one COVID vaccine has an increased risk, lifetime risk of developing cancer at some point in their lives. So, this is an attack long term on children, because these children's lives will be dramatically shortened unless we come out with some solutions for these kids.

We're seeing a surge in aggressive cancers, appearing at advanced stages, a phenomenon unlike anything seen before. Doctors are noticing a correlation between these cancers—breast, ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, and prostate—and increased lipid peroxidation, seemingly linked to vaccinations. This isn't explained by delayed diagnosis or treatment. For example, a previously healthy 28-year-old male died five days after his second Pfizer vaccine; his heart was described as "mushy." This, among other cases, highlights the vaccine's danger. The lack of media coverage is alarming; this isn't just a medical crisis, but a crisis of science and democracy. I believe this vaccine should never have been authorized for mass use.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

Turbocancer refers to cancer that behaves aggressively, growing and spreading quickly. Spike proteins from the COVID-19 vaccine have been found in cancer cells, suggesting integration. Cancer rates have increased since the vaccine rollout, with statistics showing a significant rise in cancer deaths and disability rates. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System has reported a significant increase in cancer cases associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccines have been found to be impure and contaminated with DNA and endotoxins. Regulatory agencies have ignored these concerns. The presence of carcinogenic viruses and sequences in the vaccines raises questions about informed consent. The current regulatory system is inadequate, and it's time for change.

This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process: one where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections. They know something. Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from their trial, they knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD one forty seven marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant DNA contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So, I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies, are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like, right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population. And we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

An article in Spectator Australia reported that DNA plasmids are contaminated with SV40 promoter sequences, which are oncogenic and used in cancer development in mice. The speaker questions why this is in an RNA vaccine, as the presence of DNA means it can integrate. Despite claims that the spike protein stays at the injection site, it has been identified everywhere, including in metastases from a colorectal cancer case where spike messenger RNA from the vaccine insertion was confirmed. The speaker was refused autopsies, even with consent from relatives, including a case of explosive melanoma after a booster shot. A report in The Lancet about deaths after vaccines was pulled, allegedly due to improper peer review. The speaker claims a media channel warned them that the government had made it a crime to criticize the vaccine program on the media.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.

"Major increase in colorectal cancer in young adults tied to pandemic years, researchers say." "We're planning to change our health agencies for a generation or longer." "NIH had just funded a lab that brewed up a virus that killed twenty million people worldwide." "gain of function doesn't matter at this point if it leaked or it was purposely released." "we vaccinated for it. We vaccinated with a vaccine that has more risks than benefits we know now." "Sleeping cancer cells in the lungs can be aroused by COVID and flu." "IL-6 dependent." "They confirmed this by engineering mice to lack IL6. In these animals, the dormant cancer cells did not multiply nearly as quickly." "lipid nanoparticle vaccines encompass adjuvants such as LMPs, which trigger inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1L beta and IL-six." "These vaccines also produce spike proteins, which facilitate the release of inflammatory cytokines."

- "Turbo cancer was framed by mainstream media as being basically a myth, but it's not anymore." - "Now it is in the scientific peer reviewed literature, an entire manuscript dedicated on COVID nineteen vaccine induced turbo cancer." - "Unusually aggressive cancers that kind of just like they start with a small tumor, they get the shot, and then they have like 50 tumors or this single tumor grows into a large mass and then they end up dying shortly thereafter." - "So these turbo cancers are usually seen in young individuals as outlined in that study." - "You don't see these cancers in these young individuals and there's so many different mechanisms biologically that the protein does indeed induce cancer." - "One is hyper inflammation makes the body primed for cancerous growths." - "One is genetic dysregulation, gene expression chaos." - "And another one is it literally suppresses tumor suppressor genes, p53 and BRCA, BRCA."

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise in "turbo cancers" in young people to these vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly discouraged from publishing anything that might undermine public confidence in vaccines. They argue the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, particularly for young people, and that statistical modeling supporting their use is flawed. The speaker highlights an article in the Mail on Sunday where they and James Royal asserted a causal link between the vaccines and cancer, citing cases of relapsed and new stage four cancers. They criticize the medical community for not routinely collecting patients' vaccine histories and dismissing any potential association. The speaker believes the risk of cancer increases exponentially with each vaccine dose.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise of "turbo cancers" in young people to the vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly considering it a crime to undermine public confidence in them. They state the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, with benefits existing only in statistical models. They criticize COVID modeling for being consistently inaccurate and exaggerating the severity of the pandemic. The speaker highlights a Mail on Sunday article where they and James Royal argued that the vaccines cause cancer, citing relapsed cancers and new stage four cancers in healthy individuals. They conducted a survey revealing that they were the only doctor asking patients about their vaccine history, while other doctors deny any association between the vaccines and cancer.

A scientist reports an increase in cancer cases worldwide after the rollout of experimental injections. CDC data confirms this trend, with a significant increase in cancer cases. The spike protein in these injections binds to the p53 gene, leading to cancer pathways opening up. There are numerous harmful effects caused by the spike protein, and the scientist is concerned about the lack of long-term safety studies for these products. The lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, not intended for human or veterinary use, have been administered to over 5 billion people. The J&J vaccine, containing a carcinogenic substance, was quietly pulled from the market. The NIH is withholding information on cancer pathways and forced the retraction of a scientific paper. These injections also affect the immune system's ability to function properly, impacting cancer prevention. The scientist apologizes for those who received these injections without informed consent and urges action at the local level to stop further harm.

The speaker discusses the presence of contamination in vaccines, specifically cDNA fragments and s p 40, which is a cancer-promoting segment of DNA. They mention that s v 40, a related virus, caused cancer in millions of Americans in the past. The speaker explains that s p 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the vaccines impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the vaccines promote cancer and hinder our ability to fight it. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing but questions how much of it is due to the vaccines.

Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

It is possible to understand what is happening with vaccines without a statistics degree. VAERS was in place during the rollout of many vaccines, including measles, rubella, and COVID. One speaker had not heard federal officials reference VAERS. The idea with VAERS seems to be that people are complaining and should be quiet. The technology in these shots was brand new and never deployed before at scale, and the trials were a joke. It is hard to get up-to-date cancer numbers. While one speaker does not see a lot of cancer in their practice, friends at MD Anderson say they have never seen anything like the young people coming in with very advanced tumors. That is what we have to be worried about now.

Speaker 0: Doctor Sun Shiang is concerned about suppression of natural killer function, which we can talk about in a section. 'there was a, I believe it was a colon cancer that was the DNA was sequenced, and there was the plasmid within the DNA of that colon cancer.' 'Yep, that was Kevin.' He adds, 'I would immediately start sequencing tumours in people who'd had multiple shots,' noting, 'this is a species level problem because of the number of people that were injected.' Doctor Xion Xiong writes about eight, nine and ten year olds with colon cancer and a 13 year old in his clinic dying of metastatic pancreatic cancer, and compares pre COVID and post COVID VAERS data. He 'counted all the colon cancer reports in VAERS from 2018 to 2020 for all vaccines combined,' versus VAERS from '2021 to 2023.' He finds 'an 8,300 percent increase' and a PRR of '11.5.' He concludes, 'VAERS is like leaves rustling in the wind, but it's a signal,' a 'pharmacovigilance tool designed to do this,' and, 'If it's over one or two, depending on your limit, you have a definitive association and possibly a causal effect.'

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.