TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

Today, we have a firsthand witness who has retrieved a UFO. I trained as a pilot and have served in various combat roles, including deployments in Bosnia and Kuwait. When asked about the companies involved in UFO crash retrievals, I suggest two guesses would lead to the right answers. I believe there are underwater UFO bases, particularly during the Clinton era. Yes, I have retrieved nonhuman craft. I receive GPS coordinates and a brief description just before dispatching to pick it up. I refer to this experience as ontological relief, realizing that what we perceive as "other" may actually be part of us, blurring the lines between outer space and inner space.

There's significant interest in unidentified flying objects and potential extraterrestrial life. While I’m not a strong believer, I’ve interviewed credible jet pilots who reported seeing strange objects, including one that moved four times faster than an F-22. They described a round object that didn’t resemble a comet or meteor. Speculation exists about life on Mars, but no evidence has been found. Some recent sightings, like the balloon incident, have led to theories that they could be advanced drones rather than UFOs. The pilots I've spoken to are solid individuals who assert there's something unexplained. Notably, Commander David Fravor's 2004 sighting off San Diego involved an object that exhibited extraordinary movement, defying known physics. These encounters suggest advanced technology beyond our current understanding.

Speaker 0: Have you ever recognized I’m extremely respectful of your clearances and things that you can’t talk about. But has there ever been an instance where you’ve heard somebody’s UAP story and thought, that looks like something from a blue or black page I’ve seen in my past? Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, sir, this is no joke. There is a great man I hope you have on your podcast. Some people have, for example, this professor Dave, who has put him down greatly, and others have called him all kinds of ad hominem attacks. His name is Ashton Forbes of the mh three seventy files. Let’s call them that. He has a pod named Hard Truths Podcast. He has a very interesting set of videos that he has been putting forward and trying to understand the physics, and in my opinion, he has gotten somewhere. And as a matter of fact, this guy is in the health care industry, and yet his ability to take, for example, a physics paper, he’s very interested in, for example, a neutronic fusion. So in other words, without the production of neutrons, fusion being very essential to the power plant, the way these things operate. And in my opinion, one should pay very much attention to what Ashton has to say. It’s those videos, I have never seen anything more remarkable that show the Pais effect in action than those videos. And if indeed somebody took the time to go for the incredible amount of work, in my opinion, to get the physics right, for example, when these three orbs coalesce around the aircraft and start pulsing energy, which is exactly what I’m talking about, a resonance condition being set around the craft, breaking the Schwing limit, you actually see the black hole formation. I don’t know what else to say. But if that is not the Pais effect, right there for everyone to see, I don’t know what it is. Speaker 1: Again, I call it the Pais effect because, again, this is in the wide world now. They cannot take these back. They’ve already, how should I say it, they’ve let them out there. So now they’re in the public eye. Speaker 1: But I think it’s very important, Ashton and I were talking about this, that this is the kind of disclosure you need. It is one thing to keep on hearing, oh, NHI is this. Are we not proud of being humans? Are we not capable of great feats of engineering and physics? Do we not take pride in who we are? Speaker 1: We’re Homo sapiens sapiens, and that’s where we stand. And let anyone come against our species. We shall defeat them because we’re humans. We’re very, very special in this galaxy, sir. In this whole universe, I think we hold a very special place. Speaker 1: Maybe that’s why they visit us.

I'm Phil Schneider, a former government geologist and engineer who worked in black budget programs. I was involved in building an underground base in New Mexico. We drilled four large tunnel-like holes, but the equipment kept breaking. When I was lowered down one of the holes, I encountered a 7-foot tall alien. I killed two of them, but one used a blue beam to severely injure me. The government has been hiding the truth about aliens for 70 years. There are 131 underground military bases in the US and 1,477 worldwide. Boring machines melt and deflagrate rock to create these bases. I have faced numerous attempts on my life because I pose a threat to the New World Order and the alien agenda. There are nine alien races, some of which consume human glandular secretions. Thousands of children have gone missing and may be held in these bases. We need to do our own research and speak out to uncover the truth.

Over the years, I've interviewed individuals who worked at Groom Lake. One man, who spent 12 of his 30 years in black programs there, firmly stated that UFOs absolutely exist. When I pressed him for more details, he said he couldn't share any information. A year later, during another conversation about Groom Lake, he mentioned that there are many activities happening that he wouldn't be able to discuss until 2025. He added that there are advanced technologies in the Nevada desert that would impress even George Lucas.

NASA owns the rights to the interior of the Great Pyramid, a section of the Grand Canyon, and Chaco Canyon. They restrict access to these areas, citing technological discoveries. A mysterious encounter at the Grand Canyon with a man in black military attire revealed NASA's ownership. The speaker questions the connection between NASA, these ancient sites, and space technology.

In 1974, I was introduced to the late Doctor Wernher von Braun in the U.S., the father of rocketry. He would repeat to me over and over, and the last card, the last card, the last card would be the extraterrestrial threat. And they're all lies. There is no threat. It's all based on a lie. Space. There'll be a lot of things happening in space.

Nick Fuentes discusses being enemy number one to the government, citing being on the no-fly list and having bank accounts frozen. He says questioning the Israel lobby in 2017 led to backlash. He describes being blacklisted by conservatives and social media censorship, including being banned from platforms and banks due to "reputational risk." Fuentes says he was a libertarian neocon in his youth, consuming Breitbart and Prager University content. He gets his information from the New York Times, Axios, and Twitter, using background knowledge to discern truth from propaganda. He acknowledges biases but tries to be objective. He addresses accusations of antisemitism, attributing them to political correctness. He admits to "baiting" early in his career to break through censorship. Fuentes wants America to be more Christian, specifically Catholic, and more white and European. He questions when enough immigration is enough, citing assimilation concerns. He believes the 2016 and 2020 elections were referendums on America's identity. He says individual actions determine right and wrong, criticizing Israel's actions in Gaza. He claims the Israeli government's actions stem from not being Christian. Fuentes denies being a white supremacist but believes race is real. He says Jewish people are influential due to tribalism, not just IQ. He says they are allowed to work as a team in an open system. He questions their loyalty to America, citing loyalty to Israel. He says they had a long-term relationship with the US, but it is dubious how much they benefit the US. He says they are playing a very long game and have influence in many capitals. He says they are a country, we're a country, they have a distinct national interest, they're threatened by us, and we should be threatened by them. Fuentes says third-party journalists are not allowed in Israel, which is a red flag. He says if everything is what someone says it is, then why are certain third-party publications not allowed to go and report? He says it's hard to make the conclusion that something bad isn't happening or something wrong isn't happening with that being true. Fuentes says he got in contact with Ye after the DEFCON 3 tweet. He went to Mar-a-Lago with Ye, who asked Trump to be his VP. He says Trump lost his mind and said Ye could never win. He says Ye is a good man who loves everybody but is getting screwed over. He says he wants to move on, but they won't let him move forward unless he apologizes. Fuentes says he would consider being in politics, but they're gonna throw everything he's ever said in his face. He says he's not a hateful guy, but he makes jokes about black people, Polish people, Mexicans, you name it. He says he doesn't think there's any constituency. Fuentes says he hates working out because it hurts. He says the gym bro culture is so vain. He says people should work out, but some people take it a little too far. Fuentes says after the election, he got really viral, because he said, Your body, my choice. He says everybody posted his home address, his phone number, and so people started just coming to his house. He says a kid came to his house with a gun and a crossbow and killed his dogs. He says he thinks it had to do with that tweet. He says now he has security at his place. Fuentes says he's not a really social person. He reads a lot. He plays video games. He says he's a big gamer. He says he plays, like, map games, like Civilization V and Call of War. He says he's a big fan of Joseph Stalin. He says he wants to understand life. Fuentes says he's definitely a Big Mac guy. He says everything about UFOs comes from the DOD. He says he thinks it's a big SIOP. He says he doesn't think there's any aliens here. Fuentes says there's no aliens. He says if there's aliens, we don't know about them. He says some people say aliens are demons. He says everything that we know about them or learn about them literally comes from the Department of Defense and the Pentagon, all these disclosures. He says he thinks it's a big SIOP. He says he doesn't think there's any aliens here. Fuentes says he's not a Nordic, that's for sure. He says he's a gray. Fuentes says he's not a really social person. He reads a lot. He plays video games. He says he's a big gamer. He says he plays, like, map games, like Civilization V and Call of War. He says he's a big fan of Joseph Stalin. He says he wants to understand life. Fuentes says he's definitely a Big Mac guy. He says everything about UFOs comes from the DOD. He says he thinks it's a big SIOP. He says he doesn't think there's any aliens here. Fuentes says there's no aliens. He says if there's aliens, we don't know about them. He says some people say aliens are demons. He says everything that we know about them or learn about them literally comes from the Department of Defense and the Pentagon, all these disclosures. He says he thinks it's a big SIOP. He says he doesn't think there's any aliens here. Fuentes says he's not a Nordic, that's for sure. He says he's a gray. Fuentes says he had never heard from Nelk before, but he woke up at 2 PM, and his phone's blowing up. He says they said, Oh, Nelk wants you to come on the show. He says that's how he heard about it. He says they said, Yeah, we want your reaction to the to the interview. He says he washed his face, he got on, and he thinks they they were getting a lot of shit for that. He says they were getting a lot of blowback. He says they were looking for the other side to come on and kinda tell them, you know, that what they did was okay, or it wasn't that bad. He says that he was, like, the counterweight, which is kinda funny to think about. He says it's kinda funny that they bring on Netanyahu and they think, we need to hear from the other side. He says, Let's get Nick Fuentes, which is like prime minister of Israel, like livestreamer. He says that that's the two. Fuentes says he agrees with the host, and he said that to them. He says, Like, obviously, you're gonna take it. He says, Because as a content creator, it's like you say, it's gonna be a big interview. He says, But the thing is, when it comes to pushback, it's just doing your due diligence. He says, You're acting almost on behalf of the audience and saying, what would the audience say? He says, What would a skeptical mind say in this circumstance? He says, And he told them, the only way to make it right, or the way to make it fair, is you gotta interview the other side. He says, If your goal is we're gonna hear everybody out, gonna hear out Netanyahu, we're not gonna give a ton of pushback, okay. He says, But unless you interview the other side, then it's propaganda. He says, So you gotta interview the pro Palestine side, whatever. Fuentes says he doesn't wanna say it, but he heard that they got hooked up with somebody who's pro Palestine. He says that's fitting, because it's an Israel Palestine war. He says, But even an America first person, even someone like Tucker for that matter, who is up with a similar stature to Netanyahu in terms of notoriety. He says, Or you. He says, Or me. He says, But he doesn't wanna be a shameless self advocate. He says, They should talk to me. Fuentes says he didn't watch the whole interview. He says it was just clips.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

I'm passing on what I've learned to you, things I've learned from my life experience, waking up the American people, and all the letters and people I've talked to. What do you believe about America? Are you helping to divide us or bring us together? Do you really understand what this country is all about? I saw a massive disc-shaped craft emerge from the ocean, defying our known physics. After reporting it, we were debriefed and warned to remain silent. This event started me on a lifelong quest into extraterrestrial life, government cover-ups, and secret societies. I released "The Secret Government" to protect myself. I also saw top-secret documents about alien agreements and a secret space program. Later, I realized that what I was witnessing might be our own government's creations, tested at Area 51. I shifted my focus towards government studies. I synthesized my research into "Behold a Pale Horse," explaining how ancient mystery schools secretly control the world, across different nationalities and religions.

I'm concerned about the evidence I've encountered. Donna Hair, a NASA photographic scientist, testified about seeing high-resolution satellite imagery of a white disk while working at Johnson Space Center. Initially, she thought it was a flaw in the emulsion, but her colleague pointed out that the shadows were consistent with the trees, indicating it was not a flaw. She claimed NASA airbrushed out UFOs from images for various purposes. I accessed the network in Building 8 and found folders containing large, unprocessed images. One image showed a cigar-shaped object above the Earth, featuring geometric domes and no visible seams or man-made features. It clearly did not resemble any known satellite, despite my extensive knowledge of space imagery.

I interviewed a former employee who spent 12 years in black programs at Groom Lake. When I asked if he believed in UFOs, he firmly stated that they absolutely exist but couldn't elaborate. A year later, during another discussion about Groom Lake, I inquired about the activities there. He mentioned that there are many things happening that he couldn't disclose until 2025. He added that the technology in the Nevada desert would make George Lucas envious.

I interviewed a former employee who spent 12 years in black programs at Groom Lake. When I asked if he believed in UFOs, he replied, "Absolutely, positively, they do exist," but he couldn't elaborate. A year later, I inquired about activities at Groom Lake, and he mentioned there were many things he couldn't disclose until 2025. He added that the technology in the Nevada desert would make George Lucas envious.

Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs? Yes. Were these programs designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft? Yes. Do any US contractors have similar programs? I prefer to address that in a closed session. In your book, you mention government employees injured by UAPs who are on leave and receiving compensation. Is that correct? Yes. How can the government deny recovering craft if they are compensating injured individuals? That's a great question. I've seen documentation from the US government regarding individuals who sustained injuries from UAP incidents.

Chris Mellon, a former U.S. intelligence official with about twenty years of experience in the Defense Department and on the Senate Intelligence Committee, shared remarks in response to the UAP documentary Age of Disclosure. He references the documentary’s claim that the Air Force maintained a secret program in the 1990s to track UAP near Area 51 and other sensitive military facilities, a claim attributed to General James Clapper, former Director of U.S. Air Force Intelligence and former Director of National Intelligence. Mellon asks several pointed questions about whether that secret Air Force UAP program still exists today, where the data resides, and what the Air Force has learned. He critiques the Air Force for its handling of information requests from Congress. Specifically, he notes that when Congress sought UAP information in the 2020 intelligence authorization bill, the Air Force denied possessing relevant information beyond a handful of recently submitted, non-sensitive reports issued after DoD guidance in 2020 required all military components to report UAP sightings. Mellon contends that the Air Force brass appear to treat Congress with contempt, even if not legally unlawful, and he expresses belief that the secret Air Force UAP program described by Clapper, or a similar program, remains quietly active behind the scenes. He argues this could explain several anomalies in UAP reporting. Mellon highlights incidents to illustrate his concerns: - Air Force F-22s, despite superior sensors, did not report UAP operating in DoD training areas off the East Coast, while Navy F-18s routinely detected and reported UAP on the same ranges. - The USS Princeton radar data from the Nimitz/UAP case allegedly disappeared after U.S. Air Force officers visited the ship. - There are multiple instances where Navy data was reportedly removed by Air Force personnel. - Nimitz deck logs from the period of Princeton UAP tracking in 2004 are missing. - The Air Force has reportedly never reported UAP detected by its strategic radar systems, including solid-state phased array radars with vast range and coverage, even when UAP were detected for days directly in front of these emitters. - No NORAD UAP intercept cases from recent decades were submitted with the 2021 UAP report to Congress, including the well-known UAP incident over the Bush Ranch in Texas, where F-16 pilots reportedly were compelled to sign NDAs by the Air Force. - As recently as the previous year, the Air Force refused to provide NORAD UAP intercept data to DOD’s All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office in Congress. - There are no reports of UAP in space despite a substantial U.S. Air Force space surveillance capability. - The Air Force reportedly seized Navy sonar data obtained after an encounter by a U.S. nuclear submarine with an underwater UAP. Mellon concludes that the Air Force may be withholding UAP data by placing it in an obscure, highly secret “waived special access program” inaccessible to even the chair and ranking members of the intelligence committees, or by invoking authorities such as the Atomic Energy Act to justify concealing data. He suggests the Air Force could claim to be merely the executive agent for the CIA or the National Nuclear Security Agency, creating a potential reporting gap where one agency’s claim of responsibility shifts the burden, allowing the other to deny accountability. Mellon characterizes this dynamic as a possible exploitation of a fissure in the current congressional military and intelligence reporting framework, describing it as a “deep state” mechanism that avoids full congressional visibility into UAP information.

The speaker states they came into contact with industry leaders, technical scientists, active duty and retired military personnel, intelligence officers, generals, admirals, and colonels who directed intelligence at the DIA and CIA. These individuals reached out to the speaker to conduct foreign UAP intelligence analysis and assessment. Based on exposure to classified information, the speaker claims definitively that UAPs are real. The speaker alleges that major world governments, including the United States, China, and Russia, have recovered UAP craft that have landed, crashed, or been found in or outside their territories. These recovered materials have been taken to highly sensitive programs, even more secretive than the Manhattan Project or the modern nuclear weapons industry.

I believe aliens have been present for 75 years, with countless witnesses and interactions, even flying over the White House. They are not visible through telescopes, but their existence is undeniable. I don't think they walk among us, but acknowledging their presence requires an open mind and curiosity.

I used to live in Las Vegas and had a neighbor, a drunk ex-military guy, who claimed to have worked at Area 51. One night during a power outage, he pointed out Orion's belt and said the good aliens lived on one star while the bad aliens lived on another. He described the good aliens as small, gray beings and the bad ones as tall, brown, and smelly. When I asked how UFOs traveled, he said they ran on electricity gathered in space and could open a void to move quickly, almost like falling into themselves. I was skeptical but intrigued. I once saw something in the Mojave Desert that moved much faster than a plane, making me wonder about UFOs. If this is true and I’ve revealed government secrets, I hope they don’t come after me.