TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

For years, I claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children underwent proper safety testing in placebo-controlled trials. When I confronted Fauci about this, he couldn't provide the study he claimed existed. After suing him, we received confirmation that no such study was ever conducted. The lack of liability and safety testing saves pharmaceutical companies significant costs, leading to a rush to add unnecessary vaccines to the schedule. This has resulted in a dramatic increase in chronic diseases among American children since 1989, including a rise in neurological disorders and autism, which has skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34 today.

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. Being unvaccinated should be applauded because vaccines are causing chronic diseases in America. A study with over 1,000 unvaccinated people showed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. The CDC promised to conduct a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals but never followed through. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has proven otherwise.

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

According to the speaker, chronic illness in children has risen from 12.4% in the 1980s to over 50% today, marking a significant decline in human health. Depression in girls has risen by 95%, with 10% of teenage girls on antidepressants. 15% of boys are on ADHD medication, and 25% of girls have considered suicide. The speaker claims that SSRI drugs, though increasingly prescribed, target serotonin, which is not the actual cause of depression. It's estimated that nearly half of boys and over half of girls born in 2019 will be on pharmaceutical drugs for most of their lives. Childhood cancer rates are up 40% since 1975, and heart attacks in children are now a recognized concern. The speaker suggests that environmental toxins, including a vaccine program that starts on day one of life, may be responsible. They state that the Hepatitis B vaccine, typically contracted through sexual activity or IV drug use, is mandated for day-old babies in the US, despite only 0.5% of mothers testing positive. The speaker believes that the current vaccine schedule of 72 to 90 vaccines by age 18 is contributing to the chronic disease epidemic.

According to VAERS, there have been 38,000 deaths from COVID shots. The speaker claims that under normal circumstances, the FDA would have pulled the shots, but instead, they've been put on the childhood vaccine schedule, with babies expected to get three shots by nine months old. The speaker states the shots are still under EUA status for those 12 and under, and are not fully FDA approved, yet are on the vaccine schedule. According to the CDC, nine million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots. The speaker expresses concern about myocarditis in children. The speaker believes the shots should have been shut down a long time ago.

The CDC vaccination schedule has increased from 3 injections in the first year of life to 29 today. This does not include the 4 shots recommended during pregnancy, which were not part of the schedule in 1986. During the same period, the percentage of children in America with chronic health issues has risen from under 13% in the early 1980s to over 50% today. Many of these issues, particularly immune-mediated conditions, have significantly increased since 1986. There appears to be a concerning trend regarding the immune health of children.

According to the speaker, the COVID vaccine has caused more deaths in the last 8 months than 72 other vaccines combined over the past 30 years. They claim that children are most at risk of suffering from heart attacks due to myocarditis, with a 50% chance of death or requiring a heart transplant within 5 years. The speaker mentions different studies that estimate the likelihood of children getting myocarditis from the vaccine, ranging from 1 in 300 to 1 in 2,700. They argue that the risk of COVID-19 for healthy children is zero, based on studies that found no healthy American child who died from the virus. The speaker also discusses data from Pfizer's trial, highlighting neurological injuries and the case of a girl who is now wheelchair-bound after participating in the trial. They express concern about mandating the vaccine for children based on limited testing.

The speaker says RFK Jr. aims to alter the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The law firm he hired specializes in this program, established in 1986 and in effect by 1988. He will claim the CDC hid evidence about aluminum adjuvants and try to add autism, eczema, or asthma to the compensable list, or remove vaccines from the program, leaving them to civil litigation. He reportedly wants to eliminate vaccines, arguing we traded infectious diseases for chronic diseases. He says chronic disease incidence in children is one in thirty two, implying vaccines cause autism, despite studies. At a confirmation hearing, Cassidy pressed him to admit vaccines don’t cause autism; he cited Mawson and colleagues claiming Florida Medicaid children were more likely to develop autism after vaccination; the paper was not published, not peer reviewed, and was flawed. This is the beginning; as HHS Secretary he could end vaccine manufacturing.

Two physicians and a child health safety group filed a lawsuit against the CDC and the vaccine schedule, claiming '72 vaccines for children ages zero to 18 years old that has never been studied.' They say 'while we have studied each individual vaccine, they have never studied giving all of these vaccines together' and that 'the effects, the long term effects, never.' The suit asks to either 'study it' or 'change the category of vaccines.' They note that most vaccines are 'category a' while 'meningitis B and the COVID nineteen vaccine' are 'category b,' and they want all vaccines to be category b so that 'parents, exemptions, and physicians can work together to decide what's best for each child.' The CDC says 'we haven't studied it,' citing lack of nonvaccinating participants and cost. They say 'you get billions in funding' and question feasibility. The speaker invites thoughts and promises updates.

Speaker claims that the American Academy of Pediatrics' top funders are "Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi" and "Merck" as another top funder; "So if you don't think they're captured, you're you're really not being honest." They allege that "your average pediatrician makes a lot of money by having, you know, meeting milestones about having, you know, x percentage of their, population, their patient population fully vaccinated according to the schedule." They argue "so they are pushing these things despite the fact that the science is that these children don't need it." The speaker says they found on the AAP website "they are still pushing the abject falsehood that children, healthy children, are at a they say from newborn stage five are at, quote, the highest risk for COVID." "What? Are you kidding?"

RFK Jr. continues to falsely claim that vaccines cause autism, and he's made childhood vaccines a major target. This is dangerous and will lead to the death of children. When RFK Jr. says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he's citing the instance of autism spectrum disorder. There are many interesting causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome, genetics, or medicines that pregnant people take during their pregnancy. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism. Vaccines are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children, and that's what is making America healthy. To focus on vaccines as a target and claim that they're causing harm when they're not is only a detriment to America's children.

More than 40% of American children have at least one chronic health condition. Since the 1970s, rates of childhood cancer have soared, in some cases by nearly 50%. In the 1960s, less than 5% of children were obese; now, over 20% are obese. A few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism; today, it's one in 31. The speaker states they will not stop until they defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America.

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes between these two groups is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. A study by the control group with over 1,000 unvaccinated people also revealed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. Despite promises, the CDC has never conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has been able to prove otherwise.

We're seeing the tip of the iceberg. So right now, I think probably the most prominent, demonstration of that, is, what secretary Kennedy did with changing the childhood schedule for COVID nineteen. In that, we were directed that only children with underlying conditions would be the ones that should qualify for vaccination. That's not what the data shows. Six month old to two year old, their underlying condition is youth. Fifty three percent of those children hospitalized last season had no underlying conditions. The data say that in that age range, you should be vaccinating your child. I understand that not everybody does it, but they have limited access by narrowing that recommendation. Insurance may not cover it.

The childhood vaccine schedule is under scrutiny, with the World Council For Health calling for a moratorium on childhood vaccines due to safety concerns. Vaccines given in multiple rounds may contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders like ADHD, autism, and seizures. Studies suggest that children who receive no vaccines have better outcomes.

I defend public health leaders and question why cuts are bad for health at HHS. Distrust stems from conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking money from pharmaceutical companies while recommending drugs. He claims science is settled, yet approved vaccines have been recalled. I want focus on real issues: 38% of children having prediabetes. Measles deaths were high before vaccines, but chronic conditions are a bigger threat now. RFK Jr. isn't anti-vaccine but wants vaccine studies. I question why media covers measles over obesity and diabetes. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths were American, but the CDC didn't discuss metabolic links. I support measures like removing soda from SNAP, aiming for better health policies. Pharma profits from sick children, incentivizing chronic disease.

"Parents should really stick the course and make sure that their children get all of the routine childhood vaccinations." "The American Academy for Pediatrics has reaffirmed that infants, children between the ages of six months and two years should get their COVID shots." "The first encounter with COVID should be with the shot, not with the virus." "There is still a very high risk in younger children, particularly six months to two years for hospitalization and severe complications if they get COVID." "And pregnant women should be getting the COVID vaccine." "Routine childhood vaccines have actually been thimerosal free for years now." "Aluminum nudges the immune system so that you get a longer lasting, more robust immune response with fewer doses." "There's no evidence that it's harmful." "There is a very strong track record of vaccines in randomized placebo controlled trials."

According to VAERS, there have been 38,000 deaths from COVID shots, but instead of being pulled, the FDA has doubled down and put the shots on the childhood vaccine schedule. Babies are expected to get three COVID shots by nine months old. The shots are still under EUA status for the under 12 age group and are not fully FDA approved, yet they are on the vaccine schedule. The CDC states that nine million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots. There is concern about myocarditis. It is believed that the shots should have been shut down a long time ago.

At a recent conference in Romania on the COVID crisis, a credible estimate suggested that there could be 17 million deaths worldwide from the COVID vaccine. This number may seem high, but when you consider the global population, it is not impossible. It is tragic that the vaccine is still being recommended for healthy children who are unlikely to benefit from it and may suffer serious and long-lasting harm. There has never been a proper justification for giving the vaccine to healthy kids, as they are not at high risk of dying from COVID and the vaccine does not prevent transmission. It is concerning that this practice continues even though the emergency situation has passed.

The transcript follows a documentary-style examination of rising chronic illness in American children and a contested view of vaccine safety and testing. It weaves together personal testimonies, investigative reporting, and expert interviews to present a narrative that vaccines may be linked to widespread health problems and that the safety science behind vaccination is insufficient or flawed in certain respects. Key claims about child health trends - A diverse set of pediatric health issues is described as increasingly common: ADHD, allergies, eczema, psoriasis, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s disease), IBS, sleep disorders, seizures, and neurological conditions. Several speakers list multiple conditions affecting children, suggesting a broad chronic disease trend. - A striking statistic cited: “More than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition” (Speaker 5). Relatedly, autism rates are described as rising from “one in ten thousand” decades ago to “one in thirty one” today (Speaker 5). - An overarching contention is that these rapid increases are unlikely to be explained by genetics alone, given the relatively fast pace of change in incidence. The central study and the “hidden” narrative - The documentary frames a study led by a scientist who allegedly conducted research into chronic disease and vaccination but chose not to publish due to fear of repercussions. Hidden-camera investigations and interviews are used to explore why such data might remain unpublished and how the medical establishment responds to dissenting findings. - The film positions Dr. Zervos (Marcus Zervos), an infectious disease expert at Henry Ford Health System, as a pivotal figure who agreed to a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study but reportedly did not publish the results, leading the filmmakers to pursue further inquiry with him and others. Vaccines, safety testing, and the placebo question - A core claim is that vaccines have not undergone the gold standard of safety testing: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials for the entire childhood schedule. The film argues that no childhood vaccine has completed such a trial prior to licensure. - The hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB) is used as an example: its pre-licensure safety data reportedly cover only five days after each dose, with no long-term control group, and section 6.1 of the insert notes five days of safety monitoring, raising questions about detecting longer-term autoimmune or neurological injuries. - Opposing voices acknowledge ethical constraints around placebo trials in the presence of existing vaccines, but the documentary challenges this by pointing out that certain comparator trials (e.g., Prevnar 13 vs Prevnar 7) were not against saline placebo, and thus do not establish a safety baseline. - A recurring metaphor is the “whiskey study” scenario to illustrate how non-saline placebo comparisons can mislead safety conclusions. Retrospective and observational studies; the vaccine-safety signal - The film emphasizes retrospective and observational studies as alternatives to randomized trials, arguing they can reveal safety signals when prospective trials are unavailable. It highlights the Henry Ford Health System’s data as a major retrospective study: a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analysis based on a large, integrated health database. - According to the film, the Henry Ford study found that vaccinated children had higher risks across multiple chronic health categories. Specifically, ten years of follow-up suggested: - Vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have a chronic health condition overall. - An approximate fourfold increased risk for chronic health conditions in certain analyses. - A 4.29-times higher risk for autism was not statistically significant due to small autism counts in the unvaccinated group, but substantial signals were observed in other neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reported markedly higher rates of autoimmune diseases (around six times higher) and various neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group compared with unvaccinated peers. - In the ten-year window, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children. - The documentary notes methodological limitations common to retrospective studies, such as follow-up differences and confounding factors, but argues that sensitivity analyses did not overturn the main findings. The vaccine schedule, broader policy, and dissent within the medical community - The narrative asserts that a large portion of physicians publicly defend vaccines as safe and effective, with long-standing support for vaccination policies and mandates. Yet it also recounts stories of physicians who faced professional pushback, licensing actions, or public criticism after raising questions about vaccine safety or suggesting alternative research paths. - The film mentions the Institute of Medicine’s 2011 report, which stated that there were over 150 injuries likely associated with vaccines that had not been studied, and it notes that no large, randomized comparisons between fully vaccinated and fully unvaccinated populations had been published by major institutions (as of the report’s release). - The filmmakers recount efforts to obtain a definitive vaccination–unvaccinated study from Henry Ford and other institutions, with some figures expressing willingness to publish if the study clearly demonstrated that unvaccinated children fared better, while others face professional or political pressures. Vaccine advocacy versus safety concerns; the call for replication - Pro-vaccine voices in the film emphasize that vaccines have prevented millions of deaths and remain broadly safe, citing the historical success of vaccines and the large body of published research supporting vaccine effectiveness and safety. - Proponents of re-examination advocate replicating retrospective cohort analyses in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to test whether similar patterns emerge. They stress the ethical and scientific necessity of replication to determine whether the observed signals hold across populations. - The film closes with a call for replication and transparency: if the data are robust, publishing them could transform the understanding of off-target and non-specific effects of vaccination. If replicated, such studies could reshape how vaccines are administered and studied. The documentary also threads personal stories of vaccine injury, including cases of severe reactions after various vaccines and the emotional and logistical toll on families. It juxtaposes these individual tragedies with the broader debate over vaccine safety research, urging readers to consider the evidence, replication, and the possibility that current vaccine safety paradigms may require reassessment.

In 2022, over 14 million children did not receive any vaccines. The goal is to reduce that number by 2030, working with partners like Gavi and UNICEF. Anti-vaxxers pose a serious challenge, requiring a strategy to push back, because vaccines work for both children and adults, and there is evidence to support this. It's time to be more aggressive in countering anti-vaxxers, who used COVID as an opportunity to create havoc.

The American Academy of Pediatrics' demand to remove vaccine exemptions will backfire and destroy the vaccine program. Taking away parents' rights, regardless of their reasons for not vaccinating, will turn them into lifelong advocates against vaccines. Even with exemptions in 45 states, vaccination rates are above 90%, far higher than the 50-60% in the early 1980s when everyone was "pretty much fine." The focus should be on the chronic disease epidemic, not blaming the unvaccinated. The AAP is a trade organization that benefits financially from rising chronic disease and vaccination rates. By trying to crush people's rights, the AAP is repeating the mistake made in California in 2014, which emboldened vaccine rights advocates. To persuade people to vaccinate, one must use facts, not bullying. The AAP's conduct is the worst form because they are trying to crush rights instead of persuading.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., HHS Secretary, announces with NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary that the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule. Kennedy states that the Biden administration previously urged healthy children to get COVID shots despite a lack of clinical data supporting repeat boosters in children, which Kennedy says ends today. He claims there is no evidence healthy kids need the vaccine, and most countries have stopped recommending it for children. Kennedy concludes that this action brings the country closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again.

For years, I claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children underwent safety testing in placebo-controlled trials. Despite Tony Fauci's denials, I challenged him to provide evidence. He admitted he didn't have it on hand and promised to send it, but I never received it. After suing him, his lawyers confirmed there was no such study. The lack of liability and safety testing allows pharmaceutical companies to profit significantly, as the government mandates vaccines for millions of children. This has led to a surge in unnecessary vaccines, contributing to a dramatic rise in chronic diseases among American children since 1989, including conditions like autism, which has increased from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34.