TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that top law enforcement officials expected Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election and manipulated the law to ensure her victory and Trump's defeat. He cites James Comey's alleged admission of operating in an environment where a Clinton victory was expected. The speaker discusses the alleged intrusion into the Democratic National Committee (DNC), pointing to "telltale signs in Cyrillic" and the name "Felix Dzerzhinsky" as either sloppy or overly clever attempts to implicate Russia. He alleges that the persona "Guccifer 2.0" is a fraud, based on forensic analysis of metadata by former NSA technical directors. The speaker criticizes Bob Mueller, claiming he falsified intelligence before the Iraq War and approved of torture and wiretapping. He recounts an encounter where he questioned Mueller about "parallel construction," the practice of using illegally acquired information in prosecutions without revealing its source. The speaker describes James Comey's leaking of a conversation with President Trump to prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor, Bob Mueller. He questions Comey's decision not to seize the DNC computers after the alleged Russian hacking, relying instead on CrowdStrike, a firm with a "disastrous record of veracity." The speaker claims that the DNC blamed Russia for the hacking to divert attention from the content of the leaked emails. He references Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary Clinton's PR person, allegedly pushing the "Russians hacked" narrative. Chuck Schumer is quoted as saying the intelligence community has "six ways to Sunday" to get back at Trump. The speaker discusses the Steele dossier and claims that the FBI also paid for it. He alleges that the intelligence community assessment on Russian hacking was based on handpicked analysts and that Obama stated the conclusions of Russian hacking getting to WikiLeaks were inconclusive. He claims NSA collects everything and there is no evidence of Russian hacking. The speaker references Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's text messages, where they expressed support for Hillary Clinton and a determination to "stop" Trump. He claims Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, later said there was "no there there" regarding Russia gate. The speaker claims Julian Assange released documentation of the CIA's cyber tool to hack into systems and leave telltale signs giving the responsibility to someone else. He concludes that a "deep state" within the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department acted to ensure Hillary Clinton's victory and undermine Trump.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016.

The discussion centers on whether high-ranking Democrats abused their intelligence positions to convince Americans that Russia stole the 2016 election. One participant alleges a conspiracy led by Obama, claiming Democrats couldn't believe Trump won and wanted to delegitimize his presidency. Counterarguments emphasize that a bipartisan committee, including Marco Rubio, concluded Russia interfered, but didn't change votes. The conversation explores whether the issue is the intelligence community's conclusions or public belief. One participant defends Obama's actions, citing his transition with Trump. Another claims Obama was the architect of the Russian collusion narrative, feeding fake intelligence to the media. A counterpoint is made that Trump acted differently when Biden won. One person suggests the conversation is a distraction tactic employed by Donald Trump.

The transcript states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. These emails quote a Clinton campaign adviser saying, "it will be a long term affair" and to "demonize Putin and Trump," and that, "later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire." Other emails reportedly reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents purportedly provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. The transcript adds that, despite these alleged disclosures, the Obama intel community forged ahead with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.

A report alleges that President Obama and his intel agencies conspired to sabotage Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the 2016 election. According to the report, Obama directed the creation of a false intelligence community assessment claiming Russia interfered to help Trump win. The report claims that Obama ordered the CIA to create a new assessment after Trump's victory. John Brennan allegedly handpicked five CIA analysts, siloed them, and rushed the assessment before Trump's inauguration. The assessment allegedly contained four key false elements: Putin wanted Trump to win, Putin helped Trump win, the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier), and the Russians colluded with the Trump campaign. The report claims that the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, and suppressed contradictory intelligence. Some believe that 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked voting machines to help Trump win. Solid intelligence suggested Putin had no preference and expected Hillary to win, possessing compromising information on her that was never released. The report suggests Obama and his spy chiefs knew Putin didn't prefer Trump or collude with him, but promoted the narrative anyway. Evidence purportedly points to Obama leading the manufacturing of this assessment, potentially implicating him in criminal behavior. Brennan allegedly committed perjury when he lied to Congress about the Steele dossier.

At President Trump's direction, a declassified oversight report from September 2020 has been released. The report alleges that President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of a false intelligence community assessment. This assessment promoted a contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win. The report claims there is irrefutable evidence detailing how they manufactured findings from shoddy sources, suppressed evidence that disproved their claims, and disobeyed intelligence community standards. They allegedly withheld the truth from the American people and conspired to subvert the will of the voters who elected Donald Trump. They are accused of working with media partners to promote this lie to undermine President Trump's legitimacy, launching a years-long coup against him and his administration.

The speaker claims that a declassified oversight report reveals irrefutable evidence that President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of a false intelligence community assessment (ICA). This assessment promoted a contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, which the speaker alleges was untrue. The report supposedly details how they manufactured findings, suppressed evidence, and disobeyed intelligence standards to subvert the will of the American people and undermine Trump's legitimacy, launching a "years long coup." The speaker asserts that Putin's principal interest was to undermine faith in the US democratic process, not to favor a specific candidate. The speaker claims that John Brennan and the intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that Putin was saving damaging material on Hillary Clinton until after the election, including possible criminal acts. Brennan and the IC allegedly mischaracterized intelligence, relied on the Steele dossier, and excluded information contradicting the ICA's claims about Putin's support for Trump. The speaker states that multiple intelligence community assessments concluded Russia had neither the intent nor capability to impact the election outcome.

In 2016, nobody believed it possible for Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. When he did, it seems president Obama just couldn't take it. He convened in 12/09/2016 meeting in the White House Situation Room just weeks after Hillary Clinton conceded. He ordered an ICA or intelligence community assessment to functionally attribute Trump's unexpected win to the doings of Vladimir Putin. That Obama ordered phony assessment was about politics, not national security or the truth.

Newly declassified material reveals handwritten notes by former CIA Director John Brennan from July 2016. According to the notes, Brennan briefed Obama and senior officials, suggesting Hillary Clinton's campaign approved a plan to tie Trump to Russian interference in the election, allegedly to distract from her email scandal. The notes outlined concerns about Russian knowledge of this strategy. The speaker claims that in 2016, Brennan, Obama, and their advisors knew Hillary Clinton was running an operation and were worried about Russia finding out about it. The speaker suggests that officials knew early on there was no evidence that General Flynn had done anything wrong, but talked about continuing to investigate him anyway.

The speaker discusses actions taken in recent weeks related to transparency of intelligence operations and political manipulation surrounding the 2016 U.S. election. They claim that documents have been declassified and released which reveal that, after Election Day 2016, high-level figures in the Obama administration and leaders within the intelligence community knowingly created and disseminated a false intelligence document. This document, according to the speaker, asserted that Russia intended to assist Donald Trump in winning the presidency with the aim of undermining his administration and overriding the will of the American people who voted for Trump to be the nation’s commander in chief rather than Hillary Clinton. The core claim presented is that this manufactured intelligence was produced and circulated despite the outcome of the election having already been decided by the voters, and despite the public’s expressed preference for Trump to assume the presidency. The speaker emphasizes that the deception occurred at the highest levels of government and intelligence, implying an intentional effort to influence perceptions about the 2016 election and the legitimacy of Trump’s win by attributing foreign support to him that allegedly aimed to undermine his presidency from the start. Key elements highlighted include: - The timing: after the 2016 election was completed, and after the American people expressed their choice for the presidency. - The actors: President Obama and leaders within the intelligence community. - The nature of the claim: the creation of a “manufactured” or false intelligence document. - The alleged content: Russia’s supposed goal to help Trump win with the objective of undermining his presidency and overruling the expressed will of the voters. - The consequence implied: a deliberate effort to mislead about foreign influence in the election and to challenge the legitimacy or outcome of the election by associating Trump with foreign assistance intended to subvert democratic choice. Overall, the speaker asserts that the released documents expose a deliberate fabrication by top government figures designed to cast doubt on the 2016 election outcome and to imply foreign interference aligned with undermining Trump’s presidency. The emphasis is on the authenticity and impact of declassified materials that reveal this alleged manipulation. No evaluation of the truth of these claims is provided within the summary.

We have found the evidence that proves that this Obama led intelligence community assessment was a contrived document, that was knowingly made using a fake intelligence or substandard intelligence in order to drive this, conclusion that president Obama wanted to see, which was that Russia helped Donald Trump get elected in 2016 or at least aspire to. This directly contradicted every other intelligence community assessment, every other assessment that came from the intelligence community for the last several months prior, both before the twenty sixteen election as well as immediate, immediately after.

The transcript reports that Tulsi Gabbard released a House Intel report alleging a conspiracy by President Obama and U.S. intelligence agencies to undermine the 2016 election and Donald Trump. It claims Obama ordered a new intelligence community assessment on Russia’s interference, handpicking five CIA analysts to draft a rushed, siloed report with only one person in charge. The four elements cited as the basis of the Russia hoax are: Putin wanted Trump to win; Putin took action to help Trump win; the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. It asserts there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations, senior CIA officials refused to traffic in them, but were overruled by Brennan and Comey, who allegedly cherry-picked, misquoted, and suppressed countervailing intelligence, including anonymous postings. The document alleges Obama continued promoting the hoax, mentions potential criminal implications, and states the Steele dossier was not used by the CIA. It ends with accountability rhetoric.

"There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." "There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt." "One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump." "That the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign." "Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey." "60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House." "Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country." "It's time for people to pay the price."

News alert discusses Tulsi Gabbard releasing a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and U.S. intel agencies to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency and the 2016 election. The report claims there is irrefutable evidence that Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump win. Gabbard says she obtained a House Intelligence Committee report that had been locked away in a CIA vault for nearly a decade, and investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. The assertion is that the Obama administration doctored intelligence to imply Putin and Trump colluded to steal the election, with a highly unusual, rush-developed assessment produced a month after Trump’s victory. John Brennan allegedly handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, who were siloed and not aware of each other’s work, with only one analyst in charge of drafting. The process was described as a rush job with no coordination with other intelligence agencies, essentially “home cooking” for Obama. The four key elements repeated in the assessment, forming the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation, are: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took actions to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. The claim is that none of these were true, and there was no reliable intelligence to support them. Senior CIA officials allegedly refused to propagate these allegations, but were overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, who pressed for them despite lacking verifiable evidence. The report alleges the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed counter-evidence, and even used anonymous internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA personnel allegedly admitted that these actions violated tradecraft standards, with a pressure campaign emanating from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. Speaker 1 asserts that Donald Trump knows Russia helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2 suggests Putin’s preference for Trump came from his dislike of Hillary Clinton, who was running, while Speaker 3 states Russia sought to interfere systematically to advance Trump’s prospects. The conversation notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed Russia hacked voting machines to aid Trump, yet the report contends Russians aimed to create chaos and undermine faith in democracy, with solid intelligence indicating Putin had no clear preference between Clinton and Trump but had dirt on Clinton that was not released. The discussion questions why the dirt from the DNC emails and claims about Clinton’s health, including tranquilizers, were not leaked to aid Trump, and whether the information about Clinton’s health is credible. The panel suggests that if Russia sought to influence the election, more damning information would have been released. The speakers claim Obama and top intelligence leaders mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to craft a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump. They contend Obama continued pushing the hoax after the election, describing it as undermining democracy. Towards the end, there is mention of potential criminal implications, with references to referrals to the Department of Justice and FBI for investigation, including possible liability for Obama. A tester voices that Brennan may have committed perjury before Congress. A final note asserts that the CIA did not rely on the Steele dossier for the intelligence community assessment, countering a claim made in the discussion. The segment closes with a call for accountability.

Speaker 0 says that over the last several weeks they declassified and released documents exposing that President Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the 2016 election. The document alleged that Russia aspired to help President Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. The Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.

The transcript states that Russia claimed to have very, very damaging information—high level DNC emails relating specifically to Hillary Clinton's physical and mental health and DNC leaders questioning whether, if elected, she would be capable of carrying out the duties of the presidency. Russia had this information. If they wanted to swing the election for Donald Trump, they would have released it in September or October 2016 at a pivotal time to swing momentum in Donald Trump’s direction and damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign. They did not do that deliberately. They understood that Hillary Clinton would likely be the inevitable president of The United States. They didn’t think Trump could win like a lot of other people. And so they were withholding this damaging information about Hillary Clinton and planning to release it in the days or weeks leading up to her inaugurate expected inauguration in order to once again sow chaos within The United

We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton. And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released new evidence alleging that former President Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The speaker asserts that while Obama publicly appeared to support a peaceful transfer of power, privately he took steps to sow discord and sabotage Trump, including manufacturing and politicizing intelligence that was used to justify baseless smears against the new president. The claim is that Trump had no involvement with Russia and that the Russia collusion narrative was a massive fraud, known to Obama and others involved, including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and others. The speaker reiterates that DNI Gabbard’s report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, attributing any wrongdoing to Barack Obama and the “weaponized” intelligence agencies of the time. The Russia hoax is characterized as a blatant lie manufactured by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some personally harmed by the false narrative. The speaker notes that much of this occurred during Trump’s first two years in office, consuming vast resources, time, and political capital to debunk the allegations at the highest levels of government. According to the speaker, nearly a decade later, declassification of documents by DNI Gabbard, alongside contributions from CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, supports a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This report reportedly found the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin sought to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was allegedly preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. The narrative claims that, at the time, Obama’s unusual stance led the intel community to publish implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker asserts this constitutes one of the greatest political scandals in American history, noting that legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post were rewarded with Pulitzer Prizes for propagating political disinformation. The claim is made that those awards should be stripped from journalists who disseminated out-of-context and false intelligence to push a political narrative in service of the Democrats and associated intelligence actors.

Fox News alert: Tulsi Gabbard releases a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. There is irrefutable evidence detailing how Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, selling it to the American people as true. Gabbard obtained a House Intelligence Committee report locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it shows the Obama administration doctored intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Obama wasn’t satisfied with intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed; none knew what the others were doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting the report. It was not routine, and it was rushed to publish before Trump’s inauguration. Nothing was coordinated with other intelligence agencies. Basically, this was “home cooking” for Barack Obama. Four key elements were repeated to form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took action to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of this was ever true; there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but were overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted they be pushed without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed intelligence counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA admitted violations of tradecraft standards; a massive pressure campaign came from the top, with unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Putin hated Hillary Clinton, with a noted preference for the opponent he disliked least. It was Russia in a systematic effort to interfere in the election and advance Trump’s prospects. The report notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked voting machines to help Trump win, but the report shows Russians sought to create chaos and undermine democracy; solid intelligence suggested Putin had no preference, and expected Hillary to win, holding compromising dirt on her that he never released. If Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn’t he drop the dirt? There were high-level DNC emails detailing Hillary’s psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and a daily regimen of tranquilizers; Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to create a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump, though Obama and intelligence leaders knew Putin did not collude with Trump and did not direct his people to help Trump win, yet they published it anyway. Obama and his intel spies purportedly cooked intelligence to look like Putin preferred Trump, undermining faith in elections and causing chaos. Do you believe this implicates Obama in criminal behavior? There is a referral of documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate criminal implications. Evidence points to Obama leading the manufacturing of the intelligence assessment. Even two years after the election, Obama pushed a hoax he knew wasn’t true. Brennan, Comey, and others may have liability. Trey Gowdy claims Brennan committed perjury for lying to Congress. When asked who commissioned the Steele dossier, responses indicate the CIA did not rely on it; it was not part of the intelligence community assessment. The broadcast concludes with the assertion that what happened to these officials is not revenge, but accountability, while noting ongoing questions about potential criminal action.

Fox News alert: "the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election." The report states "there is irrefutable evidence ... directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false" and that it promoted "the contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." Investigators spent "over two thousand hours" interviewing "20 CIA and FBI officials" and found "the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election." It cites "four key elements" and says "there was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations" while noting "senior CIA officials repeatedly refused" but were "overruled by Brennan and Comey." "This is how the Russia hoax was born." "The evidence ... point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment."

"We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton." "And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House."

Fox News alerts: Tulsi Gabbard releases a “bombshell report” alleging “a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.” It claims “irrefutable evidence” that Obama directed “the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false” to promote a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump. A month after the win, Obama allegedly ordered CIA director to draft a new assessment; five CIA analysts were “handpicked” and siloed, a rush job “home cooking for Barack Obama.” The four elements cited: “Putin wanted Donald Trump to win,” “Putin took action to help Trump win,” “the Russians had blackmail on Trump” (Steele dossier), and “the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign.” It asserts none were true, with overruling by Brennan and Comey and that “This is how the Russia hoax was born.” It mentions criminal implications and accountability.

A report alleges that President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of a false intelligence community assessment to promote the narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win. According to the report, Obama ordered the CIA to create a new assessment after Trump's victory, a highly unusual move. CIA Director Brennan allegedly handpicked analysts who were siloed and rushed to publish the assessment before Trump's inauguration. The assessment claimed that Putin wanted Trump to win, took action to help him, had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier), and that Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. The report claims there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations, but Brennan and Comey pushed them anyway. It is claimed that the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, and suppressed counter-narrative intelligence. The report suggests that Putin didn't care who won, but had compromising information on Hillary Clinton that he never released. It is claimed that Obama and his spy chiefs knew Putin didn't prefer Trump or collude with him, but presented it otherwise. The report suggests Obama undermined faith in elections and caused chaos, doing what the enemy wanted. The documents have been referred to the DOJ and FBI to investigate potential criminal implications for Obama and others, including Brennan and Comey, who allegedly lied to Congress.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claims that multiple intelligence community assessments released before the November 2016 election concluded that Russia lacked both the intent and capability to influence the election's outcome. Gabbard alleges that President Obama is guilty of treason and conspired with Hillary Clinton regarding the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She supports this "extreme allegation" with public statements and released documents.