reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the history of coronavirus research, highlighting its origins in 1965 and the development of spike protein vaccines by Pfizer in 1990. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing manipulation of pathogens for various purposes and questions the ethical implications of these actions. The conversation urges listeners to consider the implications of such research on humanity's future.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as human error is always a factor. The Wuhan lab in China may have been conducting research on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an infection that spread to others. The scientists are currently analyzing the data to determine the validity of these claims. It will take time to thoroughly examine the genetic evidence.

This video discusses research by virologist Luc Montagnier showing HIV RNA fragments in the spike protein. Montagnier, known for identifying HIV, found 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV in the spike protein. The presence of these fragments raises questions about the origins of the virus. The video highlights the complexity of the situation and the need for further investigation.

The video discusses allegations of DNA contamination in the BioNTech Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. A private laboratory in Magdeburg found foreign DNA in all five batches of the vaccine they tested, exceeding the allowed limit. The lab's findings have raised concerns about potential genetic damage. However, the vaccine manufacturer denies the allegations. Some scientists believe that the presence of foreign DNA in vaccines may not be harmful, while others consider negative consequences possible. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, does not independently test for DNA contamination and relies on the manufacturers' protocols. The debate surrounding DNA contamination in vaccines remains unresolved, and further independent analysis is needed for conclusive answers.

In this video, the speaker emphasizes the importance of pursuing both hypotheses regarding the origins of the virus. They express skepticism about the virus originating from a bat and becoming highly infectious to humans. The speaker believes that the exclusion from certain calls was due to their differing viewpoint. They discuss how a group of scientists initially found the genetic sequence inconsistent with evolutionary theory but later drafted a paper arguing the opposite, allegedly prompted by Dr. Fauci. The speaker criticizes the approach taken in February 2020, stating that it goes against the principles of science. They suggest that the narrative of the virus originating from a wet market was predetermined and aimed to suppress discussion about a lab leak. The speaker also acknowledges that gain-of-function research was funded by various organizations, including NIH, State Department, USAID, and DoD.

YouTube censorship and the use of genetic vaccines are discussed in this video. The speaker, a researcher in biological and medical sciences, claims that genetic vaccines can lead to the emergence of recombinant viruses. They explain that recombinant viruses are a mix of genetic material from two parental viruses, but co-infection with two viruses is unlikely. The speaker also argues that mass vaccination with genetic vaccines can contribute to the selection of variant viruses. They personally choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19, believing it is the responsibility of non-vulnerable individuals to refrain from vaccination. They suggest that convincing older individuals to get vaccinated is difficult due to a lack of persuasive arguments.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The transcript argues that deflating the parasitic system is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice, harming the people, workers, creators, and those harmed by elite interests. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidney’s RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity. It presents a quantified claim: extrapolating estimates for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 yields total excess deaths of thirty-six million since the Covid Vax rollout, and adding nine million from Covid “killing protocols” in 2020 brings the total to forty-five million for four and a half years of Covid killing protocols. It describes SARS-CoV-2, the virus and vaccine bioweapons, as part of a narrative that depopulation and genocide are not taboo due to mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. It asserts that elites and many people still think SARS-CoV-2 is naturally evolved, but truthful science allegedly proves beyond doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was designed and made by humans in a bio lab. The transcript claims the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 contains several lab-made inserts, such as PRRA and HIVGP120, which are described as too large and too numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different from SARS-CoV-2, making natural mutation or recombination quasi zero. It also references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS-CoV-2 about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. It then asserts that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce, for months up to years, huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in all organs and tissues, much greater than the mucosal infection from the virus itself in healthy unvaccinated people, which supposedly causes mild illness. The claim continues that these GenTech Covid vaccines are, in fact, bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. It adds that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source cited for these claims is Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

In the conversation, Speaker 0 discusses conclusions about a potential manipulation of the SARS-like virus. He states that there is a model based on the classic virus, but with modifications: the model is mainly derived from a bat coronavirus, to which sequences from HIV have been added. He clarifies that he does not know who added these HIV sequences, and he emphasizes that it is not natural, describing the work as done by a professional molecular biologist, a precise and meticulous process akin to an horologist working at the level of genetic sequences. Speaker 0 further explains that the purpose of such modifications is not clear to him. His goal is to present the facts without accusing anyone or identifying who did it or why. He posits a possibility that the aim could have been to develop a vaccine against AIDS, suggesting that small HIV sequences were inserted into the larger coronavirus sequence. He elaborates that in this virus, HIV genetic material is present as a long RNA strand, and at a certain position, small HIV sequences have been fixed into it. He stresses that these small sequences are meaningful, not trivial, because they could modify, for example, antigenic sites, thereby altering the protein exposed to a vaccine through a small sequence derived from another virus. Speaker 1 interjects, noting that there has been talk of a human origin for the virus, which has been refuted by most scientific authorities. Speaker 1 highlights that despite such refutations, there is still a perceived attempt to silence the research. He mentions that another group of highly regarded Indian researchers published something similar and were forced to retract their work. Overall, the dialogue centers on the possibility of engineered modifications to a coronavirus by inserting HIV sequences into its genome, the potential purpose behind such modifications (including the idea of vaccine development against AIDS), and the broader discussion about alleged suppression or censorship of related research, alongside mentions of scientific authorities denying a human-origin claim and the retraction of parallel work by Indian researchers.

In this video, the speaker discusses their involvement in analyzing patents related to intangible assets for banking. They discovered anomalies that suggested potential violations of biological and chemical weapons laws, including a patent filed by Ralph Barrick on an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus in 2002. The speaker questions why a virus would be engineered to target different tissues and highlights that SARS CoV-1 and SARS CoV-2 are not naturally occurring phenomena but rather engineered technologies. They express concern about Moderna's patent filings mentioning the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen before the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker argues that the Wuhan virus narrative falls apart when considering the lack of evidence for a collected pathogen and questions why Ralph Barrick was asked to confirm the origin of the virus. They suggest that the virus was a weapon rather than a naturally transmissible virus due to its replication defectiveness. The speaker emphasizes the significance of the term "release" in the context of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

In this video, the speaker discusses evidence suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a natural occurrence but rather a deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen. They highlight a publication by the World Health Organization from September 2019 that mentions a world exposure to a respiratory pathogen. The speaker also mentions a report by Moderna, a pharmaceutical company, which reveals a payment of $400 million to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) for a royalty-bearing license agreement. They argue that this payment indicates a corrupt relationship between NIAID, led by Anthony Fauci, and the perpetrators of the outbreak. The speaker criticizes the lack of action from Congress and governors in addressing these issues. They also discuss a study conducted at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which involved the engineering of a synthetic clone of the virus. The speaker accuses NIAID and other institutions of being part of a criminal conspiracy and calls for the public to share this information widely.

During the early stages of the pandemic, a group of virologists were consulted by the NIH. Some believed that the virus could not have occurred naturally, while others thought it was a 50/50 chance between a lab or natural origin. However, only one narrative was publicly discussed. Later, a paper titled "Proximal Origins of the SARS CoV-two Virus" was released, claiming that the virus was natural. This paper referenced a 2014 article about a 2020 outbreak, which seemed odd considering the years in between. Additionally, a grant proposal called the "diffuse grant proposal" was discovered, stating that experiments were being conducted to test the infectivity of similar viruses and even insert a furin cleavage site, which is present in the virus causing the pandemic. These findings raise concerns about the origins of the virus.

Source tomia.org April 2024. Why deflate the parasitic system? Because the parasitic destructiveness oversized states and corporations always leads to decay, corruption, injustice to the destruction of its many hosts, the people, the working and creative people, the maimed and dying slaves of the elites. See examples below. Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, Crimes Against Humanity. If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 I get in total thirty six million excess deaths since the Covid Vax rollout. Adding the nine million from the Covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of forty five million for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons Considering the estimated forty five million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for four point five years of Covid killing protocols and deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons the words bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of the mass propaganda corrupted science lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms thus the elites many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes, PRRA, HIVGP120 are much too large and too many and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. Since the GenTech covid vaccines make the human body cells produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two. In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness just cold like symptoms. These Gentech covid vaccines are of course themselves bio weapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. Source2mia.org, please like and follow.

Scientists are investigating the possibility of the COVID-19 virus originating from a lab in Wuhan. They are analyzing data to determine the accuracy of claims that the virus matches a genetic sequence patented by Moderna for cancer research. The hypothesis of a lab escape is being considered, as human error is possible. It is speculated that the Wuhan lab may have been working on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an accidental infection. The analysis of genetic sequences is a time-consuming process, but the scientists are diligently examining the evidence. The work being done by the scientists is crucial in understanding the origins of the virus.

In this video, the speaker discusses the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and raises concerns about a potential intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen. They mention that Moderna's patent applications were modified to include this justification for creating a vaccine before the virus even existed. The speaker suggests that there was a premeditated plan to use the coronavirus to push for a universal vaccine template. They also highlight a statement from a 2015 National Academy of Sciences proceeding, where it was claimed that this act was an act of domestic terrorism and a financial fraud. The speaker emphasizes the importance of investigating the premeditation behind these events.

In this video, the speaker discusses how certain strains of influenza are not included in PCR tests, such as the BSL 4 strain, h7n9, and h5n1. They question the effectiveness of testing millions of people without being able to detect these specific strains. The speaker also mentions Kristin Drosten and refers to this situation as an "evil genius" move.

In this video, the speaker discusses the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and raises concerns about a potential intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen. They mention that Moderna's patent applications were modified to include this justification for creating a vaccine before the virus even existed. The speaker claims that there was a premeditated plan to use the coronavirus to push for a universal vaccine template. They also highlight a statement from a 2015 National Academy of Sciences proceeding, suggesting that this act was a form of domestic terrorism and a financial fraud. The speaker emphasizes the importance of investigating the premeditation behind these events.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as humans make mistakes. It is being analyzed to determine its authenticity. The team is examining whether the genetic sequence is genuine, which will take some time.

The Daily Mail reported that COVID may have been manipulated in a lab, with a DNA sequence matching Moderna's patent. Scientists are investigating this claim to determine its accuracy. The possibility of a lab accident leading to the virus's release is being considered. The team is carefully analyzing the genetic sequences to verify the information. Stephane Bonsal is leading the research on this matter.

In the video, the speaker mentions that in the future, there will be more variants of a certain subject. This is biologically plausible, and the speaker suggests that the more we vaccinate, the higher the chances of new variants emerging.

The speaker discusses the improbability of the COVID-19 virus occurring naturally, citing seven distinct features that make it highly unlikely. These features include the backbone, receptor, binding to human cells, cleavage site, and codonios. When considering each feature independently, the probability of all seven characteristics appearing in nature is calculated to be 1 in 1,200,000,000.

The transcript presents estimates for extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributed to a three-year period involving the SARS-CoV-2 virus and associated vaccine “bioweapons.” It states: estimated extra deaths 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects 1.9 billion over three years, with two notable updates from 10/01/2022. Two main differences with the previous estimates: - 11 countries, about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, yielding a current base of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative for the world. - For estimating serious adverse effects, the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the referenced table. Data sources are Our World in Data, with the appendix providing links. Extra deaths (ED 2020, ED 2021, ED 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual number of total deaths in the respective year. Missing months of 2022 are extrapolated from the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of 2015–2019, with a correction factor of 0.75%. For 2020 ED, this factor is applied three times to the five-year average (reference year 2017); for 2021 ED, four times; and for 2022 ED, five times. Thus, the extra deaths estimates are excess deaths after correction for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Calculation steps: for 2020, ED 100 ks (extra deaths per 100k people) are calculated and aggregated to yield 112 extra deaths per 100k worldwide, applied to the global population to produce nine million extra deaths in 2020 (the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed). For 2021, ED 21M (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to world doses to yield 12.1 million extra deaths in 2021 (the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year of deployment). For 2022, ED 22M doses yield 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to world doses to yield 9.6 million extra deaths in 2022 (the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year of deployment). The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, taken as 87.6, resulting in an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. The document concludes that considering 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects over three years of SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons, the terms bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further states that about ten million extra deaths occur yearly worldwide since 2020, implying 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued. It attributes these estimates to assumptions, noting that data quality and integration could affect validity, and critiques mainstream media and tech platforms for censorship. The text asserts that truthful science proves SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a biolab, claiming the genetic code contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are not natural mutations or recombinations, and that inserts appear only in other viruses that are genetically very different. It cites documents, testimonies, patents, and sources such as Doctor Richard Fleming and Montanier’s discovery, alleging the virus originates from a lab and that vaccines produce toxic spike protein and other harmful components. It directs readers to links for sources and science. The article “COVID World 10/09/2022” is attributed to Pak Osmol, with an appendix referencing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count.

The speakers discuss the possibility of the Sarscov 2 virus being a laboratory-made chimera. They mention that it is possible to create a virus in the lab that is indistinguishable from a natural one. They also mention a database created by Professor Shi, containing information on over 20,000 bat and rodent viruses. The database included details such as GPS coordinates, virus type, and whether the virus was sequenced or isolated. However, the webpage containing this information was removed from the web in June 2020.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab. They are analyzing data to determine the accuracy of these claims. The possibility of a lab accident cannot be ruled out, as humans make mistakes. It is being examined whether the Wuhan lab in China was conducting virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an accidental infection. The team is carefully examining a genetic sequence that matches one patented by Moderna for cancer research. This analysis takes time.

In this video, the speaker discusses their investigation into the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the virus was created in a lab in Wuhan, China, and that Dr. Anthony Fauci funded it. They also suggest that the US intelligence community was aware of this. The speaker calls for investigations into the involvement of various organizations and individuals, including Ralph Barrick and UC Davis. They criticize Fauci for allegedly coordinating a cover-up and lying about gain-of-function research. The speaker believes that Fauci should be held accountable for the millions of deaths caused by the pandemic. The video also includes statements from Fauci about the importance of preparing for epidemics and the potential of mRNA vaccines.