reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 1928, the national grid was established to supply electricity to the growing population. While power lines do transport electricity, they also serve another purpose: harvesting electric energy from the air or ether. The ether carries a charge that increases by 100 volts for every meter in height. By hanging long wires on pylons across the country, this energy can be harnessed. Despite the availability of underground or road-based options, power lines are visible due to their ability to generate renewable and sustainable electricity for free. However, as cities expand, construction companies often have to work around these existing power lines rather than burying them.

We're back from our boots-on-the-ground adventures in DeKalb, Pasadena, Detroit, and Champaign, and it's time to revisit Star Forts. Today, we're exposing mainstream Chicago, something hidden in plain sight. They claim Fortaleza De Sao Jose De Macapa was occupied by an army from the "old world," a slip-up that hints at a previous civilization. They tell us slaves built these Star Forts. It doesn't add up. These forts, found worldwide, share identical designs, suggesting a global communication network in the 1600s and 1700s that they don't want you to know about. Take Chicago's First Baptist Church. They say it was built in a year, right before the Chicago fire. The cornerstone was laid in 1865 and finished in 1866. It's a lie to cover up another old-world building. After the fire, they just built another one. It's time to expose this narrative.

In the past, the world used to have free energy drawn from the atmosphere. This energy, known as Aether, powered everything through buildings, pylons, and other structures. However, the controllers of the world decided to take it away and reset the population. This change affected every country. If you look at the photos, you can see that everything was conductive and had a way to tap into this energy. Obelisks, towers, and cathedrals all interacted with the Earth's energy.

In the past, old sacred buildings had brass walls filled with mercury to gather free atmospheric energy. They placed these walls high up to maximize energy collection. They would then channel this energy into their homes using copper wires, providing free energy for lighting and other purposes. This information is often not disclosed, but when we examine historical artifacts, we can see that these buildings were designed like conductors. The true history has been altered to make it seem like people were constantly fighting each other, but the hidden past reveals a different story.

Old sacred buildings used brass balls filled with mercury to gather free atmospheric energy. They ran copper wires into their homes for electricity. These historical structures resemble conductors, suggesting a hidden history of free energy usage. Mainstream history portrays conflict, but the reality may be far different. Translation: Antiguos edificios sagrados utilizaban bolas de latón llenas de mercurio para recolectar energía atmosférica gratuita. Corrían cables de cobre hacia sus hogares para electricidad. Estas estructuras históricas se asemejan a conductores, sugiriendo un historia oculta de uso de energía gratuita. La historia convencional retrata conflictos, pero la realidad podría ser muy diferente.

The speaker argues that blueprints for major historical structures are missing and that this absence is “the receipt” for authorship and construction. They claim blueprints are the primary evidence of who engineered a structure, how loads were distributed, and what materials and methods were used; without them, all related history becomes “only a story” rather than evidence. They assert that mechanical and structural plans also reveal technology levels, and they question how such plans could be missing “all over the world.” The speaker claims the lack of blueprints, load-bearing calculations, stress analysis, and foundation reports undermines claims that buildings were constructed during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They further say that by the late 1800s, standard practice required archiving blueprints and that major civic and cathedral projects in the UK and USA required documentation such as foundation and soil reports, payroll, and tunnel systems. They also claim that after 1880, construction plans had to document installation of early gas and electrical systems, and they use this to argue that if such details are not found in blueprints, the installation would have occurred later. They reference multiple buildings as examples, including the Basilica of Our Lady of Sorrows in Chicago and cathedrals and basilicas listed such as Saint Paul Cathedral, Saint Patrick’s Cathedral, and the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Louis. They also mention claims about the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Louis being constructed in 1914, while arguing that verifiable documentation for when gas or electric lighting was installed is not publicly available. They state that the publicly described archive materials discussed in sources do not explicitly include complete structural engineering blueprints or load-bearing calculations, and therefore they conclude these required documents are not present. The speaker cites AECOM’s statements about restoration documentation, claiming AECOM said they had to rely on old photographs and newspaper articles due to limited documentation of previous repairs. They contrast this with what they say would exist if original construction documentation had survived, including thousands of shipping or ledger records for stone and materials. They argue that the disappearance of the paper trail would imply the builders described in mainstream history did not construct the buildings. They then introduce a progression of “episodes” and present a new interaction: an email from the Albany Institute of History and Art about the Cathedral of All Saints in Albany, New York. The speaker says they asked the institute to confirm whether its collection includes original architectural blueprints and structural drawings. They report that the institute replied that the speaker did not see blueprints in the folders and that they did not see anything related to “mechanicals.” They say the reply also states that none of the building’s records have been digitized and that the institution lacks the ability to make digital images for the requester. The speaker emphasizes additional points from the email: they claim the documents the institute has are on tissue folded into drawers and are “tracings,” not final construction blueprints, and that the institute does not have load-bearing calculations or true architectural/mechanical plans. They describe the institution as lacking a librarian on staff and say they are unable to retrieve and share documents, including by taking photographs. The speaker concludes this is “official confirmation” that the institution does not possess the blueprints and that, they argue, the mainstream narrative cannot be backed up. They then expand the argument to a broader “worldwide audit,” claiming they will ask institutions in multiple countries for blueprints for old-world palaces and publish the responses. They end by previewing a forthcoming “episode 154,” stating that they received a reply from parliamentary archives related to Big Ben (the Elizabeth Tower, London).

The story is insane. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it says that on 03/10/1861, they got the land from Alan. Alfred's first project was approved. And just sixteen days later, the foundation was finished with the laying of the cornerstone where I know it now. I've mentioned this a few times, but we have this 100% pinned down now. We are exposing this right now in real time. Are you ready? The stone is larger than the rest and is hollowed out to allow a box of mementos where it was opened up in 1961, and the documents were already gone. So a new container was put into the stone. A new container put into the cornerstone where we now know what is going on here. We know that the previous civilization put valuable items inside these cornerstones all over the world just like we showed in our one hour special episode 77 where they just couldn't remember where the cornerstone was to the Saint Patrick's Cathedral in New York City. They had a 100,000 people there to watch, and then nobody could remember where it was. We know that they know exactly where it was. They never forgot. They simply went and removed it. And this is so clear now. The cornerstones hold incredible information, possibly the details on how the building was constructed or materials inside. There's something inside these cornerstones, and we called it right here on this channel. Unbelievable. Especially when we drive this point home and show the world that we are correct. And we take a look at The US Capitol Building where in 1991, a search for the Capitol cornerstone was conducted. Remember, we are told that this building was constructed in 1793. We are at the point in our research where we understand that they are not going to wait a hundred and ninety eight years to go look for a cornerstone for the first time. And if they really did build it, they wouldn't have forgot where it went. This right here is a 100% evidence in my opinion that our civilization are the finders or the founders of these structures. They did not construct these buildings. They would know where the cornerstone is without a doubt. A search for the capital's cornerstone was conducted, including use of metal detectors. Metal detectors for stone? The cornerstone. Are you able to see very clearly now? To locate the engraved plate. It was, of course, never found, so we are told, where we know that they located it and found whatever was inside from the previous civilization.

This is an opera building. The speaker questions who would have their opera in this stone building and notes that the building itself costs $7,500,000 in 1861, with $10,000,000 worth of furniture, as stated on the back. They claim, “This is the best.” The structure is said to have been founded, with “founded” marked on the back, and the date 1671 appears. The speaker contends that in 1671 someone built a $7,500,000 building out of stone with $10,000,000 worth of furniture. They claim that by 1875, two hundred years later, it was turned into a theater, making it a $7,500,000 theater. Descriptions follow of the staircases and the claim that everything was made out of colored marble with Corinthian columns. There was a green room for ballet, and it was for the opera. The speaker then discusses Paris, stating that the city “has been reset many times over and over and over again,” and makes a parallel with the Eiffel Tower, implying it has undergone numerous resets as well. A claim is made that the Eiffel Tower is an atmospheric energy antenna, and that there used to be an orb.

The speakers argue that Big Ben’s clock, presented as a 316-foot Gothic revival tower powered by a gravity-driven rope-and-weight system installed in 1859, was in fact built with and operated by an unseen, older technology that has been removed or hidden. They contend the clock has undergone five restoration projects since 1906, and that there are hollow cavities, misaligned shafts, and tunnels discovered during later work that do not appear in Charles Berry’s supposed 1850s blueprints. They question the mainstream claim that ropes and weights powered the mechanism, noting there are no original blueprints or early maintenance records for the installation, and that the earliest technical diagrams for the escapement postdate the tower’s completion. They suggest the clock was either placed into an already existing structure or operated by a power system later covered up, not the rope-and-weight setup described in official accounts. The presenters point to 2017–2022 laser surveys showing vertical alignment deviations of only a few millimeters over 96 meters, arguing this precision exceeds what eighteen-hundreds technology could achieve. They claim there are no physical proofs that the ropes were part of the original configuration, no sketches, engravings, or early documentation of the original drive system, and that the supposed gravity escapement was patented for smaller clocks, not a 316-foot tower. They propose that the “destruction projects” since 1906 were actually repurposed foundations and attempts to retrofit a modern clock into the tower, not genuine restorations of a weight-driven mechanism. The speakers also argue the great bell and quarter bells are not original or correctly explained, noting the first bell cracked before installation, the replacement cracked soon after, and that the hammer used was allegedly much heavier than required. They allege the structure could not have housed five-ton weights and ropes due to lack of reinforced cavities near the upper chambers and even distribution around the center, implying the tower was not designed for heavy moving weights. Instead, they claim the tower’s design favors weightless, old-world technology, with the geometry and internal hollows serving resonance or frequency balance rather than mechanical timekeeping. They extend the pattern to other famous clocks worldwide (Prague Astronomical Clock, Kremlin Spasskaya Tower, Philadelphia City Hall Clock Tower, Rajabbe Clock Tower in Mumbai, etc.), arguing that many historic clocks show hollow passages, sealed tunnels, missing original blueprints, and internal voids that modern engineers class as air ducts or service passages. They reference reports by AECOM acknowledging limited records of Big Ben’s original construction and the lack of full plans, suggesting a deliberate concealment or loss of the true, older technology. The overarching claim is that these clocks share a global pattern of missing blueprints, hollow resonance chambers, and destruction-style restorations, indicating the real drive systems were weightless old-world technologies tied to resonance and vibration rather than visible rope-and-weight mechanisms.

The speaker was surprised to learn about Gwen Towers from Alexa. Gwen Towers, or the Ground Wave Emergency Network, are used to protect US communications during a high altitude nuclear explosion. They operate on low radio waves and are a backup when regular radio is disrupted.

In our hidden history, these buildings were not just for decoration. They were designed to generate free energy from the ether above and distribute it throughout our realm. We are not the most advanced civilization to have existed here. We are simply living in a post-apocalyptic world, surrounded by evidence of past greatness. Explore the concept of the mud flood and question everything.

Here are examples of electriculture antennas made from copper or brass to harness atmospheric energy for plant growth. Placing these antennas in your garden helps plants grow bigger, become frost and heat resistant, and require less water as the soil heals itself. Visit cultivateelevate.com for more information on electriculture and watch our videos to elevate your garden in 2023.

This is the 1876 Centennial International Exposition in Philadelphia, the first official world's fair in the US. It lasted for 6 months and attracted over 10 million visitors. The fair was constructed in under 2 years, with over 200 buildings covering 284 acres. The horticulture building, which had a second-floor promenade, featured unique free energy antennas disguised as ornament flagpoles. The speaker hints at more information to come in a part 2 and encourages viewers to question everything.

In the past, the world was powered by the ether, which connected everything, including pylons, obelisks, towers, and cathedrals. This energy was present in every country and interacted with the Earth's natural energy. However, the controllers of the world decided to remove this power and reset the population. By looking at these photos, you can see how everything was conductive and had a way to tap into this energy.

The speaker observes cables going into the bottom of an object, noting a need for many cables due to high power requirements. They express unfamiliarity with a configuration where cables run up the outside of the object. The location is identified as Kings Hill Avenue in Hayes.

In Bologna, Italy, there used to be many towers like this one built in the 12th century for status, defense, and living. Now only 2 remain. It's like they had skyscrapers in 1100!

The transcript describes a Sweden opera-house narrative and then expands into repeated claims about construction timelines, fires/demolitions, “previous civilizations,” and reused architectural patterns. In Sweden, the building referred to as the Oscarian Opera (Operan) is discussed as part of a larger story about the Royal Swedish Opera. A prior opera house is said to have existed before the current one. Construction is claimed to have begun around 1775, and the Royal Swedish Opera is said to have been completed less than seven years later, using no power tools and transportation described as “a donkey.” The architect is named as Axel Johan Anderberg, described as having replaced an original 1782 opera house. A contest is said to have been required for Axel Anderberg to be selected, against “all of the other 1700s master builders of Sweden.” The transcript argues that the first opera house was demolished and that a similar timeline was used again, stating that the second opera house took almost seven years as well. The transcript then claims a fire story tied to this period: during the destruction of the first opera house and construction of the new one, the Swedish National Theater being used is said to have burned down. It also states that a later renovation made artwork on a stairwell nearly impossible to make out because smoke from the city accumulated “in just 91 years.” The transcript interprets this as evidence that the current building is actually the original and that paintings were restored to the condition of an inaugural ceremony. Next, the transcript moves to Ritterholmen Church in Stockholm, alleging that its website claims completion around 1300—before Sweden wrote its first book—calling the timeline logistically impossible and unrealistic. The speaker contrasts “construction” dating with practical logistics, and then shifts to an email story about a building in Melbourne, Australia. The transcript claims the building was said to have been constructed from 1858 to 1862 and that only a couple construction photos were provided. It argues that the photos show the building already constructed and depicts a right-side area “being dug out of the dirt,” concluding that the building was originally built with dirt covering the right side because land rose and fell. It further claims the basement is technically on ground level, with ground-floor elevation differing depending on which side is viewed, implying the building was excavated. The transcript adds other examples, including Mont Saint-Michel in France (photo taken in 1925). It claims that railroad tracks visible in dirt suggest reused structures and prior ground levels, and it extends the argument to other cities, mentioning a city in Italy where doorframe sizes are compared to human scale, proposing that stone doorframes are from a past civilization while wood elements are “our work.” It claims that a fortress in the same area was built in less than three years and later destroyed/rebuilt, with references to destruction, rebuilding, a kingdom of Italy takeover, and tunnel-related “restoration” actions in 1932 and a further project in 1965. The transcript then discusses arches and stone structures, focusing on the St. Louis Arch. It states that another episode connected arches and “technology,” claiming attempts to extract energy from the earth and questioning the meaning of the St. Louis Arch. It also repeatedly asserts that names, characters, and details across narratives are generated by AI, citing repeated themes and patterns. In Massachusetts, the transcript claims the St. Anne Shrine (Fall River) is described as starting construction in 1891 by architect Napoleon Barasa, but it says a postcard over 120 years old shows a founding date of 1869 on the back. The speaker interprets “founded” as indicating a timeline mismatch, stating the biography of Napoleon Barasa never leaves Canada except for a vacation to Europe, and contrasts this with the claim that construction occurred in Massachusetts. The transcript then returns to Greene County courthouses (Ohio and Illinois), arguing that multiple Greene County courthouses were allegedly built in less than a year despite being far apart, and that this repetition indicates an AI-patterned narrative. It includes an interview from 2014 quoting Greene County clerk and recorder language about the courthouse “stand[ing] the test of time,” alongside a 2022 article about a $322,000 exterior project addressing spalling limestone. From there, Brazil’s National Library of Brazil is discussed: the transcript claims it began after the 1755 Lisbon earthquake and was shipped from Europe in three shipments, assembled in 1810–1811. It questions how such architecture could be transported and assembled at that scale, and then cites a 1909 photo story that it interprets as repainting rather than construction. It states the narrative includes uncertainty about a ship/founding date and argues that the timeline is inconsistent. Finally, the transcript connects multiple “fire narratives” to demolition, including an alleged fire at the Tesla Science Center in Shoreham on November 22, 2023. It states the cause was said to be unknown and claims the damage resembles carpet bombing rather than a fire and that stone and brick would not melt at typical house-fire temperatures. It ends by reiterating a pattern: earlier examples are framed as fires (including a cow tipping over a lantern) but are claimed to be demolitions tied to a wider reset narrative.

According to the speaker, the history of the world is a lie, and questions whether we really built fantastic structures like the churches of England from the 1850s. These churches are monstrously big, and it would have taken an insane amount of labor to create them. St. Paul's Cathedral, built in 1710, replaced the old cathedral that burned in the Great Fire of 1666, which led to the creation of insurance. The speaker questions how they moved all that marble and granite 150 years before railroads. Unlike Rome, Britain didn't have hundreds of thousands of slaves. The speaker believes these churches were used for a different purpose before the reset: to harness free energy from the air, which we have been denied and lied to about.

The speaker introduces a book titled Law Science of the Stone Age and presents Saint Paul’s Cathedral in London, highlighting the water pathways and magnetic lines through the building. They observe that the strongest point of energy is where the priest stands, and claim that nothing about the cathedral’s construction was built by chance and it surely wasn’t built with hammer, chisel, and candlelight.

The speaker says they have contacted record-keeping institutions tied to historic “old world” structures and that the responses will “shock the world,” beginning with the Cathedral of All Saints in Albany, New York, and then the Great Clock of Westminster (Big Ben/Elizabeth Clock Tower) in London. They describe emailing the Albany Institute of History and Art to confirm whether its collection includes the original architectural blueprints and structural drawings for the Cathedral of All Saints in Albany. The speaker frames the cathedral as supposedly built from 1884 to 1888 without power tools and argues that blueprints should exist for a structure of that scale. The Albany Institute of History and Art replies that, after looking through folders, it does not see blueprints and “doesn’t have the receipts to the building.” The institution also says it does not see material related to mechanicals and that none of the records from the building have been digitized. The speaker highlights additional claims that the records are too oversized to access, that there is no librarian on staff, and that no one can provide digital images because they cannot digitize the records. The speaker states that where other drawings exist (described as tissue tracings folded into drawers), they are not final blueprints and do not provide load-bearing calculations or construction measurements, and insists that no actual construction or engineering plans were found. The speaker then pivots to Big Ben and the Elizabeth Clock Tower. They describe being in contact with the parliamentary archives about claims that Big Ben was commissioned, funded, and built as part of the Palace of Westminster reconstruction after a supposed 1834 fire. They say they emailed to ask whether the Parliamentary Archives or any associated archive holds original materials related to the Great Clock of Westminster, including original blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, engineering calculations, specifications, records of communications between architect and builder, photographs of construction, and inspection certificates. The Parliamentary Archives reply, according to the speaker, that they have “surprisingly few architectural drawings” and that they do not have construction records requested, which the speaker says would prove Big Ben and the Elizabeth Clock Tower were built in the 1800s. The speaker presses further, asking whether the Parliamentary Archives has ever held a complete set of original drawings and what happened to them. The speaker says the archives respond that the architectural drawings and the requested blueprints were never part of the Parliamentary Archives collections, stating that they were not produced by Parliament. The speaker links this to the Public Records Act of 1838, claiming that records created by government departments must be preserved as public property and that construction began after the law took effect. They argue that if the project was government funded and approved, the records should have existed and been preserved, presenting the archives’ position as a contradiction with the stated government-history narrative. The speaker then says they contacted the National Archives at Kew after being told that government records, including those about construction of Big Ben, would be held there. They describe the National Archives replying that they cannot confirm the existence of records related to the construction of Big Ben and advising the speaker to look through records themselves. Immediately afterward, the speaker says the National Archives states that those collections are currently being transferred and will not be open to the public until 2026, which the speaker interprets as inaccessible records while urging public searching. Overall, the speaker asserts that multiple institutions failed to provide requested original blueprints, mechanical/engineering documentation, or digitized records, and they frame this as evidence that the documentation supporting mainstream construction timelines is missing or unavailable, culminating in a “legal paper trail” involving the Public Records Act of 1838 and the institutions’ inability to confirm the requested construction records.

In the past, the world had free energy drawn from the atmosphere. Buildings and pylons were designed to harness this energy, known as the ether. However, the controllers of the world decided to take it away and reset the population. Everything, from obelisks to cathedrals, interacted with the Earth's energy. It was a beautiful and conductive system.

This old Tartarian building was originally designed to produce free electricity using technology similar to Tesla's. It had a wire grounded into the earth, which was later added to redirect the energy produced by the building into the ground instead of distributing it to the people. Similar buildings can be found in many hometowns, characterized by balls on top containing mercury that creates a current when spinning. As this information resurfaces, we are reclaiming our power. Peace.

These star forts were not just defensive positions, but entire cities with impressive sacred geometry patterns. They were built in a time when people understood the principles of frequency and vibration. It's fascinating to think that these structures were created by people with limited resources, even in remote regions. Surprisingly, even the Statue of Liberty was built on an old star fort. These forts were far more significant than mere military fortifications, as they existed long before the invention of flight.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a pattern of alleged hoaxes surrounding so-called ancient or “old world” buildings in the United States, arguing that documented records do not exist to support the histories commonly taught. - The conversation centers on the Hoffman Tower in Lyons, Illinois, described as a tower that supposedly belongs to a park and was built in 1908 by a named construction company. The speakers claim there should be construction documents proving this, but they contacted the Village of Lyons and were told there are no blueprints or receipts for the building or the later staircase destruction in the 1990s. The village reportedly has “nothing on the building, period. Case closed. Nothing at all.” This is presented as evidence that the Wikipedia account is false and that no historical records exist to back up the claimed construction. - They assert a broader claim that “the history that we’ve all been told” since childhood is a lie, and they repeatedly state that multiple buildings in the area were not built as described. They reference years of researching and receiving the same response from officials: no documents, ledgers, or load-bearing calculations exist for these structures. - The discussion then moves to Lamont, Illinois, noting that a school in Lamont replaced an earlier one and again lacks supporting documents in the speakers’ view. They posit that the story about the 1836 school and subsequent building is likely AI-generated history and argue that the replacement school shows modern architectural features incongruent with the eighteenth- or nineteenth-century period. - They discuss a nearby historic Limestone Village Hall in Lamont, pointing to a stark contrast between a 1900s photo and the renovated present-day building, including the removal of the bell tower and bells. They claim bells were removed and melted into coins and cannons, referencing the Liberty Bell as an example of “cracked from overuse,” though they say historians are uncertain when the initial bell split occurred. They show sadness or outrage at what they view as erasing historic features during restoration. - The Altgeld Hall Chimes Tower at the University of Illinois is brought up, with a 2023 exploration referenced. They claim a restoration involved removing the bells and that this building’s historical state was captured in Episode 36 of their channel, but that the current project completely changes the building’s appearance. They describe 2024 renovations starting with a 3,000-pound bell and show before-and-after photos to illustrate perceived destruction of the “old world” building. - The speakers conclude by returning to Lamont, noting a nearby palace-style church (Bethany Lutheran Church, built in 1895) and contrasting it with the local housing, implying the church represents an architectural anomaly. They insist such “palace” constructions and “old world” features did not take place as claimed, arguing that the narrative of buildings being erected rapidly in a single year (multiple times referenced) is false. - They reference a recurring question about the authenticity of the architects and suggest that the supposed architect TJ McCarthy, who allegedly built these structures in a single year with self-taught expertise, might not be a real person. They propose that these towns contain interconnected tunnels or connections to other old world buildings, and question whether the architects were real individuals, given the lack of verifiable records. - Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes a view that “these stories … lied,” pointing to England’s Big Ben as another case where records are missing, and contends that many historic buildings worldwide from the 17th and 18th centuries were found without proper documentation.

Pine Gap is described as a US-run spy base located in Australia, potentially sitting atop “old world technology,” with this being just the beginning of a broader pattern. In Yorkshire, United Kingdom, the Royal Air Force Menwith Hill is claimed to be the largest electronic monitoring station in the world, operated under the Five Eyes alliance. The speaker asserts the Five Eyes is a US infiltration of Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and Australia, and characterizes it as a one-sided agreement that dictates terms to the other countries. Menwith Hill is said to be constructed between 1956 and 1959 as a 605-acre site with 37 giant radar domes, on British soil but run by the NSA, with an on-site commanding officer American and staffing primarily by US personnel and contractors. The Five Eyes is presented as a means for the USA to infiltrate these countries, and the speaker suggests broadening inquiry to other agreements like Nine Eyes, Fourteen Eyes, NATO, Echelon, and SOFA agreements, which allegedly define the legal status of foreign military forces stationed abroad. The narrative links joint CIA intelligence centers, fusion centers, and biometric data exchanges to extending access to millions of foreign citizens’ DNA, fingerprints, and facial recognition to a single country. The speaker emphasizes that understanding these alliances reveals key players and patterns, comparing it to decoding a game. The episodes are described as sequential for a reason, revealing a progression. UK officials’ attempts to access Menwith Hill are said to have been denied, and Edward Snowden is cited as confirming Menwith Hill as a central data interception and processing facility for global signals intelligence, including phone calls, emails, and Internet traffic from UK citizens. The discussion then focuses on power usage, noting that Menwith Hill’s subterranean operations are referenced by former intelligence personnel as involving underground components and high electricity usage—“enough electricity to power an entire small city,” with 1.7-megawatt backups and 30 MVA capacity—implying the presence of old world technology beneath the ground beyond what is publicly acknowledged. The 37 radars consume power, but not to justify such consumption, leading to the claim that something powerful lies underground. Fort Meade, the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland, is described as the United States’ primary agency within the Five Eyes, with the official mission to analyze foreign electronic communications, secure classified US government communications from cyber threats, cryptography and code breaking, provide intelligence to the military, identify terrorist networks, and share with allies. Yet the speaker questions why Fort Meade would require 60–70 MW of electricity, equating that to powering 50,000 homes, and notes public records showing a 100 MW-scale power demand for the site, suggesting underground or hidden infrastructure. Allegations include black rooms, high-security vaults inaccessible even to high clearance personnel, and the possibility of underground facilities. The discussion references a 2016 Baltimore Gas and Electric substation and transmission line built to serve Fort Meade, implying sustained or growing loads, and notes that in 2006 NSA operations maxed out the Baltimore area power grid—claims that fuel speculation of underground or old world technology beneath Fort Meade. The speaker ties these observations to a broader theory of old world technology found beneath sites like Pine Gap, Menwith Hill, and Fort Meade, potentially powering underground cities or facilities. Additional topics include a May 2025 assertion by a former assistant secretary of housing about a $21 trillion secret underground network, the RAND Corporation’s 1998–2015 references to underground and undersea facilities, and a suggestion that trillions in missing or unaudited funds may be connected to these hidden networks. The RAND reference is used to imply a broader, interconnected system, with the speaker signaling a plan to explore further, including references to 6,200-foot tunnels under Central California and a claim of a Japan tunnel documented in RAND materials but not maintained on mainstream maps. The overall synthesis points toward a belief in hidden underground infrastructures connected to the Five Eyes and global power networks, with a promise to continue exploring these connections in subsequent episodes.