reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They acknowledge their wife's role in encouraging them to share their information. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and patenting since 1965. They discuss the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and the ineffectiveness of vaccines. They emphasize the intentional release of a respiratory pathogen and the push for a universal vaccine template. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the militarization of nature and the consequences of allowing patents on biological materials. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have this conversation and emphasize the importance of discussing who we want to be as a society. The speaker discusses the history of coronavirus research, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent manipulation for various purposes. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like Pfizer and the CDC, who patented the virus and vaccines. The speaker calls for an end to gain-of-function research, the militarization of nature, and corporate influence in science. They emphasize the need for accountability for any negative effects caused by vaccines.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They discuss the patenting of infectious replication-defective clones of coronavirus and the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties. The speaker also mentions the financial aspects and lack of moral oversight in the development of vaccines. They conclude by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability. (150 words)

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They argue that this is an act of domestic and international terrorism. The speaker also highlights patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. They assert that there was a planned release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was misused for control and profit by the pharmaceutical industry and to introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, with Pfizer and Moderna acting as fronts. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA, including one in October 2019. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the CIA and Chinese CDC. They suggest a historical connection between the CIA and bioweapons research, and how the Patriot Act revived the bioweapons arms race.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They discuss the history of coronavirus, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like the CDC and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who patented and manipulated the virus. They emphasize the need to end gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker concludes by calling for accountability and a halt to the weaponization of nature.

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They also discuss the potential weaponization of coronaviruses and the release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019. The speaker implies that these actions constitute acts of terrorism.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and other organizations of criminal collusion and involvement in the distribution of the COVID campaign. They conclude by stating that this is a marketing ploy to deprive people of liberty.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA over the years. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the Chinese CDC and CIA in suppressing the lab leak theory. They connect the history of bioweapons research to the CIA and Pentagon's interest in gain-of-function research.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. The speaker acknowledges their involvement in sharing information about the pandemic, thanks the parliament members and translators, and mentions their loss of fame in mainstream media. They provide a historical context, stating that coronavirus was isolated in 1965 and has been modified and studied since then. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the ineffectiveness of vaccines against coronavirus. The speaker accuses organizations like EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA of funneling money through Anthony Fauci and engaging in gain-of-function research. They argue that coronavirus was engineered and patented as a bioweapon, and call for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and modification for various purposes since 1965. They discuss the patenting of infectious replication-defective clones of coronavirus, the failure of vaccines against coronavirus, and the involvement of organizations like Pfizer and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. The speaker accuses the CDC of violating biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. They conclude by calling for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate-controlled science.

Coronavirus has been a biological weapon since 1966, with Pfizer patenting a vaccine in 1990. The virus was modified in 1999 to cause harm, leading to a deadly pathogen being released in 2019. The US government funds these programs through universities, but politicians refuse to address it. Lying to Congress is illegal, whether about the virus origin or gain of function research. The fight for liberty against new threats like bird flu is crucial, as humans crave freedom. This battle is World War 3, with the reward being recognition for our efforts.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this was part of a larger plan to establish a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various organizations of colluding to profit from the pandemic and suggests that the virus was intentionally released. They also mention previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate protection. The speaker concludes by stating their commitment to fighting for liberty.

The speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal activities and use a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis but rather a genocide. They provide examples of unethical clinical trials and argue that the WHO has immunity from prosecution. Additionally, they criticize the Gates Foundation for exerting undue influence on the WHO through their donations. The speaker concludes by stating that the release of a biologically modified chimera was planned to sustain funding and profit.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. The speaker acknowledges their involvement in sharing information about the pandemic, thanks the members of parliament, and apologizes for any difficult terminology. They discuss the history of coronavirus research, including its isolation in 1965 and the development of vaccines in 1990. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the manipulation and patenting of the virus. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

In this video, the speaker discusses the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and raises concerns about a potential intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen. They mention that Moderna's patent applications were modified to include this justification for creating a vaccine before the virus even existed. The speaker claims that there was a premeditated plan to use the coronavirus to push for a universal vaccine template. They also highlight a statement from a 2015 National Academy of Sciences proceeding, suggesting that this act was a form of domestic terrorism and a financial fraud. The speaker emphasizes the importance of investigating the premeditation behind these events.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has brought. They emphasize the importance of the current public conversation on biological patents and express gratitude for the opportunity to discuss these issues. The speaker provides a historical context, tracing the development of coronavirus as a pathogen and its manipulation for various purposes since 1965. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the ineffectiveness of vaccines against coronavirus. The speaker asserts that SARS was engineered and discusses the financial interests and premeditated nature behind the push for a universal vaccine template. They conclude by calling for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate-driven science without assuming product liability.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. They express gratitude for the chance to speak and acknowledge their wife's role in sharing their information. The speaker discusses the history of coronavirus, its manipulation, and the patents filed for vaccines. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. They argue that coronavirus is a bioweapon and that gain of function research should be stopped. They also call for corporate accountability in science.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation and patenting of the coronavirus.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a result of incompetence or lack of knowledge, but rather a planned event. They accuse various groups, including philanthropaths, scientists, NGOs, and governments, of being involved in the deception. The speaker suggests that the pandemic was used as an opportunity for control and profit, with corporations, regulators, and media playing a role. They criticize the censorship of dissenting voices and the coercion of individuals to get vaccinated. The speaker urges people not to let those responsible for the pandemic escape accountability.