reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 states, "The first one I see out, I wanna destroy you," and declares to Islam, "you are an evil satanic religion."

Our current system only gives capital punishment and then only rarely to someone who actually kills another person. But what about someone who through their behavior has shown a willingness to kill another person? What is the actual argument for waiting until that already violent offender actually kills someone before giving them the maximum punishment. It would certainly make our communities much safer if we started executing armed robbers. As a society, we have two choices. Okay? Only two. Either we are going to inflict severe merciless suffering on the criminals, the violent degenerates, the sociopathic predators, the dysfunctional, the barbaric, or we're going to allow severe merciless suffering to be inflicted on the innocent. It is not compassion. It is monstrous cruelty.

Speaker 0 expresses shock and disbelief, exclaiming about "big bonuses" and questioning who was asked about something. Speaker 0 then states, "He's out there, ma'am," followed by further expressions of confusion and disbelief. Speaker 1 echoes the shock. Speaker 0 then states that "they've just killed he should killed a few people, you know."

Speaker 0 argues that Snowden, if he comes to the United States, should receive due process and be punished severely, stating he hopes he gets at least 176 years in jail for what he did. He asserts that crimes like espionage harm the security and safety of innocent American civilians and deserves the strictest punishment. He states his view that Snowden committed treason, ought to be convicted of that, and ought to swing from a tall oak tree. He adds that he believes Snowden should be prosecuted, and if found guilty, punished to the fullest extent possible. When asked what that punishment is, Speaker 0 answers: Death. Speaker 1 asks if he thinks Snowden should be killed, and Speaker 0 confirms: Yes.

So as we find this monster, I want him strung up. I want crows to eat his insides out. I want to be publicly televised after a guilty verdict due process and administered by the law. But I want the most monstrous, gruesome death that we just had to watch. I want that to be etched into the halls of eternity so that anyone who tries to do anything like this ever again sees what their own insides look like on national television. And their family will have to see it the way Charlie's has had to see his. I don't think I I think about whoever did this if they had to stand in a room with Charlie and how Charlie would tower over them, how they wouldn't stand a chance in a fist fight or a verbal fight or anything.

The speaker expresses strong condemnation for child rape and advocates for the death penalty for child rapists. They discuss the issue of child trafficking and the United States' role as a top destination country for human trafficking. The speaker highlights the need for education on sex addiction and the harmful effects of pornography. They also mention the importance of border enforcement and the Trump administration's efforts to combat human trafficking. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of addressing the demand side of child exploitation and suggests attaching asylum and immigration processes to embassies in Central America. They support the death penalty for child rapists and criticize the current administration's handling of the issue.

The speaker expresses disgust and accuses others of wanting to harm children by cutting off their genitals. They question how cutting off genitals can protect kids and criticize those who support it. The speaker is upset and asks others what they would like them to do. They argue that children cannot give consent and express frustration towards those who disagree. The speaker mentions the idea of killing themselves and expresses sadness at the thought.

I support the death penalty for heinous crimes, particularly against children, such as sexual assault or trafficking. The depravity of these acts warrants the ultimate punishment. Treason at the highest levels should also be considered a capital offense. We're seeing a wave of whistleblowers, and their information is being directed to the appropriate authorities. People are being exposed. Jim Comey, it's time to consider what you're willing to concede. Your freedom is at stake, and imprisonment is inevitable. Perhaps a reduced sentence in a less severe facility could be negotiated in exchange for information on those even more deeply implicated than yourself. You know exactly who I mean.

I will sign a law to ban child sexual mutilation in all 50 states. It's hard to believe that this was even a thing a decade or so ago. But we're going to put an end to it.

The speaker stated, "I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I'd do it again. I'd fucking do it again in a second."

I've seen footage of children's bodies paid for by my taxpayer dollars. It's time to take action.

Speaker 1 expresses a desire for Trump to be shot, while Speaker 0 questions this, highlighting the hardships faced by migrants. Speaker 1 condemns calling for the president's assassination as evil.

The speaker expresses extreme and disturbing ideas involving torture, violence, and sexual assault towards the listener and their family.

Speaker 0 claims to be brave and unafraid of being surrounded. They mention having already killed 800 people and express a desire to kill one more. Another person interrupts, referring to someone as a peaceful individual and suggesting they be left alone.

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

If you harm our children, you will be given no sanctuary. We will hunt you down, look for you everywhere, and cage you. This administration prioritizes prosecuting child predators. You will be hunted down and prosecuted. This is refreshing for those who work tirelessly on this issue and acknowledges the safety we aim to bring to America.

The speaker expresses a desire for swift and severe justice, stating they would "find them guilty and hang them publicly." They claim this is not an over-the-top reaction. The speaker then shifts to a desire for clarity and transparency, stating that a lack of these qualities is why people distrust the government.

The speaker supports the death penalty and authored a bill that included it for 4051 offenses. They believe in the death penalty and do not oppose it on moral grounds, stating that the bill does not go as far as hanging people for jaywalking.

The speaker argues that the death penalty is not a solution for addressing harm caused by unlawful behavior, especially in cases of child abuse. Survivors share their experiences and support the death penalty for child rapists. However, another speaker questions if the death penalty truly deters crimes or helps survivors heal. Despite differing opinions, a bill advocating for the death penalty for child rapists is passed in the Senate.

The speaker states, "I support a free Palestine. I do support demonizing Jews." The other speaker responds positively, saying, "That's good, man. I like I like hearing this. I support."

Speaker 0 asks repeatedly if the listener wants a video. They mention hitting a kid and continue to ask if the listener wants a video.

Speaker 0: Isn't it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully for once? I mean, talk about professionalism at the right time.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality, suggesting they should be thrown off a mountain. Speaker 1 confirms that this is supported by a Hadith. Speaker 0 also mentions the destruction of buildings as a form of punishment, indicating support for the death penalty.

A man expresses enthusiastic support for a sheriff who allegedly shot a judge. He states this event is "the greatest thing that's happened to me in 25 years." He claims he wouldn't ask permission before taking action and is not afraid of jail. He says he would change someone's "trajectory on this fucking planet" if they touched his daughters, which is what he claims the sheriff did because the judge was molesting his daughter. The man says the sheriff "blew his shit away" in his office. He declares he is "100% a full on advocate of public execution of pedophiles."

Speaker 0 expresses a strong desire to challenge National Geographic and urges the audience to join in killing all white people. They emphasize the importance of fighting against the white man, regardless of personal opinions or others' perceptions. The speaker firmly believes in the death and destruction of every white person, regardless of age or innocence.