reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Last year, 3,300 people were arrested in Britain for what they said on social media. One example is a young woman named Chelsea Russell from Liverpool. She posted the lyrics of her friend's favorite rap song on Instagram, which included the n-word. As a result, she was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, and given 500 hours of community service. She was also under a curfew from 8 PM to 8 AM for a year. This incident highlights the increasing number of people being visited by the police for their social media posts in Britain.

In Germany, insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially incurring higher fines due to their permanence. Even reposting untrue statements can be considered a crime. Authorities are actively curbing online hate speech, as demonstrated by coordinated raids targeting individuals posting racist content. Despite growing concerns over migration and related issues, there's a lack of political will to address these problems effectively. The focus seems to be on prosecuting opinion crimes rather than deporting criminals. My party, the AFD, faces persecution despite being a major opposition force. We're smeared as Nazis and right-wing extremists, but this isn't true. Free speech is eroding, with new laws targeting online expression. People risk punishment for criticizing mass migration. Even if the AFD performs well in elections, other parties may refuse to cooperate, maintaining a firewall against us. It is time to vote to make Germany great again.

The speaker claims Germany has a profitable "hate speech persecution" industry targeting citizens for online posts. Police raids occur for minor offenses, like a €600 fine for a poop emoji. Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck has filed over 800 criminal reports. Germany makes the most legal demands for user data from X within the EU. The German justice system uses AI surveillance to prosecute benign offenses. A law change in 2021 allows harsher punishment for insulting politicians. The company Soldan, described as a "hate crime persecution mafia," scans posts using AI, files thousands of criminal complaints monthly, and shares profits with politicians, with legal costs borne by taxpayers. Hate Aid, funded by the German government, also works to criminalize hate speech and wants to sue X to allow doxxing. The speaker urges support for free speech and fighting against tyranny.

It is illegal to display Nazi symbolism, like a swastika, or deny the Holocaust. Insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially leading to higher fines because they persist indefinitely. German law also prohibits malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes. Reposting untrue statements is also a crime because the reader can't distinguish whether you just invented this or just reposted it. Punishments for hate speech can include jail time for repeat offenders, but often involve stiff fines and device confiscation. People are shocked when their phones are taken away, and they see it as a severe punishment, sometimes worse than a fine, because so much of their life is on their phone.

Sharing material that incites racial hatred, like retweeting, can lead to legal consequences as it is considered offensive. Police actively monitor social media to identify and arrest individuals involved in such activities. It is crucial to understand the seriousness of these actions, even if one may not perceive them as harmful.

We will prosecute offenders with full force of the law, charging them with various crimes including assault, violent disorder, riot, and terrorism if necessary. Online or in person, those inciting hatred and violence will be held accountable. No one is immune from the law, whether they are committing crimes on the streets or behind a keyboard in another country.

Sharing material inciting racial hatred, like retweeting, is a serious offense. Police actively monitor social media for such content, leading to identification and arrests. The consequences are severe, even if individuals believe they are not causing harm. Translation: Sharing content that incites racial hatred, such as retweeting, is a serious offense. Police actively monitor social media for this material, leading to identification and arrests. The consequences are severe, even if individuals believe they are not causing harm.

The offense of inciting racial hatred involves publishing or sharing material that is insulting or abusive and intended to provoke racial hatred. Retweeting such content can be considered republishing and may lead to legal consequences. Dedicated police officers monitor social media for this type of material, conducting investigations, identifications, and arrests. It's important to understand that seemingly harmless actions can have serious repercussions.

Earlier this week, state police in Germany conducted raids, seizing electronics from individuals suspected of posting racist content online. Over 50 similar raids occurred across the country, targeting what prosecutors describe as coordinated online hate speech. It's absurd. They're modeling their laws after Europe's. Imagine armed agents raiding homes and seizing devices over internet posts? What if the content was Jewish, like menorahs? Suddenly, the anti-Nazi stance seems contradictory. The very principles they claim to uphold are being violated. It's nonsensical. Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Go to the AlexJonesstore.com. Infowars is recognized as the tip of the spear in the fight against the globalists. We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. These new viewers aren't getting product and it is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you that are keeping us on the air. Check out the AlexJonesstore.com today, and I thank you for keeping us on the air.

Sharing offensive content that incites racial hatred, like retweeting, can lead to legal consequences. Police actively monitor social media for such material and take action through identification and arrests. It is crucial to understand the seriousness of these actions, as individuals may unknowingly contribute to harm.

In England, there is concern over government overreach with arrests for online speech deemed hateful. Comparing to Russia, England has arrested 4,000 people for thought crimes, while Russia has only 200 arrests. Retweeting offensive content can lead to arrest under laws against incitement to racial hatred. The subjective nature of what constitutes hate speech raises concerns about freedom of expression. The evolving definition of hate speech, such as deadnaming, shows a shift towards stricter enforcement and potential criminalization.

Publishing or distributing insulting or abusive material that is intended to or likely to stir up racial hatred constitutes an offense. Retweeting such material is considered republishing and can lead to prosecution. Dedicated police officers monitor social media to identify this material, leading to identification and arrests. Individuals may not realize the harm they are causing, but they will face consequences.

We've seen police raids against citizens suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online, framed as combating misogyny. I must address the US Vice President's speech. Our motto in the Bundeswehr is "We fight for your right to be against us," and it represents our democracy. The Vice President questioned this democracy, not just in Germany, but across Europe, likening Europe's condition to authoritarian regimes. Early Tuesday morning, we accompanied state police as they raided an apartment in Northwest Germany. Six armed officers searched the suspect's home, seizing his laptop and cell phone. Prosecutors allege these electronics were used to post a racist cartoon online. Simultaneously, over 50 similar raids occurred across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech.

It is illegal to display Nazi symbolism, like a swastika, or deny the Holocaust. Insulting someone in public is a crime, and it is also a crime to insult someone online, with fines potentially higher due to the enduring nature of online content. German law prohibits malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes. Reposting false information is also a crime, as it's treated the same as creating it. Punishments for hate speech can include jail time for repeat offenders, but typically involve hefty fines and device confiscation. People are often shocked when their phones are taken away, viewing it as a severe punishment, sometimes worse than the fine itself, because their entire lives are often on their phones.

Matthew Thompson emphasizes the importance of being cautious when sharing content on social media, as even innocent sharing could lead to criminal charges for stirring up racial hatred. The Crown Prosecution Service has already charged individuals for distributing such material online. They are actively monitoring the internet for such content, so individuals should be aware of the potential legal consequences of sharing offensive material.

In Russia, 400 people were arrested for social media posts last year. In contrast, 3,300 people were arrested in Britain for similar offenses. An example is Chelsea Russell, who posted rap lyrics with the n-word after her friend's death. She was convicted, fined, given community service, and put under a curfew for a year. This incident occurred in Britain in 2018.

It's early Tuesday morning, and we're with state police raiding an apartment in Northwest Germany. Six officers searched the suspect's home and seized his laptop and cell phone. Prosecutors believe these electronics were used to post a racist cartoon online, which constitutes a crime. Simultaneously, over 50 similar raids occurred across Germany. This is part of a coordinated effort by prosecutors to combat online hate speech throughout the country.

Sharing material inciting racial hatred, like retweeting, can lead to legal consequences. Police actively monitor social media for such content, making arrests as needed. The impact of seemingly harmless actions can be severe.

In Russia, 400 people were arrested for social media posts last year. Surprisingly, in Britain, the number was much higher at 3,300. One example of an arrest in Britain was the case of Chelsea Russell, who posted rap lyrics containing the n-word on Instagram as a tribute to her deceased friend. She was found guilty, given community service, a fine, and a curfew for a year. This incident highlights the strict consequences for online speech in Britain in 2018.

We will use the full force of the law against those committing crimes, whether on the streets or online. Online hate speech and incitement are not exempt from legal consequences. Terrorist offenses related to publishing material are also applicable. We will pursue individuals provoking hatred and violence online just as we confront those causing trouble in communities physically.

Earlier this week, state police raided an apartment in Northwest Germany, seizing a suspect's laptop and cell phone for allegedly posting a racist cartoon online. This was one of over 50 similar raids across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech. It's absurd how these anti-nazi principles are being violated. The authorities are going after people for posting Jewish propaganda, like pictures with the Star of David or menorahs, claiming they're illegal symbols. It's like, how is this any different from what the Nazis would do? Also, go to AlexJonesStore.com and get great supplements and gear. We're reaching over a million people a day, but these new viewers aren't necessarily supporting the show. It's the hardcore patriots who are keeping us on the air. Become a VIP member for $30 a month and get $40 to spend in the store.

Offensive incitement to racial hatred involves distributing insulting material that can incite racial hatred. Retweeting such content can lead to committing an offense. Police officers monitor social media for this material and make arrests. It is important to combat misinformation and hate speech to protect democracy. Translation: Sharing offensive content that incites racial hatred can lead to legal consequences. Police actively monitor social media for this material to ensure accountability and protect democracy.

In Russia, 400 people were arrested for social media posts last year. In Britain, the number was 3,300. An example is Chelsea Russell from Liverpool, who posted rap lyrics with the n-word after her friend's death. She was arrested, fined, and given community service and a curfew in 2018.

The chief editor of Deutschland Kurier, David Bendelz, received a seven-month prison sentence for a meme posted by his team accusing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser of hating free speech. The speaker argues that the verdict proves Faeser hates free speech and questions if she is "retarded or just a power obsessed bitch." German defamation law, specifically paragraph 188, gives politicians special protection, making it illegal to insult them. The speaker claims the judiciary has criminalized speaking the truth if it damages a politician's reputation, calling it tyranny. The prosecutor in Bendelz's case, Alexander Baum, also initiated a house raid against Stefan Mihov for calling Minister Robert Habeck a "stupid head," traumatizing Mihov's daughter with Down syndrome. The speaker asserts that Faeser ordered the raid. They vow not to limit their free speech and accuse Faeser of being a fascist, while noting it is still legal to insult politicians from the AFD party.

A week ago, my lawyer informed me that two of my tweets are technically illegal, and I could face arrest upon returning home. This isn't a joke; prisons are being cleared to make room for people charged over social media posts. For instance, someone is currently serving three months for a Facebook meme, and a woman is facing two and a half years for a tweet. Free speech is in serious jeopardy, which is alarming not just in England but across Europe. This situation is incredibly concerning.