reSee.it - Related Video Feed

She's criticized US intelligence and promoted Russian propaganda. Debbie Wasserman Schultz referred to her as likely a Russian asset. Given our military backgrounds, what are your thoughts on her? I believe she's compromised. Her support for a brutal dictator in Syria raises concerns. Russian media has labeled her a Russian asset, which is alarming. The US intelligence community has noted her troubling relationships with adversaries. My concern is that she wouldn't pass a background check.

Taxpayers, let’s discuss the infiltration of our government. The Biden administration has made intentional intelligence failures, leading to significant threats. Maher Patel, head of intelligence programs, is prioritizing efforts away from critical issues like the southern border and threats from Iran and China. He has ties to anti-Israel sentiments and previously worked for Samantha Power. Robert Malley, Biden’s envoy to Iran, recently had his security clearance suspended by the FBI, raising concerns about his connections. Arianne Tabatabay, who was installed by Malley at the Department of Defense, has communicated directly with Iranian officials. This situation demands investigation, especially regarding why Malley was suspended while Tabatabay remains in her position. The implications of these appointments are serious and warrant immediate attention.

Normally, a nominee to lead intelligence agencies would have relevant experience. Chelsea Gabbard has none. This is disqualifying, especially considering she's echoed Kremlin talking points on the Ukraine war, promoted Russian propaganda about US biolabs, and praised Bashar al-Assad despite intelligence showing he gassed his own people. Russia Today even calls her "our girl." Republican opposition to such unqualified nominees has, unfortunately, vanished, leaving these terrible choices headed for confirmation. This is disastrous for the country.

The transcript claims that Tulsi Gabbard “walked into the Oval Office” and personally handed President Trump her resignation letter after her husband, Abraham Williams, was “diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer.” It quotes her letter: she “must step away from public service to be by his side,” cannot “ask him to face this fight alone” while she continues in her demanding position, and her resignation is effective June 30. The transcript says President Trump praised her publicly afterward and that “that is what happened.” It then claims that “within hours” Reuters published that the White House “had fired Gabbard,” describing her departure as “a victory for the intelligence community,” and that “the Internet exploded” with that narrative. The transcript offers explanations including that deep state and British intelligence had been “gunning for her for over a year,” that “they could not bang her,” and that “they planted fake stories.” It alleges she was banned from Iran war deliberations, was planning to run for president in 2028, and was “scheming against the president.” It also claims she was surrounded with “fake people” such as Joe Kent to argue that Netanyahu and Israel ran Trump, describing it as an operation to “poison a relationship” with President Trump and “split the MAGA coalition” ahead of the midterms. The transcript further claims that “rogue elements of the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee” kept firing at her, citing Katherine Harwich as writing that the CIA tracked “every keystroke on the government computers” of Gabbard’s Directors’ Initiatives Group to disband or diminish the group’s impact. It states that the group continued producing declassifications “which will result in prosecutions,” and claims her work showed Russiagate was a coordinated hoax between Barack Obama and British intelligence. It says disclosures are before a grand jury in Florida and that she opposed “the deep state conspiracy” used to impeach President Trump in 2019 and “the election rigging of 2020.” The transcript also claims she was investigating “Havana syndrome” and “directed energy attacks” that agencies have spent four years on. It states her investigations would “see the light of day before she leaves office,” and argues that the intelligence community claimed victory while her husband begins cancer treatment. Finally, it proposes “a test” for any new DNI appointment under Biden, alleging CIA and MI6 were “completely integrated, fused operationally,” and asks whether that arrangement still operates, claiming the “war” would continue using the same methods used against Tulsi Gabbard.

The speaker discusses the alleged infiltration of the Biden administration by individuals with ties to Iran. They mention Maher Ptahr, head of intelligence programs in the White House, who has been accused of prioritizing intelligence collection efforts in favor of Iran. They also bring up Robert Malley, Biden's envoy to Iran, whose security clearance was suspended by the FBI. The speaker claims that Malley installed an Iranian national, Arianne Tabatabay, in a position at the Department of Defense. They argue that these individuals pose a threat to American priorities and call for an investigation into their actions.

Defending Russia's invasion of Ukraine and meeting with figures like Bashar al Assad demonstrates poor judgment. Such actions undermine trust among allies, impacting intelligence sharing. A notable instance was when Donald Trump met with the Russian ambassador and potentially shared sensitive intelligence from a foreign source. This behavior can lead foreign intelligence agencies to withhold critical information, ultimately making Americans less safe. If allies lack trust in U.S. leadership, it poses a significant problem for national security.

Senator Kelly questioned Colonel Gabbard about her past statements regarding U.S. support for terrorist groups in Syria, referencing her claims that the U.S. was aiding Al Qaeda while attempting to overthrow the Assad regime. Gabbard expressed her shock at learning about President Obama's programs that armed groups aligned with Al Qaeda, highlighting the consequences of regime change wars in the Middle East. She noted that, while she does not support the Assad regime, the current leadership in Syria consists of Islamist extremists who persecute religious minorities. Gabbard emphasized the importance of Americans knowing that their government was supporting Al Qaeda, asserting that this should be unacceptable.

They prioritize endless work for ideological and financial reasons. A notable example is Tulsi Gabbard, who, despite her liberal views, was quickly promoted to vice chair of the DNC. However, when she questioned U.S. opposition to Assad, she became an enemy to the establishment. Hillary Clinton labeled her as "the favorite of the Russians," highlighting the harsh criticism she faced from fellow Democrats. The Democratic Party is influenced by the foreign policy establishment and the military-industrial complex. They emphasize the importance of NATO and military support for Ukraine, revealing their focus on war as a source of funding. This contrasts with Trump's opposition to such conflicts.

Tulsi Gabbard's potential access to national security information raises concerns, especially given her perceived support from Russia. Her nomination is seen as particularly damaging, more so than Matt Gaetz's. Despite her claims of being anti-war, Gabbard aligns with pro-war figures, particularly regarding Syria. Ultimately, her nomination is viewed as a pro-war stance on a global scale, similar to Donald Trump's presidency.

Ilhan Omar, a congresswoman from Minnesota, is criticized for allegedly wanting to bring 1,000 jihadists sympathizers from Gaza to the state. The speaker questions how she was elected and mentions her attendance at a speech during their own campaign.

Senator Dick Durbin is allegedly working with other members of Congress to bring Gaza refugees to the United States without public input. This move is seen as a national security threat, as these individuals are unvetted and their intentions could be dangerous. If successful, major American cities could become like Gaza.

Tulsi Gabbard was placed on a domestic terror watch list after criticizing the Biden administration. She views it as political retaliation and a violation of her rights. Surveillance includes explosive detection teams and air marshals on her flights. Gabbard questions what other government agencies may be monitoring her. She believes this is an attempt to silence critics and calls for those responsible to be held accountable. She stresses the importance of freedom and privacy in the United States.

The speaker claims intelligence failures by the Biden administration have led to "world war 4." According to the speaker, Maher Batar, head of intel programs in the National Security Council, prioritizes intelligence collection and once worked for Adam Schiff. A photo allegedly shows Batar wearing Palestinian garb and supporting "Jewish apartheid." Robert Malley, Biden's envoy to Iran, had his security clearance suspended by the FBI. Ariane Tabatabai, allegedly installed in the Department of Defense by Malley, is accused of emailing the Iranian foreign minister in 2014 to request permission to take a trip on behalf of the U.S. government. She is now assistant chief of staff to the Department of Defense's special operations office. The speaker questions why Malley's clearance was suspended and why Tabatabai is still employed by the DOD.

The Biden administration's intelligence priorities are allegedly being set by Maher Batar, head of intelligence programs in the National Security Council. He formerly worked for Adam Schiff and a photo shows him in Palestinian garb in front of a sign supporting Jewish apartheid. Robert Malley, Biden's envoy to Iran, had his security clearance suspended by the FBI. Arianne Tabatabai, who Malley installed in the Department of Defense as assistant chief of staff for special operations, allegedly emailed the Iranian foreign minister in 2014 asking for permission to take a trip on behalf of the U.S. government. These individuals are accused of having ties to the Iranian regime and influencing intelligence priorities away from American interests, potentially intentionally. House Intel has not investigated these matters.

Tulsi Gabbard released new evidence asserting that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. She claims that while publicly maintaining a peaceful transfer of power, Obama privately worked to sow discord and sabotage his successor, and that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence used to justify baseless smears against Trump to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. She contends that Trump never had anything to do with Russia and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud known to be false by Obama and others, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and more. Gabbard says the report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather by Obama and weaponized intelligence agencies, with the Russia hoax being a lie driven by Democrat political operatives approved by Obama and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. She asserts that allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the lie. According to her, the first two years of Trump’s presidency were consumed by debunking these lies at the highest government levels. She notes that nearly ten years later, declassification of documents shows the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and his allies. She claims this new evidence strengthens the case that those who sabotaged a duly elected president did grave harm to the republic. Gabbard credits CIA Director Ratcliffe, Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, and the declassification of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she says shows the intel community did not have any direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but, at Obama’s unusual direction, the intel community published implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. She describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and contends that Legacy outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for perpetuating the hoax, arguing it’s time those awards be stripped for journalism that propagates political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.

She is unqualified to be DNI, with positions that are far outside mainstream American politics. Her visit to Assad in Syria, who was aligned with Russia and Iran, was justified by her claim that Syria wasn't a direct threat to the U.S., which is incorrect. The alliance between Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah poses direct threats to Americans in the region and to key allies like Israel and Jordan. It will be interesting to see what information may emerge from the Syrian government if the rebels capture Damascus, particularly regarding Americans involved.

The speaker discusses alleged infiltration of the US government by individuals with ties to Iran. They mention Maher Ptahr, head of intelligence programs in the White House, who is accused of prioritizing intelligence collection efforts away from important areas such as the southern border and terrorism. They also mention Robert Malley, Biden's envoy to Iran, whose security clearance was suspended by the FBI. The speaker claims that Malley installed an Iranian national, Arianne Tabatabay, in a position at the Department of Defense. They argue that these individuals are distracting from protecting American priorities and call for an investigation into the situation.

Ilhan Omar's comments are unacceptable, suggesting the U.S. government should prioritize Somali interests over American ones. She claims to protect Somalia from threats, which raises concerns about her loyalty. Censure is insufficient; she should be expelled for acting as a foreign agent. Joe Biden is also under investigation for alleged foreign influence, specifically regarding payments linked to Ukraine. Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush are accused of supporting Hamas and allowing terrorists into the country. This pattern of foreign allegiance among some lawmakers jeopardizes national security. We must unite to prevent foreign agents from serving in our government. Our duty is solely to the American people, and restoring this focus is essential for the country's safety.

Hillary Clinton initiated the narrative branding Tulsi Gabbard as a Russian asset due to Gabbard's rising status in the Democratic Party. Gabbard, a combat veteran and articulate leader, began aligning with Bernie Sanders' views, which angered Clinton. This led to a rift, especially after Gabbard exposed the DNC's unfair treatment of Sanders during the 2016 nomination process. Clinton's campaign had previously fabricated claims about Donald Trump being a Russian asset, and Gabbard became another target. Gabbard's independent views, including her stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, were used against her, and her meeting with Bashar al-Assad further fueled the accusations. The discussion emphasizes that diplomacy often requires engaging with adversaries, not just allies.

Kamala Harris chose Tim Waltz as her running mate, a move criticized for being too radical. Waltz, a controversial figure, has been accused of allowing riots and supporting extreme policies like gender-affirming healthcare for children. Some speculate that Waltz was picked to create a sacrificial ticket by the Democratic party. The choice of Waltz has raised questions about the true intentions of the Democratic party and their strategy for the upcoming election.

Tulsi Gabbard labeled Kamala Harris a "deep state communist" influenced by the military-industrial complex, which she claims makes foreign policy decisions for profit, keeping the country in a constant state of war. Gabbard argues that Harris lacks the strength to oppose this complex. Following her criticism of President Biden, Gabbard was placed on a terror watch list, referred to as the "quiet eyes list." This incident has sparked concerns about government overreach and the lack of outrage from the public regarding the situation.

Adam Schiff misled about classified information to target Trump, which raises concerns about his trustworthiness with sensitive data. He should not serve on any committees.

I'm confirming that Tulsi Gabbard has appointed someone with a history of being untrustworthy, potentially aiding adversarial nations. In Connecticut, the leading Democratic candidate in a major US Senate race is facing scrutiny after being caught misrepresenting his military service. Richard Blumenthal, the state attorney general, previously stated he served in Vietnam, but reports indicate he received five wartime deferments and served stateside in the Marine Reserves. I misspoke, and I won't let a few misplaced words tarnish my record of service to our country. However, video evidence exists of Blumenthal claiming he was in Vietnam.

Key national security confirmations for the Trump administration are underway in the Senate. Tulsi Gabbard's important confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Gabbard, a former congresswoman and military veteran, has been a strong advocate for truth on the House Armed Services Committee. She has shown courage by opposing her own party's impeachment efforts against President Trump and standing up to Kamala Harris during presidential debates. As the director of National Intelligence, she is expected to defend constitutional rights and challenge those promoting unnecessary wars.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claims that multiple intelligence community assessments released before the November 2016 election concluded that Russia lacked both the intent and capability to influence the election's outcome. Gabbard alleges that President Obama is guilty of treason and conspired with Hillary Clinton regarding the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She supports this "extreme allegation" with public statements and released documents.