TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker explains why they didn't speak up earlier and expresses frustration with the lack of action taken regarding the election. They mention bringing in General Flynn and Sydney Powell to meet with the president, but faced obstacles. The speaker confirms rumors that Powell was kept away from the president. They also mention the need for a legitimate audit of the election.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. They express concerns about Russian interference, voter suppression, and irregularities with electronic voting machines. Some speakers believe that the election outcomes were affected and that the presidents were illegitimate. They mention specific cases like Bush vs. Gore in 2000 and the 2004 Ohio election. Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia is also mentioned, with some speakers claiming that her election was stolen. Overall, the speakers question the fairness and integrity of these elections.

We have a problem with the election due to the influx of mail-in ballots. Trump was initially winning in Pima County, but more ballots were suddenly poured in. The issue lies in the fact that some mail-in ballots lack signatures, indicating a broken system. Regardless of who wins, we need to ensure a fair election. Election officials were rewriting rules instead of following the legislature's authority. We don't trust the media, as they have their own agenda. People witnessed irregularities during the election and want a fair vote. We can provide a forensic audit report for further information. The deletion of a million files before the audit was debunked.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine the number of real votes and apply mail-in ballots. The speaker believes this would have happened in Texas and considers it fraud. When asked if it could have been a water leak, the speaker insists it was planned and would have occurred in Texas. They question the unprecedented three-hour halt in counting while Trump was leading in several states. The speaker asserts that anyone could have filled out the mail-in ballots, making it impossible to know their origin. When challenged about the conspiracy theory, the speaker claims to have witnessed it firsthand.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

The speaker questions the statistical possibility of a sudden increase in votes for Biden without any votes for Trump. They argue that even in the bluest city, there should be some votes for the other party. They also mention that the increase in votes occurred around 4:30 in the morning. The speaker then discusses the sudden halt in vote counting in Nevada, which they find inexplicable and illogical. They question why counting would be stopped in the middle of the day and suggest that it doesn't make sense to shut everyone down.

I believe today is a sad day for America. I think it's important to be able to challenge an election if you believe it was rigged or stolen. Many others, like Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams, have done the same. This is about the freedom to challenge and ensuring honest elections. What has happened here is a travesty of justice. I want to emphasize that we did nothing wrong and had tremendous support. This interference in the election is unprecedented and a way of campaigning. We have every right to challenge an election we believe is dishonest. Thank you all, and I'll see you soon.

Speaker 0: They reject the rule of law and the will of the people, refusing to accept the election results. Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, May 16, 2017, claimed our election was hijacked and there is no doubt about it. Speaker 2: Even if you run a great campaign, become the nominee, the election can still be stolen from you. Speaker 0: Trump did not truly win the 2016 election; he lost. Speaker 1: He knows he's an illegitimate president who didn't really win. How do we fight against him in 2020? He's illegitimate. Speaker 3: He's illegitimate, and my biggest fear is that he'll do it again with the help of his pal Vlad. We'll be stuck with him for 6 more terrifying years. Speaker 0: Would you be my vice presidential candidate? I agree. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore, a court took away the presidency. Al Gore was the true winner. Speaker 4: I believe I won the last presidential election. They stole it. Speaker 0: Al Gore won that election, or at least I think he did. Speaker 5: Rolling Stone questioned if the 2004 election was stolen. Speaker 4: I witnessed troubling evidence that not every vote was counted in Illinois 4 years ago. Speaker 1: The November 2, 2004 election was not transparent or accurate. There are legitimate questions about our election system's accuracy. Despite the final tally, I have one affirmative statement to make.

Speaker 0 discusses a transcript of a call from President Trump trying to overturn the election. They play an audio clip where Trump mentions criminal events. Speaker 1 feels threatened by Trump's comments about overseas ballots. Speaker 2 thought Trump believed he won the race but had investigated all allegations.

The speaker questions the legitimacy of the presidential election results, emphasizing that being declared president by news outlets does not make it official. They suggest investigating all concerns raised. Fox News is mentioned. Another person agrees and points out the importance of looking into the matter.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

President, people are concerned about whether the Trump team has taken the necessary steps to prevent cheating in future elections. They also wonder if the cheating that occurred during the last election will happen again. I received these questions frequently. I campaigned vigorously, holding seven large rallies in one day, traveling from Florida to Iowa. Despite this effort, things changed late in the evening when numerous ballots appeared, and at 3:02 in the morning, something bad happened. I believe we won by a significant margin and have evidence to support it, which we will release in the coming months.

In this video, the speakers discuss the ongoing controversy surrounding the 2020 US election. They mention that while some people dismiss it as a political conspiracy theory, there are legitimate questions that need to be answered. They highlight that former President Trump has the opportunity to present his case and subpoena evidence, which is seen as a positive move. They also touch on issues of election integrity and the role of the courts in addressing these concerns. The speakers mention some specific incidents, such as changes to election laws in Pennsylvania and allegations of corruption in Detroit. They conclude by discussing Trump's defense strategy, which is based on free speech and his belief that the election results were inaccurate. The video ends with a brief exchange about Trump's credibility.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

I'm embarrassed that the US can't get its presidential election right. We should not accept this. In some states, there are more dead voters than soldiers buried on historic battlefields. We did not have a free, fair, and transparent vote on November 3rd. Everyone knows who won the election: Donald Trump.

In this video, the speakers discuss the ongoing controversy surrounding the 2020 US election. They mention that while some people dismiss it as a political conspiracy theory, there are legitimate questions that need to be answered. They highlight that former President Trump has the opportunity to present his case and subpoena evidence, which is seen as a positive move. They also touch on issues of election integrity and the role of the courts in addressing these concerns. The speakers mention some specific incidents, such as changes to election laws in Pennsylvania and allegations of corruption in Detroit. They conclude by discussing Trump's defense strategy, which is based on free speech and his belief that the election results were inaccurate. The video ends with a brief exchange about Trump's credibility.

In this video, the speakers discuss the ongoing controversy surrounding the 2020 US election. They mention that while some people dismiss it as a political conspiracy theory, there are legitimate questions that need to be answered. They highlight that former President Trump has the opportunity to present his case and subpoena evidence, which is seen as a positive move. They also touch on issues of election integrity and the role of the courts in addressing these concerns. The speakers mention some specific incidents, such as changes to election laws in Pennsylvania and allegations of corruption in Detroit. They conclude by discussing Trump's defense strategy, which is based on free speech and his belief that the election results were inaccurate. The video ends with a brief discussion on Trump's credibility as a leader.

I believe today is a sad day for America. I think it's important to be able to challenge an election if you believe it was rigged or stolen. Many others, like Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams, have done the same. What's happening here is a travesty of justice and election interference. We did nothing wrong, and we have the right to challenge an election we believe is dishonest. Thank you all for being here, and I'll see you soon.

I support President Donald Trump and share the concerns of many Americans about voting irregularities in the last election. I want to assure you that on Wednesday, we will have our day in Congress to address these concerns. We will hear objections and review the evidence.

The speaker demands transparency in the election process and requests to see the ballots, poll books, cables, and tabulators. They state that if President Biden can prove them wrong through a thorough audit conducted by both Democrats and Republicans, they will accept him as their president. They emphasize the need for full disclosure with the involvement of Jocelyn Benson, Governor Whitmer, and President Biden to reveal the truth and heal the country. The speaker expresses their belief that the election was stolen and urges for actions to restore faith in the democratic process.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of allowing the constitutional process to continue, ensuring every legal ballot is counted and no illegal ones are included. They stress the need for faith in the election system. Another speaker expresses concern over the current state of the government, with the Supreme Court lacking a full bench and the executive branch leaderless. The fate of the next president is seen as being in the hands of politicians who may be influenced by personal gain or manipulation.

I'm embarrassed that the US presidential election wasn't conducted properly. We had more dead voters than soldiers buried in historic battlefields. The election on November 3rd was not free, fair, or transparent. Everyone knows that Donald Trump won.

Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for the audience's presence and states that they believe it is a sad day for America. Speaker 1 asserts that challenging an election should be allowed, as they believed the election was rigged and stolen. They mention other individuals who have also challenged elections in the past. Speaker 1 claims they did nothing wrong and accuses others of election interference. They thank the audience and reiterate their right to challenge what they perceive as a dishonest election. Speaker 0 concludes by thanking everyone and suggesting a future meeting.

At 2 o'clock in the morning, the speaker noticed that Trump was ahead by 10% in the election. However, their monitor suddenly rebooted, leading them to question the accuracy of the numbers. When they woke up later, Biden was in the lead. The speaker mentioned that only 120,000 out of the expected 170,000 absentee ballots had been processed by midnight. They believed there were still around 50,000 missing. The speaker also mentioned Sydney Powell's discussion about this issue in Rudy Giuliani's press conference. They noted that voting had stopped in the middle of the night, but only those at the processing tables would have witnessed the laptops rebooting. When asked about the political affiliation of those thrown out, the speaker said that if they clapped, it indicated they were Republicans.

Speaker 0 asks if the speaker is trying to say that President Trump will still be president after January 20th. Speaker 1 responds that it depends on what happens on Wednesday and that's why they have the debate. Speaker 0 disagrees, stating that the states certify the election and Congress doesn't have the right to overturn it. Speaker 1 mentions the 12th Amendment and a statute from the 1800s that allows objections and certification in court. Speaker 0 brings up the Tilden Hayes race and how all states have certified their elections. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are referring to the statute that governs what Congress does on January 6th, allowing for debate and certification. They emphasize that this is their only opportunity to raise an objection. They also mention not having standing to file lawsuits.